All HSPT Verbal Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #11 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Translations rarely are faithful to their original texts. Poets become enraged when their texts are significantly altered. Peter’s latest poetry was translated from English into French. Which of the following is true?
Peter hates translations.
Peter's native tongue is English.
Peter might be angry.
Peter is angry.
Peter is a translator.
Peter might be angry.
Based on the information that we are provided, we can say nothing about Peter's general attitude to translations, nor his native tongue. While translations are rarely faithful to original texts, this does not mean that they always are unfaithful. Because of this, we can say that there is a decent likelihood that the translation of Peter's poetry caused him to be angered; however, we cannot go so far as to say that it must have done so. Perhaps this translation was faithful.
Example Question #12 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
All briars are painful bushes. All painful bushes are always avoided. Bob saw a briar. Which of the following is true?
None of the other answers
Bob might have decided to touch the briar.
Bob avoided the briar.
Bob was in great pain.
Bob avoided the briar.
At least based on the information that we are given, we must say that all painful bushes are avoided. (Remember, follow the argument formally, not necessarily common sense. This is only a matter of logical form). If Bob saw a briar, we can also say that he saw a painful bush. Since he saw a painful bush, he must have avoided it (since all such bushes are always avoided). Thus, the answer to this question is, "Bob avoided the briar."
Example Question #13 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Brandon thinks most tablecloths are ugly. The sight of ugly things depresses Brandon. Maria gave Brandon a new tablecloth as a gift. Which of the following is true?
Brandon is likely to be depressed.
Brandon will probably be fine and happy.
Maria is very inconsiderate.
Brandon hates tablecloths.
Brandon is quite depressed.
Brandon is likely to be depressed.
Since Brandon thinks that most tablecloths are ugly, there is at least a good chance that Maria's gift will be deemed ugly by Brandon. It is not guaranteed, so we cannot state that he will necessarily believe it to be ugly. Since we are told that the sight of ugly things makes Brandon depressed, the reception of a tablecloth risks Brandon seeing an ugly thing and hence becoming depressed; therefore, the best we can say (among the answers provided, at least) is that Brandon is likely to be depressed.
Example Question #14 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
All refineries are profitable businesses. All profitable businesses pay a lot of taxes. The new plant at Ralton is profitable. Which of the following is true?
The new plant will become a refinery.
The new plant might pay a lot of taxes.
The new plant pays a lot of taxes.
The new plant is a refinery.
None of the other answers
The new plant pays a lot of taxes.
Do not be fooled by this simple question. While all refineries are profitable, we cannot say that all profitable things are refineries. Thus, while the new plant at Ralton is profitable, we have no idea what kind of plant it is. The best we can say is that it will pay a lot of taxes (at least based on the information with which we have been provided). All of the other answers either infer too much or are indeed quite off the mark.
Example Question #15 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
William is taller than Sally. Peter is taller than William. Henry is shorter than William. Which of the following is true?
Peter is taller than Sally.
None of the other answers
Sally is taller than Peter.
Sally is shorter than Harry.
Harry is shorter than Sally.
Peter is taller than Sally.
Since Peter is taller than William, who is taller than Sally, we can say that Peter is taller than Sally. We can say nothing at all about Henry's height in comparison with that of Sally. We can say that he is shorter than William and Peter (since William is shorter than Peter). Beyond that, we can say nothing more specific.
Example Question #16 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Larry loves to write computer programs at night. When he is awake late, Larry drinks soda. Larry loves what he is doing right now. Which of the following is true?
Larry is probably programming.
Larry is not drinking any soda.
Larry is drinking soda.
Larry is programming.
None of the other answers
None of the other answers
Although we are told that Larry loves to program at night, we are not told that this is the only thing that he loves to do; therefore, when we are told that he loves what he is doing right now, we cannot conclude that he is programming at night. Likewise, we can say nothing about his soda consumption—one way or the other. While we cannot say that he is drinking soda at night, we likewise cannot say that he is not drinking soda. Perhaps he loves going to the movies and is doing that right now—all the while gulping down a large soda.
Example Question #17 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Some men are strong. A few strong men are able to smash bricks with their heads. Luca is a man. Which of the following is most likely to be true?
Luca can smash bricks with his head.
Luca is likely to be able to smash bricks with his head.
None of the other answers
Luca is strong.
Luca might be strong.
Luca might be strong.
Since we know both that some men are strong and that Luca is a man, we can say that there is a chance that Luca is strong. Now, if he is strong, there is a slim likelyhood that he will be able to smash bricks with his head; however, note that this is a rarity based upon a mere probability (some men, a few strong). We cannot say much with certainty regarding Luca's strength. Still, we can at least admit that he is potentially strong.
Example Question #18 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Allen spent more at the store than Sally. Sally always outspends Jim at the store. Malinda always spends twice what Sally spends. Which of the following is true?
Malinda spent less than Allen.
Jim spent more than Allen.
Malinda spent more than Allen.
Jim spent less than Malinda.
Jim spent more than Malinda.
Jim spent less than Malinda.
Let us rewrite this question in quasi-mathematical terms. The following is certain:
Allen > Sally > Jim
However, regarding Malinda, we do not know if her doubling of Sally's expenditure is necessarily more than that of Allen's or less. Perhaps Allen spent five times what Sally did. Perhaps Allen does indeed spend less than Malinda. We are not told! Thus, the most that we can say is that Jim spent less than Malinda. Perhaps this is a boring conclusion, but logic requires us to conclude in this way!
Example Question #19 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
Lazy people often sleep late into the day. If you generally sleep late into the day, you will almost always run the risk of being unproductive. Lawrence is a lazy person. Which of the following is most correct?
Lawrence sometimes is productive.
Lawrence gets up late.
Lawrence is potentially unproductive.
Lawrence is unproductive.
Lawrence will be regularly productive.
Lawrence is potentially unproductive.
We cannot be too strong in our claim regarding Lawrence, for he neither necessarily sleeps in late nor is he necessarily unproductive (given the information here, at least). Still, it is asserted that often lazy people sleep in, and that people who sleep in almost always run the risk of unproductivity. Thus, it is fair to say that Lawrence does risk being unproductive, even if we are not sure whether or not he necessarily is so.
Example Question #20 : Drawing Logical Conclusions
No cars run on potatoes. All potato-based vehicles move slowly. Which of the following holds?
Cars could run on potatoes.
None of the others
Cars run quickly.
Potato-based vehicles must be supplemented by other fuels.
Cars run slowly.
None of the others
You cannot reach any of the specific conclusions provided here. We are told nothing about the possibility of cars running on potatoes. Perhaps they would run so slowly that it would cause traffic problems. Maybe only ships use potatoes. We just cannot say, given our limited information. Likewise, we cannot say anything about potato-based vehicles other than the fact that they are slow. Nothing can be said about the speed of cars, given the information that we have.