LSAT Logical Reasoning : LSAT Logical Reasoning

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for LSAT Logical Reasoning

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

Example Questions

Example Question #231 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

For about thirty years, government intelligence departments have spent resources equally between domestic and foreign activities. For about the same amount of time, intelligence departments have conducted covert operations in addition to intelligence gathering. This conduct has raised public concern that intelligence departments wield too much authority. In the end, though, domestic spending and covert operations may be simply a consequence of ineptness.

The author of the argument is most likely to agree with which of the following?

Possible Answers:

Intelligence agencies should not engage in domestic intelligence gathering

The public's concern is justified

The public's concern is unjustified

Intelligence departments have been inept for approximately thirty years

Intelligence departments may not wield too much power

Correct answer:

Intelligence departments may not wield too much power

Explanation:

The author states that the conduct of intelligence agencies may only indicate ineptness, in contrast with the view that the conduct indicates that the departments wield too much power.  As a result, the author would agree with the statement that intelligence departments may not wield too much power.

Example Question #232 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Director of the transportation department: We could save money over the next few years by closing lanes on highways and deferring repairs. The cost savings would be well worth the moderate increase in traffic jams. The roads will eventually need to be repaired, but the department could stay within budget over the next several years, which should be a top priority. If we continue to overspend, we may face a financial disaster.

Deputy Director: Closing road lanes would lead not only to a considerable increase in traffic jams but would also lead to increased accidents and death. That said, we’ve explored other options and closing the lanes seems to be our only viable plan to save money, and there is no question that we must accomplish that.

The Director and Deputy Director most likely disagree about whether?

Possible Answers:

the roads eventually should be repaired

the department is at risk of overspending

road lanes should be closed

there are alternative ways to save money

closing road lanes will lead to a considerable increase in traffic jams

Correct answer:

closing road lanes will lead to a considerable increase in traffic jams

Explanation:

Both people seem to agree that road lanes must be closed and that reducing spending should be a top priority.  The Director and Deputy Director disagree about whether closing road lanes will lead to a considerable increase in traffic jams.  The Director stated that the lane closures would lead only to a moderate increase.

Example Question #233 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Director: The most influential movie in history is likely Orson Welles’ classic Citizen Kane.  No other single film has helped so many filmmakers in their craft.  Indeed, a recent study showed that nearly 85% of modern films implemented at least one filmmaking technique pioneered by Citizen Kane.  The film was especially noteworthy in its cinematography, its use of multiple narrators in storytelling, and in its use of music to set a scene.

In evaluating the director’s argument it would be most helpful to know whether

Possible Answers:

 filmmakers who implemented techniques pioneered by Citizen Kane gave credit to Orson Welles after doing so

the study cited in the argument took into account every single modern film rather than merely accounting for a majority of them

there is evidence showing whether filmmaking techniques from any other films have been as widely implemented as have those from Citizen Kane

Citizen Kane is studied in more film schools than any other movie

audiences regard Citizen Kane as highly as do modern filmmakers

Correct answer:

there is evidence showing whether filmmaking techniques from any other films have been as widely implemented as have those from Citizen Kane

Explanation:

The conclusion, found in the first and second sentences of the paragraph, is that Citizen Kane is the single most influential film as far as filmmakers are concerned.  To evaluate this claim, it is necessary to know whether filmmaking techniques from other films have been as widely implemented.  Note that the argument does not claim that Citizen Kane is the most popular film among audiences or in film schools.

Example Question #234 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Reporter: News agencies are trying to determine how to adapt to the modern technology age.  Should they continue to promote old media outlets, incorporate news programs into social media, or develop an altogether new approach to breaking news stories?

News anchor: The discussion is not entirely open for debate.  While there are some decisions still to be made, it is difficult to see any plausible new approach outside of social media.

The reporter and news anchor most likely disagree about whether?

Possible Answers:

Old approaches for news agencies are feasible

Social media provides a new approach for news agencies

There can be any new approaches to breaking news stories that don't involve social media

News agencies are becoming irrelevant

There is room for disagreement about how news agencies should adapt to new technology

Correct answer:

There can be any new approaches to breaking news stories that don't involve social media

Explanation:

The reporter presents three ways for news agencies to adapt.  The news anchor does not suggest that there is no room for discussion but essentially suggests that there should only be two options for discussion.  The reporter and anchor most likely disagree about whether there can be any new approach to breaking news that doesn't involve social media.

Example Question #235 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Jane: Nowadays 3D effects are seen as a distracting gimmick that most people no longer appreciate.  The recent trend toward producing more 3D movies is not a good financial strategy for movie studios.  In fact, I and my friends refuse to attend movies in 3D, and I know many others that feel the same way.

Bill: But you fail to take into account the fact that 3D ticket prices are higher than 2D ticket prices.  The difference in price offsets the lower attendance at 3D movies.  I, for one, appreciate having the choice between 2D and 3D films.

The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Jane and Bill disagree about whether

Possible Answers:

2D movies are superior to 3D movies in overall quality

it is financially wise for movie studios to continue producing movies in 3D

people appreciate 3D effects in movies less now than they used to

movie studios ought to offer audiences the option to choose between 2D and 3D films

ticket price differentials between 2D and 3D movies are reasonable

Correct answer:

it is financially wise for movie studios to continue producing movies in 3D

Explanation:

Bill’s rebuttal to Jane’s argument is that studios can make up for the lower attendance at 3D films through increased ticket prices.  Hence, he does not agree with Jane that producing 3D movies “is not a good financial strategy for movie studios.”  The remaining answer choices do not contain statements about which Jane and Bill necessarily disagree, even though the topics may have been mentioned in the dialogue.

Example Question #236 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Employee 1: I am considering resigning and obtaining other available work.  I do not have any disputes with my employers and enjoy my coworkers, but the benefits are less than they were, the hours are longer, and the work has become tedious.  Many of my friends are satisfied with their jobs and employment openings are advertised everywhere.

Employee 2: I have also considered resigning. I stay because I am risk averse. Sure, this job has downsides, but our benefits here are above average and I might resign only to ask for my job again because other jobs are unavailable.

The employees are most likely to disagree about whether:

Possible Answers:

 their current benefits are above average

it is preferable to be risk averse

 they have disputes with their employers

 employment opportunities are advertised everywhere

other jobs are available

Correct answer:

other jobs are available

Explanation:

Employee 1 implicitly asserts that jobs would be available by claiming that jobs are advertised everywhere.  Employee 2 expressly challenges the assertion that jobs would be available but not the claim that employment opportunities are advertised everywhere.  Note, also, the employees do not disagree about benefits because the first asserts only that they are less than they once were.

Example Question #237 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Cynthia: People who graduate from college have higher salaries and report higher levels of happiness than those who do not graduate from college.

Don: I disagree. People who do not attend college have more earning years, are burdened by less debt, and are more likely to start families than college graduates.

Cynthia and Don disagree about which of the following?

Possible Answers:

Whether college can lead to higher-paying jobs

The advantages and disadvantages of college graduation

Whether college dropouts are better off than college graduates

Whether a college degree can lead to more happiness

Whether those who attend college accumulate debt

Correct answer:

The advantages and disadvantages of college graduation

Explanation:

Cynthia and Don disagree about the advantages and disadvantages of college graduation. They do not disagree about whether a college degree can lead to more happiness. Cynthia only comments that college graduates report higher levels of happiness than those who do not graduate. They also do not disagree about whether college dropouts are better off than college graduates, but rather whether all non-college graduates are. Here, the simplest answer is the most correct one.

Example Question #238 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Sam: No person should ever be made to alter their religious beliefs by government decree, which the new law threatens with its vague language.

John: The new law does not allow anyone to violate another person's religion, which is precisely why the language in the law had to be vague.

The point at issue in this argument is best stated as __________.

Possible Answers:

whether religion should be protected by legislative means

whether vague laws are able to be effective in reality

whether the language in the law allows someone's religion to be violated

whether religion has a role to play in government

whether government should do anything to interfere in religious beliefs

Correct answer:

whether the language in the law allows someone's religion to be violated

Explanation:

While the argument is over a law about the protection of religion, the issue is not about the relation between religion and government, as both sides agree that religion should be in some way protected from interference. The issue is whether the law's language, and especially its vagueness, appropriately protects an individual's religious beliefs.

Example Question #239 : Lsat Logical Reasoning

Sandy: Many video games are detrimental to the mental development of children. They encourage violent behavior and provide very few benefits for children’s creative faculties.

 

Robert: My objection to preventing children from playing video games is that they encourage foresight, logical deductions and are fun for the children.

Sandy and Robert’s statements provide the strongest support for holding that they disagree with each other over whether

Possible Answers:

Whether video games are socially valuable.

Children should be allowed to play video games.

Video games help children develop into socially responsible adults.

Video games help children’s creative faculties.

Video games encourage children to make logical deductions.

Correct answer:

Children should be allowed to play video games.

Explanation:

Only the correct answer is one that both Robert and Sandy are shown to disagree over. The other are simply arguments that one or the other makes that go unrefuted by their opponent.

Example Question #1 : Assumption

Live theater has been in competition with more modern media options for years. Today, there are a vast number of entertainment options and there is easy access to high quality entertainment technology, such as sophisticated home theater systems. Fewer people watch live theater than in the past. As a result, live theater has lost the competition with modern media.  

Which of the following, if true, would allow the conclusion to be logically drawn?

Possible Answers:

Live theater performances are not performed as often as they once were

In the past, there were very few entertainment options other than live theater

Live theater has lost the competition with modern media only if it has fewer viewers than in the past

Home theater systems provide the same entertainment quality as live theater

Some people who once attended live theater now use sophisticated home theater systems

Correct answer:

Live theater has lost the competition with modern media only if it has fewer viewers than in the past

Explanation:

The argument concludes that live theater has lost a competition with modern media.  The conclusion does not logically follow from the assertions in the argument as they are presented.  It is not clear how the competition would be lost.  The additional premise allows the conclusion to be drawn.

Tired of practice problems?

Try live online LSAT prep today.

1-on-1 Tutoring
Live Online Class
1-on-1 + Class
Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors