ACT Science : Earth and Space Sciences

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for ACT Science

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store varsity tutors amazon store varsity tutors ibooks store

Example Questions

Example Question #15 : How To Find Research Summary In Earth And Space Sciences

Study 1

A student wishes to study the effects of various household detergents on the mortality of a certain type of bacteria over an extended period of time. She introduces that type of bacteria to four separate agar plates (labeled Plate 1, Plate 2, Plate 3, and Plate 4), and then allows the bacteria to grow for three days. After this period, she treats Plate 1 with water, Plate 2 with Detergent X, Plate 3 with Detergent Y, and Plate 4 with Detergent Z. She then counts the number of bacterial colonies on each plate every eight hours for the next twenty-four hours.

Table 1

 Screen_shot_2015-03-12_at_6.12.46_pm

Study 2

The student now wishes to compare the effects of Detergent X and Detergent Y on the same type of bacteria as she used in Study 1. The student introduces that type of bacteria to three separate plates (labeled Plate I, Plate II, and Plate III), and then allows the bacteria to grow for 3 days. After this period, she treats Plate I with water, Plate II with Detergent X, and Plate III with Detergent Y. She then counts the number of bacterial colonies on each plate every eight hours for the next forty-eight hours.

Screen_shot_2015-03-12_at_6.12.32_pm

Which of the following best describes the relationship between time and the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 in Study 1?

Possible Answers:

As time progresses, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 increases exponentially.

As time progresses, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 decreases exponentially.

As time progresses, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 increases linearly.

As time progresses, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 decreases linearly.

Correct answer:

As time progresses, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 decreases exponentially.

Explanation:

From inspection of the table, we see that every eight hours, the number of bacterial colonies on Plate 2 is halved. Thus, the number of colonies on this plate is decreasing exponentially as time progresses.

Example Question #11 : How To Find Research Summary In Earth And Space Sciences

Study 1

A student wishes to study the effects of various household detergents on the mortality of a certain type of bacteria over an extended period of time. She introduces that type of bacteria to four separate agar plates (labeled Plate 1, Plate 2, Plate 3, and Plate 4), and then allows the bacteria to grow for three days. After this period, she treats Plate 1 with water, Plate 2 with Detergent X, Plate 3 with Detergent Y, and Plate 4 with Detergent Z. She then counts the number of bacterial colonies on each plate every eight hours for the next twenty-four hours.

Table 1

 Screen_shot_2015-03-12_at_6.12.46_pm

Study 2

The student now wishes to compare the effects of Detergent X and Detergent Y on the same type of bacteria as she used in Study 1. The student introduces that type of bacteria to three separate plates (labeled Plate I, Plate II, and Plate III), and then allows the bacteria to grow for 3 days. After this period, she treats Plate I with water, Plate II with Detergent X, and Plate III with Detergent Y. She then counts the number of bacterial colonies on each plate every eight hours for the next forty-eight hours.

Screen_shot_2015-03-12_at_6.12.32_pm

Which of the following is a reasonable conclusion to draw from the graph associated with Study 2?

Possible Answers:

Compared to Detergent X, Detergent Y causes the number of colonies to decrease less quickly at first, but kills more total colonies over the course of 48 hours.

Compared to Detergent X, Detergent Y causes the number of colonies to decrease more quickly at first and kills more total colonies over the course of 48 hours.

Compared to Detergent X, Detergent Y causes the number of colonies to decrease less quickly at first and kills fewer total colonies over the course of 48 hours.

Compared to Detergent X, Detergent Y causes the number of colonies to decrease more quickly at first, but kills fewer total colonies over the course of 48 hours.

Correct answer:

Compared to Detergent X, Detergent Y causes the number of colonies to decrease more quickly at first, but kills fewer total colonies over the course of 48 hours.

Explanation:

The curve corresponding to Plate III (which contains Detergent Y) decreases most quickly at first, but it plateaus at about twenty-four hours, whereas the curve corresponding to Plate II does not plateau until several hours later.

Example Question #121 : Earth And Space Sciences

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision making and action.

Which of the following graphs shows the general relationship between pH and acidity as described in the passage?

Possible Answers:

Graph4

Graph1

Graph2

Graph3

Correct answer:

Graph3

Explanation:

The passage describes the relationship as logarithmic. If you were unsure of what a logarithmic graph looks like, you could use the fact that a 0.1 pH change "represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity" as described by the passage, so none of the linear choices make sense and the U-shaped curve doesn't fit this relationship either, leaving you with the correct choice.

Example Question #11 : How To Find Research Summary In Earth And Space Sciences

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision making and action.

When the authors use the term "calcifying species," they most nearly mean __________.

Possible Answers:

Marine species that dissolve calcium carbonate

All marine life for which carbon is an essential element

Marine species that build shells or skeletons out of calcium carbonate minerals

Chemical compounds whose primary component is calcium

Correct answer:

Marine species that build shells or skeletons out of calcium carbonate minerals

Explanation:

The passage clearly states in the first paragraph: "Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. " From this, we can gather that "calcifying organisms" are organisms that build skeletons and shells out of calcium carbonate minerals.

Example Question #1061 : Act Science

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision making and action.

According to the passage, why would some species benefit from ocean acidification?

Possible Answers:

The destruction of coral reefs by ocean acidification will concentrate populations so that fish no longer need to migrate to feed.

No species may benefit from ocean acidification

The increased prevalence of carbon dioxide is beneficial to those species

Ocean acidification will weaken prey fish, creating an abundance of food for predators.

Correct answer:

The increased prevalence of carbon dioxide is beneficial to those species

Explanation:

At the beginning of the section titled "The Biological Impacts," the passage mentions photosyntheic organisms that may benefit from the increased levels of carbon dioxide: "Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land." This tells readers that some species benefit from ocean acidification because they use carbon dioxide, and increased prevalence of carbon dioxide is thus beneficial to those species.

Example Question #20 : How To Find Research Summary In Earth And Space Sciences

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision making and action.

Photosynthetic algae differ from shelled organisms with respect to the effect of ocean acidification primarily because __________.

Possible Answers:

the effects of ocean acification weigh on both species groups equally

photosynthetic algae produce oxygen while shelled organisms produce calcium carbonate

photosynthetic algae are unaffected by ocean acidification while shelled organisms are greatly affected

photosynthetic algae use carbon dioxide, while shelled organisms use calcium carbonate

Correct answer:

photosynthetic algae use carbon dioxide, while shelled organisms use calcium carbonate

Explanation:

The section of the passage titled "The Biological Impacts," photosynthetic algae are contrasted with shelled organisms: "Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher CO2 conditions in the ocean, as they require CO2 to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton." Based on this, we know that photosynthetic algae use carbon dioxide, while shelled organisms use calcium carbonate.

Example Question #1061 : Act Science

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision making and action.

Over time, if ocean acidification continues at the rate projected in the passage, what would you expect to happen to the concentration of calcium carbonate in the ocean?

Possible Answers:

A decrease in the total amount of carbon in the ocean

Continued desaturation of calcium carbonate

Increasing saturation of calcium carbonate in the ocean

No change in calcium carbonate, but an increase in carbon dioxide in the ocean

Correct answer:

Continued desaturation of calcium carbonate

Explanation:

The first paragraph of the passage states, "When carbon dioxide (CO2) is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals." So, this tells readers that when  is absorbed by seawater, the amount of calcium carbonate minerals in the ocean is reduced, or in other words, desaturated. The second paragraph of the passage states, "Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic." So, putting these two statements together, we can see that future projections involve the ocean becoming more acidic, and when the ocean becomes acidic, the amount of calcium carbonate in the ocean is reduced. The only answer choice that fits this prediction is "continued desaturation of calcium carbonate."

Example Question #1062 : Act Science

Adapted from "What is Ocean Acidification?" NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Carbon Program. NOAA. Web. 22 Apr. 2015. <http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F>.

The Chemistry

When carbon dioxide  is absorbed by seawater, chemical reactions occur that reduce seawater pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation states of biologically important calcium carbonate minerals. These chemical reactions are termed "ocean acidification" or "OA" for short. Calcium carbonate minerals are the building blocks for the skeletons and shells of many marine organisms. In areas where most life now congregates in the ocean, the seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate minerals. This means there are abundant building blocks for calcifying organisms to build their skeletons and shells. However, continued ocean acidification is causing many parts of the ocean to become undersaturated with these minerals, which is likely to affect the ability of some organisms to produce and maintain their shells.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity. Future predictions indicate that the oceans will continue to absorb carbon dioxide and become even more acidic. Estimates of future carbon dioxide levels, based on business as usual emission scenarios, indicate that by the end of this century the surface waters of the ocean could be nearly 150 percent more acidic, resulting in a pH that the oceans haven’t experienced for more than 20 million years.

The Biological Impacts

Ocean acidification is expected to impact ocean species to varying degrees. Photosynthetic algae and seagrasses may benefit from higher  conditions in the ocean, as they require  to live just like plants on land. On the other hand, studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk. Today, more than a billion people worldwide rely on food from the ocean as their primary source of protein. Many jobs and economies in the U.S. and around the world depend on the fish and shellfish in our oceans.

Ocean Acidification: An Emerging Global Problem

Ocean acidification is an emerging global problem. Over the last decade, there has been much focus in the ocean science community on studying the potential impacts of ocean acidification. Since sustained efforts to monitor ocean acidification worldwide are only beginning, it is currently impossible to predict exactly how ocean acidification impacts will cascade throughout the marine food chain and affect the overall structure of marine ecosystems. With the pace of ocean acidification accelerating, scientists, resource managers, and policymakers recognize the urgent need to strengthen the science as a basis for sound decision-making and action.

According to the passage, where in the marine food web do shelled organisms sit?

Possible Answers:

Shelled organisms sit in the middle of the food web; they fulfill a non-unique niche and would not be missed if removed from the ecosystem.

Shelled organisms sit at the top of the food web; they are predators that rely on many other species in the ocean for food.

Shelled organisms sit at the very bottom of the food-web; they are primary producers that use photosynthesis to generate their own food.

Shelled organisms sit towards the bottom of the food web; they are not primary producers, but they are nonetheless pivotal.

Correct answer:

Shelled organisms sit towards the bottom of the food web; they are not primary producers, but they are nonetheless pivotal.

Explanation:

One can infer that shelled organisms are not primary producers, yet they impact the food web in many significant ways, as is mentioned in the final paragraph of the passage. Thus they must sit towards the bottom, but not at the very bottom, as they are consumers, not producers.

Example Question #1063 : Act Science

Glaciers move, on average, 1 meter per day, although many are known to move faster or slower depending on their size. Whether they are alpine glaciers, which form high in the mountains, or continental glaciers that cover huge areas of land near the poles, glaciers are responsible for breaking up rock and moving sediment as they move across the land. 

Below is a chart of average speed of movement of an alpine glacier per year, as well the amount of sediment displaced by the glacier. 

Year

Average Glacial Movement

Sediment movement per year (tons)

1995

1.1 m/day

2.2

1996

1.3 m/day

2.6

1997

1.5 m/day

3.0

1998

1.3 m/day

2.2

2000

1.1 m/day

1.8

2005

1.0 m/day

1.6

2010

0.9 m/day

1.5

Two scientists have done research on an alpine lake that lies in the path of the glacier. Each took five samples of sediment from the lake.

Scientist 1 believes that the glacier is beginning to melt as it moves lower in elevation, releasing some of the sediment it has carried into mountain streams and springs, causing the makeup of sediments in the lake to change. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains brown chert, a rock that can only be found in elevations higher than that of the lake. Scientist 1 took his sample from the sediments that washed ashore on the beach of the lake.

Scientist 2 believes the glacier is not melting, but displacing rock beds so that the sediment loosens and breaks free of the bedrock and then is carried by wind and other erosive elements to the lake. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains only trace amounts of the brown chert, not enough to suggest the glacier is melting. Scientist 2 took his samples from sediment deposits at the bottom of the lake. 

Below is a chart of the sediment collection samples and the percentage of brown chert found in each.

Sample #

Scientist 1: % Brown Chert

Scientist 2: % Brown Chert

1

5.2

0.9

2

7.1

1.2

3

6.3

0.4

4

6.5

0.8

5

5.8

1.0

 

What can you reasonably concluded about the presence of brown chert in the sediments found in the alpine lake?

Possible Answers:

Erosion caused the brown chert to end up in the lake.

Animals cannot consume the lake water because of the brown chert. 

The brown chert would not have been found in the lake if not for the glacier.

Brown chert is native to the alpine area in which the lake and the glacier can be found. 

You cannot reasonably conclude anything about the presence of brown chert. 

Correct answer:

The brown chert would not have been found in the lake if not for the glacier.

Explanation:

According to the experiment, brown chert is only naturally found above the lake, and the only force displacing the sediment is the glacier. You can conclude, therefore, that the glacier is the cause of the presence of brown chert, but you cannot make any further inferences.

Example Question #1064 : Act Science

Glaciers move, on average, 1 meter per day, although many are known to move faster or slower depending on their size. Whether they are alpine glaciers, which form high in the mountains, or continental glaciers that cover huge areas of land near the poles, glaciers are responsible for breaking up rock and moving sediment as they move across the land. 

Below is a chart of average speed of movement of an alpine glacier per year, as well the amount of sediment displaced by the glacier. 

Year

Average Glacial Movement

Sediment movement per year (tons)

1995

1.1 m/day

2.2

1996

1.3 m/day

2.6

1997

1.5 m/day

3.0

1998

1.3 m/day

2.2

2000

1.1 m/day

1.8

2005

1.0 m/day

1.6

2010

0.9 m/day

1.5

Two scientists have done research on an alpine lake that lies in the path of the glacier. Each took five samples of sediment from the lake.

Scientist 1 believes that the glacier is beginning to melt as it moves lower in elevation, releasing some of the sediment it has carried into mountain streams and springs, causing the makeup of sediments in the lake to change. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains brown chert, a rock that can only be found in elevations higher than that of the lake. Scientist 1 took his sample from the sediments that washed ashore on the beach of the lake.

Scientist 2 believes the glacier is not melting, but displacing rock beds so that the sediment loosens and breaks free of the bedrock and then is carried by wind and other erosive elements to the lake. He notes that the sediment from the lake bed contains only trace amounts of the brown chert, not enough to suggest the glacier is melting. Scientist 2 took his samples from sediment deposits at the bottom of the lake. 

Below is a chart of the sediment collection samples and the percentage of brown chert found in each.

Sample #

Scientist 1: % Brown Chert

Scientist 2: % Brown Chert

1

5.2

0.9

2

7.1

1.2

3

6.3

0.4

4

6.5

0.8

5

5.8

1.0

 

If, in the year 2020, the percent of brown chert found in the alpine lake increases to 20 percent, what would you conclude about the glacier? 

Possible Answers:

Scientist 2 was the one who took the sample. 

The sediment displaced by the glacier decreased to less than 2 tons/year. 

The movement of the glacier increased to 2m/day.

The glacier is getting closer to the alpine lake, depositing more sediment closer to it. 

The glacier is melting, increasing the sediment contained in the water.

Correct answer:

The glacier is getting closer to the alpine lake, depositing more sediment closer to it. 

Explanation:

The glacier must be moving toward the lake, which lies below it, and that could increase the presence of brown chert in the lake sediment. One cannot conclude further than that without more data. 

Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors