All ACT Science Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #91 : Chemistry
Naturally occurring water in lakes and reservoirs used as sources for drinking water feature a variety of dissolved minerals such as magnesium, sodium, and calcium. Water treatment plants must closely monitor the levels of these minerals to ensure they do not exceed unsafe levels. An experiment carried out by a scientist at a water treatment plant are described below.
Experiment 1:
A common way to determine the concentration of a particular chemical is by titration. In this titration, 10mL of the treated water sample was placed in a flask as shown below in Figure 1. A buret, (a special funnel with volume markings on the side and a knob on the bottom to control how much of the substance in the buret is dispensed) was placed above the flask as shown in Figure 1. It was filled with 50mL of a 20ppm (parts per million) solution of EDTA, a chemical that can react with magnesium to chemically remove it from the water. An indicator (a substance that changes color to indicate a chemical change) was also placed into the flask; this indicator appears purple in water solutions containing magnesium, and blue in water solutions without magnesium. The buret was used to dispense EDTA solution until enough EDTA had been added to the purple magnesium-containing water solutions to remove all the magnesium and turn the solution blue. The volume, in milliliters, of EDTA solution added to each of five water samples is recorded in Table 1.
Figure 1
If a sample of tap water from elsewhere had a magnesium concentration of 100ppm, how much of the original 20ppm EDTA titrant can be expected to be used?
W can calculate the volume of titrant using the following equation setup:
Example Question #92 : Chemistry
Naturally occurring water in lakes and reservoirs used as sources for drinking water feature a variety of dissolved minerals such as magnesium, sodium, and calcium. Water treatment plants must closely monitor the levels of these minerals to ensure they do not exceed unsafe levels. An experiment carried out by a scientist at a water treatment plant are described below.
Experiment 1:
A common way to determine the concentration of a particular chemical is by titration. In this titration, 10mL of the treated water sample was placed in a flask as shown below in Figure 1. A buret, (a special funnel with volume markings on the side and a knob on the bottom to control how much of the substance in the buret is dispensed) was placed above the flask as shown in Figure 1. It was filled with 50mL of a 20ppm (parts per million) solution of EDTA, a chemical that can react with magnesium to chemically remove it from the water. An indicator (a substance that changes color to indicate a chemical change) was also placed into the flask; this indicator appears purple in water solutions containing magnesium, and blue in water solutions without magnesium. The buret was used to dispense EDTA solution until enough EDTA had been added to the purple magnesium-containing water solutions to remove all the magnesium and turn the solution blue. The volume, in milliliters, of EDTA solution added to each of five water samples is recorded in Table 1.
Figure 1
Why does the researcher use the buret?
This way the researcher doesn't have to add the EDTA titrant manually
The EDTA solution must be kept separate from the water solution
This is the best way to control exactly the amount of EDTA solution added to be able to calculate an accurate concentration of magnesium
This is a good way to provide a control for the experiment
This is the best way to control exactly the amount of EDTA solution added to be able to calculate an accurate concentration of magnesium
It states in the introduction that a buret is a good way to control the exact amount of EDTA titrant added, and as we saw in other questions, the amount of titrant added is how we calculate magnesium concentrations.
Example Question #91 : Chemistry
Solutions are made by dissolving a solute into a solvent. Different types of solvents have varying levels of solubility, or ability to dissolve certain substances.
A student decided to conduct an experiment to compare the solubilities of different solvents at different temperatures using table salt (sodium chloride) as a solute. The student would keep an amount of solvent at the specified temperature and add solute until no more solute would dissolve. This is amount or solute is called the point of saturation. The amount added to each solvent at saturation was recorded. The results of the experiment are shown in the tables:
Table 1:
Table 2:
Supersaturation is a state of a solution in which there is more solute in the solvent than predicted theoretically possible. A supersaturated solution is created by increasing the solubility of a solution past the amount of solute already dissolved in the solvent. Based on this information, which of the following procedures would allow us to create a supersaturated solution out of water?
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Dissolve 43 g of salt in the solution at 20 degrees Celsius. Double the pressure on the solution.
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Dissolve 43 g of salt in the solution at 35 degrees Celsius. Cool the solution to 20 degrees Celsius.
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Dissolve 43 g of salt in the solution at 20 degrees Celsius. Heat the solution to 35 degrees Celsius.
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Dissolve 43 g of salt in the solution at 20 degrees Celsius. Heat the solution to 35 degrees Celsius.
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Heat to 35 degrees Celsius. Dissolve 52 grams of salt in the solution and then cool to 20 degrees Celsius.
Start with the same quantity of water used in the experiment. Heat to 35 degrees Celsius. Dissolve 52 grams of salt in the solution and then cool to 20 degrees Celsius.
The correct procedure is that which involves saturating the solution at a higher temperature and then cooling that solution to a temperature at which the amount dissolved in the solvent is more than the theoretical point of saturation. Therefore the answer is saturating the solution at 35 degrees Celsius and simply cooling the solution to 20 degrees Celsius.
Example Question #23 : How To Find Experimental Design In Chemistry
Benzophenones are commonly added to cosmetics as UV stabilizers. By adding these chemicals, the cosmetics become less susceptible to breakdown by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Oxybenzone and dioxybenzone are examples of benzophenones used in cosmetics.
A sunscreen company has received complaints about the longevity of its products and wants to see if adding benzophenones can alleviate this issue. They design an experiment with the following groups.
1. Sunscreen containing oxybenzone.
2. Sunscreen containing oxybenzone.
3. Sunscreen containing dioxybenzone.
4. Sunscreen containing dioxybenzone.
Each group is exactly the same aside from the added benzophenones. The company plans to expose each sample to high levels of UV radiation for 10 days and then test the effectiveness of each sample.
What could be changed to strengthen the experiment?
Removing the benzophenones groups to simplify the experiment.
Adding groups with more concentrations of benzophenones.
Exposing the samples to UV radiation for a longer period.
Nothing could be changed to strengthen the experiment.
Adding a control group with no benzophenones added.
Adding a control group with no benzophenones added.
In order to test whether a change to their sunscreen will improve its resistance to UV radiation, the experiment must include the original product as a control. The impact of benzophenones requires a proper control group to be interpreted.
Example Question #93 : Chemistry
Clock reactions are chemical interactions that exhibit a physical change periodically over a given time interval. Many of these reactions involve iodine, the most famous being the Chlorine Dioxide-Iodine-Malonic Acid reaction. These reactions can be quite startling as flasks of colorless liquid periodically turn dark blue and then resolve back to their original colorless state. Even more striking, they seem to alternate between being colorless and blue several times. The term "clock reaction" is derived from the fact that the time at which these sudden changes occur can be predicted.
Beyond performing these reactions in a well stirred beaker, there are two other notable ways to conduct experiments with clock reactions that demonstrate interesting properties of these reactions. The first is in a continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR). In a CSTR, the reactants are introduced at a continuous rate while the volume of liquid in the reactor is kept constant by siphoning off excess fluid. The result of this process is that one can maintain the ideal conditions in which the reaction may occur over time and restricts the buildup of excess product or reactant that would otherwise make the oscillations of the reactions decay. In a CSTR, clock reactions can be maintained switching predictably from colorless to blue, for example, for far longer than in a simple beaker.
The second way to conduct a clock reaction experiment is in a tank with no stirring at all. This allows the reactants to interact heterogeneously, or without being thoroughly mixed. When this occurs, we can get some parts of the tank that are one color and other parts that are another color. This means that we can observe two different stages of the reaction in one vessel. The patterns that this makes are called Turing patterns, named by the great computer scientist Alan Turing. Turing predicted that the heterogeneous mixing of chemicals called morphogens in complex organisms were responsible for biological pattern formation like spots on a leopard, stripes on a zebra, or patterns on a tropical fish. The existence of such patterns and chemicals has since been confirmed and clock reactions are often used to study these types of Turing patterns.
Suppose after reading this passage you wanted to design an experiment to study closely the exact moment of physical change in the reaction. Which method described in the passage would you employ?
The continuous flow stirred reactor
An unstirred tank
A mass spectrometer
A flow cytometer
The stirred beaker
The continuous flow stirred reactor
If you wanted to study the exact moment of change, you want to observe this change as many times as you can to collect information. While a stirred beaker is a decent choice, the best choice would be the CSTR or continuous flow stirred reactor because it can keep the reaction running optimally for longer periods of time. This would allow you to collect a greater quantity of data with more accuracy.
Example Question #94 : Chemistry
Clock reactions are chemical interactions that exhibit a physical change periodically over a given time interval. Many of these reactions involve iodine, the most famous being the Chlorine Dioxide-Iodine-Malonic Acid reaction. These reactions can be quite startling as flasks of colorless liquid periodically turn dark blue and then resolve back to their original colorless state. Even more striking, they seem to alternate between being colorless and blue several times. The term "clock reaction" is derived from the fact that the time at which these sudden changes occur can be predicted.
Beyond performing these reactions in a well stirred beaker, there are two other notable ways to conduct experiments with clock reactions that demonstrate interesting properties of these reactions. The first is in a continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR). In a CSTR, the reactants are introduced at a continuous rate while the volume of liquid in the reactor is kept constant by siphoning off excess fluid. The result of this process is that one can maintain the ideal conditions in which the reaction may occur over time and restricts the buildup of excess product or reactant that would otherwise make the oscillations of the reactions decay. In a CSTR, clock reactions can be maintained switching predictably from colorless to blue, for example, for far longer than in a simple beaker.
The second way to conduct a clock reaction experiment is in a tank with no stirring at all. This allows the reactants to interact heterogeneously, or without being thoroughly mixed. When this occurs, we can get some parts of the tank that are one color and other parts that are another color. This means that we can observe two different stages of the reaction in one vessel. The patterns that this makes are called Turing patterns, named by the great computer scientist Alan Turing. Turing predicted that the heterogeneous mixing of chemicals called morphogens in complex organisms were responsible for biological pattern formation like spots on a leopard, stripes on a zebra, or patterns on a tropical fish. The existence of such patterns and chemicals has since been confirmed and clock reactions are often used to study these types of Turing patterns.
Given that different patterns happen when different concentrations of the reactants interact with each other, which of the following would NOT be a useful experimental variable in an experiment designed to explore the mechanism and dynamics of different patterns of chemicals in clock reactions?
The initial concentration of reactants
The volume of water in the tank before adding reactants
The size of the reaction tank
Time
The depth of the tank
Time
Since concentration is important to the pattern formation and the reactions happen over and over again in time, it seems that any answer that involves changing either the concentration of reactants directly or indirectly (via the volume of the reaction vessel into which the reactants are placed) is a valid experimental variable. The answer that would not be the most helpful is time because we know these reactions proceed over and over again in time.
Example Question #91 : Chemistry
A student performed the following procedures to study various photosynthetic pigments (light-absorbing chemicals) in tree leaves and the wavelengths of light they absorb.
Experiment 1:
The student obtained samples of leaves from oaks, maples, ashes, sycamores, and poplars. Each leaf sample was ground separately with a mortar and pestle to release the pigments, and then each sample was suspended in water to make a colored solution of the pigment. The student then measured the absorption spectrum (a graph of how much light is absorbed by a pigment at varying wavelengths of light) of each solution in a device called a spectrophotometer. The setup of a spectrophotometer is shown below in Diagram 1.
The light source emits white light, which is split into its various wavelengths by the prism. Next, a slit, which can be moved up or down to select a particular wavelength, is used to transmit just a single wavelength to the sample. The sample absorbs a fraction of this light that is characteristic to the pigment in the sample, and the rest is transmitted to the detector for a readout. Using the spectrophotometer, the student found the λmax (the wavelength of light in nanometers (nm) that the pigment absorbs most intensely, for each sample) and recorded the results in Table 1. Table 1 also shows the transmittance and absorbance values at λmax. Transmittance, T, is defined as the fraction of light, expressed as a decimal, which passes through the sample. Absorbance, A, is given by:
A = –log(T) or 10–A = T
Experiment 2:
A student is given a leaf from an unknown source. She crushes and extracts the pigment according to the procedure in Experiment 1. Measuring the absorbance spectrum in the spectrophotometer produces the following readout, shown in Diagram 2.
Diagram 2
During the experiment, the student finds the mechanism that moves the slit up and down has stopped functioning. Which of the following will result from this problem?
The student will no longer be able to find the transmittance at a particular wavelength.
The student will no longer be able to split the white light from the light source into a spectrum of wavelengths.
The student will no longer be able to find the absorbance at a particular wavelength.
The student will no longer be able to study the results at various wavelengths of light.
The student will no longer be able to study the results at various wavelengths of light.
The description of the spectrophotometer in Experiment 1 states that the purpose of the slit is to be able to select a single wavelength of light. This wavelength can be chosen by moving the slit up or down. Thus, if it cannot move up or down, it can only select the wavelength of light it is stuck on, and can no longer scan different wavelengths of light to pass through the sample.
Finding the transmittance is governed by the function of the detector, finding the absorbance is governed by a mathematical transformation of the transmittance value as shown by the equation in Experiment 1, and the splitting of white light into various wavelengths is governed by the function of the prism. Thus, the three other answers are incorrect.
Example Question #781 : Act Science
A student wanted to study the kinetics, or rates of a chemical reaction based on the concentrations of its reactants and products, of the reaction shown below.
This reaction is easy to monitor using a spectrophotometer, which measures how much light of a particular wavelength is absorbed by a solution. The deep purple potassium permanganate, or , absorbs light of a 550 nm wavelength in proportion to its concentration in the reaction solution. Manganese sulfate, or , is pale pink and absorbs light of a 500 nm wavelength in proportion to its concentration in the reaction solution. All other reactants and products are colorless and do not absorb visible light and thus cannot be monitored using the spectrophotometer.
Experiment 1:
The student constructed a standard curve, or a graph of the absorbance of solutions of varying concentrations of potassium permanganate, to quantify the relationship between concentration and absorbance. To prepare five sample of increasing concentration, he labeled five test tubes A, B, C, D, and E, weighed out 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 grams of potassium permanganate into each, respectively, and added 1 milliliter (mL) of water to each test tube to dissolve. Then, he used the spectrophotometer to determine the absorbance at 550 nm of each sample. The data is graphed in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1
Experiment 2:
The student then studied potassium permanganate in the presence of oxalic acid, , to observe the reaction. Monitoring both the absorbances of potassium permanganate and manganese sulfate, he was able to determine the reaction rate using a special setting on the spectrophotometer. The reaction rate at various concentrations of reactants is shown below in Table 1.
A scientific relationship, known as Beer's Law, mathematically correlates absorbance to concentration via the following equation:
where is the absorbance, is the concentration of the sample, and is a constant specific for the chemical in the sample. According to Figure 1, what is the value of , in mL/g, for potassium permanganate?
You can solve for by plugging in corresponding values of and . For example, if we plugged in the concentration of 0.1 grams/mL for , and the corresponding absorbance it produces according to Figure 1 of 0.2 for , we obtain the following mathematical relationship:
By dividing, we can see that is 2.
Alternatively, you may view the equation like the equation of a line, like , where , , and , or the slope of the line. As the slope of the line in Figure 1 is clearly 2, we know the answer is .
Example Question #782 : Act Science
A student wanted to study the kinetics, or rates of a chemical reaction based on the concentrations of its reactants and products, of the reaction shown below.
This reaction is easy to monitor using a spectrophotometer, which measures how much light of a particular wavelength is absorbed by a solution. The deep purple potassium permanganate, or , absorbs light of a 550 nm wavelength in proportion to its concentration in the reaction solution. Manganese sulfate, or , is pale pink and absorbs light of a 500 nm wavelength in proportion to its concentration in the reaction solution. All other reactants and products are colorless and do not absorb visible light and thus cannot be monitored using the spectrophotometer.
Experiment 1:
The student constructed a standard curve, or a graph of the absorbance of solutions of varying concentrations of potassium permanganate, to quantify the relationship between concentration and absorbance. To prepare five sample of increasing concentration, he labeled five test tubes A, B, C, D, and E, weighed out 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 grams of potassium permanganate into each, respectively, and added 1 milliliter (mL) of water to each test tube to dissolve. Then, he used the spectrophotometer to determine the absorbance at 550 nm of each sample. The data is graphed in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1
Experiment 2:
The student then studied potassium permanganate in the presence of oxalic acid, , to observe the reaction. Monitoring both the absorbances of potassium permanganate and manganese sulfate, he was able to determine the reaction rate using a special setting on the spectrophotometer. The reaction rate at various concentrations of reactants is shown below in Table 1.
The "special setting" on the spectrophotometer underlined in the description of Experiment 2 likely involves what?
Measuring how fast the concentration of potassium sulfate increases by observing its changing absorbance at 500 nm.
Measuring concentrations of potassium permanganate and oxalic acid by observing their relative absorbances at 550nm and 500 nm, respectively.
Measuring how fast the concentration of oxalic acid decreases by observing its changing absorbance at 550 nm.
Measuring concentrations of potassium permanganate and manganese sulfate by observing their relative absorbances at 550nm and 500 nm, respectively.
Measuring concentrations of potassium permanganate and manganese sulfate by observing their relative absorbances at 550nm and 500 nm, respectively.
"Measuring concentrations of potassium permanganate and manganese sulfate by observing their relative absorbances at 550 nm and 500 nm, respectively" is the correct answer. It is the only answer that contains chemicals that absorb visible light, and thus the only concentrations that may be monitored by the spectrophotometer, as stated in the introduction to the experiments.
Example Question #1 : How To Find Synthesis Of Data In Chemistry
The rate of a reversible chemical reaction depends on many factors, including concentrations of the reactants and products, temperature, and presence of enzymes called catalysts. In the forward reaction, two reactants combine to form one product. However, in a reverse reaction, the product is broken down into the two reactants.
In order for a forward reaction to occur, the reactants moving around in the test tube must physically interact with each other. The more often reactants interact with each other, the more produce is formed in the same amount of time. The speed at which reactants combine into products (the rate of the reaction) can be calculated by dividing the amount of a chemical produced in a reaction (often measured in moles) by the time it takes to produce that amount.
In order to determine the effects of reactant and product concentration, temperature, and presence of catalysts on the rate of a reaction, a scientist studied the following reaction:
The scientist varied the conditions of the experiment and measured the rate of the reaction. The results are outlined in Table 1. The units of concentration are moles per liter.
In order to display the relationship between the number of moles of H+ and the rate of the reaction in Experiments 1 and 4, the scientist could:
Plot the number of moles of H+ against the rate of the formation of HCl
Plot the number of moles of H+ against the moles of acid convertase
Plot the number of moles of H+ against the temperature
Plot the number of moles of H+ against the moles of Cl-
Plot the number of moles of H+ against the rate of the formation of HCl
The question asks us to determine the best way to show the relationship between the moles of a certain reactant, H+, and the rate of the reaction. The most logical way would be to plot the moles versus the rate, providing a line or bar graph that would show how the rate increased with increasing concentration of the reactant. The other plot set ups do not provide a clear way to show how increasing or decreasing the concentration of a reactant would change the rate.