In the sentence above, the antecedent of the pronoun "it" is unclear. It does not make sense to drive a car's engine around (it might make sense to drive an engine to be delivered or repaired, but not just to take it out for a scenic meander). Clearly what the author of the sentence is trying to indicate is that they do not want to drive the car around. In order to clear up the ambiguity, you must use a noun instead of a pronoun. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but we didn't want to drive the car around anyway."

In the sentence above, the word "he" does not refer to any antecedent in the sentence, therefore, a noun must replace it in order to avoid ambiguity. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but the Reverend didn't answer."

Whenever you have multiple antecedents in a sentence, you must be extremely clear with pronoun usage in order to avoid any ambiguity. In the sentence above, "it" could refer to either "the drill" or "the trunk." The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "I insist that you take the drill out of the trunk so that the drill can be fixed promptly."

Sentence with multiple antecedents must be extremely clear in their pronoun usage in order to avoid any ambiguity. In the sentence above, "he" could refer to either "George" or "Wilfred." The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but Wilfred is definitely stronger."

In the sentence above, the antecedent of the pronoun "them" is unclear. It does not make sense to eat a Burger Shoppe restaurant. Clearly what the author of the sentence is trying to indicate is that they need to eat some food, probably from Burger Shoppe. In order to clear up the ambiguity, you must use a noun instead of a pronoun. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but we wanted to try to eat Burger Shoppe's food anyway."

In the sentence above, the antecedent of the pronoun "him" is unclear. "Him" cannot refer to a computer, as computers are genderless (for now). Clearly what the author of the sentence is trying to indicate is that the principal had to email "William's father," but William's father never responded. In order to clear up the ambiguity, you must clarify the antecedent. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "The principal emailed William's father to let him know his son was missing from school again."

In the sentence above, the word "it" does not refer to any antecedent in the sentence. Therefore, it has no proper antecedent, and it must be replaced by a noun in order to avoid ambiguity. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but he was perfectly content: poverty never bothered him."

In the sentence above, the word "they" cannot refer to any antecedent existing in the sentence, since the only pronoun is singular, and no groups of people are mentioned. Therefore, "they" has no proper antecedent, and must be replaced by a noun in order to avoid ambiguity. The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "the owners were not impressed by his fulminating."

Whenever you have multiple antecedents in a sentence, you must be extremely clear with pronoun usage in order to avoid any ambiguity. In the sentence above, "it" could refer to either "the notebook" or "the bag." The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "I can write my name on the notebook."

Whenever you have multiple antecedents in a sentence, you must be extremely clear with pronoun usage in order to avoid any ambiguity. In the sentence above, "his" could refer to either "Paul" or "Mark." The best way to correct the underlined portion of the sentence above is: "but Paul's offense was much more serious."