All AP World History Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #11 : War And Civil Conflict 1450 To 1750
Select the event that signaled the beginning of the end of Spain’s role as a power player in 16th century Western Europe.
Portugal’s capture of Spain’s properties in the New World
England’s calamitous defeat of the Spanish Armada
Pope Sixtus V’s papal/military alliance with England
Sir Francis Drake’s destruction of the Spanish port Cadiz
The assassination of King Phillip II of Spain
England’s calamitous defeat of the Spanish Armada
When war first broke out between Spain and England in 1587, following English Queen Elizabeth I’s execution of Mary, Queen of Scots, many onlookers would most likely have seen Spain as the clearly inevitable victor. However, this was not at all the case. Despite King Phillip II of Spain’s attempts to muster his army and navy swiftly so that he could invade England, the English forces were able to strike first. In 1587, Sir Francis Drake, a famous privateer, led the English navy on a series of devastating assaults on the main Spanish port of Cadiz and various spots along the coast of Portugal. Drake’s attack on Cadiz ended up destroying part of the Spanish Armada (aka the navy), forcing Spain to postpone its invasion until repairs could be made. Finally, the Armada was ready and on May 30th, 1587, it sailed off for England. But in a shocking turn of events, the English navy completely shattered the world-famous Armada; about one-third of the Armada’s ships were ruined, sunk, or otherwise lost. This defeat crippled Spain, both militarily and politically. In the eyes of much of Western Europe, the once all-mighty Armada had been defeated and this meant that Spain was now vulnerable. The country was never quite able to recover the prestige and power it once had wielded. England and France took advantage of this power vacuum and moved to fill it, not only within Europe but also in the New World, where they gradually took over Spain’s colonies.
Example Question #641 : Political History
Select the primary cause of the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648).
The Calvinist takeover of the Palatinate region
The German territories’ secession from Austria
Religious fervor/hatred
The Holy Roman Emperor’s repeal of the Treaty of Augsburg
Ruthless and conflicting political ambitions
Religious fervor/hatred
The Thirty Years’ War can be rather difficult to understand at first, especially because by the time it ended in 1648, nearly every country and/or region in Western Europe had become somehow involved. It is important to keep in mind that, despite all the fighting over pieces of territory and alliances, the primary cause of the war was actually religious fervor and hatred. The Peace of Augsburg (1555) had established an uneasy truce but many rulers refused to respect the right of other leaders to peacefully decide the religious orientation of their own regions. Through political and economic pressure, many monarchs attempted to change the dominant religion of other nations, as Ferdinand II did when he became Holy Roman Emperor in 1619. Such schemes were especially frequent within the scattered German territories (no united country of Germany yet existed). The Germanic region, because of its perfect geographic position, was a rich highway of trade for the entire continent and all the separate German territories were used to governing themselves without outside interference. However, the Germanic region was torn apart by internal conflict between nearly equally strong Lutheran and Calvinist factions. The situation was further intensified when Frederick III became the Elector Palatine (aka the ruler) of the Palatinate, a tiny region near modern-day Luxembourg. Frederick III was a devout Calvinist who wanted to spread his faith and so he formed a Protestant military and made alliances with England, France, and the Netherlands against Catholic Spain. The Holy Roman Empire (which was seen as the main stronghold of Catholicism) didn’t want to leave its Catholic ally, Spain, vulnerable and so it rushed to the country’s aid, which turned up the temperature even further. Seeing this, the German territories also began to take sides, and perhaps the richest region, Bavaria, which was mostly Catholic, allied itself with Spain. The duke of Bavaria, Maximilian I, formed a Catholic military defense league to oppose Frederick III’s Protestant league. A confrontation was now basically unstoppable.
Example Question #651 : Political History
Select the one interval/period that was NOT part of the Thirty Years’ War.
The Papal Period
The Swedish/French Period
The Danish Period
The Bohemian Period
The Swedish Period
The Papal Period
The Thirty Years’ War is commonly divided by historians into four different intervals/periods in which various Western European regions and countries became dominant in the fighting. The first part of the war, which lasted from 1618 until 1622, took place mostly in Bohemia, a region which today is part of Germany. The Bohemian Period first erupted when Ferdinand, the archduke of Styria – who in 1619 would also become Ferdinand II, Holy Roman Emperor – took over the throne of Bohemia and began persecuting Protestants. Outraged, the Bohemian Protestants rose up to throw off Ferdinand’s rule, drawing in various other Western European powers in the process. The Danish Period (1625-1629) broke out when King Christian IV of Denmark came to the Bohemian Protestants’ rescue by attempting to invade the Germanic region. Next, in 1630, came the Swedish Period, in which King Gustavus Adolphus II of Sweden assumed leadership of the main Protestant forces. A brilliant military strategist, King Adolphus led the Swedish and other Protestant armies to numerous victories against Ferdinand’s Catholic armies. Eventually, in 1635, several German Protestant states (led by Saxony) entered into the Peace of Prague with Ferdinand and dropped out of the conflict. But Sweden, buoyed by fresh support from France and the Netherlands, refused to back down and so the final period of the war, the Swedish/French, erupted. Lasting for thirteen more years, this interval saw some of the bloodiest fighting of the entire conflict, especially once the Spanish Army got involved (on the side of the Holy Roman Emperor).
Example Question #12 : War And Civil Conflict 1450 To 1750
Select the one battle that is regarded as the turning point of the Thirty Years’ War.
The Battle of Wallenstein
The Battle of Lutzen
The Battle of Breitenfeld
The Battle of White Mountain
The Defenestration of Prague
The Battle of Breitenfeld
Historians consider the Battle of Breitenfeld to be the turning point of the Thirty Years’ War. The Battle of Breitenfeld occurred in 1630, right at the opening of the Swedish period of the conflict. At this point, King Gustavus Adolphus II of Sweden had just entered the war and he was eager to put his famous military mind and strong army to the test. However, the Holy Roman Emperor, Ferdinand II, had recently chosen a new leader for his armies – Albrecht of Wallenstein, a Protestant mercenary who had recently won several brutal victories in Denmark and who seemed unstoppable. Shrewdly, King Adolphus allied himself with the leaders of the Germanic territories Brandenburg and Saxony and their combined military might crushed Wallenstein’s forces at the Battle of Breitenfeld. Crucial to the Swedish/Brandenburg/Saxony victory were the Swedish King’s new battlefield innovations – King Adolphus made his artillery, infantry, and cavalry units all quite mobile and also taught them his own fearsome “fire and charge” strategy. The defeat of his forces at Breitenfeld came as a complete shock to the Holy Roman Emperor and he lost confidence in Wallenstein as an effective general. In 1634, the Emperor actually had Wallenstein assassinated, a decision which was motivated even further by revelations that the mercenary had been attempting to make backroom peace deals with the Protestant army.
Example Question #101 : War And Civil Conflict
Which statement about the Treaty of Westphalia is FALSE?
Austria and Brandenburg emerged as the two most powerful Germanic regions
Each Germanic territory was given its independence and territorial respect
Calvinism was recognized as legally protected religion
The Netherlands and the Swiss Confederacy were both placed under English control
The Peace of Augsburg’s provision of independent religious choice by each country’s ruler was upheld
The Netherlands and the Swiss Confederacy were both placed under English control
Finally, the Thirty Years’ War came to an end in 1648 with the Treaty of Westphalia. The Treaty upheld the Peace of Augsburg by re-stating that the ruler of every country and/or region was allowed to freely (without external interference) choose his/her people’s national religion. The Treaty also recognized the independence of each Germanic territory, of which Brandenburg (later known as Prussia) and Austria would become the most influential. Legal independence was also granted to the Swiss Confederacy (aka modern Switzerland) and the United Provinces of the Netherlands. Perhaps most importantly for Europe’s future peace, Calvinism was recognized as a fully legal and protected religion, just like Lutheranism and Catholicism had been for many years. Pope Innocent X opposed this last agreement but the other rulers, desperate for peace, overruled his objections.
Example Question #11 : War And Civil Conflict 1450 To 1750
Why is the Thirty Years’ War considered the second most destructive event in European history before modern times?
The massive amount of military and civilian causalities
None of these
The widespread looting carried out by all armies
The many political assassinations ordered by all sides
The new military tactics developed by King Gustavus Adolphus II of Sweden
The massive amount of military and civilian causalities
Today, many historians rank the Thirty Years’ War as the second most destructive event in all of pre-modern European history (the time period before the Industrial Revolution). Naturally, the Black Death holds the number one spot. The Thirty Years’ War earned this reputation because of the massive amount of causalities, both military and civilian, that resulted over the long years of warfare. Each leader urged his men to fight ruthlessly, employed brutal battle tactics, and encouraged widespread looting and plundering of any captured territories. The fierce nature of these techniques, combined with the religious hatred that raged through both sides, guaranteed that any civilian caught in the crossfire stood a good chance of being killed, even after a battle had ended. Casualty counts were especially high in the Germanic region, where historians estimate that by the time the Treaty of Westphalia had been signed in 1648, one third of the total population had been killed.
Example Question #101 : War And Civil Conflict
In 1642, the English Civil War erupted, with the forces of King Charles I facing off against the Parliament’s soldiers. Which statement about this conflict is FALSE?
The war was provoked by King Charles I’s armed invasion of Parliament
The King’s men were known as “Cavaliers,” while Parliament’s supporters were called “Roundheads"
Oliver Cromwell was the most influential Scottish leader to ever challenge the King’s army on the battlefield
The entire conflict would last for four years
Oliver Cromwell was the most influential Scottish leader to ever challenge the King’s army on the battlefield
In 1642, the long years of animosity between Parliament and King Charles I erupted into civil war. The final push into armed conflict came when the King personally led a military invasion of Parliament, seeking to capture and imprison the most vocal of his critics within that body. Although the King’s effort failed, he promptly began to assemble his army and so Parliament, outraged by the incursion, raised their own forces. Soon enough, the two forces met on the battlefield and would continue to clash in numerous battles for the next four years. The King’s men became known as “Cavaliers” (because of their formal military training), while Parliament’s soldiers were called “Roundheads” (because of the distinctive shape of their helmets). Ultimately, Parliament would win the war, partially owing to their alliance with Scottish rebels in 1643. Yet perhaps the single most crucial factor that led to Parliament’s victory was the leadership of one man: Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell was an English squire who rose to prominence through the Parliamentary forces due to his military cunning, strong leadership, and strict discipline. Cromwell was a devout Puritan and he intended that Parliament’s victory over the King would lead to formal legal acceptance of dissenters by the English government.
Example Question #11 : War And Civil Conflict 1450 To 1750
Select the most vital term of peace established by the 1555 Treaty of Augsburg.
Every region’s leader was free to decide its own religious policy.
The Holy Roman Empire was abolished.
Calvinism and Anabaptism were granted legal recognition and protection.
The Catholic Church could no longer compel any region to pay taxes to the Papacy.
None of these
Every region’s leader was free to decide its own religious policy.
The Peace of Augsburg, which first took effect in 1555, put an end to the battles that had been waged between various Protestant armies against the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V over a period of nearly thirty long years. The Peace included various conflict resolutions but its most important term was the adoption of the principle that from now on, the leader of each Western European region (from Switzerland to Denmark to Germany) was able to freely choose the religious allegiance of his own region. No outside influence or external force was allowed to interfere with this freedom and any region’s dissenters were permitted to immigrate to another area in which their religion had been selected as the official norm. Under the Peace of Augsburg, Lutheranism was officially granted legal protection and the regional split between Protestantism and Catholicism was therefore firmly established.
Example Question #11 : War And Civil Conflict 1450 To 1750
Select the final outcome of the 1667 War of the Devolution.
France annexed the Spanish Netherlands
France assumed control of several towns in the Spanish Netherlands
Spain regained several formerly French territories
Sweden took control of the Franche-Comte
France assumed control of several towns in the Spanish Netherlands
As part of his strategy to increase France’s status and secure its borders, in 1667 King Louis XIV invaded the neighboring territories of Flanders and the Franche-Comte. Prior to the invasion, tensions between these territories, France, and the Spanish Netherlands had reached a boiling point after King Louis claimed that his first wife (Marie Therese) was the rightful heir to the Spanish Netherland’s throne. (The Spanish Netherlands were separate from the United Provinces of the Netherlands.) When neither the government of the Spanish Netherlands or any other surrounding provinces agreed to support his claim, Louis decided to seize what he wanted by force and so in 1667 he sent his armies to simultaneously invade Flanders and the Franche-Comte (two areas which France had long coveted). This conflict became known as the War of the Devolution. While France’s invasion was initially successful, ultimately France was forced to retreat from Flanders by the armies of England, Sweden, and the United Provinces of the Netherlands. These three nations banded together, in the so-called Triple Alliance, to force out France’s army and hopefully put an end to Louis’s ambitions. Yet in spite of his forced retreat from Flanders, Louis was far too militarily strong to ignore entirely. In the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, which formally ended the War of the Devolution, Louis was able to gain control over several towns that had once belonged to the Spanish Netherlands, as a sort of peace offering that the Triple Alliance hoped would keep the French king satisfied and prevent further confrontations.
Example Question #1374 : Ap World History
Which piece of land/territory did France gain as a result of the 1678-9 Peace of Nijmwegen?
The Franche-Comte
The entire United Provinces of the Netherlands
Alsace and Lorraine
Flanders
The Franche-Comte
In spite of the concessions made to him in the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, King Louis XIV was not content with the amount of territory under French control. As part of his plan to secure France’s borders, he began scheming to conquer several of the areas immediately outside of France’s borders, which he intended to use as buffer zones against foreign invasions. In 1672, Louis sent his French army to invade the Netherlands (both the Spanish Netherlands, which were controlled by the Hapsburg dynasty, and the independent United Provinces of the Netherlands). Alarmed by Louis’s second invasion of the region, William of Orange of the Netherlands joined forces with the Holy Roman Emperor, Spain, and the leaders of the territories of Lorraine and Brandenburg to attempt to defeat the Sun King’s army once and for all. However, France’s army was truly a large and formidable force – Louis had spent massive amounts of money recruiting more soldiers, investing in new methods of training, and furnishing his men with new, top-notch weapons and armor. Consequently, the coalition forces, led by Prince William of Orange, were unable to decisively defeat the French army. Ultimately, the conflict ended in a stalemate. The concluding peace treaty, known as the Peace of Nijmwegen, once again gave Louis several advantageous benefits. Most importantly, this Peace gave France control over the territory of Franche-Comte, which Louis and his royal ancestors had long coveted.