ISEE Upper Level Reading : Literature Passages

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for ISEE Upper Level Reading

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

Example Questions

Example Question #191 : Literature Passages

Adapted from Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy (1895)

He sounded the clacker till his arm ached, and at length his heart grew sympathetic with the birds' thwarted desires. They seemed, like himself, to be living in a world which did not want them. Why should he frighten them away? They took upon more and more the aspect of gentle friends and pensioners—the only friends he could claim as being in the least degree interested in him, for his aunt had often told him that she was not. He ceased his rattling, and they alighted anew.

"Poor little dears!" said Jude, aloud. "You shall have some dinner—you shall. There is enough for us all. Farmer Troutham can afford to let you have some. Eat, then my dear little birdies, and make a good meal!"

They stayed and ate, inky spots on the nut-brown soil, and Jude enjoyed their appetite. A magic thread of fellow-feeling united his own life with theirs. Puny and sorry as those lives were, they much resembled his own.

His clacker he had by this time thrown away from him, as being a mean and sordid instrument, offensive both to the birds and to himself as their friend. All at once he became conscious of a smart blow upon his buttocks, followed by a loud clack, which announced to his surprised senses that the clacker had been the instrument of offense used. The birds and Jude started up simultaneously, and the dazed eyes of the latter beheld the farmer in person, the great Troutham himself, his red face glaring down upon Jude's cowering frame, the clacker swinging in his hand.

"So it's 'Eat my dear birdies,' is it, young man? 'Eat, dear birdies,' indeed! I'll tickle your breeches, and see if you say, 'Eat, dear birdies' again in a hurry! And you've been idling at the schoolmaster's too, instead of coming here, ha'n't ye, hey? That's how you earn your sixpence a day for keeping the rooks off my corn!"

Based on the passage, the primary purpose of the clacker was to __________.

Possible Answers:

provide entertainment

beat people

warn people of the bird's presence

scare the birds

attack the birds

Correct answer:

scare the birds

Explanation:

We know from the first lines that the clacker is a noisemaker which is designed to scare the birds away, as the passage says, “[Jude] sounded the clacker till his arm ached, and at length his heart grew sympathetic with the birds' thwarted desires.”

Example Question #192 : Literature Passages

Adapted from Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy (1895)

He sounded the clacker till his arm ached, and at length his heart grew sympathetic with the birds' thwarted desires. They seemed, like himself, to be living in a world which did not want them. Why should he frighten them away? They took upon more and more the aspect of gentle friends and pensioners—the only friends he could claim as being in the least degree interested in him, for his aunt had often told him that she was not. He ceased his rattling, and they alighted anew.

"Poor little dears!" said Jude, aloud. "You shall have some dinner—you shall. There is enough for us all. Farmer Troutham can afford to let you have some. Eat, then my dear little birdies, and make a good meal!"

They stayed and ate, inky spots on the nut-brown soil, and Jude enjoyed their appetite. A magic thread of fellow-feeling united his own life with theirs. Puny and sorry as those lives were, they much resembled his own.

His clacker he had by this time thrown away from him, as being a mean and sordid instrument, offensive both to the birds and to himself as their friend. All at once he became conscious of a smart blow upon his buttocks, followed by a loud clack, which announced to his surprised senses that the clacker had been the instrument of offense used. The birds and Jude started up simultaneously, and the dazed eyes of the latter beheld the farmer in person, the great Troutham himself, his red face glaring down upon Jude's cowering frame, the clacker swinging in his hand.

"So it's 'Eat my dear birdies,' is it, young man? 'Eat, dear birdies,' indeed! I'll tickle your breeches, and see if you say, 'Eat, dear birdies' again in a hurry! And you've been idling at the schoolmaster's too, instead of coming here, ha'n't ye, hey? That's how you earn your sixpence a day for keeping the rooks off my corn!"

The phrase “tickle your breeches” could most likely be equated to __________.

Possible Answers:

thrashing someone

a game

shouting at someone

waking a person up

forcing a person to run

Correct answer:

thrashing someone

Explanation:

When Farmer Troutham says he will “tickle Jude's breeches,” he is talking about beating him, or thrashing him, to remind him of his duties. The author is portraying Troutham as a cruel man.

Example Question #1191 : Passage Based Questions

Adapted from Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy (1895)

He sounded the clacker till his arm ached, and at length his heart grew sympathetic with the birds' thwarted desires. They seemed, like himself, to be living in a world which did not want them. Why should he frighten them away? They took upon more and more the aspect of gentle friends and pensioners—the only friends he could claim as being in the least degree interested in him, for his aunt had often told him that she was not. He ceased his rattling, and they alighted anew.

"Poor little dears!" said Jude, aloud. "You shall have some dinner—you shall. There is enough for us all. Farmer Troutham can afford to let you have some. Eat, then my dear little birdies, and make a good meal!"

They stayed and ate, inky spots on the nut-brown soil, and Jude enjoyed their appetite. A magic thread of fellow-feeling united his own life with theirs. Puny and sorry as those lives were, they much resembled his own.

His clacker he had by this time thrown away from him, as being a mean and sordid instrument, offensive both to the birds and to himself as their friend. All at once he became conscious of a smart blow upon his buttocks, followed by a loud clack, which announced to his surprised senses that the clacker had been the instrument of offense used. The birds and Jude started up simultaneously, and the dazed eyes of the latter beheld the farmer in person, the great Troutham himself, his red face glaring down upon Jude's cowering frame, the clacker swinging in his hand.

"So it's 'Eat my dear birdies,' is it, young man? 'Eat, dear birdies,' indeed! I'll tickle your breeches, and see if you say, 'Eat, dear birdies' again in a hurry! And you've been idling at the schoolmaster's too, instead of coming here, ha'n't ye, hey? That's how you earn your sixpence a day for keeping the rooks off my corn!"

Which of the following statements about Troutham is supported by the passage?

Possible Answers:

He is well spoken. 

He is undemanding.

He pays his employees well.

He is severe. 

He is a small man. 

Correct answer:

He is severe. 

Explanation:

Troutham's violent reaction to Jude's discretion shows that he is a violent man, which is equal to “severe.” He may think he pays his employees well, but a sixpence was about one fortieth of a pound, so it was not a great deal of money.

Example Question #52 : Making Inferences And Predictions In Literature Passages

Adapted from Volume III of Memoirs, Correspondence and Private Papers of Thomas Jefferson (1818; ed. T. J. Randolph 1829) 

The following is an excerpt from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Adams.

The public papers, my dear friend, announce the fatal event of which your letter of October the 20th had given me ominous foreboding. Tried myself in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection which can rive the human heart, I know well, and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to endure. The same trials have taught me that for ills so immeasurable, time and silence are the only medicine. I will not, therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours, will I say a word more where words are vain, but that it is of some comfort to us both, that the term is not very distant, at which we are to deposit in the same cerement, our sorrows and suffering bodies, and to ascend in essence to an ecstatic meeting with the friends we have loved and lost, and whom we shall still love and never lose again. God bless you and support you under your heavy affliction.

What can you infer caused Jefferson to write this letter to Adams?

Possible Answers:

The loss of the war of 1812

None of the other answers is correct.

Adam's loss to Jefferson in the presidential election

A recent disease that Adams had

The death of someone close

Correct answer:

The death of someone close

Explanation:

The following clues can help best: "fatal event," "tried myself in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection," and then the long end where Jefferson hints of their own deaths. All of these remarks hint that there has been some sort of death. (Indeed, it was the death of Abigail, John's wife, that occasioned this beautiful little letter.)

Example Question #51 : Making Inferences And Predictions In Literature Passages

Adapted from Volume III of Memoirs, Correspondence and Private Papers of Thomas Jefferson (1818; ed. T. J. Randolph 1829) 

The following is an excerpt from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Adams.

The public papers, my dear friend, announce the fatal event of which your letter of October the 20th had given me ominous foreboding. Tried myself in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection which can rive the human heart, I know well, and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to endure. The same trials have taught me that for ills so immeasurable, time and silence are the only medicine. I will not, therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours, will I say a word more where words are vain, but that it is of some comfort to us both, that the term is not very distant, at which we are to deposit in the same cerement, our sorrows and suffering bodies, and to ascend in essence to an ecstatic meeting with the friends we have loved and lost, and whom we shall still love and never lose again. God bless you and support you under your heavy affliction.

What does Jefferson believe would be the effect of attempting to console Adams at length?

Possible Answers:

It would have little effect.

It would just anger Adams.

It would occasion much emotional pain.

None of the others answer choices is correct.

It would be insulting.

Correct answer:

It would occasion much emotional pain.

Explanation:

The key sentence for this question is, "I will not, therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief." Granted, Jefferson does go on to say that any words would be vain. This would seem to imply that his words would have little effect. This is true, to a degree. However, he implies here that useless condolences would be likely to "open afresh the sluices of [Adams'] grief." That is, words of comfort would likely only make Adams feel bad about all that has happened, thus causing him emotional pain.

Example Question #52 : Making Inferences And Predictions In Literature Passages

Adapted from Volume III of Memoirs, Correspondence and Private Papers of Thomas Jefferson (1818; ed. T. J. Randolph 1829) 

The following is an excerpt from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Adams.

The public papers, my dear friend, announce the fatal event of which your letter of October the 20th had given me ominous foreboding. Tried myself in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection which can rive the human heart, I know well, and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to endure. The same trials have taught me that for ills so immeasurable, time and silence are the only medicine. I will not, therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours, will I say a word more where words are vain, but that it is of some comfort to us both, that the term is not very distant, at which we are to deposit in the same cerement, our sorrows and suffering bodies, and to ascend in essence to an ecstatic meeting with the friends we have loved and lost, and whom we shall still love and never lose again. God bless you and support you under your heavy affliction.

If Jefferson is correct, what might we expect regarding the coming days for Adams?

Possible Answers:

They will get better slowly

They will help Adams to understand the meaning of loss

They will improve surprisingly fast

They will be difficult

None of the other answer choices are correct.

Correct answer:

They will be difficult

Explanation:

Although we might guess many things about the coming days for Adams, do not "overshoot the mark." He may learn many lessons through is suffering, but this cannot be inferred from the passage. Likewise, there is nothing in the passage guaranteeing the length of time that this recovery will take. Instead, Jefferson implies that there are more griefs to come, particularly when he says, "I know well, and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to end." He does speak of the consolation that will come in the not too distant future from being likewise "deposit[ed] in the same cerement." However, that event will end Adams' days. While his days last, we can only say that there will be pain—though the duration and depth are somewhat open to interpretation.

Example Question #53 : Making Inferences And Predictions In Literature Passages

Adapted from Aristotle's Politics: A Treatise on Government by Aristotle (trans. Ellis 1895)

Now with respect to these honors, which he proposes to bestow on those who can give any information useful to the community, this, though very pleasing in speculation, is what the legislator should not settle, for it would encourage informers, and probably occasion commotions in the state. And this proposal of his gives rise also to further conjectures and inquiries; for some persons have doubted whether it is useful or hurtful to alter the established law of any country, if even for the better.  We cannot immediately determine upon what he here says, whether it is advantageous to alter the law or not. We know, indeed, that it is possible to propose to new model both the laws and government as a common good.  Since we have mentioned this subject, it may be very proper to enter into a few particulars concerning it, for it contains some difficulties, as I have already said, and it may appear better to alter them, since it has been found useful in other sciences.

What can we say about the underlined "he" mentioned in the passage's first sentence?

Possible Answers:

The person is someone who has made a proposition regarding political matters.

None of the other answer choices is correct.

The person is an informant for a certain government.

The person has long been in dialogue with Aristotle.

The person's views are quite contested in Athens.

Correct answer:

The person is someone who has made a proposition regarding political matters.

Explanation:

The most basic answer is the best answer for this question. From the context, we can tell that Aristotle is interacting with a particular idea or set of political proposals, namely those pertaining to a certain manner of giving honors. We are not told that the person proposing them is someone deserving of such "honors for information." The only thing we know is that he has "proposed" the idea. Thus, he is likely a thinker making propositions, nothing else—as far as we can tell.

Example Question #61 : Textual Relationships In Literature Passages

Adapted from Aristotle's Politics: A Treatise on Government by Aristotle (trans. Ellis 1895)

Now with respect to these honors, which he proposes to bestow on those who can give any information useful to the community, this, though very pleasing in speculation, is what the legislator should not settle, for it would encourage informers, and probably occasion commotions in the state. And this proposal of his gives rise also to further conjectures and inquiries; for some persons have doubted whether it is useful or hurtful to alter the established law of any country, if even for the better.  We cannot immediately determine upon what he here says, whether it is advantageous to alter the law or not. We know, indeed, that it is possible to propose to new model both the laws and government as a common good.  Since we have mentioned this subject, it may be very proper to enter into a few particulars concerning it, for it contains some difficulties, as I have already said, and it may appear better to alter them, since it has been found useful in other sciences.

If Aristotle were to explore a comparison in the section that follows this selection, what would he most likely compare and contrast?

Possible Answers:

The peace of some societies versus others

The views of others that are contrasted with his own

None of the other answer choices is correct.

The benefits and ills of informers in governmental positions

Progress in the arts and in laws

Correct answer:

Progress in the arts and in laws

Explanation:

In the middle of the paragraph, Aristotle mentions the problem of changing laws in a country. He states, "Some persons have doubted whether it is useful or hurtful to alter the established law of any country." He says that this is a difficult subject, so some particular points should be considered. It may even appear better to alter them, especially given that progress and alteration has been helpful in "other sciences." We can expect him to compare and contrast progress and change in laws with those found in other sciences. This would be an investigation into the particulars of which he speaks.

Example Question #4 : Extrapolating From The Text In Literary Fiction Passages

Adapted from Candide by Voltaire (1918 trans.)

"Grandeur," said Pangloss, "is extremely dangerous according to the testimony of philosophers. For, in short, Eglon, King of Moab, was assassinated by Ehud; Absalom was hung by his hair, and pierced with three darts; King Nadab, the son of Jeroboam, was killed by Baasa; King Ela by Zimri; Ahaziah by Jehu; Athaliah by Jehoiada; the Kings Jehoiakim, Jeconiah, and Zedekiah, were led into captivity. You know how perished Croesus, Astyages, Darius, Dionysius of Syracuse, Pyrrhus, Perseus, Hannibal, Jugurtha, Ariovistus, Cæsar, Pompey, Nero, Otho, Vitellius, Domitian, Richard II of England, Edward II, Henry VI, Richard III, Mary Stuart, Charles I, the three Henrys of France, the Emperor Henry IV! You know—" 

"I know also," said Candide, "that we must cultivate our garden." 

"You are right," said Pangloss, "for when man was first placed in the Garden of Eden, he was put there ut operaretur eum, that he might cultivate it; which shows that man was not born to be idle." 

"Let us work," said Martin, "without disputing; it is the only way to render life tolerable.”

The whole little society entered into this laudable design, according to their different abilities. Their little plot of land produced plentiful crops. Cunegonde was, indeed, very ugly, but she became an excellent pastry cook; Paquette worked at embroidery; the old woman looked after the linen. They were all, not excepting Friar Giroflée, of some service or other; for he made a good joiner, and became a very honest man.

Pangloss sometimes said to Candide: "There is a concatenation of events in this best of all possible worlds; for if you had not been kicked out of a magnificent castle for love of Miss Cunegonde, if you had not been put into the Inquisition, if you had not walked over America, if you had not stabbed the Baron, if you had not lost all your sheep from the fine country of El Dorado, you would not be here eating preserved citrons and pistachio-nuts."

"All that is very well," answered Candide, "but let us cultivate our garden."

What can we infer about Candide’s character from this passage?

Possible Answers:

That he only says one thing, over and over

That he has always been a gardener

That he prefers a quiet life to one that is overwhelmed with complexities

That he is disrespectful of Pangloss' clear authority

That gardening is the most important thing in his life

Correct answer:

That he prefers a quiet life to one that is overwhelmed with complexities

Explanation:

Candide keeps speaking about the "garden" and its cultivation because he (like Martin) wants to avoid the arguments and discussions that arise from complexities like those expressed by Pangloss. Instead, he would like them to work in their garden and make a little society in peace.

Example Question #2 : Making Inferences And Predictions In Literature Passages

Adapted from Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson (1883)

He was a very silent man by custom. All day he hung round the cove or upon the cliffs with a brass telescope; all evening he sat in a corner of the parlor next the fire and drank rum and water very strong. Mostly he would not speak when spoken to, only look up sudden and fierce and blow through his nose like a fog-horn; and we and the people who came about our house soon learned to let him be. Every day when he came back from his stroll he would ask if any seafaring men had gone by along the road. At first we thought it was the want of company of his own kind that made him ask this question, but at last we began to see he was desirous to avoid them. When a seaman did put up at the Admiral Benbow (as now and then some did, making by the coast road for Bristol) he would look in at him through the curtained door before he entered the parlor; and he was always sure to be as silent as a mouse when any such was present. For me, at least, there was no secret about the matter, for I was, in a way, a sharer in his alarms. He had taken me aside one day and promised me a silver fourpenny on the first of every month if I would only keep my "weather-eye open for a seafaring man with one leg" and let him know the moment he appeared. Often enough when the first of the month came round and I applied to him for my wage, he would only blow through his nose at me and stare me down, but before the week was out he was sure to think better of it, bring me my four-penny piece, and repeat his orders to look out for "the seafaring man with one leg.”

How that personage haunted my dreams, I need scarcely tell you. I would see him in a thousand forms, and with a thousand diabolical expressions. Now the leg would be cut off at the knee, now at the hip; now he was a monstrous kind of a creature who had never had but the one leg, and that in the middle of his body. To see him leap and run and pursue me over hedge and ditch was the worst of nightmares. And altogether I paid pretty dear for my monthly fourpenny piece, in the shape of these abominable fancies.

 Based on this passage, what can we predict is likely to happen later in the story?

Possible Answers:

The man with one leg will show up.

The narrator will go deaf.

The narrator will tell the man who is paying him the monthly fourpenny piece that his work isn’t worth that much money.

The man described at the beginning of the first paragraph will suddenly become friendly and sociable.

The narrator will run away from home.

Correct answer:

The man with one leg will show up.

Explanation:

Let’s consider what happens in each paragraph of the passage. In the first paragraph, a man is described, and we can tell that he is eager to avoid seafaring men. He pays the narrator to watch out for the man with one leg. The narrator then has nightmares about the man with one leg. Based on these events, it is reasonable to predict that the man with one leg might show up later in the story, as the man described in the first paragraph is paranoid and paying people to let him know if he shows up. None of the other answer choices are supported by the passage.

Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors