All AP US History Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #5 : Domestic Politics 1946–1980
The election of 1960 marked the end of the two terms of President Eisenhower. The election was important for many reasons. It was assumed, correctly, that Eisenhower’s Vice President Richard Nixon would be the Republican Party nominee. Nixon had turned the office of the Vice President into a national political base for the 1960 election during his time in office, thus the assumption was correct. Additionally, the 1960 election was the first election in which Alaska and Hawaii participated in the election process, as they had been granted statehood the previous year. This is significant because now all fifty states would hold primaries. However, Nixon did not run in all the state primaries because of the assumption that he would be his party’s nominee because he had served as Vice President under President Eisenhower. He did choose to run uncontested in a few primaries but only to prove his ability to get popular votes. The election was the source of much debate as well, because of the candidacy of Virginia Senator Harry F. Byrd running as a third party candidate. His presence also contributed to making the election of 1960 the closest in popular vote since the 1884 election.
Why was the election of 1960 considered one of the closest elections in American History?
The election resulted in a tie and was sent to the Senate to decide who would be the new President.
It was the first time a third party candidate ran for office.
John F. Kennedy won the election with 100,000 popular votes and a 303 to 219 vote margin in the Electoral College.
It was the first election to use television to broadcast debates between the candidates, giving more people the opportunity to see the candidates without leaving their homes.
Richard Nixon won the election with 100,000 popular votes and a 303 to 219 margin in the Electoral College.
John F. Kennedy won the election with 100,000 popular votes and a 303 to 219 vote margin in the Electoral College.
John F. Kennedy won the 1960 election with 49.9% of the votes while Richard M. Nixon gathered 49.7% of the votes. Of the 68 million votes cast, John Kennedy won the election with 100,000 popular votes. The Electoral College gave John Kennedy 303 votes as opposed to Richard Nixon’s 219 votes. The vote was close, but was not a tie and for that reason there was no need to send the election to the Senate. In past elections, Vice-Presidents ran for the Presidency without any restraint as a common expectation for the Vice-President. Third party candidates, while not common, had run in Presidential elections in prior years and the candidacy of Senator Byrd did not play a role in the closeness of the election of Kennedy as President. Post-election analysis showed that one of the contributing factors of the close vote were the televised debates. John Kennedy was more photogenic in the televised debates, but Richard Nixon was more appealing to the radio listeners of the debates. Therefore, the televised debates were not the deciding factor. The correct answer is based purely on voter preference and the popular vote count.
Example Question #6 : Domestic Politics 1946–1980
The Cold War intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Tensions between the United States and the United Soviet Social Republic increased as the rivalry between the United States and the USSR manifested itself in economic and political clashes. In the United States, this lead to a period of perceived threats posed by communist and leftist sympathizers inside the country. It was feared that these individuals would work as spies for the USSR, and therefore, posed a threat to the security of the United States. This fear was known as the Red Scare; red referred to the red color of the Soviet flag and the supposed allegiance to the Soviet beliefs. This fear effected both the American government and society. In March 1947, President Harry S. Truman issued Executive Order 9835, known as the Loyalty Order, requiring all federal employees to be analyzed for sufficient loyalty to the government. This was an unusual action, when one considers the foundation of American in liberty and freedom of political organization. The legislative branch became involved in the Red Scare with the actions of The House Unamerican Activities Committee and Senator Joseph McCarthy in the forefront of investigating allegations of subversive elements in the government and the Hollywood film industry. Other governmental agencies were involved in the investigations as well. Federal Bureau of Investigation Director J. Edgar Hoover equated any form of protest to communist subversion and took a role in the investigations as well. Hoover had been part of an earlier less pervasive Red Scare in the years following World War I. He viewed his role in the investigations to be one of information gathering. He collected extensive files on suspected subversives using wiretaps, surveillance and infiltration of leftist groups. These files were used in trials for espionage. The House Unamerican Activities Committee reacted to probes into alleged subversive activity by “blacklisting” individuals it considered suspicious. But Senator Joseph McCarthy was the most visible and well-known figure during the years of the Red Scare. His anticommunist campaign took the form of Senate hearings relying on hearsay and intimidation to obtain testimony against alleged communist sympathizers. He was the most powerful and most feared figure in American politics during the Red Scare. Many individuals came under his scrutiny. Some lost careers and had their reputations destroyed. One of the most famous cases was that of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg who were tried, convicted and executed for committing espionage. The United States Supreme Court also played a role in the Red Scare with its ruling on a case that shocked many Americans by limiting the basic rights and freedoms of Americans.
What was the name and ruling of this Supreme Court case?
United States vs Willow River Power Company; ruling on the power of government to take property from any citizen
Chaplinsky vs.New Hampshire, ruling on the use of fighting words or incendiary words
Ex parte Quirin, ruling that suspected communist sympathizers’ were to be tried by military tribunals
Dennis vs. United States, ruling that free speech rights of alleged communists could be restricted because their actions presented a clear and present danger to the American government.
United States vs. Classic, ruling that the federal government had a right to wiretap suspected spies
Dennis vs. United States, ruling that free speech rights of alleged communists could be restricted because their actions presented a clear and present danger to the American government.
There were many cases brought before the United States Supreme Court during the Red Scare. Dennis vs. United States is the strongest and emphasized the fear in the country of communist influences by stating that free speech rights could be restricted if it was determined to be a clear and present danger to the country. The determination of a clear and present danger was open to interpretation and circumstance. Ex parte Quirin limited the scope of its ruling to suspected spies stating that they were to be tried by military tribunals. Chaplinsky vs. New Hampshire ruled on the use of derisive, offensive and annoying speech (often referred to as “fighting words). United States vs. Willow River Power Company ruled on property rights and the rights of the government to take personal property, namely land, for public use. United States vs. Classic ruled on the power of the federal government to regulate primary elections.
Example Question #1 : Domestic Politics 1946–1980
"I have come today from the turmoil of your Capital to the tranquillity of your campus to speak about the future of your country.
The purpose of protecting the life of our nation and preserving the liberty of our citizens is to pursue the happiness of our people. Our success in that pursuit is the test of our success as a nation.
For a century we labored to settle and to subdue a continent. For half a century we called upon unbounded invention and untiring industry to create an order of plenty for all of our people.
The challenge of the next half century is whether we have the wisdom to use that wealth to enrich and elevate our national life, and to advance the quality of our American civilization.
Your imagination and your initiative, and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the Great Society.
The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time. But that is just the beginning."
Who delivered the speech above?
John F. Kennedy
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson
Martin Luther King
Lyndon B. Johnson
Lyndon B. Johnson delivered the "Great Society" speech on May 22, 1964 to expand the social programs of the New Deal. Support for the initiatives was high, in part due to the assassination of JFK. In 1965, Congress passed several reforms, including Medicaid, Medicare, and educational programs.
Example Question #111 : Ap Us History
"It did not take atomic weapons to make man want peace...But the atomic bomb was the turn of the screw. It made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country."
J. Robert Oppenheimer, commencement address, 1946
How did the invention of atomic weapons affect the development of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States?
The United States parlayed its invention of nuclear weapons into a lasting advantage by developing the Trident submarine-launched ballistic missile system
The stockpiles of nuclear weapons that both countries possessed ensured that they would avoid open conflict
The Soviet Union's advantage in nuclear weaponry canceled out the larger conventional military possessed by the United States
The Soviet Union placed nuclear warheads in several South American countries to increase its ability to strike the United States
The stockpiles of nuclear weapons that both countries possessed ensured that they would avoid open conflict
During the Cold War, the acknowledgement of mutually assured destruction guaranteed that conflicts between the U.S. and USSR would be fought by proxy, such as the wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam.
Example Question #1 : Global Participation 1946–1980
"It did not take atomic weapons to make man want peace...But the atomic bomb was the turn of the screw. It made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country."
J. Robert Oppenheimer, commencement address, 1946
Which of the following events reflected the change in relations between countries that Oppenheimer predicted in the wake of the atomic bomb?
the launch of Sputnik in 1957
the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961
the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962
the resolution of the Suez Canal Crisis in 1957
the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962
Although all of the events took place during the post-nuclear era, the Cuban Missile Crisis is most closely associated with a world on the brink of destruction due to atomic war. The risks associated with war demanded a diplomatic solution.
Example Question #1 : 1980–Present
Reagan's supply-side economics was based on the theory that __________.
heavily investing in the infrastructure through federal work programs would stimulate the economy.
increasing taxes on America's wealthiest one-percent of the population would allow the federal government to reduce taxes for those beneath the poverty line.
taxing middle-class Americans at a higher rate would allow the federal government to reduce taxes for those beneath the poverty line.
reducing corporate taxes would cause those corporations to spend the additional money to purchase equipment and hire more employees, creating a trickle-down effect.
reducing tariffs on America's largest trading partners would encourage other countries to spend more money on American products.
reducing corporate taxes would cause those corporations to spend the additional money to purchase equipment and hire more employees, creating a trickle-down effect.
Reagan believed that by decreasing taxes on corporations, additional money would be available to purchase machinery, hire new employees, open new stores, etc. The money used for these purposes would cause additional corporations and individuals to receive more money and, in turn, spend it. This was called the "trickle-down effect." Reagan also decreased taxes for individuals using the same theory.
Example Question #2 : 1980–Present
"In the days ahead I will propose removing the roadblocks that have slowed our economy and reduced productivity. Steps will be taken aimed at restoring the balance between the various levels of government. Progress may be slow, measured in inches and feet, not miles, but we will progress. It is time to reawaken this industrial giant, to get government back within its means, and to lighten our punitive tax burden. And these will be our first priorities, and on these principles there will be no compromise." Ronald Reagan, First Inaugural Address, 1981.
What was a key component of the economic program described by Reagan in the speech above?
Increase the amount of regulation of the U.S. economy
Increases taxes to promote government spending
Increase the number of imports in the U.S. economy to spur economic growth
Cutting taxes, especially on the those with the highest incomes, in order to stimulate economic growth
Cutting taxes, especially on the those with the highest incomes, in order to stimulate economic growth
A central strand of supply-side economics, or "Reagonomics," as it is known, was cutting taxes, particularly on the those with the highest incomes, in order to stimulate economic growth. According to the theory, this economic growth would will eventually "trickle down" to all taxpayers and help the economy as a whole.
Example Question #3 : 1980–Present
Ronald Reagan was elected President during a time of economic stress in America. Inheriting a struggling economy, Reagan formulated two new tax programs, the Economic Recovery Act of 1981 and the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Both Acts lowered the tax rates to give tax relief to all Americans (but were, admittedly, heavily skewed to tax relief for the exceptionally wealthy). The Economic Recovery Act of 1981 indexed tax rates for inflation. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 efficiently closed loopholes in the tax law, as well as lowering the tax rates again. President Ronald Reagan referred to the 1986 Act as "a second American Revolution for hope and opportunity." He believed that America’s economy, and the American taxpayer, were struggling under an imbalanced tax burden, unnecessary social spending, and excessive government regulation.
Reagan based his tax plan on what economic theory?
Laissez-Faire Capitalism
Keynesian Economics
Neoclassical Synthesis
Neo-Malthusian Theory
supply-side economics
supply-side economics
The economic plan of President Reagan was based on the belief that changes in marginal tax rates influence economic activity. He strongly believed that high tax rates discouraged work, investment and growth. Additionally, he felt that consumption, living standards and income levels interact to effect the economy. The marginal tax rate was also important because it indicated to the wage earner how much “additional” income would be taxed and sent to the government and how much income would be maintained by the wage earner. Thus, it was, ostensibly, an incentive to work (some would argue that poverty and the desire to avoid a life of struggle and hardship in a society with a rapidly shrinking social net would similarly function as incentive). This is a fundamental tenet of supply side economics. Reagan’s efforts to improve the economy in his two tax plans were based on supply side economic theory.
Example Question #4 : 1980–Present
The major political parties in the United States, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, are well recognized to the voting public. There are 50 additional political parties in the United States, however, that are active and offer candidates for President. These are collectively known as Third Parties. Third Parties serve an important role in the United States political system. These parties, formed by individuals with particular interests, issues, and ideologies, force the major parties to address new issues and can influence an election by taking votes from both major party candidates during an election year. Third Parties are also formed when individuals, dissatisfied with the major parties, split off from the major party. This type of Third Party is also called a Splinter Party. Third Parties have influenced American elections since 1912. There have been many well-known Third Party Presidential candidates.
The election of 1992 saw a third party candidate run for the Presidency. This candidate was one of the most successful third party candidates since 1912. This candidate did not win any Electoral College votes but did win a respectable percentage of the popular vote. Who was this candidate, what percentage of the popular vote did he win and what was the name of his party?
Robert Dole, 37% of the popular vote, The New Republican Party
Patrick Buchanan, 20% of the popular vote, The Reform Party
Ross Perot, 18.9% of the popular vote, The Independent Party
George Wallace, 46% of the popular vote, The American Independent Party
Newt Gingrich, 35% of the popular vote, The Free Speech Party
Ross Perot, 18.9% of the popular vote, The Independent Party
Patrick Buchanan is a former senior aide to Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan. He attempted, unsuccessfully, to run for office as head of the Reform Party in 2000. Robert Dole is the former Senator from Kansas and did run for the Presidency, not as a third party candidate but as a member of the Republican Party. George Wallace ran as a third party candidate in 1968 earning 46 Electoral College votes for the American Independent Party. Newt Gingrich is a political adviser, author, and a former member of the House of Representatives where he also served as the Speaker of the House. Gingrich attempted a run for the Presidency in 2012 but did not receive the nomination of his political party, the Republican Party. Ross Perot ran in the 1992 election as The Independent Party candidate receiving 18.9% of the popular vote making him one of the most successful third party candidates since 1912.
Example Question #3 : 1980–Present
Operation Desert Storm, also known as The Gulf War, began in 1991 as a response by the United States and Allied nations to Iraq’s attempt to conquer Kuwait. During its history, Kuwait had been a part of Iraq until 1923 when new borders were created. It remained under British military protection until 1961. At that time, Kuwait joined the Arab League. Iraq protested this action claiming Kuwait’s status prior to 1923 made it part of Iraq’s territory. Kuwait formed its own Constitution in 1963 with the Emir and a group of ministers holding executive power. An assembly was also elected in the same year. In 1990, Saddam Hussein made the decision to regain the land lost and ordered his army to attack Kuwait. Hussein had threatened Kuwait for many years prior to the 1990 invasion; however, the extent of the invasion surprised the world. The Iraqi army rapidly seized all of Kuwait and was swiftly advancing towards Saudi Arabia. The United Nations and President George H.W. Bush demanded that Iraq withdraw from Kuwait. Iraq refused to withdraw from Kuwait and the Iraqi army continued to move southward. The result was Operation Desert Storm, which placed the largest number of American forces on foreign soil since the Viet Nam conflict.
What was the major concern of the world’s leaders regarding Iraq’s attack on Kuwait?
Syrian troops would join the Iraqi troops in attacking Saudi Arabia
Iraq would control a significant portion of the world’s oil supplies
Iraq would be well positioned to attack the Arab Emirates, a major ally of the United States
Iran agreed to join with Iraq to reclaim territories it lost in World War II
Fear that Russia might support Iraq with military supplies
Iraq would control a significant portion of the world’s oil supplies
Combined with the oil reserves in Kuwait, control of Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves would give Iraq control of one-fifth of the world’s oil supply in addition to destabilizing the Middle East. King Fahd, of Saudi Arabia, agreed with the American plan to place troops on the Saudi border to defend against an Iraqi attack. The Arab Emirates worked with the allies to settle this dispute. Iran did not agree with Iraq in its attack on Kuwait, had not lost territories during World War II and was also working with the allies to prevent or end the war. The Soviet Union was interested in this war because it was taking place close to its southern border. The Soviet interest was more academic than active participation. Syria was a close ally of the United States in this endeavor providing staging bases and troops to help the allies in the war.