If It Ain’t Broke Don’t Fix It by Armani

If It Ain’t Broke Don’t Fix It by Armani - May 2020 Scholarship Essay

A teacher's essential concern should be the students and what sort of realizing condition will be most appropriate to address the student’s issues. There are a wide range of feelings with regards to what the best or suitable educational program is for students throughout our whole educational system. I don't accept the idea that there is only one way of teaching that can give the perfect educational program and experience to every single student. Similarly, as there are various techniques for instructing, there are additionally various approaches to learn. It is fundamental that we remember this as they help the students accomplish their objectives and find their abilities. Overall the instructors must urge students to attempt new things and do what they can to forestall restricting them in any capacity.
I believe that a large number of the schools today simply attempt to set the student up to proceed onward to school and by doing so prohibit the students, who are skilled with different capacities that are similarly significant and helpful in the public arena, despite the fact that those gifts may not really be something that can be refined through a conventional multi year school. This is a concern but does not seem as if it will change because classrooms cannot be used for individual students. This would stunt the growth of a student's social maturation which is more beneficial in some aspects of life.
I unequivocally accept that students should demonstrate commonsense utilization of the ideas they are instructed. For myself this is particularly eminent in scientific applications. As educators, they have to not only illuminate students on the best way to work through an issue: they have to show why it works and what it is helpful for. Without something to apply the data to, math is simply a surge of numbers and recipes that students remember for a particular test and afterward rapidly overlook. By showing explicit instances of uses the students will have the option to hold a portion of the data and afterward adjust what they have figured out to differentiate and apply what they have learned to issues they experience later on. This is a tool to teach students but not as much of a change in education. Tools will change in 50 years for sure. They will change in 10, maybe even 5 years.
With all that being said, real education requires tons of hands on learning and human contact or interaction. Therefore, there will still be big brick buildings housing materials to teach our future youth. The type of materials might change but teaching strategies will most likely stay the same. There will be more technology infused in order to give students more access to information they need in order to maximize progress. There are many speculations that teachers will be replaced but I believe that is impossible. Teachers, in my opinion and based on my experiences, provide guidance to students that cannot be replaced. The student teacher relationship, assuming that both parties are cooperating, is so beneficial to the student and their outlook on authority, and education as a whole. The right teacher can set a student on a path to success by teaching them determination, focus, and discipline. If they do their job and teach as well as build relationships with the students in a mentor kind of way, the sky's the limit for the student.
All in all, education will essentially stay the same no matter if it's 50 years in the future or 200 years in the future. The only things that will change are the tools used to get students to reach their potentials but nothing else will differ. There will still be teachers, students, and desks, maybe not any blackboards but education itself is something that cannot be drastically changed in my opinion.