All AP US Government Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #4 : Bill Of Rights
Which of the following amendments is often called the “states’ rights” amendment, due to its powerful endorsement of states’ rights?
Fairly easy question as long as you know your amendments. The answer is the 10th amendment, as it reads: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
In somewhat plainer English, this means that any governmental power that is neither (1) given to the federal government, nor (2) forbidden to the states is given to the states or the “people” (citizens). It is for this very reason that the 10th amendment is commonly referred to as the “states’ rights” amendment.
Example Question #161 : Constructing The Constitution
Which Amendment deals with the Right to Petition?
The Fourth Amendment
The First Amendment
The Sixth Amendment
The Tenth Amendment
The First Amendment
The First Amendment concerns five different liberties that are fairly similar, including the right of the people “to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” The Amendment does not mandate that the government need to address or address the “grievances,” but this ensures that people can still formally show their displeasure to the government.
Example Question #3 : Bill Of Rights
Another crucial concern shared by many architects of the Constitution was the protection of individual rights. However, because most of the delegates believed that such rights were already being adequately safeguarded by the states and the national government’s system of checks and balances, the initial draft of the Constitution contained only a few key provisions to protect personal freedoms. Which of the following is not one of those early protections?
A ban against any religious qualifications for government officeholders
Freedom of speech
A prohibition against any bills of attainder
A right to a trial by jury
Protection of the writ of habeas corpus
Freedom of speech
Surprisingly, the right to freedom of speech –one of the most famous individual freedoms– was not part of the initial Constitution. Freedom of speech and others of the most well-known rights (such as freedom of the press, the right to bear arms, and freedom of religion), as contained in the Bill of Rights, were all later additions to the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were some of the most vociferous advocates of the Bill of Rights and many states refused to ratify the Constitution at all unless such personal freedoms were given explicit written protection. The ten Amendments that together comprise the Bill of Rights were therefore added to the Constitution in 1791, in order to allay these fears.
Example Question #6 : Bill Of Rights
Why was the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution?
To enshrine state power.
To safeguard individual liberties
To establish a state church
To outline the basic structure of the judiciary
To provide protection from ex post facto laws
To safeguard individual liberties
The constitution as originally drafted, did not have any safeguard for individual liberties. Many objected to this, so as a condition of ratification, it was promised that a Bill of Rights would be drafted.
Example Question #2 : Bill Of Rights
The Fifth Amendment prohibits "double jeopardy." What is "double jeopardy"?
When someone is tried twice for the same crime
The right to a jury of your peers
Cruel or unusual punishment
The right to remain silent
When someone is tried twice for the same crime
The Fifth Amendment says that no person shall "be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb", thus defining double jeopardy as being tried for the same crime. The Fifth Amendment provides people the right to remain silent instead of prohibiting it. Although the Bill of Rights does prohibit the use of cruel and unusual punishment, it's prohibition is under the Eighth Amendment. The Bill of Rights guarantees a jury of your peers, not prohibits it.
Example Question #4 : Bill Of Rights
Which statement about the Bill of Rights is FALSE?
Originally, the Bill of Rights was believed to apply only to the national government, until Congress passed the incorporation doctrine to enforce the Bill on the state level
The Bill of Rights was greatly popular among ordinary citizens, not least because many retained painful memories of the abuses and infringements perpetuated by King George III and the British Parliament
Modern judicial precedent ensures that the Bill of Rights is equally (or near so) applicable across the federal, state, and local levels
Many Framers, state legislators, and Congressional delegates refused to ratify the Constitution at all until the Bill of Rights was added
Originally, the Bill of Rights was believed to apply only to the national government, until Congress passed the incorporation doctrine to enforce the Bill on the state level
It is indeed true that originally, many Congressmen and federal judges had doubts as to exactly how far beyond the national government’s scope the Bill of Rights could legally reach. In fact, in 1833 the Supreme Court even ruled that the Bill of Rights only imposed limitations on the federal government, leaving the states and local administrations exempt. However, the Court quite clearly found this stance to be deficient, as did other sectors of government, and so in a further case (which proceeded in 1925), the Supreme Court first established the so-called incorporation doctrine. Citing the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court defined the incorporation doctrine as the principle by which the Bill of Rights could be applied beyond the national government, to the conduct of state and local governments as well. Especially relevant for the doctrine’s justification is the Due Process Clause, contained in the Fourteenth Amendment, which prevents either state or federal governments from infringing on any individual’s life, liberty, or property rights without due process of the law (meaning that special legal permission must be obtained, usually under severe circumstances).