All GMAT Verbal Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #28 : Correcting Preposition Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Lamar was unsure which department he should deliver his work to.
Lamar was unsure to which, department he should deliver his work.
Lamar was unsure which department he delivers his work to.
Lamar was unsure which department he should deliver his work to.
Lamar was unsure, which department he should deliver his work to.
Lamar was unsure to which department he should deliver his work.
Lamar was unsure to which department he should deliver his work.
This sentence contains a dangling preposition. Prepositions should never appear at the end of a sentence. Instead of saying "which department he should deliver his work to," it should be "to which department he should deliver his work." The correct choice is, "Lamar was unsure to which department he should deliver his work."
Example Question #21 : Correcting Preposition Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
She wondered what the next invention would be of.
what, the next invention would be.
what, the next invention would be of.
what, the next invention, would be of.
what the next invention would be.
what the next invention would be of.
what the next invention would be.
This sentence contains a dangling preposition; a preposition should never end a clause in standard English. In actuality, there is no need for the word "of" whatsoever, and all that is needed is to omit it. The correct choice is, "what the next invention would be."
Example Question #30 : Correcting Preposition Errors
Which option best replaces the underlined sentence?
She wondered who the painting was of.
She wondered who was painted in the painting.
She wondered whom the painting was of.
She wondered whom was in the painting.
She wondered who the painting was of.
She wondered who was in the painting.
She wondered who was in the painting.
This sentence contains a dangling preposition. Prepositions should never end a clause. The sentence needs to be reworded. The correct choice is "She wondered who was in the painting" as the other choices either have the dangling preposition or pronoun errors.
Example Question #31 : Correcting Other Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Her inquiry about the petroleum cartels in Brazil made her a target of the cartel's harassment.
Her inquiry about the petroleum cartels of Brazil
Her inquiry into the petroleum cartels into Brazil
Her inquiry into the petroleum cartels of Brazil
Her investigation about the petroleum cartels into Brazil
Her inquiry on top of the petroleum cartels all about Brazil
Her inquiry into the petroleum cartels of Brazil
The most idiomatic use of prepositions is "Her inquiry into the petroleum cartels of Brazil." The phrase "inquiry about" is unidiomatic. And many of the adjustments to the preposition preceding Brazil are seemingly trivial. It is important in this case to examine each choice carefully and consider both prepositions and the particular context of their use.
Example Question #31 : Correcting Other Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
Many soldiers have undertaken specialized education, which both helps them with current combat tasks and future endeavors.
both of which helps them with current combat tasks and future endeavors.
which helps them both with current combat tasks and future endeavors.
which both helps them with current combat tasks and future endeavors.
which helps them with both current combat tasks and future endeavors.
which helps them with current combat tasks and future endeavors both.
which helps them with both current combat tasks and future endeavors.
The placement of "both" in this sentence makes the underlined phrase confusing and awkward. By placing the word "both" nearer to the two things it joins together, "current combat tasks and future endeavors," makes the meaning of the sentence much more clear. The only answer choice which correctly makes this change is "which helps them with both current combat tasks and future endeavors."
Example Question #2 : Correcting Conventional And Idiomatic Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
The abrupt resignation of the CEO was not very surprising to those close to him, who knew that he would always put his family first.
who knew that he would always put his family first and foremost.
who knew that he would always be putting his family first.
who knew that he would always put his family first.
who knew he would always put family first.
who knew that he would have always put his family first.
who knew he would always put family first.
The sentence is not technically gramatically correct as it is written, but it is awkwardly worded and unnecessarily long. The sentence is best served by being shortened to a more direct statement that conveys the same meaning. The answer choice that best does this kind of streamlining is "who knew he would always puthis family first."
Example Question #3 : Correcting Conventional And Idiomatic Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
For all intensive purposes, the new plan was essentially the same as the old plan, but with a much tighter time frame in which to accomplish everything.
For all intensive purposes, the new plan being essentially the same
For all intents and purposes, the new plan was essentially the same
For all intensive purposes, the new plan was effectively the same
For all intensive purposes, the new plan was essentially the same thing
For all intensive purposes, the new plan was essentially the same
For all intents and purposes, the new plan was essentially the same
The use of the phrase "for all intensive purposes," as it is in this sentence, is incorrect. The idiom is actually "for all intents and purposes," which indicates that every element was considered. "For all intents and purposes, the new plan was essentially the same," is the correct answer choice as it is the only one that uses the correct idiom.
Example Question #4 : Correcting Conventional And Idiomatic Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
In the back corner of the building stood a lone chair, that was said to be a memorial for the property’s original owner who died tragically before the mansion was fully completed.
a lone chair, which was saying
a lone chair, that was said
a lone chair that was said
a lone chair, which had been said
a lone chair which was said
a lone chair that was said
The use of "which" in the underlined portion of the sentence is incorrect, as it introduces information crucial to the sentence. "Which" is used to introduce non-restrictive clauses, which provide additional but non-essential information in a sentence, and "that" is used to introduce restrictive clauses, which contain information information essential to the sentence. "Which" should be preceded by a comma. In this sentence, the comma that precedes "that" is extraneous and incorrect. As the only answer choice that makes this change, "a lone chair that was said" is the correct answer choice.
Example Question #5 : Correcting Conventional And Idiomatic Usage Errors
She is as yet regarded as being the best pirate on the seven seas.
What option best replaces the underlined portion of the sentence?
She is as yet regarded as being
She is yet regarded as being
As yet, she is regarded as being
She is as yet regarded as
As yet, she is regarded as
As yet, she is regarded as
"As yet" or "as of yet" can almost always be replaced by "yet." The only exception is when it comes at the beginning of the sentence, where it means the same thing as "so far." "Regarded as being" is a common grammar mistake. It should instead be "regarded as."
Example Question #5 : Correcting Conventional And Idiomatic Usage Errors
Replace the underlined portion with the answer choice that results in a sentence that is clear, precise, and meets the requirements of standard written English.
The snob woman looked down on the slovenly young man, who always dressed in a disheveled manner.
The snob woman looked down on the slovenly young man
The snobby woman looked down on the slovenly young man
The snob woman looks down on the slovenly young man
The snob woman looked down to the slovenly young man
The snob woman looking down on the slovenly young man
The snobby woman looked down on the slovenly young man
The use of "snob" as an adjective in this sentence is incorrect, as "snob" is a noun and cannot properly modify "woman." The word needs to be changed to an adjectival form. "The snobby woman looked down on the slovenly young man" is the only answer choice to appropriately use an adjective.