All Common Core: 5th Grade English Language Arts Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #11 : Key Ideas And Details
Passage 1
Ecuador, in South America, is home to 417 types of frogs and toads. Many of these species, or types of frogs, are at risk of dying out. In the last 50 years, many amphibian species have gone extinct. Salamanders, frogs, and toads are all amphibians. Amphibians are animals that spend part of their life in water and part on land, and have backbones. Amphibians must live near water. Amphibians are in trouble because their habitat is being destroyed as trees are being cut down to make room for farms and roads. Amphibians also absorb pollution easily, because they breathe through their skin. Amphibians are usually the first to disappear when an environment is under threat from pollution. Due to pollution, some frogs are born with deformed, or wrongly shaped, body parts, such as extra legs and eyes. Frogs with deformed body parts are a clue for scientists that an environment is suffering. Between the destruction of their habitats and risks to frogs from pollution, frogs are at risk of endangerment and extinction.
Scientists are working to save amphibians from their plight. Scientists want the government to pass laws that protect amphibian habitats and limit pollution.
Passage 2
My name is Maria and I am an amphibian conservation biologist. My job is to protect amphibians and their natural habitats, develop educational programs and exhibits to engage the public about amphibian conservation, and research to develop tools that will allow scientists to reintroduce amphibians back into the wild. Conservation biologists are scientists who study and protect animals and their environments. I work in a zoo, but I often travel to places like Ecuador or Brazil to observe a variety of amphibians in their natural habitats. Brazil, for example, has 1,022 different types of frogs, toads and salamanders! In my work at the zoo, I specialize in only a small portion of that number. Here in the zoo, we have many amphibians in our care because some or all of their natural habitats were destroyed. We are not alone in our work to protect amphibians. Many people, in many kinds of jobs, are helping protect amphibians and their habitats. I partner with other scientists and lawyers, like my friend Fernanda, to help create laws that best support the conservation, or protection, of amphibians. Fernanda is an environmental lawyer who works to create laws like the Endangered Species Act that protect wildlife and their homes. She, in turn, needs to partner with government workers who can lobby and vote to help get laws passed. Together, our goal is to work together to build a world where these amphibians have safe space to live outside of the zoo, in their natural habitat, protected from pollution or loss of space. We are working with a facility in Brazil to build protected space for amphibians to be released from the zoo and into a space where they can thrive.
Given what you read in passage 1 and 2, what can you infer about the best way for change to happen to protect amphibians?
Amphibians will naturally come back in places they are endangered, even if nothing changes.
Scientists and zoos need to work together to move more amphibians into zoos for protection.
Scientists, lawyers, government workers, and voters need to all work together to help protect and conserve amphibians and their habitats.
Scientists, lawyers, government workers, and voters are all working separately to protect amphibians.
Scientists, lawyers, government workers, and voters need to all work together to help protect and conserve amphibians and their habitats.
This is the best inference, because both passages mention the need for all these groups to work together to make positive changes to protect amphibians.
Example Question #12 : Key Ideas And Details
“Once upon a time, there was a little prince. His father spoiled him, and his grandfather doted on him even more.”
The prince's grandfather spoiled him even more than his father did.
False
True
True
“Doted even more” tells the reader that compared to the father, the grandfather spoiled the prince even more.
Example Question #13 : Key Ideas And Details
Carol and Nisha are twin sisters. They are fourteen years of age. This is an example of:
fact and opinion
comparing
contrasting
chronological order
comparing
This sentence is coming Carol and Nisha. They are both twins and they are both fourteen years old.
Example Question #12 : Compare And Contrast Text Aspects
A Voice for Freedom and Song
Marian Anderson was a world-class singer. By the year 1939, Marian had sung for people around the world, including kings and presidents. Her dream was to sing at Constitution Hall, but, in her mind, she viewed it as something that would never happen. The owners, the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), would not allow her to sing because she was African-American.
Marian was used to dealing with people who only saw her for her skin color. When she was younger, she applied to become a student at a music school. She was denied entrance because of her race. In the early 1900s, when Marian began her singing career, segregation still kept African-American people from achieving their goals and dreams.
Marian performed in 1925 in a voice contest in New York and won. She was able to sing with the New York Philharmonic! She thought doors would start opening for her in the United States, but instead, people foolishly turned her away. Marian traveled to Europe in 1928, and there she became quite popular.
In 1939, she returned to the United States, but she was still subject to the cruelty and unfairness of racism and segregation. When Marian attempted to sing at Constitution Hall, the DAR had many excuses for why she couldn’t perform. They tried telling her that the dates weren’t available, or that they weren’t booking new performers. Eventually, they told Marian the truth: she couldn’t perform because they only allowed white musicians.
This rejection inspired thousands of people to rally together against the horrible segregation laws that prevented many from hearing Marian’s beautiful voice. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt resigned from the DAR and publicly shamed them for their treatment of African-American performers. Mrs. Roosevelt and her staff arranged a concert at the Lincoln Memorial for Marian to perform. Seventy-five thousand people attended, standing against discrimination and getting to hear Marian sing.
After the DAR incident, Marian took a stand and refused to sing for segregated crowds. She finally achieved her dream of singing at Constitution Hall when the DAR reversed its policy on allowing African-American performers. Marian retired from performing in 1964, the same year that the Civil Rights Act was signed. Along with other brave activists, she used her talents to advocate for justice, and her voice helped create lasting change against racism and segregation in the United States.
How did First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt’s view of racism and segregation compare to the DAR’s?
Mrs. Roosevelt publicly shamed DAR for their treatment of African-American performers.
All of the answer choices are correct.
Mrs. Roosevelt resigned from DAR over their racist policies because they did not allow African-American’s to perform.
Mrs. Roosevelt and her staff arranged a concert at the Lincoln Memorial for Marian to perform when the DAR refused to allow Marian to perform.
All of the answer choices are correct.
Mrs. Roosevelt had much more progressive ideas about racism and segregation and did not support the DAR’s policies. She left the DAR, publically shamed them, and held her own concert supporting African-American performers. DAR had a strict white performers only viewpoint, and this contradicted what Mrs. Roosevelt thought.
Example Question #11 : Compare And Contrast Text Aspects
Young Enterprise Services
Young Enterprise Services (YES) is a program created to encourage entrepreneurship in 14- to 18-year-olds who have already shown a clear ability for starting businesses. The program, which began in 2002, has provided loans, grants, and counseling—in the form of workshops and individual meetings with entrepreneurs—to over 7500 young people. The future of YES, however, is now at risk.
One complaint is that the funds that YES distributes have disproportionately gone to young people from low-income families. Though no one has claimed that any of the recipients of YES funds have been undeserving, several families have brought lawsuits claiming that their funding requests were rejected because of the families’ high levels of income.
Another challenge has been making sure that a young person, not his or her family, is receiving the funding. The rules state that the youth must create the business plan and that any profits above $1,000 be placed in a bank account. The rules say that the money can only be used for education, investment in the business, and little else. There have been cases of parents or even a neighbor using the money for their business.
On the other hand, YES has had some real success stories. A 14-year-old girl in Texas used the knowledge and funding she received through the program to connect with a distributor who now carries her line of custom-designed cell phone covers. Two brothers in Alaska have developed an online travel service for young people vacationing with their families. Both of these businesses are doing well and earning money. Unfortunately, these and other successes have received little media coverage. This is a shame, but one that can be fixed.
How does the author organize this passage?
Chronologically listing the achievements of YES
Identifying the problem YES faces and providing a solution
Highlighting the challenges and successes of YES
Persuading readers to support YES with positive details and facts
Highlighting the challenges and successes of YES
The author of the text Young Enterprise Services compares and contrasts the challenges and the successes of YES. The author describes the lawsuits the organization is facing, the public scrutiny, and the logistical challenges of allotting funds correctly. The author also highlights the successful businesses of multiple young people and how the organization helps the community.
Example Question #14 : Compare And Contrast Text Aspects
Coal Passage 1
The typical coal plant in the United States creates more than 125,000 tons of ash and 193,000 tons of sludge each year. On average, 42% of coal combustion waste ponds and landfills are unlined. This means that the substances in the waste can seep into the ground and nearby lakes. Some of the substances include arsenic, mercury, chromium, and cadmium. These can contaminate drinking water supplies and directly contact the consumers who drink water from these areas. The disposal of coal plant waste has damaged many ecosystems. Once the coal plants have cycled through billions of gallons of water to cool the system, it is dumped back into the river, ocean, or lake it is pulling water from. When this hot water is released back into the body of water, it creates “thermal pollution,” which can harm the plants and animals living in this area. Many plants add chemicals to their cooling water, which is released back into the lake, ocean, or river with the hot water.
Coal Passage 2
Coal is a concentrated form of prehistoric biomass, plant life, and is the most plentiful fossil fuel produced in the United States. More than 90 percent of the coal consumed in the US is used to generate electricity. Coal power is also an essential industry source for making steel, cement, and paper, and is used in numerous other industries. Coal was a valuable resource that powered trains, steamships, and other forms of transportation for centuries. Coal is essential to the US economy and provides consumers with affordable electricity. The mining of coal and the use of coal power plants provide vital jobs to many American citizens. In 2018 15% of U.S. coal production was exported to other countries. Exporting coal has a positive effect on the United State’s economy.
Which author would be most likely to promote the use of coal, and which piece of evidence supports the claim?
The author of Passage 2; “Coal is a concentrated form of prehistoric biomass, plant life, and is the most plentiful fossil fuel produced in the United States.”
The author of Passage 1; “The disposal of coal plant waste has damaged many ecosystems.”
The author of Passage 1; “Many plants add chemicals to their cooling water, which is released back into the lake, ocean, or river with the hot water.”
The author of Passage 2; “Coal power is also an essential industry source for making steel, cement, and paper, and is used in numerous other industries.”
The author of Passage 2; “Coal power is also an essential industry source for making steel, cement, and paper, and is used in numerous other industries.”
The author of Passage 1 is focused on the negative side of the coal industry and presents the downside to using fossil fuel, so he/she is unlikely to promote the use of coal. Passage 2's author highlights the positive aspects of coal, so they are naturally more likely to promote its use. The piece of text evidence that would support this claim is “Coal power is also an essential industry source for making steel, cement, and paper, and is used in numerous other industries.” because it uses the phrase “essential industry source” letting readers know it is an important source of the common materials and products we need. Which author would be most likely to promote the use of coal, and which piece of evidence supports the claim?
Example Question #12 : Compare And Contrast Text Aspects
Adapted from Aesop’s The Ants & the Grasshopper (620-560 BCE)
One bright day in late autumn, a family of Ants were bustling about in the warm sunshine, drying out the grain they had stored up during the summer, when a starving Grasshopper, his fiddle under his arm, came up and humbly begged for a bite to eat.
"What!" cried the Ants in surprise, "haven't you stored anything away for the winter? What in the world were you doing all last summer?"
"I didn't have time to store up any food," whined the Grasshopper; "I was so busy making music that before I knew it, the summer was gone."
The Ants shrugged their shoulders in disgust.
"Making music, were you?" they cried. "Very well; now dance!" And they turned their backs on the Grasshopper and went on with their work.
When comparing the Grasshopper and the Ants, there is a contrast in their behavior and attitudes. How could the Grasshopper and Ants be described?
The Grasshopper is cruel, and the Ants are kind.
The Grasshopper is well-prepared, and the Ants are lazy.
The Grasshopper is irresponsible, and the Ants are hard-workers.
The Grasshopper is greedy, and the Ants are generous.
The Grasshopper is irresponsible, and the Ants are hard-workers.
The Grasshopper has not prepared a stash of food for the winter because he was busy playing music and forgetting about his responsibilities for the upcoming season. The Ants saved food and are prepared for a hard winter. The Grasshopper has to beg others for supplies, and the Ants are well stocked from their own planning and diligence.
Example Question #13 : Compare And Contrast Text Aspects
Echolocation is a behavior in which animals emit calls and then listen to the echoes that bounce back off of stable things in the environment. This behavior can be used to navigate and to find food or mates. Orcas, dolphins, sperm whales, and pilot whales are all creatures that use this function to gather information. They release small bursts of air from air sacs in their heads and then through their mouths. This burst of air will make a click or ringing sound. The sound will bounce off an object and return to the whale or dolphin. That information is then transferred to a centralized place (the brain) where it is processed, and the organism responds in ways that will help it survive and reproduce.
Platypus have a "sixth-sense" that allows them to hunt underwater: electroreception. To find meals in the mud, it uses its bill to detect movements and subtle electric fields produced by its prey. Receptors on the bill detect changes in pressure and motion. Two types of receptors track the electrical signals produced by small prey when they contract their muscles. The platypus moves its head side-to-side to determine its next meal's direction and distance by collecting and processing this sensory information. The platypus has about 40,000 of these special receptors.
How are dolphins and platypus similar?
They both use echolocation to find mates and prey.
They both hunt prey using a special adaptation for processing information.
There is nothing similar between a dolphin and a platypus.
They both use the electrical signals of their prey to determine their locations while hunting.
They both hunt prey using a special adaptation for processing information.
Dolphins and platypus are specially adapted hunters and use their environment to make decisions about their prey and mates. A dolphin uses a series of clicks or ringing sounds called echolocation to determine the approximate size and location of stable objects in their environment. Platypus use electroreception to detect movements and subtle electric fields produced by its prey. Receptors on the bill detect changes in pressure and motion. Both of these animals have a special adaptation that helps them process information.
Example Question #14 : Key Ideas And Details
Passage 2: Adapted from "Why the Sun and the Moon Live in the Sky" in Folk Stories from Southern Nigeria, West Africa by Elphinstone Dayrell (1910)
Many years ago the sun and water were great friends, and both lived on the earth together. The sun very often used to visit the water, but the water never returned his visits. At last the sun asked the water why it was that he never came to see him in his house, the water replied that the sun's house was not big enough, and that if he came with his people he would drive the sun out.
He then said, "If you wish me to visit you, you must build a very large compound; but I warn you that it will have to be a tremendous place, as my people are very numerous, and take up a lot of room."
The sun promised to build a very big compound, and soon afterwards he returned home to his wife, the moon, who greeted him with a broad smile when he opened the door. The sun told the moon what he had promised the water, and the next day commenced building a huge compound in which to entertain his friend.
When it was completed, he asked the water to come and visit him the next day.
When the water arrived, he called out to the sun, and asked him whether it would be safe for him to enter, and the sun answered, "Yes, come in, my friend."
The water then began to flow in, accompanied by the fish and all the water animals.
Very soon the water was knee-deep, so he asked the sun if it was still safe, and the sun again said, "Yes," so more water came in.
When the water was level with the top of a man's head, the water said to the sun, "Do you want more of my people to come?" and the sun and moon both answered, "Yes," not knowing any better, so the water flowed on, until the sun and moon had to perch themselves on the top of the roof.
Again the water addressed the sun, but receiving the same answer, and more of his people rushing in, the water very soon overflowed the top of the roof, and the sun and moon were forced to go up into the sky, where they have remained ever since.
What does the sun do when the water says he cannot come visit?
The sun convinces the water to come over to his house without making any renovations.
The sun goes to visit the Water instead of inviting him over.
The sun asks the moon to help him build a bigger house.
The sun builds a bigger house.
The sun builds a bigger house.
This question asks you about what happens immediately after a particular moment in the story. Specifically, it asks about a character's action—what the sun does after the water says he cannot come visit. Let's find this particular part of the story and see what happens right after it.
At last the sun asked the water why it was that he never came to see him in his house, the water replied that the sun's house was not big enough, and that if he came with his people he would drive the sun out.
He then said, "If you wish me to visit you, you must build a very large compound; but I warn you that it will have to be a tremendous place, as my people are very numerous, and take up a lot of room."
This is the part of the story described by the question. Now we need to see what the sun does immediately afterward, which will help us figure out the correct answer.
The sun promised to build a very big compound, and soon afterwards he returned home to his wife, the moon, who greeted him with a broad smile when he opened the door. The sun told the moon what he had promised the water, and the next day commenced building a huge compound in which to entertain his friend.
When it was completed, he asked the water to come and visit him the next day.
The sun promises to build a bigger house and does so. The answer choice that best matches this sequence of events is "The sun builds a bigger house," so it is the correct answer.
Example Question #15 : Key Ideas And Details
Passage 1: Rabbits, Stoats, and Kiwis: The Ecology of New Zealand (2016)
The island nation of New Zealand is unique. Many of its animals and plants are found nowhere else. The kiwi is one of the most famous of these animals. This small, flightless bird dwells on the ground. It has tiny wings with which it is unable to fly. Kiwis belong to the same biological family as ostriches and emus, but they are much smaller than their relatives. Kiwis have round bodies and long beaks, and their brown feathers are very long and thin. Because of this, at first glance, someone who has never seen a kiwi before might think it has fur!
New Zealand is particularly fond of the kiwi. It is the country’s national bird. New Zealanders are even sometimes referred to as “kiwis.” Unfortunately, the kiwi is in danger due to changes humans made to New Zealand’s environment.
Hundreds of years ago, European colonists decided to bring rabbits from Europe to New Zealand. They wanted to hunt them for food and for sport. Unfortunately, their plan succeeded too well. In Europe, other animals in the food chain eat rabbits. This keeps their population in check. In New Zealand, though, no animals ate rabbits. So, their population grew to an enormous size. There were way too many rabbits!
The colonists tried to fix the problem by bringing another animal to New Zealand. Since none of New Zealand’s animals ate rabbits, the colonists imported one from Europe that did: the stoat. Stoats are small, carnivorous mammals similar to weasels. They eat rabbits, as well as birds and their eggs. Bird scientists warned the colonists to reconsider their plan, but the plan went forward—to the kiwi’s detriment.
New Zealand’s islands historically lacked predatory mammals. Because of this, kiwis’ flightlessness never put them at a huge risk of being hunted and eaten. This was the case until the stoats were released. The stoats began to eat the kiwis and their eggs in huge numbers. The kiwis had no way of protecting themselves from the stoats. As a result, their population plummeted.
To this day, stoats threaten the kiwi population in New Zealand. To protect native wildlife, residents have to tried to use various methods of trapping and hunting to limit the size of the stoat population. Certain areas have also been fenced in to keep stoats away from native birds like the kiwi.
To function, environments maintain a careful equilibrium between predators and prey. Altering this balance purposely or accidentally can have serious consequences.
Which of the following best summarizes the passage’s message?
Kiwis are bound to be driven to extinction eventually.
Interfering in any environment is always a bad idea, no matter how good of an idea it might seem.
By bringing rabbits to New Zealand, European colonists altered the natural balance of the environment.
Humans have caused a lot of problems in New Zealand.
Human interference in New Zealand’s environment has caused problems and harmed the kiwi, a native bird.
Human interference in New Zealand’s environment has caused problems and harmed the kiwi, a native bird.
A good summary of a passage is not too broad or too specific. A summary that is too broad could encompass and describe a much wider range of topics than the passage actually discusses. A summary that is too specific will only relate to one of the passage's points. A good test to use is to consider whether the summary describes something relevant to each and every paragraph in the passage. If certain paragraphs don't relate to the summary at all, but others do, the summary is likely too specific to be the best one.
One way to approach a summary question is to consider how you would describe the passage to a friend who asked you what you just read. For this passage, you might say that it was about New Zealand, the kiwi, and the effects that humans bringing rabbits and stoats to the island have had. Notice that you wouldn't necessarily mention that New Zealanders are now trapping and hunting stoats using various methods—that's a detail that only pertains to one paragraph and likely wouldn't be included in a summary of the entire passage. Imagining you're describing the passage to a friend in a sentence or two can help you avoid including unnecessary detail.
Let's now look at the answer choices. "Kiwis are bound to be driven to extinction eventually" doesn't match the point of the passage. While the author discusses how stoats have reduced the kiwi's population, at no point does the author claim that the birds will necessarily be driven to extinction. "Humans have caused a lot of problems in New Zealand" and "Interfering in any environment is a bad idea, no matter how good of an idea it might seem" are both too general to be the best answer. Humans may have caused non-environmental problems in New Zealand, too, and it's possible that interfering in an environment in some way could be a good thing. We would at least need to see more evidence than the one narrative the passage provides to conclude that it's always a bad idea. The answer choice "By bringing rabbits to New Zealand, European colonists altered the natural balance of the environment" doesn't pass the paragraph test described earlier. The statement certainly describes the paragraphs that talk about the importation of rabbits, but what about the other paragraphs that talk about the stoats and kiwis? It doesn't reflect the point of those.
The best answer choice is "Human interference in New Zealand’s environment has caused problems and harmed the kiwi, a native bird." The focus on the kiwi specifically is appropriate, because before we hear about the environmental problems the European colonists caused in New Zealand, we learn about the kiwi. This is the best answer.