AP US Government : Court Cases

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for AP US Government

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

Example Questions

Example Question #5 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines established that __________.

Possible Answers:

accused individuals must be reminded of their rights by arresting police officers

The First Amendment applies to the rights of students in American public schools as long as those rights do not distract from educational purposes

speech intended to instill fear is unconstitutional

the internment of certain individuals is permissible during war if those individuals represent a threat to the security of the rest of the population

a lawyer must be provided by the state or local government if an individual is unable or unwilling to pay for one

Correct answer:

The First Amendment applies to the rights of students in American public schools as long as those rights do not distract from educational purposes

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), centered around several school children from the Tinker family who wore black wristbands to school to show solidarity for the end of the Vietnam War. Those students were suspended by the school, and their case eventually came before the Supreme Court of The United States. The Court ruled that schools could not violate the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and expression of students in public schools unless those rights constituted an overt distraction from educational pursuits.

Example Question #2 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

The Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke __________.

Possible Answers:

prohibited same-sex marriage throughout the union

upheld the right of private citizens to sue the United States government in court

abolished the right of public schools to hold mandatory prayer sessions

reaffirmed the constitutionality of affirmative action as it applies to college admissions

established that the Bill of Rights applies equally to the states as it does to the Federal government

Correct answer:

reaffirmed the constitutionality of affirmative action as it applies to college admissions

Explanation:

In the Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), reaffirmed that affirmative action was constitutional, particularly as it applies to college admissions, although the court did also rule that setting aside a specific quota for minority students was not permissible. It helped define what exactly constitutes legal affirmative action and what does not.

Example Question #1 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

Which Supreme Court case states that unions and other nonprofit organizations can spend unlimited amounts of money promoting their political views in specific, independent, circumstances?

Possible Answers:

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

Buckley v. Valeo

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Johnson v. Texas

Lemon v. Kurtzman

Correct answer:

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), ruled that the First Amendment prohibits the United States government from preventing unions and nonprofit organizations from funding the promotion of their political views. The case centered around the lobby group, Citizens United, and its attempts to publish a propaganda video that was critical of Hillary Clinton.

Example Question #3 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

Which of these Supreme Court cases required each state to draw its congressional districts so they are approximately equal in population size?

Possible Answers:

Chimel v. California

Illinois v. Gates

United States v. Ross

Wesberry v. Sanders

Gibbons v. Ogden

Correct answer:

Wesberry v. Sanders

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Wesberry v. Sanders (1964), ruled that each state had to draw its congressional districts so that the were roughly equal in population distribution. The Court ruled that there was sufficient language in the Constitution that each individual should have fair and equal representation to justify the ruling.

Example Question #1001 : Ap Us Government

The Supreme Court case, New York Times v. Sullivan __________.

Possible Answers:

centered around the reactionary response to the Civil Rights movement and reinforced segregation in the South

established the legal precedent that a public official could not sue a media organization for reporting a mistake made by the public official

undermined the Freedom of the press established in the First Amendment and severely weakened the ability of newspapers to carry out investigative journalism without fear of reprisal

made it harder for public officials to bring cases of libel against the press and expanded the scope of the First Amendment protection of Freedom of the Press

guaranteed the right of a defendant to legal counsel and an attorney, as well as expanding on the rights assured under the Fourteenth Amendment

Correct answer:

made it harder for public officials to bring cases of libel against the press and expanded the scope of the First Amendment protection of Freedom of the Press

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), involved a police officer (Sullivan) suing the New York Times for publishing inaccurate and misleading information. The Supreme Court overturned the ruling of the lower courts and found in favor of the New York Times. The case established that, for a libel charge to be brought against a media organization or individual, it had to be proved that the inaccurate comments were not just a mistake, but were deliberately malicious. This greatly expanded the scope of the First Amendment protection of Freedom of the Press.

Example Question #1002 : Ap Us Government

Which Supreme Court case established that Congress could not ban slavery in a territory?

Possible Answers:

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Lawrence v. Texas

Brown v. Board of Education

New York Times v. Sullivan

Plessy v. Ferguson

Correct answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), was a very important court ruling of the Nineteenth Century. It not only established that Congress could not ban slavery in the territory it also ruled that African-Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be American citizens and therefore did not even have the right to bring a case before the Supreme Court. It was the intention of the Court, led by Chief Justice Taney, to end the question of slavery expansion into the territories that threatened to divide the United States in two. Ultimately the court case provoked such a vehement reaction in the North, especially among the Republican party, that the differences between the two sides were only further entrenched.

Example Question #13 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

The Supreme Court case, Lawrence v. Texas established that __________.

Possible Answers:

same-sex relationships were not protected under the Constitution

states were free to decide the issue of abortion for themselves

abortion should be legalized throughout the United States

Creationism and evolution theory should be treated with equal respect and attention in the classroom

states could make no laws regarding the legality of same-sex relationships

Correct answer:

states could make no laws regarding the legality of same-sex relationships

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Lawrence v. Texas (2003), established that states have no right to make laws regarding the legality of same-sex relationships. It essentially legalized all forms of same-sex relationships across the nation in one-stroke and perhaps paved the way to the current marriage equality reform that is sweeping across the United States.

Example Question #11 : Impact Of Notable Court Cases

The Supreme Court case, Barron v. Baltimore determined that __________.

Possible Answers:

the Federal government has no right to intervene in intrastate commerce

the Bill of Rights applied equally to Federal and State governments

the Federal government cannot involve itself in the establishment of a state religion

the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply universally to all citizens of the United States

the Bill of Rights only applied to the Federal government and could not be universally applied to laws issued by states

Correct answer:

the Bill of Rights only applied to the Federal government and could not be universally applied to laws issued by states

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case, Barron v. Baltimore, occurred in 1833. In this case, the Court established that the Bill of Rights, specifically the Fifth Amendment, did not apply to states.

Example Question #1011 : Ap Us Government

The Supreme Court case, Engel v. Vitale, established that __________.

Possible Answers:

it is unconstitutional for a state to force public school students to recite prayer in the classroom

all religions should be equally protected under the First Amendment

it is unconstitutional for the President to try to expand the size of the judiciary for political reasons

there should be an official two-term limit for all Presidents

abortion should be legal

Correct answer:

it is unconstitutional for a state to force public school students to recite prayer in the classroom

Explanation:

Engel v. Vitale (1962) established that it was a violation of the First Amendment for a state or an organization to require students in a public school to recite a prayer that favored one religion over another.

Example Question #1012 : Ap Us Government

The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland __________.

Possible Answers:

upheld the right of the Federal government to create a national bank

established the right of Congress to regulate interstate commerce

undermined the concept of judicial review

overturned the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson

legalized abortion

Correct answer:

upheld the right of the Federal government to create a national bank

Explanation:

The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) upheld the Federal government's right to create a national bank. The case is related to the implied powers, or loose constructionist, interpretation of the Constitution. Essentially, this interpretation grants the government powers that are not specifically outlined in the Constitution.

Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors