ACT Science : ACT Science

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for ACT Science

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store varsity tutors ibooks store

Example Questions

Example Question #1001 : Act Science

A group of scientists wanted to investigate weather patterns in four cities across the United States. They conducted a series of experiments to look for similarities and differences among the four cities. The scientists measured wind speed and direction, amount of precipitation, and percentage of cloud cover for one week. Further explanation can be found below.

Experiment 1

Scientists measured wind speed using an anemometer at 15 different locations around each city. Measurements were taken at each location 3 times a day and then averaged to get a daily wind speed for each city. This was repeated every day for one week and the results were compiled into table 1.

Windspeed

Experiment 2

 

Scientists set up barometers at five locations in each city. At the end of each day, the precipitation levels in the five barometers were averaged to find the average daily precipitation and the results are compiled in Table 2.

Precip2

Experiment 3

For the final experiment, scientists placed upward facing cameras atop the ten tallest buildings in each city. The cameras took one picture per hour. The scientists then used computer software to stitch together the images from all the cameras. The resulting meta-image was then analyzed with another computer program to find the percent of the sky covered by clouds. The results can be found in table 3.

 

Ccp3

Which of the following is an assumption made by the scientists during the design of these experiments?

Possible Answers:

The scientists assumed there would be rain in each city every day.

The scientists assumed that cloud cover would not affect precipitation.

The scientists assumed that San Berdoo would receive less precipitation than Madison.

The scientists assumed that five barometers would be enough to get accurate data about precipitation.

The scientists assumed that there would be wind in each city every day.

Correct answer:

The scientists assumed that five barometers would be enough to get accurate data about precipitation.

Explanation:

The scientists only planned on measuring precipitation from five barometers per city. This means they must have assumed that five barometers would be enough to get an accurate impression of daily precipitation in each city. 

They did not assume there would be precipitation or wind in each city. In fact, San Berdoo had no precipitation on multiple days.

Example Question #1001 : Act Science

A group of scientists wanted to investigate weather patterns in four cities across the United States. They conducted a series of experiments to look for similarities and differences among the four cities. The scientists measured wind speed and direction, amount of precipitation, and percentage of cloud cover for one week. Further explanation can be found below.

Experiment 1

Scientists measured wind speed using an anemometer at 15 different locations around each city. Measurements were taken at each location 3 times a day and then averaged to get a daily wind speed for each city. This was repeated every day for one week and the results were compiled into table 1.

Windspeed

Experiment 2

 

Scientists set up barometers at five locations in each city. At the end of each day, the precipitation levels in the five barometers were averaged to find the average daily precipitation and the results are compiled in Table 2.

Precip2

Experiment 3

For the final experiment, scientists placed upward facing cameras atop the ten tallest buildings in each city. The cameras took one picture per hour. The scientists then used computer software to stitch together the images from all the cameras. The resulting meta-image was then analyzed with another computer program to find the percent of the sky covered by clouds. The results can be found in table 3.

 

Ccp3

Which of the following is supported by the data in Experiment 3?

Possible Answers:

Madison is sunnier than San Berdoo.

Tallahassee is wetter than Madison.

Kalamazoo is cloudier than Tallahassee.

San Berdoo is sunnier than Kalamazoo.

Madison is windier than Kalamazoo.

Correct answer:

San Berdoo is sunnier than Kalamazoo.

Explanation:

After reading the question carefully, we see that we need to look at Experiment 3. Eliminate any options that don't deal with cloud cover. 

Then, we can see that in order of increasing cloud cover, we have: San Berdoo, Madison/Kalamazoo, and finally, Tallahassee. 

Thus, the only statement we can say is supported is that San Berdoo is sunnier than Kalamazoo.

Example Question #67 : Earth And Space Sciences

The above chemical equation describes the dissociation of carbonic acid  into bicarbonate  and hydrogen ion . A chemistry student wants to study the behavior of carbonic acid, as it is a part of one of the most important physiological control systems in the human body.

When carbon dioxide  enters the blood in your body, it takes on the form of carbonic acid. Carbonic acid is in what we call "equilibrium" with bicarbonate ion and hydrogen ion. This equilibrium functions in the following manner: if more carbonic acid is present, more will dissociate into bicarbonate and hydrogen ion. On the other hand, if there is more bicarbonate and/or hydrogen ion, we say that equilibrium as shown in the above equation will "shift left" and more carbonic acid will be produced from bicarbonate and hydrogen.

To study this effect, the student obtains a mixture of carbonic acid, bicarbonate, and hydrogen ion. Next, the student conducts trials in which she adds a certain amount of one of the chemicals one at a time and then measures how the concentrations of each chemical change after each addition.

Which statement best explains why it is important for the student to add each chemical one at a time before measuring the total concentrations and then adding a different chemical?

Possible Answers:

Adding one chemical at a time ensures that no chemical reactions between carbonic acid and hydrogen ion will occur.

Adding one chemical at a time allows the student to isolate the effects of the change in concentration of one chemical.

Adding one chemical at a time has no significance to phenomenon under study.

Adding one chemical at a time ensures that equilibrium will shift at every measurement.

Adding one chemical at a time will allow for more accurate measurements of how much was added into the flask.

Correct answer:

Adding one chemical at a time allows the student to isolate the effects of the change in concentration of one chemical.

Explanation:

The correct answer is that adding chemicals one at a time will isolate each chemical and the changes in concentrations of carbonic acid, bicarbonate, and hydrogen ion that it produces. This type of procedure would make it a lot easier to identify how and by how much the concentrations in the flask change upon inserting additional amounts of each chemical into the flask.

Example Question #61 : Earth And Space Sciences

Glaciers move, on average, 1 meter per day, although many are known to move faster or slower depending on their size. Whether they are alpine glaciers, which form high in the mountains, or continental glaciers that cover huge areas of land near the poles, glaciers are responsible for breaking up rock and moving sediment as they move across the land. 

Below is a chart of average speed of movement of an alpine glacier per year, as well the amount of sediment displaced by the glacier. 

Year

Average Glacial Movement

Sediment movement per year (tons)

1995

1.1 m/day

2.2

1996

1.3 m/day

2.6

1997

1.5 m/day

3.0

1998

1.3 m/day

2.2

2000

1.1 m/day

1.8

2005

1.0 m/day

1.6

2010

0.9 m/day

1.5

Two scientists have done research on an alpine lake that lies in the path of the glacier. Each took five samples of sediment from the lake.

Scientist 1 believes that the glacier is beginning to melt as it moves lower in elevation, releasing some of the sediment it has carried into mountain streams and springs, causing the makeup of sediments in the lake to change. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains brown chert, a rock that can only be found in elevations higher than that of the lake. Scientist 1 took his sample from the sediments that washed ashore on the beach of the lake.

Scientist 2 believes the glacier is not melting, but displacing rock beds so that the sediment loosens and breaks free of the bedrock and then is carried by wind and other erosive elements to the lake. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains only trace amounts of the brown chert, not enough to suggest the glacier is melting. Scientist 2 took his samples from sediment deposits at the bottom of the lake. 

Below is a chart of the sediment collection samples and the percentage of brown chert found in each.

Sample #

Scientist 1: % Brown Chert

Scientist 2: % Brown Chert

1

5.2

0.9

2

7.1

1.2

3

6.3

0.4

4

6.5

0.8

5

5.8

1.0

 

What could have caused the difference in percentages of brown chert found in the sediment collected by each scientist?

Possible Answers:

Coincidence

Faulty experimental design on the part of Scientist 1

Faulty experimental design on the part of Scientist 2

The difference in the time when the sediment was collected

The difference in the place from which the sediment was collected

Correct answer:

The difference in the place from which the sediment was collected

Explanation:

Scientist 1 collected data from the beach, Scientist 2 from the lake bed. This could most definitely account for the difference in the percentages of brown chert detected; furthermore, there is no indication time of collection was of consequence, nor that either scientist had a faulty experimental design. 

Example Question #69 : Earth And Space Sciences

A scientist has observed a new planet, Planet H. It was discovered that Planet H has water on its surface. As a result, it is being investigated to determine if it is possible for Planet H to sustain human life. Futhermore, observations revealed that Planet H has four moons: Moon J, Moon K, Moon L, and Moon M. Each moon's radius, distance to Planet H, and time to orbit Planet H have been recorded in the provided table. 

Act 2

Before allowing humans to live on Planet H, what should scientists invesitigate further? 

Possible Answers:

The temperature of Planet H

It cannot be determined from the given information

Scientists should investigate all of the listed choices

The atmosphere of Planet H

The food sources of Planet H

Correct answer:

Scientists should investigate all of the listed choices

Explanation:

It is known that the water needed for humans to survive can be found on the surface of Planet H. It will be important to know if there is adequate food for humans to consume and survive. Additionally, if Planet H is too hot or too cold, humans cannot survive on Planet H, and allowing people to go there would not be a good idea. Finally, the atmosphere needs to be studied to determine the oxygen levels on Planet H that are necessary for humans to breathe. The correct answer is all of the choices need to be investigated by scientists because each is an important factor in determining if Planet H can sustain human life. 

Example Question #61 : Earth And Space Sciences

In a specific region, a scientist recorded the rainfall, in inches, during the months of May, June, July and August. The scientist recorded this data in the same spot each month over four years. The purpose of this study was to see how the new factories built in the area impacted the rainfall in that location. 

Act 3

What improvements can be made to this experiment? 

Possible Answers:

Test the pH of the rainfall

Record the rainfall in other areas around the country

Record the rainfall every other year rather than every year

All of these

Correct answer:

Test the pH of the rainfall

Explanation:

Recording rainfall in other areas of the country will not help the scientist with her ultimate goal of seeing how factories impact rainfall. Recording the rainfall per a week instead of per a month will not give any major benefits to the experiment as the scientist will probably look at annual rainfall for the recorded months. 

Factories can increase pollution in the environment which may lead to more acidic rain that could impact the enivronment. Therefore measuring the pH of the rainfall would be a beneficial addition to the experiment. 

Example Question #18 : How To Find Experimental Design In Earth And Space Sciences

One night there was a meteor shower and scientists in four different regions, A, B, C and D, observed and counted the number of meteors seen. The scientists noted the duration of the meteor shower and the visibility of the stars. 

Act 2

What is a way that the scientists could improve their method of observation? 

Possible Answers:

Note if the observations were taken by the naked eye or by an automated telescope

Note the elevation of each observation location

All of these

Note the weather and the potential impact this had on their observations

Determine the light pollution in each region and how this impacts results

Correct answer:

All of these

Explanation:

The weather in a region could impact the results if it were cloudy or if it was clearly would change visibility. Knowing the weather would improve the results of this experiments validity. Using an automated telescope would prevent human error that could occur in observations made by the naked eye. Light pollution affects the visibility of the night sky. Also, noting the elevation of the locations may affect visibility of meteors. Knowing this information will inform one how the light pollution affects the results of the observation.

Example Question #1001 : Act Science

Scientist 1: This scientist asserts that drilling for oil should be performed in the ocean. Scientist 1 claims that in the ocean, the oil is at a shorter depth below the Earth’s surface than on dry land. The shorter drilling depth is more ideal for access by drills.

Scientist 2: Scientist 2 believes that drilling for oil should be performed on dry land and not underwater. This is due to the fact that water is at a higher pressure than is observed on the surface of Earth. Scientist 2 asserts that drilling at the lower pressure will be less likely to damage the equipment resulting in an unsuccessful event.

Experiment: The scientists conduct various experiments. The data that the scientists collect indicates the depth at which it is necessary to drill on land and in the ocean in order to reach. The other data that the scientist collect is on the pressure that the equipment will need to experience while drilling for oil at each location.

What is not taken into account with the information that the scientists obtain in their experiments? 

Possible Answers:

Different drills can be used for land and underwater

The amount of oil that can be obtained at each site

All of these

The time it would take to drill to the appropriate depth at each site

The cost of operating on land versus underwater

Correct answer:

All of these

Explanation:

Drills are made to used on land and there are also drills that are made to be used underwater. Operating costs are a necessary requirement to determine the best location to drill at for the maximum profits. The scientist do not consider the oil that can be yielded at each site, which could change the best location to drill at. Finally, the scientist measure the depth to drill at, but there is no indication if it takes longer to drill underwater than on land or vice versa. The scientists should long into all of this information.  

Example Question #1002 : Act Science

Scientist 1: Scientist 1 claims that the best spot to find gold is near volcanic areas. This scientist claims that the high temperatures and high pressure helps to form the gold. Therefore the best area to find large quantities of gold is near volcanoes.

Scientist 2: Scientist 2 asserts that the best area to find gold is in rivers. In the rivers the gold can be free flowing and easier to see. In addition, the gold found in the rivers does not necessarily require equipment for digging. It is is found in the river due to the water carrying, rather than eroding it. 

How can it be determined which scientist's site is the best to find gold? 

Possible Answers:

Ask locals of both regions how much gold they believe can be found in each location

The scientists can ask a geologist for the best location

The scientists can guess at the best location and search for gold there

Dig only a single hole near the volcano and only look at one river then compare the obtained data

Cannot be determined from the given information

Correct answer:

Dig only a single hole near the volcano and only look at one river then compare the obtained data

Explanation:

The scientists should not ask the locals or a geologist, but should perform experiments themselves to obtain primary data. The scientists can perform a smaller dig site at the volcano and a smaller scale look at the rivers to determine the best location before performing a full scale digging experiment. 

Example Question #1002 : Act Science

Scientists have long debated the origin of organic molecules on Earth. Organic molecules are those based on the atom carbon, which can form four distinct bonds in contrast to the fewer number allowed in most other non-metals. As a result of this property, carbon can give rise to the enormously complex molecular shapes necessary for life to arise.

Some scientists argue that organic matter was dissolved in water ice on comets, and brought to Earth early in its history. These comets crashed into the early Earth, and deposited carbon-based molecules in copious quantities to the Earth’s surface as their water melted.

In 2014, the first space probe landed on the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Suppose that scientists find the following information from 5 distinct samples after landing on the comet. Each sample was taken at a single geographical location, but 5 meters deeper than the last. Sample 1 was taken at a depth of 1 meter below the surface.

Sample #

Water Ice?

Concentration of Organics

1

No

N/A

2

Yes

1 mg/L

3

No

N/A

4

Yes

4 mg/L

5

Yes

10 mg/L

These samples were compared to 5 similar samples from the surface of Mars. Scientists posited that this comparison would be meaningful because we know that life does not exist on Mars the same way that it does on Earth. Thus, they are comparing a known non-biological celestial body, Mars, with another celestial body, the comet, which may be seeding life on suitable plants.

Sample #

Water Ice?

Concentration of Organics

1

No

N/A

2

No

N/A

3

No

N/A

4

No

N/A

5

Yes

1 mg/L

The use of multiple samples on both the comet and Mars is most likely used to:

I.  Compare different geographical regions on both the comet and Mars, as measured for the concentration of organics

II.  Help determine the consistency of measurements taken by the instruments

III.  Ascertain how depth of sampling impacts the concentration of organics

Possible Answers:

II and III

I and III

I and II

II only

Correct answer:

II and III

Explanation:

The passage specifies that the sampling is being completed in one location on both Mars and the comet. Thus, option I is not appropriate. Both II and III are valid reasons for using multiple measurements. These multiple measurements give us an idea of how consistent our measurement instruments are, as well as the overall trends that we are observing.

Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors