All LSAT Logical Reasoning Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #221 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Learning a sport is much like getting to know a new friend. In the beginning, it can feel uncomfortable when getting to know a new friend, but comfort and affinity tend to increase as familiarity develops. Similarly, as a person practices playing a new sport, he or she will tend to _______.
Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?
meet new people, and feel more comfortable making new friends.
improve his or her skills with the sport and level of athleticism.
focus on improving in that sport, while diverting attention away from other activities.
feel more at ease with the sport and gain more joy than discomfort from it as time goes on.
ignore the uncomfortable aspects of taking on a new sport and hope that the future holds more optimistic possibilities.
feel more at ease with the sport and gain more joy than discomfort from it as time goes on.
As a person gets to know a friend, the initial uncomfortable feeling is replaced by a feeling of familiarity and comfort. The text states that getting to know a friend is like playing sports. Therefore, as a persons practices playing that new sport, he or she should also beging to feel more comfortable.
The correct answer choice, that the person will "feel more at ease with the sport and gain more joy than discomfort from it as time goes on," is the closest to feeling more comfortable.
Example Question #5 : Determining Which Answer Best Expresses The Point At Issue
Although the therapist uses hypnosis for all of her clients, she uses a more intensive version of hypnosis for clients who have suffered acute trauma. While her usual hypnosis techniques usually take about twenty minutes to perform, her more intensive version usually requires at least an hour to complete and takes place at a different clinic.
Which of the following statements does not logically flow from the text above?
The therapist believes that hypnosis can help all of her patients.
The practice of hypnosis includes varying levels of intensity.
Hypnosis is a widely accepted practice in the field of therapy.
Victims of trauma often require more intensive levels of treatment than other clients.
The therapist's usual hypnosis practice does not take place at a different clinic.
Hypnosis is a widely accepted practice in the field of therapy.
The correct answer is:
Hypnosis is a widely accepted practice in the field of therapy.
While the text explains how this particular therapist practices hypnosis, it does not reflect on how accepted hypnosis is in the general field of therapy.
Example Question #222 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Marie: Local charities need to proactively recruit volunteers. Otherwise, they are likely to continue being understaffed. The functioning of these charities depends on volunteers, and people will only volunteer if they know there is a need. If charities can let enough people know about that need, people will volunteer.
Tony: The charities also need more funding. Without funds, it does not matter how many volunteers sign up to help charities. If charities do try to recruit more volunteers, they will have to find new tactics because people know the need is great.
Marie and Tony most likely disagree about whether
there is a need for increased funding
local charities should try to recruit volunteers
people know there is a need for volunteers
local charities are understaffed
the functioning of charities depends on volunteers
people know there is a need for volunteers
There is no indication in the passage that Marie and Tony disagree about whether there is a need for volunteers or for funding, though they appear to disagree about the magnitude of the needs. Neither is there a direct conflict about whether charities should recruit. The parties only explicitly disagree about whether people know there is a need.
Example Question #223 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
John: There are very few reasons to support the new state immigration laws, and several reasons to oppose them. Most importantly, the laws fail to include any "Dream Act" provision for immigrant college students, and thus provide no incentive for persons here illegally to gain a higher education.
Mary: But you've failed to mention the sweeping reforms to the residency process included in the laws. Those reforms make understanding levels of citizenship much simpler for those who don't speak English. If parents of college students can't even figure out their own statuses, they're unlikely to understand how to improve the status of their children.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that John and Mary disagree over whether
the new state immigration laws are superior in some ways to the prior laws
the lack of a "Dream Act" provision is the most important consideration in supporting or opposing the new state immigration laws
college students should be able to gain residency based on completion of a higher education
a "Dream Act" provision will be effective for the majority of immigrant college students
there are several reasons to oppose the new state immigration laws
the lack of a "Dream Act" provision is the most important consideration in supporting or opposing the new state immigration laws
John specifically states that the lack of a “Dream Act” provision is the most important omission in the new laws. Mary implies that process reforms are more important, as they make the laws easier to understand for non-English speakers and thus are a precursor to other substantive provisions.
Example Question #8 : Determining Which Answer Best Expresses The Point At Issue
The government has finally developed a strategy for combating corporate crime that could be effective. Instead of fruitlessly attempting to find culpable individuals within a corporation, the government now prosecutes corporations directly. The evidence against individuals within a corporation is often too weak to sustain convictions, but the evidence against these individuals, taken as a whole, is often sufficient to convict the corporation for which they work.
With which of the following would the author most likely agree?
The government's policy of prosecuting corporations could be successful
Individuals are usually less culpable for corporate crimes than the corporations for which they work
A government policy regarding corporate crime is effective when it dissuades corporate crime
The government still prosecutes a substantial number of individuals for corporate crimes
The new government policy will be more effective than prior policies
The government's policy of prosecuting corporations could be successful
While the author views the new government policy favorably, the author does not suggest that the policy will be effective. Instead, the author prefers the policy to previous policy and believes the policy could be effective.
Example Question #224 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees individuals the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. This raises the question as to what makes a search unreasonable. In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court held that a search is unreasonable when a person has a subjective expectation of privacy, and society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable. However, this definition raises yet another question: when is an expectation of privacy reasonable?
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the excerpt?
A search is considered to be unreasonable when a person has a subjective expectation of privacy.
Katz v. United States is an important Fourth Amendment case dictating the limits of what constitutes a reasonable or unreasonable search or seizure.
It is inconclusive as to what is considered to be a reasonable expectation of privacy, and therefore the Fourth Amendment does not always offer sufficient protection.
Although the Fourth Amendment limits the extent to which individuals can be subject to searches and seizures, it is still unclear as to what those limits are.
The Fourth Amendment is designed to safeguard our privacies, but those privacies are not always protected because of how vague the amendment is.
Although the Fourth Amendment limits the extent to which individuals can be subject to searches and seizures, it is still unclear as to what those limits are.
This option is the only one that properly captures the main message of the excerpt. The other answer choices either misstate information or are too narrowly constructed.
Example Question #221 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Cell phone technology has progressed more quickly than almost anyone could have predicted. Only fifteen years ago was it even conceivable that handheld devices might be able to both store large amounts of data and access the internet. Yet, just a few years later, cell phones accomplish both of these things and are readily accessible to the public. While technology usually advances at predictable, moderate speed, advancements during some periods are so rapid as to be truly remarkable. The development of the cell phone provides an example of just such a time.
The author of the argument is most likely to agree with which of the following?
Fifteen years ago, people thought it was unlikely that a handheld device would ever be capable of accessing the internet
Cell phone technology advancements are likely to slow in the near future
Technological developments proceed more quickly than other types of developments
The rapid development of cell phone technology is likely to continue in the future
The speed of cell phone technology development is not typical of technological developments
The speed of cell phone technology development is not typical of technological developments
The author indicates that cell phone technology is not an isolated event, but provides an example of something that has happened at other times. The author also makes clear, however, that the usual course is for technology to progress at predictable, moderate speeds. As a result, the author is likely to agree that cell phone development has not been typical.
Example Question #225 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Physical trainer: Exercise is one of the most important parts of one's day. Many people are aware that 30 minutes of exercise lowers the heart rate, burns calories, and strengthens muscles. Many people, however, do not know that 30 minutes of exercise can also provide the benefits of elevating a person's metabolism and increasing productivity at work or school.
John: I'm sure exercise is one way of losing weight, but there are other ways. As a result, burning calories is an insignificant benefit of exercise.
John and the physical trainer most likely disagree about which of the following statements?
Burning calories is an important benefit of exercise
30 minutes of exercise burns calories
Burning calories is a necessary part of losing weight
Most people who exercise do so in order to lose weight
Exercise is an important part of one's day
Burning calories is an important benefit of exercise
John does not question whether exercise has important benefits or whether it burns calories. Instead, John simply questions whether burning calories is among the important benefits since calories can be burned in other ways.
Example Question #226 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Jeans have been a staple of fashion for many decades. They may have remained fashionable for so long because they are durable, comfortable, and easy to maintain. It seems unlikely that any one of these factors alone could account for the popularity of jeans. After all, many articles of clothing have gone out of style even though they were comfortable. The same can be said of clothing items that were durable and clothing that was easy to maintain.
With which of the following would the author most likely agree?
Jeans are popular for three reasons--they are durable, comfortable, and easy to maintain
It is impossible to explain why jeans have been popular for so long
Clothing items will be popular for decades if a variety of factors are all met
Jeans are durable but this fact alone does not explain why they have been popular for so long
Jeans have been popular for longer than any other clothing item
Jeans are durable but this fact alone does not explain why they have been popular for so long
The author acknowledges that jeans are durable, but also makes clear that none of the three factors, alone, can explain why jeans have been so popular. The author does not reach a firm conclusion as to what is the correct explanation.
Example Question #227 : Lsat Logical Reasoning
Teacher: Textbooks are just not effective for teaching some subjects to children. They don't take an interest in the topics, don't really understand them, and certainly won't remember them long term. To solve these problems we need to regularly take students to museums. Textbooks aren't a good option anymore.
Principal: It does seem that students are often distracted in the classroom. However, there are alternatives to textbooks that do not involve taking students to museums. Documentaries, for instance, can be an effective learning tool.
The teacher and principal are most likely to disagree about which of the following statements?
Students won't remember what they learn in textbooks long term
Taking students to museums is necessary
Textbooks are not effective
Students often do not understand the topics in textbooks
Documentaries can be an effective learning tool
Taking students to museums is necessary
The principal seems to suggest that museums are one of multiple alternatives to textbooks. The teacher, on the other hand, states that students must be brought to museums. The principal and teacher are most likely to disagree about whether taking students to museums is necessary.