Scientist 1: This scientist claims that the current in a circuit flows from the positive side of a battery to the negative side of the battery. In other words, the protons in the circuit are responsible for the flow of electricity.

Scientist 2: This scientist asserts that the current in a circuit flows from the negative side of a battery to the positive side of the battery. In other words, the electrons in the circuit are responsible for the flow of electricity.

Experiment A: The scientists construct a circuit that contains just a battery, a switch and light bulb. The wiring is made of copper. The scientists turn the switch from off to on. It is noticed that the light bulb turns on.

Experiment B: The scientists have developed a novel metal that allows for only electrons to travel through the metal, but does not allow protons to travel through the metal. The scientists construct the same circuit as in Experiment A, using this material as the wiring. When the switch is turned on, the light bulb turns on.

Experiment C: The scientists have also constructed a metal that allows for only protons to travel through the metal, but does not allow for electrons to travel through the metal. The same circuit as in Experiment A is constructed, but with the wiring being made by this innovative metal. When the switch is turned on, the light bulb does not turn on.

Whose viewpoint(s) does Experiment B support or disprove? 

Scientist 1: This scientist claims that the current in a circuit flows from the positive side of a battery to the negative side of the battery. In other words, the protons in the circuit are responsible for the flow of electricity.

Scientist 2: This scientist asserts that the current in a circuit flows from the negative side of a battery to the positive side of the battery. In other words, the electrons in the circuit are responsible for the flow of electricity.

Experiment A: The scientists construct a circuit that contains just a battery, a switch and light bulb. The wiring is made of copper. The scientists turn the switch from off to on. It is noticed that the light bulb turns on.

Experiment B: The scientists have developed a novel metal that allows for only electrons to travel through the metal, but does not allow protons to travel through the metal. The scientists construct the same circuit as in Experiment A, using this material as the wiring. When the switch is turned on, the light bulb turns on.

Experiment C: The scientists have also constructed a metal that allows for only protons to travel through the metal, but does not allow for electrons to travel through the metal. The same circuit as in Experiment A is constructed, but with the wiring being made by this innovative metal. When the switch is turned on, the light bulb does not turn on.

Whose viewpoints are support or disproved by all of these experiments?

Two scientists are concerned with producing electricity with magnets.

Scientist 1 believes that rotating a magnet within a coil of wires will produce electricity. Scientist 1 asserts that the larger the magnet the more electricity will be produced. 

Scientist 2 believes that rotating the coil of wires around a magnet will produce electricity. Scientist 2 asserts that the more number of coils the more electricity will be produced. 

The scientists conduct the following experiment. The scientists take four magnets, A, B, C and D; with A being the smallest magnet, B the next smallest, then C and the largest magnet was D. The scientist rotate the magnets at the same constant speed in the coils and record the number of milliamps produced. This was done in copper wiring with 20, 40 and 60 coils. When testing by rotating the coil around the magnet at the same speed of the magnet rotation produced the results recorded below.

Which of the scientist(s) viewpoints is/are supported by the experiment?

Sometimes scientists need to scale down experiments because collecting full-scale data may not be practical or possible. Most of the time, the data collected during a small scale-experiment is an accurate indicator of full-scale results. For example, research of craters on the Earth’s surface has indicated that the Earth has experienced a history of massive meteor collisions. It has been hypothesized that, amongst other things, these impacting meteorites caused the Earth’s oceans to vaporize. The detrimental effects associated with meteor collisions would have made the planet to be uninhabitable to humans. Due to these adverse effects, an experiment that could produce meteor-sized craters would not be possible in a full-scale setting.

Researchers have developed small-scale experiments that are exemplary of Newton’s three laws of motion. Newton’s first law states that an object in motion will stay in motion unless it is acted on by another force. This phenomenon is known as inertia. The second law comes in the form of an equation that calculates how much force is exerted on two colliding objects with respect to mass and acceleration. In other words force is equal to the mass of an object multiplied by its acceleration. The third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, forces always occur in pairs. A counter force that is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction compliments each force in a particular direction. For example, if you push downwards on a table then the table, in theory, pushes upwards with the same force.

In a particular small-scale exercise, students were asked to design an experiment in which two “meteorites” would be dropped into a medium of sand and the subsequent crater diameters would be measured. Afterwards, the sand would be leveled and the experiment would be repeated. The students were asked to identify all of the factors that could affect the formation of the craters. This was done in order to ensure that each experiment was testing one independent and one dependent variable at a time. Otherwise, it would be unclear which variable is causing the observed effect. Possible variables that could alter the outcome of the experiment included but were not limited to the following: height of the fall, speed of the “meteorite,” angle of impact, and the mass of meteorite.

Consider an experiment that seeks to identify the mass of the meteorite analog. All other variables would have to remain constant in order to ensure accurate results.  In order to do this, the height of the fall was set to one meter. The object was placed on top of a vertical meter stick. In order to keep the acceleration and height of the drop constant, it was rolled off of the stick instead of being pushed or simply dropped. Last, a protractor was used to keep the meter stick at a ninety-degree angle. In the procedure, a marble and a golf ball were used as “meteorites” of different masses.

The results of the experiment were recorded in the table and figure provided.

Many craters on Earth have already been found; however, scientists believe there are many more that will never be discovered. Which of the following represents the most significant factor supporting this theory?

Sometimes scientists need to scale down experiments because collecting full-scale data may not be practical or possible. Most of the time, the data collected during a small scale-experiment is an accurate indicator of full-scale results. For example, research of craters on the Earth’s surface has indicated that the Earth has experienced a history of massive meteor collisions. It has been hypothesized that, amongst other things, these impacting meteorites caused the Earth’s oceans to vaporize. The detrimental effects associated with meteor collisions would have made the planet to be uninhabitable to humans. Due to these adverse effects, an experiment that could produce meteor-sized craters would not be possible in a full-scale setting.

Researchers have developed small-scale experiments that are exemplary of Newton’s three laws of motion. Newton’s first law states that an object in motion will stay in motion unless it is acted on by another force. This phenomenon is known as inertia. The second law comes in the form of an equation that calculates how much force is exerted on two colliding objects with respect to mass and acceleration. In other words force is equal to the mass of an object multiplied by its acceleration. The third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, forces always occur in pairs. A counter force that is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction compliments each force in a particular direction. For example, if you push downwards on a table then the table, in theory, pushes upwards with the same force.

In a particular small-scale exercise, students were asked to design an experiment in which two “meteorites” would be dropped into a medium of sand and the subsequent crater diameters would be measured. Afterwards, the sand would be leveled and the experiment would be repeated. The students were asked to identify all of the factors that could affect the formation of the craters. This was done in order to ensure that each experiment was testing one independent and one dependent variable at a time. Otherwise, it would be unclear which variable is causing the observed effect. Possible variables that could alter the outcome of the experiment included but were not limited to the following: height of the fall, speed of the “meteorite,” angle of impact, and the mass of meteorite.

Consider an experiment that seeks to identify the mass of the meteorite analog. All other variables would have to remain constant in order to ensure accurate results.  In order to do this, the height of the fall was set to one meter. The object was placed on top of a vertical meter stick. In order to keep the acceleration and height of the drop constant, it was rolled off of the stick instead of being pushed or simply dropped. Last, a protractor was used to keep the meter stick at a ninety-degree angle. In the procedure, a marble and a golf ball were used as “meteorites” of different masses.

The results of the experiment were recorded in the table and figure provided.

This experiment was done using objects of differing masses. Instead, imagine that the experiment was done using objects of different volumes (i.e. the mass of the objects stayed the same but their size differed). What can we theorize about the craters?

Scientist 1: Scientist 1 believes that light displays particle behavior. This means that rays of light have their own associated momentum. Furthermore, Scientist 1 does not believe that light will exhibit wave behavior.

Scientist 2: Scientist 2 disagrees with Scientist 1 and believes that light can exhibit wave behavior, but does not display particle behavior. In other words, this scientist believes that light does not have any momentum.

Experiment: To settle their disagreement, the scientists setup the following experiment. The scientist take dark metallic material. This material is attached to pole and the metallic material can spin if it is subjected to a force; similar to a watermill or wind turbine. This setup is then placed outside and exposed to sunlight. 

If the metallic surface rotates when exposed to light, whose viewpoint is strengthened and why? 

Scientist 1: Scientist 1 believes that light displays particle behavior. This means that rays of light have their own associated momentum. Furthermore, Scientist 1 does not believe that light will exhibit wave behavior.

Scientist 2: Scientist 2 disagrees with Scientist 1 and believes that light can exhibit wave behavior, but does not display particle behavior. In other words, this scientist believes that light does not have any momentum.

Experiment: To settle their disagreement, the scientists setup the following experiment. The scientist take dark metallic material. This material is attached to pole and the metallic material can spin if it is subjected to a force; similar to a watermill or wind turbine. This setup is then placed outside and exposed to sunlight. 

If during the experiment the metallic material does not move, whose viewpoint is strengthened and why?

As part of an engineering competition, a group of students are asked to design a flying robot that simulates the way real birds fly. Below, three of the students give their explanations for how bird flight occurs.

Student 1:

Birds are able to fly due to the shape of their wings. Bird wings are convex on their upper sides, while their lower sides are usually concave. This type of shape is called an airfoil. When a wing travels through the air, air passing over the top of the wing must travel a greater distance than air passing under the wing. The stream of air passing over the wing and the stream of air passing under the wing meet together at the tail end of the wing. In order for both streams of air to meet at the same point behind the wing, the air above the wing, which travels a greater distance, must travel faster than the air below the wing.

When a volume of air travels more quickly over a distance, its molecules are spread out over a greater distance. As a result, the air traveling over the top of a wing has a lower pressure than the air traveling under the wing. Because the wing has a region of low pressure above it and a region of relative high pressure below it, it experiences a net upward force. When this upward force is greater than or equal to the bird's weight, or the force exerted on a bird by gravity, the bird is able to fly.

The magnitude of the upward force depends on the speed at which air flows across the wing and on the corresponding difference in pressure over and under the wing. When birds flap their wings, they increase the speed of air flowing across their wings, thus producing a greater upward force.

Student 2:

There are two components to bird flight: lift and thrust. "Lift" refers to the upward force that allows a bird to stay aloft in the air despite its weight, while "thrust" refers to the horizontal force that allows a bird to move forward through the air. Birds are able to fly because they do not hold their wings perfectly horizontally. Instead, their wings are angled slightly upward. The angle at which a wing is inclined upward, with respect to the horizontal, is called its "angle of attack."

Air is not an ideal gas; instead, it has viscosity. This means that the air flowing close to a solid object tends to follow the curves of that object. When air encounters a bird's wing, it follows the incline of the wing. Because of the wing's angle of attack, the air is directed downward and back. The air continues to move downward, even after it has left the wing. This movement of the air creates an opposing force that pushes the bird upward and forward.

Thus, the angle of attack of a bird's wings accounts for both the lift and thrust components of a bird's flight.

Student 3:

Birds are able to fly because the way in which they move their wings allows them to create a net movement of air downward and backward. The flapping of a bird's wings can be understood as being composed of two parts: a downstroke, during which the bird moves its wings down, and an upstroke, during which the bird moves its wings up. During a downstroke, a bird displaces a quantity of air downward and behind it. During an upstroke, however, the bird's wings are angled upward in a way that displaces less air, and its wing feathers rotate to allow air to pass through them. Thus, on the upstroke, the bird much exerts less force on the air than it does on the downstroke.

The explanation given by Student 3 differs from the explanation given by Student 2 in that __________.

As part of an engineering competition, a group of students are asked to design a flying robot that simulates the way real birds fly. Below, three of the students give their explanations for how bird flight occurs.

Student 1:

Birds are able to fly due to the shape of their wings. Bird wings are convex on their upper sides, while their lower sides are usually concave. This type of shape is called an airfoil. When a wing travels through the air, air passing over the top of the wing must travel a greater distance than air passing under the wing. The stream of air passing over the wing and the stream of air passing under the wing meet together at the tail end of the wing. In order for both streams of air to meet at the same point behind the wing, the air above the wing, which travels a greater distance, must travel faster than the air below the wing.

When a volume of air travels more quickly over a distance, its molecules are spread out over a greater distance. As a result, the air traveling over the top of a wing has a lower pressure than the air traveling under the wing. Because the wing has a region of low pressure above it and a region of relative high pressure below it, it experiences a net upward force. When this upward force is greater than or equal to the bird's weight, or the force exerted on a bird by gravity, the bird is able to fly.

The magnitude of the upward force depends on the speed at which air flows across the wing and on the corresponding difference in pressure over and under the wing. When birds flap their wings, they increase the speed of air flowing across their wings, thus producing a greater upward force.

Student 2:

There are two components to bird flight: lift and thrust. "Lift" refers to the upward force that allows a bird to stay aloft in the air despite its weight, while "thrust" refers to the horizontal force that allows a bird to move forward through the air. Birds are able to fly because they do not hold their wings perfectly horizontally. Instead, their wings are angled slightly upward. The angle at which a wing is inclined upward, with respect to the horizontal, is called its "angle of attack."

Air is not an ideal gas; instead, it has viscosity. This means that the air flowing close to a solid object tends to follow the curves of that object. When air encounters a bird's wing, it follows the incline of the wing. Because of the wing's angle of attack, the air is directed downward and back. The air continues to move downward, even after it has left the wing. This movement of the air creates an opposing force that pushes the bird upward and forward.

Thus, the angle of attack of a bird's wings accounts for both the lift and thrust components of a bird's flight.

Student 3:

Birds are able to fly because the way in which they move their wings allows them to create a net movement of air downward and backward. The flapping of a bird's wings can be understood as being composed of two parts: a downstroke, during which the bird moves its wings down, and an upstroke, during which the bird moves its wings up. During a downstroke, a bird displaces a quantity of air downward and behind it. During an upstroke, however, the bird's wings are angled upward in a way that displaces less air, and its wing feathers rotate to allow air to pass through them. Thus, on the upstroke, the bird much exerts less force on the air than it does on the downstroke.

Suppose that a robot is designed with a pair of wings that, on their downstroke, displace air downward and backward with a force of 10 N, and that, on their upstroke, displace air upward and forward with a force of 5 N.

Given that Student 3's explanation is correct, is it possible for such a robot to fly?

As part of an engineering competition, a group of students are asked to design a flying robot that simulates the way real birds fly. Below, three of the students give their explanations for how bird flight occurs.

Student 1:

Birds are able to fly due to the shape of their wings. Bird wings are convex on their upper sides, while their lower sides are usually concave. This type of shape is called an airfoil. When a wing travels through the air, air passing over the top of the wing must travel a greater distance than air passing under the wing. The stream of air passing over the wing and the stream of air passing under the wing meet together at the tail end of the wing. In order for both streams of air to meet at the same point behind the wing, the air above the wing, which travels a greater distance, must travel faster than the air below the wing.

When a volume of air travels more quickly over a distance, its molecules are spread out over a greater distance. As a result, the air traveling over the top of a wing has a lower pressure than the air traveling under the wing. Because the wing has a region of low pressure above it and a region of relative high pressure below it, it experiences a net upward force. When this upward force is greater than or equal to the bird's weight, or the force exerted on a bird by gravity, the bird is able to fly.

The magnitude of the upward force depends on the speed at which air flows across the wing and on the corresponding difference in pressure over and under the wing. When birds flap their wings, they increase the speed of air flowing across their wings, thus producing a greater upward force.

Student 2:

There are two components to bird flight: lift and thrust. "Lift" refers to the upward force that allows a bird to stay aloft in the air despite its weight, while "thrust" refers to the horizontal force that allows a bird to move forward through the air. Birds are able to fly because they do not hold their wings perfectly horizontally. Instead, their wings are angled slightly upward. The angle at which a wing is inclined upward, with respect to the horizontal, is called its "angle of attack."

Air is not an ideal gas; instead, it has viscosity. This means that the air flowing close to a solid object tends to follow the curves of that object. When air encounters a bird's wing, it follows the incline of the wing. Because of the wing's angle of attack, the air is directed downward and back. The air continues to move downward, even after it has left the wing. This movement of the air creates an opposing force that pushes the bird upward and forward.

Thus, the angle of attack of a bird's wings accounts for both the lift and thrust components of a bird's flight.

Student 3:

Birds are able to fly because the way in which they move their wings allows them to create a net movement of air downward and backward. The flapping of a bird's wings can be understood as being composed of two parts: a downstroke, during which the bird moves its wings down, and an upstroke, during which the bird moves its wings up. During a downstroke, a bird displaces a quantity of air downward and behind it. During an upstroke, however, the bird's wings are angled upward in a way that displaces less air, and its wing feathers rotate to allow air to pass through them. Thus, on the upstroke, the bird much exerts less force on the air than it does on the downstroke.

The amount of force exerted on an object can be calculated by multiplying the mass of the object by the acceleration it experiences. Given that Student 3's explanation is correct, which of the following situations would allow a bird's body to experience the greatest upward force?