Clearly, Eggbert has a very upbeat personality, and Wilbert's personality is negative and depressive. We see at the end of the sentence that Eggbert had an "exceedingly optimistic disposition." When something is "saccharine," it is overly sweet—often describing an overly optimistic personality. The contrast is clearly between being depressive and being so very positive. For this reason, the best pair of words for the second and the third blanks are "melancholic" and "doleful." A "melancholic" person is someone who is generally sad. A "doleful" remark is one that expresses sorrow.

The best clue for this sentence is that the younger colleague's essay is said to be "little more than a patchwork of sources." This hints that the younger colleague merely gathered together a bunch of sources without doing sufficient work to order or connect them together. Such an approach can be called "eclectic," which means drawn from various sources. This is the best option for this sentence. (While the work might have been poor, we are not 100% guaranteed of that from our context clues.) The work seems to have lacked internal cohesion or unity. Thus, it is understandably called "disunified." In contrast to this, a "systematic" approach is one that follows a careful plan. This is an acceptable contrast to the "eclectic" method mentioned in the case of the younger colleague.

The general idea of the sentence is that it is often simpler to avoid disagreement completely rather than to choose topics that could possibly be disagreeable to someone in a large group. An "anodyne" remark is chosen to be very inoffensive. "Peculiar" things are ones that are unique to a given person, group, or object. Finally, someone chooses to make such anodyne remarks in contrast to the much more difficult task of making carefully chosen, but substantive, remarks that will be acceptable to all. Such latter attempts would require careful balancing. That is, they would require deft action, meaning quite clever and (metaphorically speaking) nimble action.

The best clue in this sentence is the word "irregular." The two types of quakes are being contrasted for being regular and irregular. Thus, the small quakes (since they are the irregular ones) are best called "sporadic." In general, both of these types of events are "seismic," meaning related to earthquakes and such movements. Finally, we do not know much about the size of the fractures, but we can guess that they did destabilize the building. Thus, this is the best option, given the details provided in the sentence.

The most tempting wrong answer is likely the set "berate . . . value . . . verbiage"; however, several factors work in favor of the ultimately correct set, "disparage . . . worth . . . invective." Clearly, the last word should capture the sense of being forceful and negative. This already weighs in favor of "invective." The real key to the sentence is noting the synergy between "disparage" and "worth," for disparaging remarks are those that regard someone as having little worth; therefore, these three words work together much more closely than do the three potentially tempting words mentioned above.

The first answer must be something to soothe, like a soothing lotion, or "liniment." The second must be a synonym for lessen, like "allay," and the third must be a synonym for make worse, such as "exacerbate."

The best clue in this sentence is the statement that the drink contained something poisonous. Milton was unaware of this, but it clearly was the case. Thus, the second blank is best answered by "insalubrious" (unhealthy) or "toxic". Now, the first blank does not work well with words like "devoured," "consumed," and "gorged." All of these really refer to solid food, not liquid. The word "imbibed" comes from the Latin for to drink and means basically that in English. Finally, the word "onset" expresses well the fact that the effects of the poisonous brew became evident quickly.

The best first clue for this sentence is the word "horrors." This indicates that the sentence is talking about more than mere battles and happenings of war. The second blank is best filled by "atrocities," which means extremely horrible events, often because of great injuries and death that are caused. The other two blanks are then easily filled given that the sentence is talking about the general experience of such horrors. Any soldier who has been a witness to such horrors will be quite aware of their reality.

The best first clue for this sentence is "his indomitable will." The root "domi-" can come from "dominus" in Latin, meaning lord. (Do not confuse this with "domus", meaning house and found in the English "domicile.") When something is "indomitable," it has no lord; it cannot be overcome. The simple word "tasks" works well enough for the first blank. We really only know that Étienne has a general undertaking—tasks. Something that is "insuperable" is not able to be overcome. Trusting in his undefeatable will, Étienne thinks he can overcome such seemingly impossible tasks. The implication is that he trusts that he can outlast such hardships. Hence, he can "persevere" through them.

We know based on the context of the sentence that the first blank is describing some undersirable or negative characteristic regarding the rise in unemployment. Given this context, "disquieting," meaning upsetting or concerning, and "aberrant," meaning departing from a norm, could both make sense. "Antidiluvian," meaning outdated, "inchoate," meaning undeveloped or in an early stage of development, and "caustic," meaning sarcastic or biting, don't make sense here. This narrows our choices to either "disquieting . . . discomfiture . . . fatuous" or "aberrant . . . antipathy . . . dogmatic."

We can see from the context that the second blank describes some negative reaction resulting from the increase in unemployment. "Discomfiture," meaning an unsettling or disconcerting state, and "antipathy" meaning aversion or antagonism, could both potentially work. Moving to the final sentence, we know that based on early information detailing the rise in unemployment, the mayor's speech about "unlimited opportunities" seems untimely and silly. "Dogmatic," meaning opinionated or dictatorial, doesn't really fit perfectly; however, "fatuous," meaning silly, naive, or pointless, does make sense given the context. Thus, we know the correct final answer is "diquieting . . . discomfiture . . . fatuous."