GMAT Verbal : Sentence Correction
Study concepts, example questions & explanations for GMAT Verbal
All GMAT Verbal Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #1 : Correcting Interrupting Phrase Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English. One of the answer choices reproduces the underlined portion as it is written in the sentence.
For Kant, ever the optimist moral progress within a community is almost inevitable.
For Kant ever the optimist moral progress
For Kant ever the optimist, moral progress
For Kant, ever the optimist moral progress
For Kant (ever the optimist moral) progress
For Kant—ever the optimist—moral progress
For Kant—ever the optimist—moral progress
In formal written English, em-dashes (—) or commas are used to set off interrupting phrases. Commas would also be correct if used to set apart the phrase "ever the optimist," but that option is not provided as an answer choice, so the option that uses em-dashes to set apart the phrase is the correct answer.
Example Question #244 : Correcting Phrase, Clause, And Sentence Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
William McKinley, who served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, and he was re-elected for his second term as president in 1900.
William McKinley served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, and he was re-elected
William McKinley, who served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, was re-elected
William McKinley, who served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, and he was re-elected
William McKinley: who served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, was re-elected
William McKinley, served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, was re-elected
William McKinley, who served on the side of the Union in the Civil War, was re-elected
The relative clause beginning with "who served..." modifies William McKinley. This modifying phrase should be offset by two commas. The verb "was" is the predicate of the sentence - if you remove the modifying clause, you get "William McKinley was re-elected." This is correct, over "William McKinley and he was re-elected." Interrupting phrases should be able to be removed, and still leave a grammatically correct sentence behind.
Example Question #1 : Correcting Modifier Placement Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
For the last decade, the city has had more tourists every single year.
the city has had more tourists every single year.
the city has had more tourists each single year.
the city having had more tourists every single year.
the city has had more tourists every single year than the year before.
the city has had more tourists coming every single year.
the city has had more tourists every single year than the year before.
The sentence as written is awkward, making it seem as though some unspecified amount of tourists are arriving "every single year." The exact comparison being made by "more" must be made explicit. The only answer choice that clears up this confusion is "the city has had more tourists every single year than the year before."
Example Question #1 : Correcting Modifier Placement Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
A majority of the electorate believes that policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people at the national level.
A majority of the electorate believe that national policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people.
A majority of the electorate believe that policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people at the national level.
A majority of the electorate believes that policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people at the national level.
A majority of the electorate believes that national policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people.
A majority of the electorate, at the national level, believes that policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people.
A majority of the electorate believes that national policy directives have little to no impact on the day-to-day lives of the people.
A majority is singular, so the verb "to believe" must agree with that verb form. Additionally, there is an ambiguous modifier at the end of the sentence. "National level" refers to policy, not people; therefore, it must be placed next to "policy," the noun that it modifies.
Example Question #2 : Correcting Ambiguous Modifier Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Working overtime to produce their first issue, the newspaper was instantly acclaimed as a successful venture in the publishing field.
Working overtime to produce their first issue
Working overtime in producing their first issue
Having worked overtime to produce their first issue
Working overtime to produce the first issue
With its staff working overtime to produce the first issue
With its staff working overtime to produce the first issue
As constructed, the sentence reads that the "newspaper," an inanimate object, is what is working overtime, rather than the individuals actually putting in the work. The phrase needs to be reworked to show what is actually working. "With its staff working overtime to produce the first issue" is the only answer choice that makes the correct change.
Example Question #3 : Correcting Ambiguous Modifier Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Gerald fumbled with his papers, apologized to his coworkers, and replaced them on his podium.
replacing them on his podium.
then replaced them on his podium.
and replaced it on his podium.
and replaced those on his podium.
and replaced the papers on his podium.
and replaced the papers on his podium.
The example sentence is unclear because the pronoun "them" has an unclear antecedent. In the example, "them" could refer either to the coworkers or the papers, and is therefore ambiguous. The correction would be simply to specify that it is "the papers" that are being replaced.
Example Question #2 : Correcting Ambiguous Modifier Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Our supervisor instructed us to strictly keep track of the time we spent away from our desks.
strictly instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our desks.
strictly instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our desks.
instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our strictly desks.
instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our desks strictly.
instructed us to keep strictly track of the time we spent away from our desks.
strictly instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our desks.
The example sentence includes an ambiguous modifier. In the example sentence, "strictly" is not placed close enough to the verb it modifies, and is thus it is impossible to know whether the supervisor gave his instruction "strictly" (meaning in a strict manner), or whether he or she was providing a restriction on what the employees kept track of (i.e. to keep track "strictly" meaning only of the time spent away from their desks). The best correction here would be to move "strictly" closer to "instructed," making it clear that the manner of instruction is being modified. The correct version of the sentence reads, "Our supervisor strictly instructed us to keep track of the time we spent away from our desks."
Example Question #1447 : Sentence Correction
The President told us gleefully to greet the ambassadors.
Which option best replaces the underlined sentence?
The President told us (gleefully) to greet the ambassadors.
The President gleefully told us to gleefully greet the ambassadors.
The President told us gleefully to greet the ambassadors.
The President gleefully told us to greet the ambassadors.
The President told us to greet the gleefully ambassadors.
The President gleefully told us to greet the ambassadors.
In the original sentence, "gleefully" is an ambiguous modifier. Is the President gleeful when giving his orders to the group, or is he telling the group to themselves be gleeful when they greet the ambassadors? The correct answer shifts the word to make things clearer. All of the other options have errors of their own.
Example Question #2 : Correcting Ambiguous Modifier Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English. One of the answer choices reproduces the underlined portion as it is written in the sentence.
The congressmen conferred quietly in the cloakroom wearing patriotic pins.
quietly conferred in the cloakroom wearing patriotic pins
conferred quietly in the cloakroom, wearing patriotic pins
wearing patriotic pins conferred quietly in the cloakroom
wearing patriotic pins, conferred quietly in the cloakroom
conferred quietly in the cloakroom wearing patriotic pins
wearing patriotic pins conferred quietly in the cloakroom
“Wearing patriotic pins” modifies the noun “congressman” not “cloakroom”; therefore, it must be placed directly after the word “congressmen.”
Example Question #1 : Correcting Dangling Modifier Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Thomas Jefferson, the muted public speaker, was quite different from Thomas Jefferson, the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence.
Jefferson, the muted public speaker, was quite different from Thomas Jefferson, the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence
Jefferson the muted public speaker was quite different from Thomas Jefferson the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence
Jefferson the muted public speaker and firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence was quite different
Jefferson, the muted public speaker, and Thomas Jefferson, the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence, was quite different
Jefferson, the muted public speaker, and Thomas Jefferson, the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence, were quite different
Jefferson the muted public speaker was quite different from Thomas Jefferson the firebrand author of the Declaration of Independence
When appositive clauses are required to understand the meaning of a sentence, they should not be surrounded by commas. In this case, the sentence does not make sense if you remove the appositive clauses, so they should not be surrounded by commas.
All GMAT Verbal Resources
