All ACT Science Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #961 : Act Science
In describing the physics involved in sending a satellite into orbit, two scientists express their opinions.
Scientist 1: Two important factors need to be considered when working with a satellite: its orbital radius and its orbital speed . Orbital radius determines how far the satellite is from Earth, while orbital speed determines how quickly that satellite orbits Earth. A satellite's orbital speed depends on its orbital radius, the mass of the object being orbited (in this case, Earth), and the mass of the satellite.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius of a satellite is not something that can be controlled by anything but orbital speed and the mass of the object being orbited. A satellite orbiting earth can only change its orbital radius by changing its orbital speed.
A company has plans to send a satellite into orbit that will collect solar radiation for scientific study. The day before launch, the company wants to add some heavy equipment to the satellite without changing their predictions for the satellites orbital radius or speed. What would the two scientists say in response to this last-minute change?
Scientist 1: You must adjust your predictions for orbital radius and speed; Scientist 2: You do not need to adjust your predictions.
Scientist 1: You do not need to adjust your predictions; Scientist 2: You must adjust your predictions for orbital radius and speed.
Both Scientist 1 and Scientist 2: You do not need to adjust your predictions.
Both Scientist 1 and Scientist 2: You must adjust your predictions for orbital radius and speed.
More information is needed such as the mass of the equipment added.
Scientist 1: You must adjust your predictions for orbital radius and speed; Scientist 2: You do not need to adjust your predictions.
The correct answer is that Scientist 1 would likely advise the company to redo their calculations since they have now altered the mass of the satellite, and this will affect the predicted orbital radius and speed; however, Scientist 2 argues that satellite mass does not matter, so Scientist 2 will likely say that this change will not affect the project.
Example Question #961 : Act Science
In describing the physics involved in sending a satellite into orbit, two scientists express their opinions.
Scientist 1: Two important factors need to be considered when working with a satellite: its orbital radius and its orbital speed . Orbital radius determines how far the satellite is from Earth, while orbital speed determines how quickly that satellite orbits Earth. A satellite's orbital speed depends on its orbital radius, the mass of the object being orbited (in this case, Earth), and the mass of the satellite.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius of a satellite is not something that can be controlled by anything but orbital speed and the mass of the object being orbited. A satellite orbiting earth can only change its orbital radius by changing its orbital speed.
Scientists have recently discovered two comets that orbit Earth at such similar distances that any alterations in their distances would cause them to eventually collide. The two comets differ in size: one is nearly one hundred times as massive as the other. Nevertheless, both comets have been observed to travel at nearly the same speed. Whose hypothesis does this information support?
Scientist 1's hypothesis
Neither Scientist 1's nor Scientist 2's hypothesis
Both Scientist 1's and Scientist 2's hypotheses
More information is needed to support or refute either scientist's claims.
Scientist 2's hypothesis
Scientist 2's hypothesis
The correct answer is that this information supports Scientist 2's hypothesis. Scientist 2 argues that mass of a satellite does not affect its orbital radius or orbital speed. This we can extrapolate to also apply to comets. This is the important step. Once we have done that, it becomes clear that this new information supports Scientist 2's claim.
Example Question #961 : Act Science
Two scientists are interesting in studying the orbits of Jupiter's moons around Jupiter. Based on their own observations, the two scientists express their conclusions below:
Scientist 1: The moons of Jupiter vary greatly in size and mass and yet all have very different orbital radii (distances from Jupiter) which show no correlation with each moon's mass. This is likely attributed to the fact that while they have different masses, they are very small in comparison to the mass of Jupiter, so we can say that, relative to Jupiter's mass, the masses of Jupiter's moons are essentially equivalent. Jupiter's moons also vary greatly in the speed at which they orbit Jupiter. Unlike mass, this does correlate with orbital radius. A greater speed corresponds to a smaller orbital radius.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius is a quantity that does not depend on the orbiting object's mass. Instead, it depends on the mass of the central object (Jupiter, in this case) and the speed of the orbiting object. If, for example, Europa (one of Jupiter's moons) were orbiting a planet of half the mass of Jupiter at the same speed, it would have half the orbital radius. On the other hand, if Europa were orbiting Jupiter and Europa suddenly doubled its rotational speed, its orbital radius would decrease by a factor of four.
Upon which of the following statements are both Scientist 1 and Scientist 2 most likely to agree?
Orbital radius and the mass of the orbiting object are directly related.
Orbital radius and orbital speed are directly related.
Orbital radius and the mass of the orbiting object are inversely related.
Orbital radius and orbital speed are inversely related.
There is no relationship between orbital radius and orbital speed.
Orbital radius and orbital speed are inversely related.
The correct answer is that orbital radius and orbital speed are inversely related. Scientist 1 asserts that a greater speed results in a smaller orbital radius, implying an inverse relationship. Scientist 2 states the same thing in more explicit terms.
Example Question #962 : Act Science
Two scientists are interesting in studying the orbits of Jupiter's moons around Jupiter. Based on their own observations, the two scientists express their conclusions below:
Scientist 1: The moons of Jupiter vary greatly in size and mass and yet all have very different orbital radii (distances from Jupiter) which show no correlation with each moon's mass. This is likely attributed to the fact that while they have different masses, they are very small in comparison to the mass of Jupiter, so we can say that, relative to Jupiter's mass, the masses of Jupiter's moons are essentially equivalent. Jupiter's moons also vary greatly in the speed at which they orbit Jupiter. Unlike mass, this does correlate with orbital radius. A greater speed corresponds to a smaller orbital radius.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius is a quantity that does not depend on the orbiting object's mass. Instead, it depends on the mass of the central object (Jupiter, in this case) and the speed of the orbiting object. If, for example, Europa (one of Jupiter's moons) were orbiting a planet of half the mass of Jupiter at the same speed, it would have half the orbital radius. On the other hand, if Europa were orbiting Jupiter and Europa suddenly doubled its rotational speed, its orbital radius would decrease by a factor of four.
Over which of the following statements are the two scientists most likely to disagree?
In general, orbital radius does not depend on an object's orbital speed.
In general, orbital radius depends on the mass of the orbiting object.
In general, orbital radius does not depend on the mass of the orbiting object.
In general, orbital radius does not depend on the mass of the central object.
Europa is an ideal example for examining the orbits of Jupiter's moons.
In general, orbital radius depends on the mass of the orbiting object.
The correct answer is the statement "orbital radius depends on the mass of the orbiting object." Although Scientist 1 posits that in the case of a massive central object such as Jupiter, the masses of orbiting objects around that central object do not significantly affect orbital radius, Scientist 1 does so with the underlying assumption that normally the mass of the orbiting object does play a role in orbital radius; however, Scientist 2 expresses the opposite opinion, saying explicitly that orbital radius does not depend on the mass of the orbiting object. For the record, Scientist 2 is correct.
Example Question #963 : Act Science
Two scientists are interesting in studying the orbits of Jupiter's moons around Jupiter. Based on their own observations, the two scientists express their conclusions below:
Scientist 1: The moons of Jupiter vary greatly in size and mass and yet all have very different orbital radii (distances from Jupiter) which show no correlation with each moon's mass. This is likely attributed to the fact that while they have different masses, they are very small in comparison to the mass of Jupiter, so we can say that, relative to Jupiter's mass, the masses of Jupiter's moons are essentially equivalent. Jupiter's moons also vary greatly in the speed at which they orbit Jupiter. Unlike mass, this does correlate with orbital radius. A greater speed corresponds to a smaller orbital radius.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius is a quantity that does not depend on the orbiting object's mass. Instead, it depends on the mass of the central object (Jupiter, in this case) and the speed of the orbiting object. If, for example, Europa (one of Jupiter's moons) were orbiting a planet of half the mass of Jupiter at the same speed, it would have half the orbital radius. On the other hand, if Europa were orbiting Jupiter and Europa suddenly doubled its rotational speed, its orbital radius would decrease by a factor of four.
If Jupiter's mass were to suddenly decrease significantly, with which statement would Scientist 1 most likely agree and Scientist 2 most likely disagree?
The orbital radii of Jupiter's moons would decrease.
The orbital radii of Jupiter's moons would begin to correlate with their masses.
The orbital radii of Jupiter's moons would increase.
The orbital speeds of Jupiter's moons would increase.
The orbital speeds of Jupiter's moons would decrease.
The orbital radii of Jupiter's moons would begin to correlate with their masses.
The correct answer is the statement that the orbital radii of Jupiter's moons would begin to correlate with their masses. Scientist 1 makes the claim that the only reason this correlation is not observed in Jupiter's case is that Jupiter's mass is very large relative to its moons. Therefore, if Scientist 1 were correct, we would expect this correlation to become visible once Jupiter's mass were small enough that the differences in its moons' masses would be significant. Scientist 2 disagrees and says that there is no relationship between mass of an orbiting object and its orbital radius. Therefore, Scientist 2 would not agree with this statement.
Example Question #964 : Act Science
Two scientists are interesting in studying the orbits of Jupiter's moons around Jupiter. Based on their own observations, the two scientists express their conclusions below:
Scientist 1: The moons of Jupiter vary greatly in size and mass and yet all have very different orbital radii (distances from Jupiter) which show no correlation with each moon's mass. This is likely attributed to the fact that while they have different masses, they are very small in comparison to the mass of Jupiter, so we can say that, relative to Jupiter's mass, the masses of Jupiter's moons are essentially equivalent. Jupiter's moons also vary greatly in the speed at which they orbit Jupiter. Unlike mass, this does correlate with orbital radius. A greater speed corresponds to a smaller orbital radius.
Scientist 2: Orbital radius is a quantity that does not depend on the orbiting object's mass. Instead, it depends on the mass of the central object (Jupiter, in this case) and the speed of the orbiting object. If, for example, Europa (one of Jupiter's moons) were orbiting a planet of half the mass of Jupiter at the same speed, it would have half the orbital radius. On the other hand, if Europa were orbiting Jupiter and Europa suddenly doubled its rotational speed, its orbital radius would decrease by a factor of four.
According to Scientist 2, how can we best describe the relationship between an orbiting object's orbital speed and that object's orbital radius?
They are directly and exponentially related.
They are inversely and linearly related.
They are inversely and exponentially related.
There is no relationship.
They are directly and linearly related.
They are inversely and exponentially related.
The correct answer is that the two variables are inversely and exponentially related. Like Scientist 1, Scientist 2 makes it clear that as orbital speed increases, orbital radius decreases. However, Scientist 2 also specifies by how much. When orbital speed doubles, orbital radius decreases by a factor of four. The most likely relationship of the answers given therefore is an inverse relationship that is also exponential.
Example Question #967 : Act Science
Two physics students are describing a concept called the orbital radius.
Student 1: Orbital radius is defined as the distance from an object in orbit to the object that is being orbited. For example, this would include the distance from a satellite orbiting Earth to the Earth. Several factors affect an orbiting object's orbital radius. The mass of the object compared to the object being orbited, the speed at which the orbiting object is moving, and the gravitational force pulling at the orbiting object.
Student 2: An orbital radius is the distance from an orbiting object's center to the center of the object being orbited. The only thing that affects an orbiting object's orbital radius is the object's speed. A faster orbiting object will have a lower orbital radius and vice versa.
Jupiter has 67 moons orbiting it. When studying why these moons never collide, it is revealed that all 67 of jupiter's moons have different orbital radii. What would the students say about their speeds?
Student 1: Jupiter's moons must have the same speed.
Student 2: Jupiter's moons may have the same speed.
Student 1: Jupiter's moons may have different speeds.
Student 2: Jupiter's moons must have different speeds.
Student 1: Jupiter's moons may have the same speeds.
Student 2: Jupiter's moons may have different speeds.
Student 1: More information is necessary.
Student 2: More information is necessary.
Student 1: Jupiter's moons must have different speeds.
Student 2: Jupiter's moons may have different speeds.
Student 1: Jupiter's moons may have different speeds.
Student 2: Jupiter's moons must have different speeds.
The correct answer is that Student 1 would say that the speeds may vary while Student 2 would have to argue that they are all different. For Student 2, orbital radius is the end-all-be-all for orbital speed. That is, if objects have different orbital radii, they must also have different speeds. On the other hand, Student 1 points to various factors—mass and speed—affecting orbital radius. Since mass is not clarified in the question, Student 1 would not be able to definitively speak to the orbital speeds of the moons; therefore, Student 1 is most likely to give a a non-definitive answer like Student 2's answer.
Example Question #961 : Act Science
Two physics students are describing a concept called the orbital radius.
Student 1: Orbital radius is defined as the distance from an object in orbit to the object that is being orbited. For example, this would include the distance from a satellite orbiting Earth to the Earth. Several factors affect an orbiting object's orbital radius. The mass of the object compared to the object being orbited, the speed at which the orbiting object is moving, and the gravitational force pulling at the orbiting object.
Student 2: An orbital radius is the distance from an orbiting object's center to the center of the object being orbited. The only thing that affects an orbiting object's orbital radius is the object's speed. A faster orbiting object will have a lower orbital radius and vice versa.
It is found that all 67 of Jupiter's moons have different masses and different orbital radii. How does this new information affect each student's claims?
It supports the claims of both student 1 and student 2.
It supports the claims of student 1 but refutes the claims of student 2.
It supports the claims of student 2 but refutes the claims of student 1.
It refutes the claims of both student 1 and student 2.
More information is necessary.
It supports the claims of both student 1 and student 2.
The correct answer is that it supports both claims. While it might more clearly support Student 1's claims that differences in masses affect orbital radii, this information does not tell us whether there is some sort of relationship between any of the variables involved. All it says is that objects with varying masses and speeds also have varying orbital radii. This could support both students since Student 2 might argue that the differences in orbital radii are only due to their differences in speed and not mass.
Example Question #969 : Act Science
Two physics students are describing a concept called the orbital radius.
Student 1: Orbital radius is defined as the distance from an object in orbit to the object that is being orbited. For example, this would include the distance from a satellite orbiting Earth to the Earth. Several factors affect an orbiting object's orbital radius. The mass of the object compared to the object being orbited, the speed at which the orbiting object is moving, and the gravitational force pulling at the orbiting object.
Student 2: An orbital radius is the distance from an orbiting object's center to the center of the object being orbited. The only thing that affects an orbiting object's orbital radius is the object's speed. A faster orbiting object will have a lower orbital radius and vice versa.
Two satellites, one very small and one very large, are in orbit around the Earth in what is called geostationary orbit. Geostationary orbit is a precise distance from the Earth where many commercial satelites are sent. The two satellites are found to have the exact same orbital speed. How does this new information affect the students' claims?
More information is needed to draw a conclusion on their claims.
This information supports the claims of both students.
This information refutes the claims of Student 2 and supports the claims of Student 1.
This information supports the claims of Student 2 and refutes the claims of Student 1.
This information refutes the claims of both students.
This information supports the claims of Student 2 and refutes the claims of Student 1.
The correct answer is that it supports student 2 and refutes student 1. Since the satellites have different masses and identical speeds, Student 1 would argue that they should have different orbital radii. But since both are in geostationary orbit, we know that this is not the case. Student 2, however, would agree with this, since Student 2 made a point that orbital speed is the only thing that affects orbital radius.
It should be noted that this is only partially true. The only two factors that affect orbital radius are orbital speed and the mass of the object being orbited. Both students were partially correct.
Example Question #970 : Act Science
Glaciers move, on average, 1 meter per day, although many are known to move faster or slower depending on their size. Whether they are alpine glaciers, which form high in the mountains, or continental glaciers that cover huge areas of land near the poles, glaciers are responsible for breaking up rock and moving sediment as they move across the land.
Below is a chart of average speed of movement of an alpine glacier per year, as well the amount of sediment displaced by the glacier.
Year |
Average Glacial Movement |
Sediment movement per year (tons) |
1995 |
1.1 m/day |
2.2 |
1996 |
1.3 m/day |
2.6 |
1997 |
1.5 m/day |
3.0 |
1998 |
1.3 m/day |
2.2 |
2000 |
1.1 m/day |
1.8 |
2005 |
1.0 m/day |
1.6 |
2010 |
0.9 m/day |
1.5 |
Two scientists have done research on an alpine lake that lies in the path of the glacier. Each took five samples of sediment from the lake.
Scientist 1 believes that the glacier is beginning to melt as it moves lower in elevation, releasing some of the sediment it has carried into mountain streams and springs, causing the makeup of sediments in the lake to change. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains brown chert, a rock that can only be found in elevations higher than that of the lake. Scientist 1 took his sample from the sediments that washed ashore on the beach of the lake.
Scientist 2 believes the glacier is not melting, but displacing rock beds so that the sediment loosens and breaks free of the bedrock and then is carried by wind and other erosive elements to the lake. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains only trace amounts of the brown chert, not enough to suggest the glacier is melting. Scientist 2 took his samples from sediment deposits at the bottom of the lake.
Below is a chart of the sediment collection samples and the percentage of brown chert found in each.
Sample # |
Scientist 1: % Brown Chert |
Scientist 2: % Brown Chert |
1 |
5.2 |
0.9 |
2 |
7.1 |
1.2 |
3 |
6.3 |
0.4 |
4 |
6.5 |
0.8 |
5 |
5.8 |
1.0 |
Which of the following findings would most closely resemble the hypothesis of scientist 1?
The alpine lake below the glacier is lower in water volume than it has been in the last decade.
The alpine lake below the glacier only has one kind of fish.
Sediments containing the rock, brown chert, have been found as far as ten miles from the glacier.
Alpine springs in the area around the glacier have had a higher volume of water in the last five years.
None of the other answers is correct.
Alpine springs in the area around the glacier have had a higher volume of water in the last five years.
If the glacier is melting, like scientist 1 believes, there will be more water saturating the earth that would run into mountain springs, increasing their volume.