All ACT English Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #2211 : Correcting Grammatical Errors
The truth is, I kinda hate my brother. Can you blame me? We're always fighting. Today, he "borrowed" my favorite book and now its ripped in two. Likewise, my brother and I like to play sports together. We both bond over games like volleyball, and basketball. We both play real good. We even were considering trying out for the high school team together.
Which of the following is the best alternative for the underlined phrase, "real good"?
really good
better
NO CHANGE
real well
really well
really well
First of all, the word being described is "play," which is a verb; therefore, an adverb is needed to describe "play." The adverb form of "good" is "well." To describe the word "well," which is an adverb, one needs another adverb. "Really" is the adverb form of "real." Therefore, "really well" is the correct way to describe the pair's playing.
Example Question #962 : Word Usage Errors
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the sentence. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
Anna knew it was to late to catch the bus to school in time for English class.
it was two late
it was too late
it was to be too late
it was later than to
NO CHANGE
it was too late
"too" serves as an adjective here, not a preposition. Adjective form is "too" and preposition form is "to."
Example Question #55 : Other Adjective And Adverb Errors
Passage adapted from G. K. Chesterton, What I Saw in America (1922)
Now when I was lecturing in America I was often told, in a radiant and congratulatory manner, that such and such a person was bound to come and hear me lecture. It seemed a very, cruel form of conscription, and I could not understand what authority could have made it compulsory. In the course of discovering my error, however, I thought I began to understand certain American ideas and instincts that lie behind this American idiom. For as I have urged before, and shall often urge again, the road to international friendship is through really understanding jokes. It is in a sense through taking jokes seriously. It is quite legitimate to laugh at a man who walks down the street in three white hats and a green dressing gown, because it is unfamiliar; but after all the man has some reason for what he does; and until we know the reason we do not understand the story, or even understand the joke. So the outlander will always seem outlandish in custom or costume; but serious relations depend on our getting beyond the fact of difference to the things wherein it differs. A good symbolical figure for all this may be found among the people who say, perhaps with a self-revealing simplicity, that they are bound to go to a lecture.
Choose the answer that best corrects the bolded and underlined portion of the passage. If the bolded and underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
NO CHANGE
taking serious jokes
taking seriously jokes
taking jokes serious
NO CHANGE
This sentence discusses how something ought to be done (i.e, how jokes should be taken) by using an adverb ("seriously") to modify a verb phrase ("taking jokes") without splitting it up. Adjectives, such as "serious," should only be used to modify noun phrases.
Example Question #2211 : Correcting Grammatical Errors
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the sentence. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
A well-rehearsed big band is reminiscent of a fine tuned engine with all of its components working together in harmony.
finest
finer
most fine
finely
NO CHANGE
finely
"Tuned" is an adjective that modifies the noun "engine". Adverbs modify adjectives, so the adverb "finely" is necessary in this sentence.
Example Question #2214 : Correcting Grammatical Errors
“What is Leisure?”
It would likely surprise [1] modern readers if he or she were told that the meaning of life is leisure. This seems to be the same thing as saying that the meaning of life is nothing more than relaxing by the side of the pool. [2] One can imagine almost anyone thinking to himself, “What a preposterous idea.” This idea is not as foreign as it might appear at first glance. Indeed, [3] it could be considered the classic Western position about the very meaning of life. [4] This, of course, lies in contrast to all other global positions, but that’s a topic for another day.
[5] Of course, we need to understand what is meant by the word leisure if we are going to understand this assertion. The best way to understand this is to consider a contrast between two different kinds of activity. [6] On the one hand, there are many activities that are for the sake of something else. [7] On the other hand. There are those activities that are done for their own sake. These latter kinds of activities are those that are properly understood as being leisurely. [8] For example, when someone cuts onions for a meal, the cutting of the onions is not done for their own sake. The easiest way to figure out if something is being done for the sake of another end is to ask, “Why are you doing that.” [9] The onion cutter will answer, “I am doing it so that I can make dinner.” This helps us to see that the cutting of the onions is for the sake of something else. [10] Indeed, even the eating of dinner is for the sake of something else, namely attaining adequate nutrition.
[11] In contrast to these examples, leisurely activities are those that are done for they’re own sake. [12] For example, ask someone who enjoys organ music why he is listening to an organ concert. The answer will almost certainly be, “For the sake of listening to organ music. It is that important and beautiful!” Many things can be considered leisurely, including forms of games that are played merely for their own enjoyment; however, it is important to bear in mind that there is a hierarchy of goods. [13] Some types of leisure are better than others and likely are more preferable.
Choose the answer that best corrects section [3].
it could be considered the classic-western position
it could be considered the classic western position
it would be considered the classic Western position
NO CHANGE
it would be considered the classic Western position
In this case, the word "Western" clearly refers to something that designates a proper noun. It is not merely indicating a general direction, as when we say, "The restaurant is on the western side of Washington, DC." Instead, the word "Western" is being used here to refer to "the West" in the sense of "Western Civilization." Thus, it is best to leave this selection unchanged, for it is written well enough as is. Likewise, you should not change the verb to "was." While some philosophers and commentators do think that Western Civilization no longer believe this point, this short essay really doesn't tell us one way or the other about this fact. Therefore, the conditional "could" is best left in the passage.
Example Question #2212 : Correcting Grammatical Errors
Margaret Mitchell the writer was having a horrible day. She just completed her latest novel when the tornado sirens went off. Fast, she rushed down into the basement, barricaded the door, and she sat in a corner of the dank dusty room to wait for the storm to pass. The winds howled noisy and increased in intensity until it sounded like the tornado was right above her. Suddenly, a gigantic bang echoed throughout the basement and Margaret dropped to the floor in terror. Then just as suddenly the noise vanished. Margaret got up and dusted her off before moving hesitantly toward the basement door. She opened it, and found the house above her was completely gone. Despite the horror of the site, she sighed and muttered, "Oh, well." A neighbor came running up to her and said, "Margaret! Thank goodness your alive! But what happened to your house, and what about your new book?" Margaret gave a rueful smile and replied, "Oh, that's Gone With The Wind."
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the passage. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
Fastly
Quickly
Quick
NO CHANGE
Quickly
"Fast" is an adjective, but in the passage as written, it is being used to describe how Mitchell "rushed." Adjectives cannot describe verbs, but adverbs describe verbs, so changing "Fast" to "Quickly" would correct the error.
Example Question #1 : Relative Pronoun Usage Errors
One of the most popular programs of all those featured on the Internet (1) is a video clip show. The format of the show is simple, each (2) week the host, a short but attractive New York native named John Jackson introduces (3) a set of three video clips from all over the Internet. These clips shows (4) people hurting themselves in accidents, getting into crazy situations, interacting stupidly with animals, and et cetera. (5) Jackson introduces each clip comically and often comments on the action with animations where (6) he makes fun of the people in the videos. While the videos are often funny, there is definitely an element of schadenfreude involved in watching these clips. Schadenfreude is a German word for "the pleasure one takes at seeing the suffering of others". (7) Jacksons (8) show are (9) not far removed from popular TV programs like (10) The U.S. Laughs at You there is also a version of which (11) on the Internet. It is an open question whether laughing at these videos is a harmless activity or it causes harm to us. (12)
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
of which
NO CHANGE
in which
when
in which
"Where" should be used only for expressions denoting places, so the best and most gramattical replacement here would be "in which."
Example Question #111 : Other Pronoun Errors
Many people watch football however (1) some do not. With (2) those who do not watch this sport (3) football is an incomprehensible pastime. Non football (4) fans cannot understand what is so exciting about watching two packs of grown men running away or toward each other, while (5) clinging for dear life to a piece of pigskin. It also makes from little to no sense (6) why those whom (7) play the sport gets (8) paid the exorbitant amounts that they do, even though he is (9) in effect doing the same thing that high school and college students do on a daily bases (10). But as the French would say, "Chacun à son goût" (11) though its (12) highly doubtful that most football fans (or even people who are not fans) would know what that means.
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
whose
(DELETE)
who
NO CHANGE
who
The pronoun here is being used as a subject for the verb "play," so "who" would be the appropriate choice.
Example Question #1 : Relative Pronoun Usage Errors
Adapted from The Autobiography of John Adams (ed. 1856)
Not long after this, the three greatest measures of all were carried. Three committees were appointed, one for preparing a declaration of independence, another for reporting a plan of a treaty to be proposed to France, and a third to digest a system of articles of confederation to be proposed to the States. I was appointed on the committee of independence and on that for preparing the form of a treaty with France. On the committee of confederation Mr. Samuel Adams was appointed. The committee of independence were Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston. Mr. Jefferson had been now about a year a member of Congress, but had attended his duty in the house a very small part of the time, and, when there, had never spoken in public. During the whole time I sat with him in Congress, I never heard him utter three sentences together. It will naturally be inquired how it happened that he was appointed on a committee of such importance. There were more reasons than one. Mr. Jefferson had the reputation of a masterly pen; he had been chosen a delegate in Virginia, in consequence of a very handsome public paper which he had written for the House of Burgesses, which had given him the character of a fine writer. Another reason was, that Mr. Richard Henry Lee was not beloved by the most of his colleagues from Virginia, and Mr. Jefferson was set up to rival and supplant him. This could be done only by the pen, for Mr. Jefferson could stand no competition with him or any one else in elocution and public debate.
Which is the best form of the underlined sentence?
NO CHANGE
Mr. Jefferson had the reputation of a masterly pen, for he had been chosen a delegate in Virginia in consequence of a very handsome public paper which he had written for the House of Burgesses that had given him the character of a fine writer.
Mr. Jefferson had the reputation of a masterly pen for he had been chosen a delegate in Virginia in consequence of a very handsome public paper that he had written for the House of Burgesses that had given him the character of a fine writer.
Mr. Jefferson had the reputation of a masterly pen; he had been chosen a delegate in Virginia in consequence of a very handsome public paper which he had written for the House of Burgesses and which had given him the character of a fine writer.
Mr. Jefferson had the reputation of a masterly pen; he had been chosen a delegate in Virginia in consequence of a very handsome public paper which he had written for the House of Burgesses and which had given him the character of a fine writer.
The most significant issue in this sentence is the paralleling of the two uses of "which" in the second independent clause. They both modify the word "paper":
The paper...
(1) "which he had written for the House of Burgesses"
AND
(2) "which had given him the character of a fine writer."
To help clear up this sentence, the best option (among those provided) is the one that makes this parallel explicit by using the conjunction "and." This helps to prevent the reader from being confused about the antecedent for the second "which."
Example Question #2221 : Correcting Grammatical Errors
"Whomever (1) wins the game will play in the Megabowl," (2) Paul shouted, and Derek wasnt (3) sure how to respond. He dint (4) particularly care for football generally, (5) or for the Megabowl specifically but (6) he did not want to upset his best friend, whom (7) was obviously excessively (8) excited about the news. He took a deep breath then (9) he said "That's wonderful news (10) Paul. Where is the game be (11) held?" Paul grinned and replied, "In Antarctica!" Derek blinked. "Since when are they having football games in Antarctica" he (12) asked. Paul simply smiled and said, "There had to be some good to come out of global warming, right?"
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
Who ever
Who
NO CHANGE
Whoever
Whoever
The relative pronoun that begins this sentence is being used as the subject of this clause, and thus "Whoever" is the most appropriate choice. "Whomever" is the objective case.
Certified Tutor
Certified Tutor