All AP English Literature Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #2 : Analyzing Sequence In Prose Fiction Passages
Adapted from The Confidence-Man: His Masquerade by Herman Melville (1857)
At sunrise on a first of April, there appeared suddenly a man in cream-colors at the water-side in the city of St. Louis.
His cheek was fair, his chin downy, his hair flaxen, his hat a white fur one, with a long fleecy nap. He had neither trunk, valise, carpet-bag, nor parcel. No porter followed him. He was unaccompanied by friends. From the shrugged shoulders, titters, whispers, wonderings of the crowd, it was plain that he was, in the extremest sense of the word, a stranger.
In the same moment with his advent, he stepped aboard the favorite steamer Fidèle, on the point of starting for New Orleans. Stared at, but unsaluted, with the air of one neither courting nor shunning regard, but evenly pursuing the path of duty, lead it through solitudes or cities, he held on his way along the lower deck until he chanced to come to a placard nigh the captain's office, offering a reward for the capture of a mysterious impostor, supposed to have recently arrived from the East; quite an original genius in his vocation, as would appear, though wherein his originality consisted was not clearly given; but what purported to be a careful description of his person followed.
As if it had been a theatre-bill, crowds were gathered about the announcement, and among them certain chevaliers, whose eyes, it was plain, were on the capitals, or, at least, earnestly seeking sight of them from behind intervening coats; but as for their fingers, they were enveloped in some myth; though, during a chance interval, one of these chevaliers somewhat showed his hand in purchasing from another chevalier, ex-officio a peddler of money-belts, one of his popular safe-guards, while another peddler, who was still another versatile chevalier, hawked, in the thick of the throng, the lives of Measan, the bandit of Ohio, Murrel, the pirate of the Mississippi, and the brothers Harpe, the Thugs of the Green River country, in Kentucky—creatures, with others of the sort, one and all exterminated at the time, and for the most part, like the hunted generations of wolves in the same regions, leaving comparatively few successors; which would seem cause for unalloyed gratulation, and is such to all except those who think that in new countries, where the wolves are killed off, the foxes increase.
Pausing at this spot, the stranger so far succeeded in threading his way, as at last to plant himself just beside the placard, when, producing a small slate and tracing some words upon if, he held it up before him on a level with the placard, so that they who read the one might read the other. The words were these:—
"Charity thinketh no evil.”
Which of the following happens first in this passage?
One man sells another a money-belt.
The man in cream-colors boards a steamboat.
The man in cream-colors writes on a slate.
The man in cream-colors approaches the placard by the captain’s office.
A peddler attempts to sell books about con men and thieves.
The man in cream-colors boards a steamboat.
Figuring out what happens first may look like a challenge, but moving paragraph by paragraph can help you figure this out. The first paragraph describes how “there appeared suddenly a man in cream-colors at the water-side in the city of St. Louis.” In the second paragraph, this man boards a steamboat. Then, the man approaches the placard by the captain’s office, where one man sells another a money-belt and a peddler attempts to sell books about con men and thieves. Finally, the man in cream-colors writes on a slate. So, the correct answer is that “the man in cream-colors boards a steamboat.” Given that the rest of the actions take place on board the steamboat, it makes sense that the man in cream-colors boards the steamboat before any of the other events take place.
Example Question #31 : Summarizing Or Describing The Passage
Adapted from The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain (1876)
In the fullness of time the interesting occasion arrived. At eight in the evening the schoolhouse was brilliantly lighted, and adorned with wreaths and festoons of foliage and flowers. The master sat throned in his great chair upon a raised platform, with his blackboard behind him. He was looking tolerably mellow. Three rows of benches on each side and six rows in front of him were occupied by the dignitaries of the town and by the parents of the pupils. To his left, back of the rows of citizens, was a spacious temporary platform upon which were seated the scholars who were to take part in the exercises of the evening; rows of small boys, washed and dressed to an intolerable state of discomfort; rows of gawky big boys; snowbanks of girls and young ladies clad in lawn and muslin and conspicuously conscious of their bare arms, their grandmothers' ancient trinkets, their bits of pink and blue ribbon and the flowers in their hair. All the rest of the house was filled with non-participating scholars.
The exercises began. A very little boy stood up and sheepishly recited, "You'd scarce expect one of my age to speak in public on the stage," etc.—accompanying himself with the painfully exact and spasmodic gestures that a machine might have used—supposing the machine to be a trifle out of order. But he got through safely, though cruelly scared, and got a fine round of applause when he made his manufactured bow and retired.
A little shamefaced girl lisped, "Mary had a little lamb," etc., performed a compassion-inspiring curtsy, got her meed of applause, and sat down flushed and happy.
Tom Sawyer stepped forward with conceited confidence and soared into the unquenchable and indestructible "Give me liberty or give me death" speech, with fine fury and frantic gesticulation, and broke down in the middle of it. A ghastly stage-fright seized him, his legs quaked under him and he was like to choke. True, he had the manifest sympathy of the house, but he had the house's silence, too, which was even worse than its sympathy. The master frowned, and this completed the disaster. Tom struggled a while and then retired, utterly defeated. There was a weak attempt at applause, but it died early.
"The Boy Stood on the Burning Deck" followed; also "The Assyrian Came Down," and other declamatory gems. Then there were reading exercises, and a spelling fight. The meager Latin class recited with honor. The prime feature of the evening was in order, now—original "compositions" by the young ladies. Each in her turn stepped forward to the edge of the platform, cleared her throat, held up her manuscript (tied with dainty ribbon), and proceeded to read, with labored attention to "expression" and punctuation. The themes were the same that had been illuminated upon similar occasions by their mothers before them, their grandmothers, and doubtless all their ancestors in the female line clear back to the Crusades. "Friendship" was one; "Memories of Other Days"; "Religion in History"; "Dream Land"; "The Advantages of Culture"; "Forms of Political Government Compared and Contrasted"; "Melancholy"; "Filial Love"; "Heart Longings," etc., etc.
A prevalent feature in these compositions was a nursed and petted melancholy; another was a wasteful and opulent gush of "fine language"; another was a tendency to lug in by the ears particularly prized words and phrases until they were worn entirely out; and a peculiarity that conspicuously marked and marred them was the inveterate and intolerable sermon that wagged its crippled tail at the end of each and every one of them. No matter what the subject might be, a brainracking effort was made to squirm it into some aspect or other that the moral and religious mind could contemplate with edification. The glaring insincerity of these sermons was not sufficient to compass the banishment of the fashion from the schools, and it is not sufficient today; it never will be sufficient while the world stands, perhaps. There is no school in all our land where the young ladies do not feel obliged to close their compositions with a sermon; and you will find that the sermon of the most frivolous and the least religious girl in the school is always the longest and the most relentlessly pious. But enough of this. Homely truth is unpalatable.
Based on the passage, with which of the following statements would the author be most likely to agree?
Children should always be clean and tidy in appearance.
School performances are always edifying for the community.
Excessive religiosity is often a sign of superficiality.
Tom Sawyer's performance was better than that of the other students.
Original student compositions are more interesting than reading exercises.
Excessive religiosity is often a sign of superficiality.
The correct answer is "excessive religiosity is often a sign of superficiality." The reader can infer that the author is most likely to agree with this statement based on his discussion of the practice of sermonizing in student compositions that appears towards the end of the passage.
Example Question #32 : Interpreting The Passage
Adapted from An Ideal Husband by Oscar Wilde (1894)
Mrs. Cheveley: Except their husbands. That is the one thing the modern woman never understands.
Lady Markby: And a very good thing too, dear, I dare say. It might break up many a happy home if they did. Not yours, I need hardly say, Gertrude. You have married a pattern husband. I wish I could say as much for myself. But since Sir John has taken to attending the debates regularly, which he never used to do in the good old days, his language has become quite impossible. He always seems to think that he is addressing the House, and consequently whenever he discusses the state of the agricultural laborer, or the Welsh Church, or something quite improper of that kind, I am obliged to send all the servants out of the room. It is not pleasant to see one’s own butler, who has been with one for twenty-three years, actually blushing at the side-board, and the footmen making contortions in corners like persons in circuses. I assure you my life will be quite ruined unless they send John at once to the Upper House. He won’t take any interest in politics then, will he? The House of Lords is so sensible. An assembly of gentlemen. But in his present state, Sir John is really a great trial. Why, this morning before breakfast was half over, he stood up on the hearthrug, put his hands in his pockets, and appealed to the country at the top of his voice. I left the table as soon as I had my second cup of tea, I need hardly say. But his violent language could be heard all over the house! I trust, Gertrude, that Sir Robert is not like that?
Lady Chiltern: But I am very much interested in politics, Lady Markby. I love to hear Robert talk about them.
Lady Markby: Well, I hope he is not as devoted to Blue Books as Sir John is. I don’t think they can be quite improving reading for any one.
Mrs. Cheveley: [Languidly.] I have never read a Blue Book. I prefer books . . . in yellow covers.
Lady Markby: [Genially unconscious.] Yellow is a gayer color, is it not? I used to wear yellow a good deal in my early days, and would do so now if Sir John was not so painfully personal in his observations, and a man on the question of dress is always ridiculous, is he not?
Mrs. Cheveley: Oh, no! I think men are the only authorities on dress.
Lady Markby: Really? One wouldn’t say so from the sort of hats they wear? Would one?
[The butler enters, followed by the footman. Tea is set on a small table close to Lady Chiltern.]
Lady Chiltern: May I give you some tea, Mrs. Cheveley?
Mrs. Cheveley: Thanks. [The butler hands Mrs. Cheveley a cup of tea on a salver.]
Lady Chiltern: Some tea, Lady Markby?
Lady Markby: No thanks, dear. [The servants go out.] The fact is, I have promised to go round for ten minutes to see poor Lady Brancaster, who is in very great trouble. Her daughter, quite a well-brought-up girl, too, has actually become engaged to be married to a curate in Shropshire. It is very sad, very sad indeed. I can’t understand this modern mania for curates. In my time we girls saw them, of course, running about the place like rabbits. But we never took any notice of them, I need hardly say. But I am told that nowadays country society is quite honeycombed with them. I think it most irreligious. And then the eldest son has quarreled with his father, and it is said that when they meet at the club Lord Brancaster always hides himself behind the money article in The Times. However, I believe that is quite a common occurrence nowadays and that they have to take in extra copies of The Times at all the clubs in St. James’s Street; there are so many sons who won’t have anything to do with their fathers, and so many fathers who won’t speak to their sons. I think myself, it is very much to be regretted.
Mrs. Cheveley: So do I. Fathers have so much to learn from their sons nowadays.
Lady Markby: Really, dear? What?
Mrs. Cheveley: The art of living. The only really Fine Art we have produced in modern times.
Lady Markby's tone throughout the passage is best described as __________.
glib and witty
thoughtful and concerned
serious and admonishing
pious
direct and hopeful
glib and witty
The correct answer is "glib and witty." The banter between Lady Markby and Mrs. Cheveley is quick and amusing, and is meant to engage the reader for being both humorous and paradoxical.
Example Question #31 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Adapted from Life and Remains of John Clare "The Northamptonshire Peasant Poet" by John Clare (1872, ed. J. L. Cherry)
I am! Yet what I am who cares, or knows?
My friends forsake me, like a memory lost.
I am the self-consumer of my woes,
They rise and vanish, an oblivious host,
Shadows of life, whose very soul is lost.
And yet I am—I live—though I am toss'd
Into the nothingness of scorn and noise.
Into the living sea of waking dream,
Where there is neither sense of life, nor joys,
But the huge shipwreck of my own esteem
And all that's dear. Even those I loved the best
Are strange—nay, they are stranger than the rest.
I long for scenes where man has never trod—
For scenes where woman never smiled or wept—
There to abide with my Creator, God,
And sleep as I in childhood sweetly slept,
Full of high thoughts, unborn. So let me lie,
The grass below; above, the vaulted sky.
Which of the following best describes the second stanza?
A stormy ocean of emotions
Meeting those on a crossroads and not recognizing them
Sailing across the wastes of friendship
A voyage of self discovery
Diving into the depths of a lake and coming out rejuvenated
A stormy ocean of emotions
The speaker is obviously in some emotional distress throughout the second stanza and the author links this to an extended metaphor of a violent sea and the “shipwreck” of “self-esteem.” We can therefore say the second stanza is “a stormy sea of emotions,” as the other answers are insufficient in capturing the “emotion” and violence of the sea in the metaphor.
Example Question #31 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Adapted from The Vicar of Wakefield by Oliver Goldsmith (1766)
The temporal concerns of our family were chiefly committed to my wife's management; as to the spiritual, I took them entirely under my own direction. The profits of my living, which amounted to but thirty-five pounds a year, I made over to the orphans and widows of the clergy of our diocese; for having a sufficient fortune of my own, I was careless of temporalities, and felt a secret pleasure in doing my duty without reward. I also set a resolution of keeping no curate, and of being acquainted with every man in the parish, exhorting the married men to temperance and the bachelors to matrimony, so that in a few years it was a common saying, that there were three strange wants at Wakefield, a parson wanting pride, young men wanting wives, and ale-houses wanting customers. Matrimony was always one of my favorite topics, and I wrote several sermons to prove its happiness; but there was a peculiar tenet that I made a point of supporting; for I maintained with Whiston, that it was unlawful for a priest of the church of England, after the death of his first wife, to take a second, or to express it in one word, I valued myself upon being a strict monogamist. I was early initiated into this important dispute, on which so many laborious volumes have been written. I published some tracts upon the subject myself, which, as they never sold, I have the consolation of thinking are read only by the happy Few. Some of my friends called this my weak side; but alas! they had not like me made it the subject of long contemplation. The more I reflected upon it, the more important it appeared. I even went a step beyond Whiston in displaying my principles: as he had engraved upon his wife's tomb that she was the only wife of William Whiston; so I wrote a similar epitaph for my wife, though still living, in which I extolled her prudence, economy, and obedience till death; and having got it copied fair, with an elegant frame, it was placed over the chimney-piece, where it answered several very useful purposes. It admonished my wife of her duty to me, and my fidelity to her; it inspired her with a passion for fame, and constantly put her in mind of her end.
It was thus, perhaps, from hearing marriage so often recommended, that my eldest son, just upon leaving college, fixed his affections upon the daughter of a neighboring clergyman, who was a dignitary in the church, and in circumstances to give her a large fortune: but fortune was her smallest accomplishment. Miss Arabella Wilmot was allowed by all, except my two daughters, to be completely pretty. Her youth, health, and innocence, were still heightened by a complexion so transparent, and such an happy sensibility of look, as even age could not gaze on with indifference. As Mr Wilmot knew that I could make a very handsome settlement on my son, he was not averse to the match; so both families lived together in all that harmony which generally precedes an expected alliance. Being convinced by experience that the days of courtship are the most happy of our lives, I was willing enough to lengthen the period; and the various amusements that the young couple every day shared in each other's company, seemed to increase their passion. We were generally awaked in the morning by music, and on fine days rode a hunting. The hours between breakfast and dinner the ladies devoted to dress and study: they usually read a page, and then gazed at themselves in the glass, which even philosophers might own often presented the page of greatest beauty. At dinner my wife took the lead; for as she always insisted upon carving everything herself, it being her mother's way, she gave us upon these occasions the history of every dish. When we had dined, to prevent the ladies leaving us, I generally ordered the table to be removed; and sometimes, with the music master's assistance, the girls would give us a very agreeable concert. Walking out, drinking tea, country dances, and forfeits, shortened the rest of the day, without the assistance of cards, as I hated all manner of gaming, except backgammon, at which my old friend and I sometimes took a two-penny hit. Nor can I here pass over an ominous circumstance that happened the last time we played together: I only wanted to fling a quatre, and yet I threw deuce ace five times running. Some months were elapsed in this manner, till at last it was thought convenient to fix a day for the nuptials of the young couple, who seemed earnestly to desire it.
Which of the following sentences best captures the theme of the passage?
A discussion of financial and marital concerns
A hypothesis on the best way to treat one's wife
An epistle begging forgiveness for the successes and failures of married life
A discourse on the best ways to transfer familial traditions to the young
A study of the withdrawal from polite and common society upon marriage
A discussion of financial and marital concerns
If we look at the passage as a whole, it largely describes the marital concerns of the speaker and also mentions his financial arrangements, which in turn will affect the future nuptial arrangements of his son. We can come to this answer by eliminating the other answers, as it is not an “epistle” or “letter”; the family appear to be involved in society; the traditions being passed to the young belongs to the second paragraph alone and not the passage as a whole; and the hypothesis on the best way to treat a wife appears in the first paragraph alone.
Example Question #32 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Adapted from "Old Man Traveling" by William Wordsworth in Lyrical Ballads by William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1798 ed.)
The little hedge-row birds,
That peck along the road, regard him not.
He travels on, and in his face, his step,
His gait, is one expression; every limb,
His look and bending figure, all bespeak
A man who does not move with pain, but moves
With thought—He is insensibly subdued
To settled quiet: he is one by whom
All effort seems forgotten, one to whom
Long patience has such mild composure given,
That patience now doth seem a thing, of which
He hath no need. He is by nature led
To peace so perfect, that the young behold
With envy, what the old man hardly feels.
—I asked him whither he was bound, and what
The object of his journey; he replied
"Sir! I am going many miles to take
"A last leave of my son, a mariner,
"Who from a sea-fight has been brought to Falmouth,
And there is dying in an hospital."
Based on the poem, which of the following words best describes the narrator?
Stoic
Idealistic
Nonsensical
Fanciful
Cynical
Idealistic
We can eliminate “stoic,” as the only character who shows any form of stoicism, or lack of emotion, is the man, whereas the narrator shows envy, at least. The narrator cannot accurately be called "nonsensical," either, as the poem makes sense and nothing in its content suggests that the narrator somehow does not make sense. The narrator is not "cynical," either, as he or she views the man in a positive light when he or she knows nothing about him. We are left with “idealistic” and “fanciful” as potential answer choices, which are very similar. “Fanciful” generally means coming from the imagination or unrealistic, whereas “idealistic” would be describing the action of the speaker in putting the man on a pedestal, which he clearly is doing.
Example Question #33 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Adapted from "Old Man Traveling" by William Wordsworth in Lyrical Ballads by William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1798 ed.)
The little hedge-row birds,
That peck along the road, regard him not.
He travels on, and in his face, his step,
His gait, is one expression; every limb,
His look and bending figure, all bespeak
A man who does not move with pain, but moves
With thought—He is insensibly subdued
To settled quiet: he is one by whom
All effort seems forgotten, one to whom
Long patience has such mild composure given,
That patience now doth seem a thing, of which
He hath no need. He is by nature led
To peace so perfect, that the young behold
With envy, what the old man hardly feels.
—I asked him whither he was bound, and what
The object of his journey; he replied
"Sir! I am going many miles to take
"A last leave of my son, a mariner,
"Who from a sea-fight has been brought to Falmouth,
And there is dying in an hospital."
Which of the following sentences best captures the theme of the passage?
We must find solace in walking when we are most sad
We should respect our elders
We can be tranquil in nature regardless of external worries
We can attain enlightenment at any age
Life is a journey to visit the sick and ailing
We can be tranquil in nature regardless of external worries
The poem deals with tranquility in nature regardless of decay; indeed, the full title of the poem is "Old Man Traveling; Animal Tranquility and Decay; A Sketch." The man is traveling through nature, which is tranquil despite the fact that around it people live their lives and die in violent circumstances like battles. We can therefore say that the them the poet wants to convey overall is tranquility regardless of external worries. There is some suggestion that the man has gained a sort of peace or enlightenment due to his years, but the poet does not suggest one can only achieve this state through age. We could argue that “we must find solace in walking when we are most sad,” but this doesn't exactly fit the message that is being conveyed as there is no imperative given to walk by the poet. The other possible answers are both similarly trite and fail to grasp the theme as they focus on small parts of the poem rather than its entirety.
Example Question #31 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Passage adapted from Edna St. Vincent Millay's "Spring" (1921).
To what purpose, April, do you return again?
Beauty is not enough.
You can no longer quiet me with the redness
Of leaves opening stickily.
I know what I know. 5
The sun is hot on my neck as I observe
The spikes of the crocus.
The smell of the earth is good.
It is apparent that there is no death.
But what does that signify? 10
Not only under the ground are the brains of men
Eaten by maggots.
Life in itself
Is nothing,
An empty cup, a flight of uncarpeted stairs. 15
It is not enough that yearly, down this hill,
April
Comes like an idiot, babbling and strewing flowers.
A prominent theme in the poem is that __________.
the rebirth of nature during springtime proves that life ultimately overcomes death
the reality of death makes life itself that much more meaningful and precious in comparison
immortality is found through union with nature
life is short, and so it is important to live fully and seize the day
beauty and the apparent rebirth of nature in springtime do not make up for the ultimate reality of death
beauty and the apparent rebirth of nature in springtime do not make up for the ultimate reality of death
The central message of the poem is that the sense of new life that is associated with springtime is ultimately an illusion, and that death is certain. As the poem states, the coming of springtime "is not enough" to compensate for impending death.
The message of the poem is not that one should "seize the day" or that life is meaningful and precious, because life is ultimately considered to be nothing (see 13-15), regardless of how it is lived. It cannot be said that the rebirth of spring proves that life overcomes death, because the writer gives concrete evidence of the finality of death in lines 11-12. For the same reason, there is little support for the idea of immortality in the poem.
Example Question #35 : Extrapolating From The Passage
Passage adapted from Arthur Conan Doyle's "A Scandal in Bohemia" (1891)
To Sherlock Holmes she is always the woman. I have seldom heard him mention her under any other name. In his eyes she eclipses and predominates the whole of her sex. It was not that he felt any emotion akin to love for Irene Adler. All emotions, and that one particularly, were abhorrent to his cold, precise but admirably balanced mind. He was, I take it, the most perfect reasoning and observing machine that the world has seen, but as a lover he would have placed himself in a false position. He never spoke of the softer passions, save with a gibe and a sneer. They were admirable things for the observer—excellent for drawing the veil from men’s motives and actions. But for the trained reasoner to admit such intrusions into his own delicate and finely adjusted temperament was to introduce a distracting factor which might throw a doubt upon all his mental results. Grit in a sensitive instrument, or a crack in one of his own high-power lenses, would not be more disturbing than a strong emotion in a nature such as his. And yet there was but one woman to him, and that woman was the late Irene Adler, of dubious and questionable memory.
I had seen little of Holmes lately. My marriage had drifted us away from each other. My own complete happiness, and the home-centred interests which rise up around the man who first finds himself master of his own establishment, were sufficient to absorb all my attention, while Holmes, who loathed every form of society with his whole Bohemian soul, remained in our lodgings in Baker Street, buried among his old books, and alternating from week to week between cocaine and ambition, the drowsiness of the drug, and the fierce energy of his own keen nature. He was still, as ever, deeply attracted by the study of crime, and occupied his immense faculties and extraordinary powers of observation in following out those clues, and clearing up those mysteries which had been abandoned as hopeless by the official police. From time to time I heard some vague account of his doings: of his summons to Odessa in the case of the Trepoff murder, of his clearing up of the singular tragedy of the Atkinson brothers at Trincomalee, and finally of the mission which he had accomplished so delicately and successfully for the reigning family of Holland. Beyond these signs of his activity, however, which I merely shared with all the readers of the daily press, I knew little of my former friend and companion.
One night—it was on the twentieth of March, 1888—I was returning from a journey to a patient (for I had now returned to civil practice), when my way led me through Baker Street. As I passed the well-remembered door, which must always be associated in my mind with my wooing, and with the dark incidents of the Study in Scarlet, I was seized with a keen desire to see Holmes again, and to know how he was employing his extraordinary powers. His rooms were brilliantly lit, and, even as I looked up, I saw his tall, spare figure pass twice in a dark silhouette against the blind. He was pacing the room swiftly, eagerly, with his head sunk upon his chest and his hands clasped behind him. To me, who knew his every mood and habit, his attitude and manner told their own story. He was at work again. He had risen out of his drug-created dreams and was hot upon the scent of some new problem. I rang the bell and was shown up to the chamber which had formerly been in part my own.
His manner was not effusive. It seldom was; but he was glad, I think, to see me. With hardly a word spoken, but with a kindly eye, he waved me to an armchair, threw across his case of cigars, and indicated a spirit case and a gasogene in the corner. Then he stood before the fire and looked me over in his singular introspective fashion.
“Wedlock suits you,” he remarked. “I think, Watson, that you have put on seven and a half pounds since I saw you.”
“Seven!” I answered.
“Indeed, I should have thought a little more. Just a trifle more, I fancy, Watson. And in practice again, I observe. You did not tell me that you intended to go into harness.”
“Then, how do you know?”
“I see it, I deduce it. How do I know that you have been getting yourself very wet lately, and that you have a most clumsy and careless servant girl?”
“My dear Holmes,” said I, “this is too much. You would certainly have been burned, had you lived a few centuries ago. It is true that I had a country walk on Thursday and came home in a dreadful mess, but as I have changed my clothes I can’t imagine how you deduce it. As to Mary Jane, she is incorrigible, and my wife has given her notice, but there, again, I fail to see how you work it out.”
Which sentence best describes the point of this passage?
This passage introduces readers to Sherlock Holmes, the narrator, and their history together.
This passage introduces the case that Sherlock and the narrator will work together to solve.
This passage establishes an aura of mystery, which inspires the reader to keep going.
This passage introduces the conflict between Sherlock and the narrator, which will be the theme of the rest of the novel.
This passage lays out a strong case against Holmes brand of logical reasoning.
This passage introduces readers to Sherlock Holmes, the narrator, and their history together.
The passage alternates between describing Sherlock and describing the narrator's relationship to Sherlock. In the process, we learn about the narrator himself. So, the correct answer is: "This passage introduces readers to Sherlock Holmes, the narrator, and their history together." The other answers make logical leaps, or discuss events not present (or guessable) from the passage provided.
Example Question #34 : Interpreting The Passage
Passage adapted from The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford (1915)
This is the saddest story I have ever heard. We had known the Ashburnhams for nine seasons of the town of Nauheim with an extreme intimacy--or, rather with an acquaintanceship as loose and easy and yet as close as a good glove's with your hand. My wife and I knew Captain and Mrs. Ashburnham as well as it was possible to know anybody, and yet, in another sense, we knew nothing at all about them. This is, I believe, a state of things only possible with English people of whom, till today, when I sit down to puzzle out what I know of this sad affair, I knew nothing whatever. Six months ago I had never been to England, and, certainly, I had never sounded the depths of an English heart. I had known the shallows.
I don't mean to say that we were not acquainted with many English people. Living, as we perforce lived, in Europe, and being, as we perforce were, leisured Americans, which is as much as to say that we were un-American, we were thrown very much into the society of the nicer English. Paris, you see, was our home. Somewhere between Nice and Bordighera provided yearly winter quarters for us, and Nauheim always received us from July to September. You will gather from this statement that one of us had, as the saying is, a "heart," and, from the statement that my wife is dead, that she was the sufferer.
…You may well ask why I write. And yet my reasons are quite many. For it is not unusual in human beings who have witnessed the sack of a city or the falling to pieces of a people to desire to set down what they have witnessed for the benefit of unknown heirs or of generations infinitely remote; or, if you please, just to get the sight out of their heads.
Someone has said that the death of a mouse from cancer is the whole sack of Rome by the Goths, and I swear to you that the breaking up of our little four-square coterie was such another unthinkable event.
What is the best summary of the passage?
The narrator and his wife traveled frequently, giving them a good grasp on the characteristics of people from different countries
The narrator and his wife witness the destruction of a city on their first trip to England
The narrator and his wife suffered from the unkindness of the Ashburnhams, which brought about her death
The narrator and his wife had a close friendship with the Ashburnhams, but death and other factors tore the friend group apart
The narrator's first trip to England brought close friendship with the Ashburnhams and a broadened understanding of the world
The narrator and his wife had a close friendship with the Ashburnhams, but death and other factors tore the friend group apart
This question asks you to select an appropriate summary of the passage. In the first paragraph, the author introduces the lengthy, close friendship with the Ashburnhams. In the second paragraph, he reveals that his wife has died, and alludes to factors that may have hindered his ability to truly understand his friends. In the third and fourth paragraphs, he uses strong metaphors to express his sadness and shock at the breaking apart of the friend group. Therefore, the statement "The narrator and his wife had a close friendship with the Ashburnhams, but death and other factors tore the friend group apart" is an accurate summary of this passage.