Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and the right to peacefully assemble are all protections enumerated in the First Amendment.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," as written in the Bill of Rights, restricts government from establishing an official or national religion. The Free Exercised clause refers to your right to practice your religion. The 2nd Amendment covers the right to bear arms and due process is in the 4th Amendment. The Freedom of Religion Clause does not exist.

Free speech is protected by the 1st amendment and includes symbolic speech, like flag burning, and attack ads. The Supreme Court has ruled that when speech may incite immediate violence or causes a public danger, it can be limited. Such as yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.

The Anti-Federalists were opposed to the constitution, as a concession to their concerns, it was promised that a Bill of Rights would be drafted by the First Congress of the United States. This was done in 1789 when the 1st Congress came into session.

When the Supreme Court "incorporates" an amendment in the Bill of Rights, it applies that amendment--that is, requires its enforcement against--ALL of the states. The Supreme Court does this through the 14th Amendment (generally through either the Due Process clause, or the Equal Protection clause). At this point, most students wonder why the Supreme Court needs to do anything at all--after all, aren't the amendments constitutional law, and thus they trump state law? The full answer is far beyond the scope of an AP/College level American Government course, but the brief answer is no. Prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment, the Supreme Court held in Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833) that the Bill of Rights applied ONLY to the federal government. Thus, rather than overturning Barron, the Supreme Court has used the 14th Amendment to apply Bill of Rights amendments piecemeal to the states. 

The Supreme Court need not have a hand in allowing corporations to do anything--corporations are largely governed by state law, and can form for "any lawful purpose." Thus this answer cannot be correct. 

Forbidding the state from applying an amendment is incorrect for multiple reasons. Most importantly, the principles of federalism dictate that so long as a state is not acting unconstitutionally, or against the federal government in areas where the federal government controls, the state is free to act. Thus this answer cannot be correct. 

Enforcing the amendment against the federal government sounds tempting, but it is not correct. Remember that the bill of rights (at least until the 14th Amendment and incorporation) applied only to the federal government, thus the Supreme Court would not need to "incorporate" anything. 

"No answer is correct" cannot be correct for the simple reason that there is a correct answer! 

First, remember that the Bill of Rights consists of ONLY the first ten amendments. The Amendment beginning “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude . . .” is the correct answer, as it is the 13th Amendment. Although this may sound as if it belongs in the Bill of Rights, it is not one of the original ten.

The rest are as follows:

“ . . . to keep and bear arms” is the Second Amendment
“No Soldier shall in time of peace be quartered . . . “ is the Third Amendment

This one is slightly tricky—you may not have heard of it before, because it’s never been the subject of any controversy whatsoever. That said, it was EXTREMELY important to the newly-minted USA because one of the many transgressions of the British (in the eyes of the public) was that the British forced the [then-] colonists to house soldiers.

“ . . . nor shall private property be taken for public use . . .” is part of the Fifth Amendment
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights . . .” is the Ninth Amendment

Again, this may seem unfamiliar, but it is an important part of the Bill of Rights, and the greater scheme of Federalism. 

The Bill of Rights incorporates the first ten amendments of the Constitution, including the rights to free speech and freedom of religion, as well as the right to bear arms, and many others.

The Third Amendment to the Constitution is one of the least commented on and remembered parts of the Bill of Rights, but the protection it gives was just as important to the framers of the Constitution as the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights. British colonial officials would house, or quarter, troops in private homes, which was a source of consternation in the colonies as well as a practice many Americans did not want to see in their new independent nation.

The Fourth Amendment was created to protect citizens from government searches or seizures without a warrant. This was crucial for the colonists because of their experiences with Great Britain: it was not unusual for British soldiers to search homes or seize belongings for any reason they saw fit.

The Federalists believed the Constitution on its own could define the new government of the United States, as well as protect the rights of the people; however, the Anti-Federalists refused to approve the new Constitution without a Bill of Rights. They believed government could easily become uncontrollable if not kept in check, and the Bill of Rights would guarantee certain rights to the people while helping keep the government accountable.