Common Core: 7th Grade English Language Arts : Common Core: 7th Grade English Language Arts

Study concepts, example questions & explanations for Common Core: 7th Grade English Language Arts

varsity tutors app store varsity tutors android store

All Common Core: 7th Grade English Language Arts Resources

1 Diagnostic Test 49 Practice Tests Question of the Day Flashcards Learn by Concept

Example Questions

Example Question #1 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

Passage 1:

Graffiti - the public drawings and paintings that often cover surfaces of walls and other public structures - are often written off as an act of vandalism. However, the time has finally come when we begin to recognize graffiti for the art form it truly is.

Artists such as Banksy have shown us that graffiti can be a way to showcase not only one’s talent in the visual arts but also one’s political and social causes and stances. Some cities have even come to embrace graffiti to such an extent that they have commissioned works of art from these artists on the facades of public buildings.

Although graffiti began as an act of anarchy and rebellion, its contributions to society and the communities impacted by the art have seen positive responses that far outweigh the negatives. Graffiti is no longer a costly nuisance that should be immediately covered or removed, it has instead flourished to become an entirely new and unique art form with talent and renown that will eventually come to match the household names “Picasso” and “Michaelangelo” in stature.

Passage 2:

Though some might idolize graffiti as an act of admirable rebellion, this “art” causes nothing but negative impacts on its community. Those who would vandalize their streets and neighborhoods are no friend to the community. Instead, these criminals deface properties, decrease home values, and leave the community looking less pristine and cared for.

Such vandals also disregard the work put in by maintenance workers cleaning up after their messes and government officials attempting to create a better community for their citizens. While the work created by graffiti “artists” can sometimes be visually impressive, this does not outweigh the fact that what they have created is not art, but a crime against the community.

Popular graffiti “artists” auctioning work off for thousands of dollars apiece only perpetuate this trend. It is high time we put a stop to these criminal activities rather than glorifying them and allow true artists who follow city policies and stick to canvas or sculpture their due respect.

Which of the following statements would the author of Passage 1 be most likely to disagree with?

Possible Answers:

The negative impacts of graffiti far outweigh the positives

Graffiti’s history includes acts of rebellion and anarchy

Graffiti often expresses an artist’s visual art talents

Graffiti has contributed positively to society and the community

Correct answer:

The negative impacts of graffiti far outweigh the positives

Explanation:

The author of Passage 1 feels overall positively about graffiti and cites its positive attributes. While the author does address graffiti’s origins in rebellion and anarchy, graffiti is referred to throughout Passage 1 as an art form that establishes artistic talent and has “seen positive responses that far outweigh the negatives.” This is precisely the opposite of what is expressed in our correct answer: “The negative impacts of graffiti far outweigh the positives.”

Example Question #2 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

Passage 1:

Graffiti - the public drawings and paintings that often cover surfaces of walls and other public structures - are often written off as an act of vandalism. However, the time has finally come when we begin to recognize graffiti for the art form it truly is.

Artists such as Banksy have shown us that graffiti can be a way to showcase not only one’s talent in the visual arts but also one’s political and social causes and stances. Some cities have even come to embrace graffiti to such an extent that they have commissioned works of art from these artists on the facades of public buildings.

Although graffiti began as an act of anarchy and rebellion, its contributions to society and the communities impacted by the art have seen positive responses that far outweigh the negatives. Graffiti is no longer a costly nuisance that should be immediately covered or removed, it has instead flourished to become an entirely new and unique art form with talent and renown that will eventually come to match the household names “Picasso” and “Michaelangelo” in stature.

Passage 2:

Though some might idolize graffiti as an act of admirable rebellion, this “art” causes nothing but negative impacts on its community. Those who would vandalize their streets and neighborhoods are no friend to the community. Instead, these criminals deface properties, decrease home values, and leave the community looking less pristine and cared for.

Such vandals also disregard the work put in by maintenance workers cleaning up after their messes and government officials attempting to create a better community for their citizens. While the work created by graffiti “artists” can sometimes be visually impressive, this does not outweigh the fact that what they have created is not art, but a crime against the community.

Popular graffiti “artists” auctioning work off for thousands of dollars apiece only perpetuate this trend. It is high time we put a stop to these criminal activities rather than glorifying them and allow true artists who follow city policies and stick to canvas or sculpture their due respect.

Which of the following statements would the author of Passage 2 be most likely to agree with?

Possible Answers:

Vandalism can be well-intentioned and good for the community

All graffiti artists are unfairly paid thousands for their work

Graffiti is always visually impressive

Graffiti should be regarded as a criminal activity, not as art

Correct answer:

Graffiti should be regarded as a criminal activity, not as art

Explanation:

The author of Passage 2 directly states that the work of graffiti artists should not be considered art, and that “what they have created is not art, but a crime against the community.” We do not, however, know that all graffiti artists are paid thousands, that vandalism can be good for the community, or that graffiti is always visually impressive - even if the author cites that in some cases, this might be true.

Example Question #3 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

Every day it seems, new inventions surface that promise to add value to our day-to-day lives. But did you know, many of the inventions we interact with on a daily basis were developed completely by accident?

Take the microwave, for instance. This accidental invention was developed by engineer Percy Spencer who, upon experimenting with a microwave-emitting magnetron, found that the candy bar in his pocket had begun to melt. Spencer was then able to harness this radiation into the microwave we use today to make snack time a speedy process!

Perhaps one of the most well-known accidental inventions of today, the potato chip was born when a customer kept requesting that his french fries be sliced thinner and made crispier. Though chef George Crum responded with the chips as a joke, they quickly became a favorite snack around the world!

Even the match is a result of accidental invention. When pharmacist John Walker was stirring chemicals, he noticed that the end of his stirring stick had dried into a hardened lump. When attempting to scrape the dried residue off, a flame sparked, and so did Walker’s idea to turn this accident into a helpful tool!

So, the next time your science experiment doesn’t go as planned, or you burn what you have cooked on the stove, keep in mind that some of today’s most valued inventions were discovered when the inventor least expected it!

According to the passage, the author would most likely agree that

Possible Answers:

inventions aren’t always well planned out and anticipated

all of the best inventions were created accidentally

accidental inventions don’t count as real inventions

inventions can only be created by those who are not careful when cooking or conducting experiments

Correct answer:

inventions aren’t always well planned out and anticipated

Explanation:

In the passage, the author cites examples of accidental inventions. That is, inventions that were discovered without the original intent of the inventor. This does not, however, indicate to us that this is the only way helpful inventions can be created, nor does the passage indicate that the author believes these accidental inventions should not be credited as real inventions. However, there is strong evidence that the author believes that “Inventions aren’t always well planned out and anticipated,” as this is the entire idea behind accidental inventions.

Example Question #4 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

Every day it seems, new inventions surface that promise to add value to our day-to-day lives. But did you know, many of the inventions we interact with on a daily basis were developed completely by accident?

Take the microwave, for instance. This accidental invention was developed by engineer Percy Spencer who, upon experimenting with a microwave-emitting magnetron, found that the candy bar in his pocket had begun to melt. Spencer was then able to harness this radiation into the microwave we use today to make snack time a speedy process!

Perhaps one of the most well-known accidental inventions of today, the potato chip was born when a customer kept requesting that his french fries be sliced thinner and made crispier. Though chef George Crum responded with the chips as a joke, they quickly became a favorite snack around the world!

Even the match is a result of accidental invention. When pharmacist John Walker was stirring chemicals, he noticed that the end of his stirring stick had dried into a hardened lump. When attempting to scrape the dried residue off, a flame sparked, and so did Walker’s idea to turn this accident into a helpful tool!

So, the next time your science experiment doesn’t go as planned, or you burn what you have cooked on the stove, keep in mind that some of today’s most valued inventions were discovered when the inventor least expected it!

Which of the following represents a view not held by the author?

Possible Answers:

Inventions can sometimes strike us at unexpected times

Some methods of cooking take longer than the microwave

Percy Spencer should have eaten the candy bar so that it wouldn’t be accidentally melted and wasted

A match is a tool that some consider helpful

Correct answer:

Percy Spencer should have eaten the candy bar so that it wouldn’t be accidentally melted and wasted

Explanation:

Though our other answer choices have reasonable support from the passage, we cannot confidently determine that the author felt that “Percy Spencer should have eaten the candy bar so that it wouldn’t be accidentally melted and wasted.” In fact, the author uses Spencer’s example to show the fortunate outcomes of accidental inventions. So, the author very likely would not suggest that Spencer should have eaten the candy bar before his work to avoid melting it - and certainly wouldn’t consider the bar wasted! Even though it likely went uneaten, the bar contributed to one of the most impactful inventions of our time!

Example Question #5 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

You likely hear the name “Napoleon Bonaparte” and immediately think of the short in stature and short in temper French emperor. But have you heard about his most embarrassing surrender? No, not Waterloo! Not Laon or the battle of La Rothiere either! Napoleon's most laughable defeat came well before his loss at Waterloo, in the summer of 1807.

Despite Napoleon's great renown as a brilliant military leader, he once retreated frantically from an army of ….bunnies! You heard that right! Shortly after Napoleon’s Treaties of Tilsit was penned, the emperor planned to celebrate with his fellow military men the best way he knew how - a hunt! Napoleon ordered the chief of staff, Alexandre Berthier, to organize an extravagant rabbit hunt for Napoleon and his men.

Not to be outdone, Berthier collected what was estimated to be between hundreds and thousands of rabbits for the hunt. However, while Berthier assumed that, like wild rabbits, these village-raised rabbits would scurry at the sight of Napoleon and his men, exactly the opposite was true. When the day came and the hunting party was ready for the chase, the bunnies were released. But instead of running for the woods, the swarm of rabbits came straight for Napoleon and his men. Though the men initially attempted to fight back, they were overwhelmed by the horde and fled to their coaches on a panicked retreat. It was not until the coaches sped away, rabbits still hopping aboard even as they attempted to retreat, that Napoleon was able to escape the furry army.

Embarrassed in front of the military peers and subordinates who once respected him, Napoleon fled home from a battle he never anticipated, and one he would never fully recover from the battle of the bunnies.

According to the passage, the author would describe Napoleon as all of the following except

Possible Answers:

easily upset

undefeated in battle

short

successful in some battles

Correct answer:

undefeated in battle

Explanation:

Napoleon is described by the author as “short in stature and short in temper,” meaning that he was both short and easily upset, and the author cites that Napoleon had “great renown as a brilliant military leader,” meaning that he had at least some success. The author does not, however, refer to Napoleon as undefeated in battle, and actually cites several defeats - even beyond the embarrassing retreat spoken about in the passage.

Example Question #3 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

You likely hear the name “Napoleon Bonaparte” and immediately think of the short in stature and short in temper French emperor. But have you heard about his most embarrassing surrender? No, not Waterloo! Not Laon or the battle of La Rothiere either! Napoleon's most laughable defeat came well before his loss at Waterloo, in the summer of 1807.

Despite Napoleon's great renown as a brilliant military leader, he once retreated frantically from an army of ….bunnies! You heard that right! Shortly after Napoleon’s Treaties of Tilsit was penned, the emperor planned to celebrate with his fellow military men the best way he knew how - a hunt! Napoleon ordered the chief of staff, Alexandre Berthier, to organize an extravagant rabbit hunt for Napoleon and his men.

Not to be outdone, Berthier collected what was estimated to be between hundreds and thousands of rabbits for the hunt. However, while Berthier assumed that, like wild rabbits, these village-raised rabbits would scurry at the sight of Napoleon and his men, exactly the opposite was true. When the day came and the hunting party was ready for the chase, the bunnies were released. But instead of running for the woods, the swarm of rabbits came straight for Napoleon and his men. Though the men initially attempted to fight back, they were overwhelmed by the horde and fled to their coaches on a panicked retreat. It was not until the coaches sped away, rabbits still hopping aboard even as they attempted to retreat, that Napoleon was able to escape the furry army.

Embarrassed in front of the military peers and subordinates who once respected him, Napoleon fled home from a battle he never anticipated, and one he would never fully recover from the battle of the bunnies.

We can determine from the passage that the author would likely describe Berthier as

Possible Answers:

high-ranking in his military position

always making mistakes when given a task

often reprimanded by Napoleon for making mistakes

successful in every event he coordinated

Correct answer:

high-ranking in his military position

Explanation:

According to the passage, we don’t know that Berthier was always making mistakes, or that he was often reprimanded for mistakes, and we can determine that he was definitely not always successful. We do, however, know that Berthier held a high-ranking military position, as he was chief of staff to Napoleon.

Example Question #7 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

The animal kingdom is made up of creatures of all shapes, sizes, and colors. While we may see color as little more than decoration, animals use their colors in three key ways: to hide, to deceive, and to attract.

The first purpose of color in the animal kingdom, to hide, is perhaps the most commonly known. Animals use a variety of colorations to camouflage themselves or to obscure their shapes from predators. For instance, the owl is often colored and patterned to match the bark of its tree of choice to better blend into its surroundings when perched. The leafy seadragon, an aquatic example of a species employing color to hide, uses its blue-green coloration and leaf-like protrusions to blend into the aquatic foliage of its ecosystem. But perhaps no species is better known for its ability to use color to hide than the chameleon, which can change color to blend into its surroundings. In fact, the chameleon is so well-known for this trait that its name has become a term that is now generally used to refer to one who “changes to fit/blend in.”

Deception is the second function of color in animals. Animals have been known to use their colors and patterns to deceive potential predators and prey. The hemeroplanes triptolemus, otherwise known as the aptly named “snake mimic caterpillar,” uses large, eye-like colorations on its underbelly to flip over and appear snake-like and thus more intimidating to predators. The orchid mantis is another fascinating example of deception in the animal kingdom. Brightly colored in hues of pink and purple, the mantis contorts itself to appear flower-like as it awaits its prey. When pollinators come around expecting a flower to feed on, they are in for a surprise, as the mantis sits ready to strike.

Animals don’t always use their colors to become less pronounced or to hide their true forms from predators or prey. They can also use colors to attract. Bright colorations in animals are used to both attract mates, and to attract attention from and send a warning to potential predators. Many species of birds are known to use bright colorations to attract potential female mates. Additionally, poisonous creatures might be seen with bright colorations and patterns to warn potential predators to leave them be! In fact, many non-poisonous animals have taken this “attract attention” purpose and melded it with “deception” to use their bright coloration to appear poisonous and thus dangerous to predators - even though they are completely harmless!

When it comes to animal colorations, there’s more than meets the eye. With bright colors to attract a mate or ward off a foe, patterns to obscure one’s form and markings that can make even the most harmless bug look like a terrifying creature, animals use color in many ways to better their chances of survival in the wild.

According to the passage, the author would be most likely to describe the colors of animals as

Possible Answers:

Purposeless

Functional

Impractical

Useless

Correct answer:

Functional

Explanation:

The author of the passage describes various purposes of the functions of colors in the animal kingdom. So, the author would describe the colors of animals as “functional,” or having a purpose/function. All of our other answer options contrast this function and don’t align with the passage.

Example Question #8 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

The animal kingdom is made up of creatures of all shapes, sizes, and colors. While we may see color as little more than decoration, animals use their colors in three key ways: to hide, to deceive, and to attract.

The first purpose of color in the animal kingdom, to hide, is perhaps the most commonly known. Animals use a variety of colorations to camouflage themselves or to obscure their shapes from predators. For instance, the owl is often colored and patterned to match the bark of its tree of choice to better blend into its surroundings when perched. The leafy seadragon, an aquatic example of a species employing color to hide, uses its blue-green coloration and leaf-like protrusions to blend into the aquatic foliage of its ecosystem. But perhaps no species is better known for its ability to use color to hide than the chameleon, which can change color to blend into its surroundings. In fact, the chameleon is so well-known for this trait that its name has become a term that is now generally used to refer to one who “changes to fit/blend in.”

Deception is the second function of color in animals. Animals have been known to use their colors and patterns to deceive potential predators and prey. The hemeroplanes triptolemus, otherwise known as the aptly named “snake mimic caterpillar,” uses large, eye-like colorations on its underbelly to flip over and appear snake-like and thus more intimidating to predators. The orchid mantis is another fascinating example of deception in the animal kingdom. Brightly colored in hues of pink and purple, the mantis contorts itself to appear flower-like as it awaits its prey. When pollinators come around expecting a flower to feed on, they are in for a surprise, as the mantis sits ready to strike.

Animals don’t always use their colors to become less pronounced or to hide their true forms from predators or prey. They can also use colors to attract. Bright colorations in animals are used to both attract mates, and to attract attention from and send a warning to potential predators. Many species of birds are known to use bright colorations to attract potential female mates. Additionally, poisonous creatures might be seen with bright colorations and patterns to warn potential predators to leave them be! In fact, many non-poisonous animals have taken this “attract attention” purpose and melded it with “deception” to use their bright coloration to appear poisonous and thus dangerous to predators - even though they are completely harmless!

When it comes to animal colorations, there’s more than meets the eye. With bright colors to attract a mate or ward off a foe, patterns to obscure one’s form and markings that can make even the most harmless bug look like a terrifying creature, animals use color in many ways to better their chances of survival in the wild.

Which of the following statements would the author of the passage be most likely to disagree with?

Possible Answers:

Animals vary in shapes, sizes, and color

Animals can use color to better their chances of attracting a mate

Animals cannot employ more than one function of color at the same time

Animals sometimes use color to deceive their predators or prey

Correct answer:

Animals cannot employ more than one function of color at the same time

Explanation:

While the author of the passage addresses the use of color to deceive, the varying shapes and sizes of animals, and their use of color to attract a mate, the author also shows that animals can employ more than one function of color at a time. An example of such an instance is given in paragraph four, where the author states that “many non-poisonous animals have taken this “attract attention” purpose and melded it with “deception” to use their bright coloration to appear poisonous and thus dangerous to predators - even though they are completely harmless.”

Example Question #11 : Reading To Determine Author's Point Of View

Passage 1:

The penny has long outlived its usefulness in the monetary system and should be removed from use. Pennies cost more to produce than the value they represent. In fact, it costs taxpayers nearly two cents to produce and distribute every one cent penny.

Additionally, the penny does not represent the real level of purchasing power. Go to the corner store today and ask for the “penny candy,” and you might be routed to a row of treats, but you’re unlikely to find anything for purchase for under a quarter.

On top of the cost and lack of benefit, pennies are also heavy for their value, so much so that many don’t even care to keep the pennies they receive in change. 11% of people report that they would rather throw a penny away than carry it around with them, and over $62 million dollars in coins are thrown out annually - most of them pennies.

Whether it’s at the grocery register or at the bank, everyone who handles pennies agrees that they are excessively time-consuming to process. Even most charities would rather do without the pennies they receive! It’s time we let go of this costly antiquity and get rid of the penny once and for all!


Passage 2:

The penny is a sacred historic symbol in America and should be respected for its historical value. Over half of Americans are in favor of keeping the penny, and many fear the trend that eliminating low-value currency sets. “Rounding tax,” or the inclination for businesses to round prices up to the nearest unit of change available, could have an impact on consumers, and as inflation continues, the nickel, the dime, and even the quarter could follow!

Not only does the penny help keep costs low, but it would also be costly to take out of commission effectively. The penny is also a powerful historical tribute to Abraham Lincoln, who has appeared on the penny’s face since 1909.

The penny represents far more than its one-cent value and eliminating it would take a toll on the history it represents and the majority of citizens who seek to keep it in commission.

Which of the following statements would the author of Passage 1 be most likely to agree with?

Possible Answers:

The penny does not carry any historical significance

All change should be abolished

Pennies have never been a useful currency

Most candy today costs at least 25 cents

Correct answer:

The penny does not carry any historical significance

Explanation:

While the author of Passage 1 is in favor of removing the penny from use, we cannot use this information to conclude that the author thinks pennies have never been useful or held any historical significance, or that all change should be abolished. However, given the excerpt “go to the corner store today and ask for the “penny candy,” and you might be routed to a row of treats, but you’re unlikely to find anything for purchase for under a quarter,” we can see that the author would agree that most candy costs at least a quarter - or 25 cents.

Example Question #12 : Craft And Structure

Passage 1:

The penny has long outlived its usefulness in the monetary system and should be removed from use. Pennies cost more to produce than the value they represent. In fact, it costs taxpayers nearly two cents to produce and distribute every one cent penny.

Additionally, the penny does not represent the real level of purchasing power. Go to the corner store today and ask for the “penny candy,” and you might be routed to a row of treats, but you’re unlikely to find anything for purchase for under a quarter.

On top of the cost and lack of benefit, pennies are also heavy for their value, so much so that many don’t even care to keep the pennies they receive in change. 11% of people report that they would rather throw a penny away than carry it around with them, and over $62 million dollars in coins are thrown out annually - most of them pennies.

Whether it’s at the grocery register or at the bank, everyone who handles pennies agrees that they are excessively time-consuming to process. Even most charities would rather do without the pennies they receive! It’s time we let go of this costly antiquity and get rid of the penny once and for all!


Passage 2:

The penny is a sacred historic symbol in America and should be respected for its historical value. Over half of Americans are in favor of keeping the penny, and many fear the trend that eliminating low-value currency sets. “Rounding tax,” or the inclination for businesses to round prices up to the nearest unit of change available, could have an impact on consumers, and as inflation continues, the nickel, the dime, and even the quarter could follow!

Not only does the penny help keep costs low, but it would also be costly to take out of commission effectively. The penny is also a powerful historical tribute to Abraham Lincoln, who has appeared on the penny’s face since 1909.

The penny represents far more than its one-cent value and eliminating it would take a toll on the history it represents and the majority of citizens who seek to keep it in commission.

According to the author of Passage 2, Abraham Lincoln

Possible Answers:

Would be forgotten if the penny were eliminated

Was only honored by having his face featured on the penny

Has appeared on the penny’s face since the penny’s creation

Was chosen to be featured on the penny as a sign of honor

Correct answer:

Was chosen to be featured on the penny as a sign of honor

Explanation:

In Passage 2, we are told that “the penny is also a powerful historical tribute to Abraham Lincoln, who has appeared on the penny’s face since 1909.” While we do not know that this is when the penny was first created, nor do we know that Lincoln has no other means of tribute and would otherwise be forgotten (the Lincoln memorial and the five-dollar bill would beg to differ!), we do know that he was chosen to be featured as a sign of honor, otherwise known as a tribute.

All Common Core: 7th Grade English Language Arts Resources

1 Diagnostic Test 49 Practice Tests Question of the Day Flashcards Learn by Concept
Learning Tools by Varsity Tutors