MCAT Physical : Atoms, Elements, and the Periodic Table

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for MCAT Physical

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

Example Questions

Example Question #1 : Subatomic Particles And Elemental Properties

Which given element has the highest electronegativity?

Possible Answers:

Titanium

Phosphorus

Arsenic

Oxygen

Sodium

Correct answer:

Oxygen

Explanation:

Electronegativity increases from the bottom to the top, and from the left to the right of the periodic table. Of the choices given, oxygen is closest to the top right corner.

Example Question #1 : Subatomic Particles And Elemental Properties

Which of the following has the largest radius?

Possible Answers:

Correct answer:

Explanation:

The answer is . While chloride ion is not farthest downward and right on the periodic table of the answers, it is the largest radius in this case. Potassium ion, although isoelectronic with chloride, would have a smaller radius because it would have more protons pulling at the same number of electrons.

Example Question #1 : Subatomic Particles And Elemental Properties

Which of these elements has an atomic radius that is smaller than its ionic radius?

Possible Answers:

Correct answer:

Explanation:

Chlorine is the only nonmetal listed which would gain electrons to ionize. For a nonmetal, becoming an ion usually means gaining electron(s), and therefore means an increase in radius. Therefore, since  is the only element in this list that will gain electrons to ionize, it is the correct answer.

Example Question #2 : Subatomic Particles And Elemental Properties

Which of these pairs of elements are most chemically similar?

Possible Answers:

Copper and cobalt

Chlorine and xenon

Hydrogen and helium

Magnesium and potassium

Calcium and barium

Correct answer:

Calcium and barium

Explanation:

The most chemically similar elements can are in the same family on the periodic table. Calcium and barium are both in group II of the periodic table. In all other answer choices, the two elements listed are in different families and are therefore chemically dissimilar.

Example Question #1 : Ions And Isotopes

In the operation of nuclear reactors, engineers make use of substances known as neutron poisons. These are used to help store nuclear waste and slow nuclear reactions, but are also generated naturally in nuclear chain reactions as a by-product. This natural by-product can stop the desirable chain reaction present in a nuclear reactor used for power generation. 

For example, in nuclear power plants, U-235 is used as a fuel. U-235 absorbs a neutron, and subsequently generates neutrons (which power the chain reaction) and Xe-135. Xe-135 is a well-known neutron poison, and thus can impact the continued chain reaction of a nuclear power plant if it becomes over abundant during power generation. 

To help account for this, engineers have developed measurements to quantify the impact of Xe-135 on nuclear operations. For instance, the time during which there is an inability to start a reactor due to the buildup of Xe-135 is referred to as the precluded start-up time. Also, the amount of time that the reactor cannot override the effects of built up Xe-135 is called poison outage time. Perhaps the most important measure that engineers have developed is the neutron absorption capacity (σ), which is measured in units of barns and is a function of microscopic cross section. Xe-135 has a neutron absorption capacity of 2.00 * 106 barns, while another common poison, Sm-149, has a neutron absorption capacity of 74,500 barns.

A scientist studying the reaction above is surprised to find traces of Xe-124 in his analysis of the reaction. How is Xe-124 different from Xe-135?

Possible Answers:

Xe-135 is a more massive isotope than Xe-124

Xe-135 is a more massive ion than Xe-124

Xe-124 has 11 fewer protons

Xe-124 has 11 fewer electrons

Xe-124 has 11 fewer positrons

Correct answer:

Xe-135 is a more massive isotope than Xe-124

Explanation:

Xe-135 and Xe-124 are isotopes of xenon, not ions. Ions have charges, while isotopes have varying atomic mass numbers; thus, Xe-135 is a more massive isotope of xenon than is Xe-124.

Note that this change in mass can only be attributed to neutron numbers. Changing proton number would alter the elemental identity. Changing electron number would not alter the mass, and would create a charge discrepancy.

Example Question #2 : Ions And Isotopes

The isotope  has _________ protons, _________ neutrons, and _________ electrons.

Possible Answers:

53 . . . 78 . . . 53

53 . . . 78 . . . 78

78 . . . 78 . . . 53

53 . . . 131 . . . 53

131 . . . 53 . . . 131

Correct answer:

53 . . . 78 . . . 53

Explanation:

The lower number, the atomic number, indicates the number of protons. The upper number, the mass number, indicates the sum of protons and neutrons. The number of neutrons would be equal to the number of protons subtracted from the total mass number. In a neutral atom, the number of protons and electrons is equal in order to balance charge.

The atomic number of iodine is 53, meaning there must be 53 protons. The total mass number is 131.

The remaining mass must come from neutrons; thus there are 78 neutrons. Since the atom is neutral, the electrons will balance the protons. In total, there are 53 protons, 78 neutrons, and 53 electrons.

Example Question #61 : Atoms, Elements, And The Periodic Table

Which of the following combination of particles accurately describes the above element?

Possible Answers:

29 protons, 93 neutrons, 29 electrons

29 protons, 64 neutrons, 35 electrons

29 protons, 35 neutrons, 29 electrons

29 protons, 35 neutrons, 35 electrons

29 protons, 64 neutrons, 29 electrons

Correct answer:

29 protons, 35 neutrons, 29 electrons

Explanation:

The lower number next to the atomic symbol gives the number of protons, 29. The upper number gives the number of protons plus neutrons, so the number of neutrons is given by the difference between upper and lower numbers: 64 - 29 = 35. Finally, this is a neutral isotope since no net charge is noted, so the number of electrons must equal the number of protons, 29.

Example Question #2 : Ions And Isotopes

In the operation of nuclear reactors, engineers make use of substances known as neutron poisons. These are used to help store nuclear waste and slow nuclear reactions, but are also generated naturally in nuclear chain reactions as a by-product. This natural by-product can stop the desirable chain reaction present in a nuclear reactor used for power generation. 

For example, in nuclear power plants, U-235 is used as a fuel. U-235 absorbs a neutron, and subsequently generates neutrons (which power the chain reaction) and Xe-135. Xe-135 is a well-known neutron poison, and thus can impact the continued chain reaction of a nuclear power plant if it becomes over abundant during power generation. 

To help account for this, engineers have developed measurements to quantify the impact of Xe-135 on nuclear operations. For instance, the time during which there is an inability to start a reactor due to the buildup of Xe-135 is referred to as the precluded start-up time. Also, the amount of time that the reactor cannot override the effects of built up Xe-135 is called poison outage time. Perhaps the most important measure that engineers have developed is the neutron absorption capacity (σ), which is measured in units of barns and is a function of microscopic cross section. Xe-135 has a neutron absorption capacity of 2.00 * 106 barns, while another common poison, Sm-149, has a neutron absorption capacity of 74,500 barns.

A scientist is studying atomic radius within a sample of radioactive flourine sourced from a nuclear reactor similar to the one described in the passage. Which of the following changes is likely to result in the largest atomic radius found in the sample?

Possible Answers:

Adding a neutron to flourine

Removing an electron from flourine

Adding a proton to flourine

Adding an electron to flourine

Removing a neutron from flourine

Correct answer:

Adding an electron to flourine

Explanation:

Adding an electron to flourine results in a flourine anion. Anions generally have larger atomic radii than do their original atomic counterparts, and relative to their cation counterparts. Addition or substraction of neutrons has less of an impact due to their neutral charges and location in the nucelus. Adding a proton would increase the charge in the nucleus, convert flourine to neon, and pull the existing electrons in more tightly, decreasing radius.

Example Question #3 : Ions And Isotopes

In the operation of nuclear reactors, engineers make use of substances known as neutron poisons. These are used to help store nuclear waste and slow nuclear reactions, but are also generated naturally in nuclear chain reactions as a by-product. This natural by-product can stop the desirable chain reaction present in a nuclear reactor used for power generation. 

For example, in nuclear power plants, U-235 is used as a fuel. U-235 absorbs a neutron, and subsequently generates neutrons (which power the chain reaction) and Xe-135. Xe-135 is a well-known neutron poison, and thus can impact the continued chain reaction of a nuclear power plant if it becomes over abundant during power generation. 

To help account for this, engineers have developed measurements to quantify the impact of Xe-135 on nuclear operations. For instance, the time during which there is an inability to start a reactor due to the buildup of Xe-135 is referred to as the precluded start-up time. Also, the amount of time that the reactor cannot override the effects of built up Xe-135 is called poison outage time. Perhaps the most important measure that engineers have developed is the neutron absorption capacity (σ), which is measured in units of barns and is a function of microscopic cross section. Xe-135 has a neutron absorption capacity of 2.00 * 106 barns, while another common poison, Sm-149, has a neutron absorption capacity of 74,500 barns.

How is a nuclear reaction, as described in the passage, different from a chemcial reaction?

Possible Answers:

Nuclear reactions frequently involve changes in electric charge; chemical reactions do not

Chemical reactions result in an increase in the entropy of the universe; nuclear reactions do not

Nuclear reactions involve the release and absorption of energy; chemical reactions do not

Nuclear reactions frequently involve changes in atomic number; chemical reactions do not

Chemical reactions frequently involve changes in atomic number; nuclear reactions do not

Correct answer:

Nuclear reactions frequently involve changes in atomic number; chemical reactions do not

Explanation:

Nuclear reactions are unique because they can involve the change of one atom to another, by changing the atomic number. Chemical reactions, by and large, keep atomic number constant, but often vary the ionic state of atoms. In this way, chemical reactions can be thought of as generally involving electrons, while nuclear reactions generally involve protons and neutrons.

Example Question #1 : Ions And Isotopes

An isotope of an element __________.

  1. has all the chemical characteristics of the element
  2. can be stable, or non-radioactive
  3. is designated by the atomic number of the element
  4. contributes to the atomic mass of the element, as shown on the periodic table, in proportion to its abundance
  5. all of the above
Possible Answers:

5

3

1

2

4

Correct answer:

5

Explanation:

The correct answer is 5. An isotope is a form of an element with a different number of neutrons in the nucleus. Because the proton number (atomic number) is the same, the electron configuration is the same and therefore the atom behaves chemically in an identical manner to other atoms of the same element. Many isotopes are stable, and indeed that is how elements such as chlorine come to have average atomic masses in between integers; chlorine at 35.45 g/mole is a weighted average of the two stable isotopes, chlorine-35 and chlorine-37. Unstable isotopes of any element undergo decay at various rates. Unless they persist in some quantifiable amount, they aren’t really “there” to participate in the weighted average of an atomic mass.

Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors