All ACT English Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #5 : Avoiding Ambiguity And Redundancy
The Wowzer 25 (or W25) was regarded to be the best (1) video game system of all time when it came out. Wowzer released the Wowzer 25 in America during the year 1996 (2) as a follow-up to their last system, the Superduper Wowzer that (3) was released (4) in America five years before. The W25 derives its name from its resolution being 25-bit (5) which is something no other console had done before. (6) With 25-bit resolution, a player could finally roam a 3-D world with Wowzer’s mascot WowMan. Being able to play in a 3-D world was groundbreaking; it was an experience gamers at the time would not forget. (7) The W25’s graphics were good and then became even better after Wowzer had released (8) an expansion pack that increased the W25’s RAM from 4 megabytes to 8. (9) As the console grew, the graphics were becoming (10) better and better since (11) developers became more comfortable developing their games for it. (12)
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
game developers became more comfortable creating their games for it
game developers became more comfortable developing for it
NO CHANGE
game developers became more comfortable creating games for it
game developers became more comfortable creating games for it
The phrase "game developers became more comfortable creating their games for it" preserves all of the information in the original sentence, without being redundant.
Example Question #311 : Act English
Adapted from The Autobiography of John Adams (ed. 1856)
Here I will interrupt the narration for a moment to observe that, from all I have read of the history of Greece and Rome, England and France, and all I have observed at home and abroad, articulate eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with great reserve. The examples of Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson are enough to show that silence and reserve in public, are more efficacious than argumentation or oratory. A public speaker who inserts himself, or is urged by others, into the conduct of affairs, by daily exertions to justify his measures, and answer the objections of opponents, makes himself too familiar with the public and unavoidably makes himself enemies. Few persons can bear to be outdone in reasoning or declamation or wit or sarcasm or repartee or satire, and all these things that are very apt to grow out of public debate. In this way, in a course of years, a nation becomes full of a man’s enemies, or at least, of such as have been galled in some controversy and take a secret pleasure in assisting to humble and mortify him. So much for this digression. We will now return to our memoirs.
Which of the following is the best form of the underlined section?
articulate eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment.
eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with great reserve.
articulate eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with great reserve.
articulate eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with greatest reserve.
eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with great reserve.
All of the incorrect answers are such because they would alter the meaning of the sentence. Even if it is something as small as the change from "great" to "greatest," there is a slight change in meaning. However, the expression "articulate eloquence" is a redundant expression. An eloquent person is articulate in speech, so there is no reason to repeat that fact by using the adjective "articulate."
Example Question #11 : Avoiding Ambiguity And Redundancy
Adapted from The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James (1902)
In the matter of religions, it is particularly easy distinguishing the too orders of question. Every religious phenomenon has its history and its derivation from natural antecedents. What is nowadays called the higher criticism of the Bible are only a study of the Bible from this existential point of view, neglected to much by the earlier church. Under just what biographic conditions did the sacred writers bring forth their various contributions to the holy volume? What had they exactly in their several individual minds, when they delivered their utterances? These are manifestly questions of historical fact, and one does not see how the answer to it can decide offhand the still further question: of what use should such a volume, with its manner of coming into existence so defined, be to us as a guide to life and a revelation? To answer this other question we must have already in our mind some sort of a general theory as to what the peculiarities in a thing should be which give it value for purposes of revelation; and this theory itself would be what I just called a spiritual judgment. Combining it with our existential judgment, we might indeed deduce another spiritual judgment as to the Bibles’ worth. Thus, if our theory of revelation-value were to affirm that any book, to possess it, must have been composed automatically or not by the free caprice of the writer, or that it must exhibit no scientific and historic errors and express no local or personal passions, the Bible would probably fare ill at our hands. But if, on the other hand, our theory should allow that a book may well be a revelation in spite of errors and passions and deliberate human composition, if only it be a true record of the inner experiences of great-souled persons wrestling with the crises of his fate, than the verdict would be much favorable. You see that the existential facts by itself are insufficient for determining the value; and the best adepts of the higher criticism accordingly never confound the existential with the spiritual problem. With the same conclusions of fact before them, some take one view, and some another, of the Bible's value as a revelation, according as their spiritual judgment as to the foundation of values differ.
Which is the best form of "best adepts"?
NO CHANGE
best interpreters
best practitioners
best attempts
best practitioners
The word "adept" can be used to mean someone skilled at a given practice. Since the word does have overtones derived from the adjective form, meaning very skilled, it would be better to avoid the semi-redundancy of saying, "best adepts," as this potential redundancy could be distracting for the reader. It would be better to use another word like "practitioner," at least to prevent the reader from becoming distracted by the potential reduplication in "best adepts."
Example Question #311 : Act English
The local flower shop has a semi-annual sale twice per year in April and August.
Which of the following choices more accurately and concisely conveys the same information as the above sentence?
The local flower shop has a sale in April and August.
The local flower shop has a sale twice per year in April and August.
The local flower store has a semi-annual sale.
Everything in the local flower shop is on sale in April and August.
The local flower shop has a semi-annual sale twice per year in April and August.
The local flower shop has a sale in April and August.
The original sentence was redundant in saying: "semi-annual," "twice per year," and "in April and August." Using "in April and August" conveys that the sale is semi-annual and that it is twice per year, but those phrases would not convey the exact dates of the sale. However, we don't know for sure that everything for sale in the flower shop is on sale in April and August, so "Everything in the local flower shop is on sale in April and August" cannot be the correct answer.
Example Question #221 : Revising Content
The Channel Tunnel is a feat of engineering. After decades of discussion, planning, and construction, a project that was first conceived in 1802 has finally become a reality. Today, the Chunnel allows millions of people to travel easily between England and France.
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the passage. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
decades and many years
tens of years
a ton
NO CHANGE
a number of decades
NO CHANGE
"Decade" means period of ten consecutive years, so it is redundant to repeat this information. Thus, "decades and tens of years" is redundant. "Tens of years" is not as succint as "decades," so it too is incorrect. "A ton" is too colloquial to be accepted in formal writing.
Example Question #283 : Writing And Revising Effectively
In today's society, (1) they have a popular TV series that (2) follows the life of 4-5 (3) young teenage girls who are trying to raise their child while being a teenager at the same time (4). The television series shows hardships, but they (5) focus more on the relationships of these girls rather than how much their baby’s diaper is changed or how often the baby spits up all over them. They always have a happy ending, giving teen girls these days hope that it (6) will do the same for them. The show focuses of (7) a different group of teen moms each season, but all being held back by having a child at a young age. Some are alone, some have significant others, and some even decided to give (8) their baby up for adoption, but not one of their lives are perfect nor easy (9). Some teenagers enjoy watching the show just to watch the babies grow, but others watch it because they think it’s popular, they think it will make them popular as well (10). The show is based upon these girl’s (11) lives and it doesn’t always seem to have to do with their children it has to do with them being teenagers (12).
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
NO CHANGE
the happy ending
the series
having a child
having a child
Again we have an ambiguous pronoun reference, but from the context of the rest of the paragraph, it is clear that "it" refers to "having a child" more than to any other possibility.
Example Question #284 : Writing And Revising Effectively
In today's society, (1) they have a popular TV series that (2) follows the life of 4-5 (3) young teenage girls who are trying to raise their child while being a teenager at the same time (4). The television series shows hardships, but they (5) focus more on the relationships of these girls rather than how much their baby’s diaper is changed or how often the baby spits up all over them. They always have a happy ending, giving teen girls these days hope that it (6) will do the same for them. The show focuses of (7) a different group of teen moms each season, but all being held back by having a child at a young age. Some are alone, some have significant others, and some even decided to give (8) their baby up for adoption, but not one of their lives are perfect nor easy (9). Some teenagers enjoy watching the show just to watch the babies grow, but others watch it because they think it’s popular, they think it will make them popular as well (10). The show is based upon these girl’s (11) lives and it doesn’t always seem to have to do with their children it has to do with them being teenagers (12).
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
NO CHANGE
the teens
the series
the series' producers
the series' producers
The referent for the pronoun "they" is ambiguous in the original, but it most likely refers to the people producing the series rather than the series itself (which would need a singular pronoun) or the teens in the series itself.
Example Question #316 : Act English
Adapted from The Autobiography of John Adams (ed. 1856) Here I will interrupt the narration for a moment to observe that, from all I have read of the history of Greece and Rome, England and France, and all I have observed at home and abroad, articulate eloquence in public assemblies is not the surest road to fame or preferment, at least, unless it be used with caution, very rarely, and with great reserve. The examples of Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson is enough to show that silence and reserve in public is more efficacious than argumentation or oratory. A public speaker who inserts himself, or is urged by others, into the conduct of affairs, by daily exertions to justify his measures, and answer the objections of opponents, makes himself too familiar with the public and unavoidably makes himself enemies. Few persons can bear to be outdone in reasoning or declamation or wit or sarcasm or repartee or satire, and all these things that are very apt to grow out of public debate. In this way, in a course of years, a nation becomes full of a man’s enemies, or at least, of such as have been galled in some controversy and take a secret pleasure in assisting to humble and mortify him. So much for this digression. We will now return to our memoirs.
Which of the following could be removed from the underlined sentence?
"and answer the objections of opponents"
"into the conduct of affairs"
"or is urged by others," "by daily exertions," and "and unavoidably makes himself enemies"
"or is urged by others" and "by daily exertions"
"or is urged by others" and "by daily exertions"
This sentence is very difficult to understand at first glance. This is in no small part due to the numerous asides that are expressed in it. Looking at the correct answer, we might see that these two selections could be set off with parentheses:
"A public speaker who inserts himself (or is urged by others) into the conduct of affairs, (by daily exertions) to justify his measures, and answer the objections of opponents, makes himself too familiar with the public and unavoidably makes himself enemies."
Now, removing the items in parentheses, we get:
"A public speaker who inserts himself into the conduct of affairs(,) to justify his measures(,) and answer the objections of opponents, makes himself too familiar with the public and unavoidably makes himself enemies."
Fixing the punctuation placed in parenthesis above solely for emphasis (and adding a clarifying expression in brackets for now), we can rewrite this as:
"A public speaker, who inserts himself into the conduct of affairs [in order] to justify his measures and answer the objections of opponents, makes himself too familiar with the public and unavoidably makes himself enemies."
This is somewhat clearer than the original form.
Example Question #313 : Act English
"Our Family Trip to Hawaii" by Jennifer Mings (2013)
Last summer, my mother, sister, brother, and me took a trip to Honolulu, Hawaii. We were excited to see everything, and couldn’t wait to arrive. After our lengthy plane ride, we stepped off of the plane in a daze. There was two flight attendants who immediately greeted us, putting flower wreaths around our necks. We then met up with our tour guide; and he told us that we would be going straight to Pearl Harbor.
On our way to Pearl Harbor, there was a largely immense amount of traffic, something that aggravated my mother. Luckily, the tour guide was a native of the island, and he was able to calm my mother down.
When we finally arrived at Pearl Harbor, there was many tourists and natives of different nationalities. The first thing we did when we arrived was watching a movie about the history of Pearl Harbor, which included the story of the USS Arizona. During the movie, everyone had been excited to see the USS Arizona Memorial and wanted to get on the boat. After, we all got on a boat and we were driven to the USS Arizona Memorial. It was an amazing, beautiful, gorgeous, and great experience for everyone.
Choose the answer that best corrects the bolded portion of the passage. If the bolded portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
It was a beautiful, gorgeous, and great experience for everyone
It was an amazing and beautiful experience for everyone
It was an amazing, beautiful, gorgeous, great experience for everyone
NO CHANGE
It was an amazing and beautiful experience for everyone
This is because “amazing” and “great” mean the same thing, and “beautiful” and “gorgeous” mean the same thing, so one of each must be removed in order to avoid repetition.
Example Question #222 : Revising Content
"Our Family Trip to Hawaii" by Jennifer Mings (2013)
Last summer, my mother, sister, brother, and me took a trip to Honolulu, Hawaii. We were excited to see everything, and couldn’t wait to arrive. After our lengthy plane ride, we stepped off of the plane in a daze. There was two flight attendants who immediately greeted us, putting flower wreaths around our necks. We then met up with our tour guide; and he told us that we would be going straight to Pearl Harbor.
On our way to Pearl Harbor, there was a largely immense amount of traffic, something that aggravated my mother. Luckily, the tour guide was a native of the island, and he was able to calm my mother down.
When we finally arrived at Pearl Harbor, there was many tourists and natives of different nationalities. The first thing we did when we arrived was watching a movie about the history of Pearl Harbor, which included the story of the USS Arizona. During the movie, everyone had been excited to see the USS Arizona Memorial and wanted to get on the boat. After, we all got on a boat and we were driven to the USS Arizona Memorial. It was an amazing, beautiful, gorgeous, and great experience for everyone.
Choose the answer that best corrects the bolded portion of the passage. If the bolded portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
NO CHANGE
There were an immense amount
There was an immense amount
There was a largely, immense amount
There was an immense amount
The adjectives “large” and “immense” mean the same thing, so only one of them should be used in order to avoid repetition.
Certified Tutor
Certified Tutor