All ACT English Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #11 : Punctuation Errors
"Whomever (1) wins the game will play in the Megabowl," (2) Paul shouted, and Derek wasnt (3) sure how to respond. He dint (4) particularly care for football generally, (5) or for the Megabowl specifically but (6) he did not want to upset his best friend, whom (7) was obviously excessively (8) excited about the news. He took a deep breath then (9) he said "That's wonderful news (10) Paul. Where is the game be (11) held?" Paul grinned and replied, "In Antarctica!" Derek blinked. "Since when are they having football games in Antarctica" he (12) asked. Paul simply smiled and said, "There had to be some good to come out of global warming, right?"
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the question number. If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
breath; then
breath: then
NO CHANGE
breath, then
breath; then
The semicolon is most appropriate here, because the two clauses can stand as two complete sentences, and "then" is being used not as a conjunction but as a conjunctive adverb.
Example Question #1 : Semicolon Errors
Adapted from "Nature" by Ralph Waldo Emerson (1836)
Whoever considers the final cause of the world, will discern a multitude of uses that result. They all admit of being thrown into one of the following classes; Commodity Beauty Language and Discipline.
Under the general name of Commodity, I rank all those advantages which our senses owe to nature. This, of course, is a benefit which is temporary and mediate, not ultimate, like its service to the soul. Yet although low, it is perfect in its kind, and is the only use of nature which all men apprehend. The misery of man appears like childish petulance, when we explore the steady and prodigal provision that has been made for his support and delight on this green ball which floats him through the heavens. What angels invented these splendid ornaments, these rich conveniences, this ocean of air above, this ocean of water beneath, this firmament of earth between? This zodiac of lights, this tent of dropping clouds, this striped coat of climates, this fourfold year? Beasts, fire, water, stones, and corn serve him. The field is at once his floor his work-yard his play-ground his garden and his bed.
Nature, in its ministry to man, is not only the material, but is also the process and the result. All the parts incessantly work into each other's hands for the profit of man. The wind sows the seed, the sun evaporates the sea, the wind blows the vapor to the field, the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this, the rain feeds the plant, the plant feeds the animal, and thus the endless circulations of the divine charity nourish man.
Which is the best form of the underlined section?
The wind sows the seed; the sun evaporates the sea; the wind blows the vapor to the field; the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this; the rain feeds the plant; the plant feeds the animal, and thus
The wind sows the seed, the sun evaporates the sea, the wind blows the vapor to the field, the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this, the rain feeds the plant, the plant feeds the animal; and thus
The wind sows the seed; the sun evaporates the sea; the wind blows the vapor to the field; the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this; the rain feeds the plant; the plant feeds the animal; and thus
NO CHANGE
The wind sows the seed; the sun evaporates the sea; the wind blows the vapor to the field; the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this; the rain feeds the plant; the plant feeds the animal; and thus
Semicolons are used when a sentence contains a series of elements which contain commas; if commas were used, there would be confusion about where an element begins or ends, as would be the case with the element "the ice, on the other side of the planet, condenses rain on this."
Example Question #2 : Semicolon Errors
Adapted from “The Nose Tree” in German Fairy Tales and Popular Stories by Jacob Grimm and Wilhelm Grimm (trans. Taylor, ed. 1864)
Then the king made known to all his kingdom, that whomever would heal her of this dreadful disease should be richly rewarded. Many tried, but the princess got no relief. Now the old soldier dressed himself up very sprucely as a doctor, and said he could cure her. Therefore, he chopped up some of the apple, and, to punish her a little more, gave her a dose, saying he would call to-morrow and see her again. The morrow came, and, of course, instead of being better, the nose had been growing on all night as before; and the poor princess was in a dreadful fright. So the doctor then chopped up a very little of the pear and gave it to her. He said that he was sure that it would help, and he would call again the next day. Next day came, and the nose was to be sure a little smaller. However, it was bigger than when the doctor first began to meddle with it.
Then he thought to him, "I must frighten this cunning princess a little more before I am able to get what I want from her." Therefore, he gave her another dose of the apple and said he would call on the morrow. The morrow came, and the nose was ten times bad as before.
"My good lady," said the doctor, "Something works against my medicine and is to strong for it. However, I know by the force of my art that it is this, you have stolen goods about you. I am certain of it. If you do not give them back, I can do nothing for you."
The princess denied very stoutly that she had anything of the kind.
"Very well," said the doctor, "you may do as you please, but I am sure I am correct. You will die if you do not own it." Then he went to the king, and told him how the matter stood.
"Daughter," said he, "send back the cloak, the purse, and the horn, that you stole from the right owners."
Then she ordered her maid to fetch all three and gave them to the doctor, and begged him to give them back to the soldiers. The moment he had them safe, he gave her a whole pear to eat, and the nose came right. And as for the doctor, he put on the cloak, wished the king and all his court a good day and was soon with his two brothers. They lived from that time happily at home in their palace, except when they took an airing to see the world in their coach with their three dapple-grey horses.
Which of the following is the best form of the underlined selection, "as before; and the poor princess was in a dreadful fright"?
as before; therefore, the poor princess was in a dreadful fright
as before and the poor princess was in a dreadful fright
as before, and the poor princess was in a dreadful fright
NO CHANGE
as before; therefore, the poor princess was in a dreadful fright
Since the sentence already is compounded, it is necessary to avoid stringing together more clauses by using "and" in a simple manner. While you could perhaps use "and" to introduce the independent clause after the semicolon, this would be very informal and grammatically questionable. Clearly, the author does relate the princess's fright to the growth of the nose. Therefore, the word "therefore" would function as a better connective between the two sentences that are connected by the semicolon.
Example Question #1 : Semicolon Errors
Which of the following sentences uses a semicolon incorrectly?
Contestants came from Houston, Texas; Detroit, Michigan; and Los Angeles, California.
Don't tell me about it; I haven't seen it yet.
I'd like to go out tonight; but I have a lot of homework.
I've never played golf; even so, I think I would be good at it.
She had never worn a dress before, and she was reluctant to try one on now; however, she was tired of people calling her a tomboy, so she slipped the pink gown over her head.
I'd like to go out tonight; but I have a lot of homework.
Semicolons can be used to separate items in a complex list, to join two independent clauses, to join two main clauses with a conjunctive adverb or a transitional phrase, and to join complex clauses with a coordinating conjunction. They are not used to join main clauses with coordinating conjunctions, which require commas instead.
Example Question #2 : Semicolon Errors
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the sentence. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
James chose a large, rusty car, Philip chose a brand new car, and I chose the cheapest, ugliest car on the lot.
James chose a large rusty car, Philip chose a brand new car, and I chose the cheapest ugliest car on the lot.
NO CHANGE
James chose a large, rusty car, Philip chose a brand new car; and I chose the cheapest, ugliest car on the lot.
James chose a large rusty car Philip chose a brand new car and I chose the cheapest ugliest car on the lot.
James chose a large, rusty car; Philip chose a brand new car; and I chose the cheapest, ugliest car on the lot.
James chose a large, rusty car; Philip chose a brand new car; and I chose the cheapest, ugliest car on the lot.
Because the first and third clauses in this sentence contain commas themselves, semicolons are needed to separate the clauses in order to avoid confusion. Also, because the phrases "large, rusty car" and "cheapest, ugliest car" can also be rendered as "large and rusty car" and "cheapest and ugliest car", the commas separating the adjectives are necessary.
Example Question #3 : Semicolon Errors
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the sentence. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
Sawyer attended that high school his first solo violin performance took place in the auditorium during his sophomore year.
that high school? His first
that high school, his first
that high school; his first
that high school, but his first
NO CHANGE
that high school; his first
Unchanged, the presented sentence is a run-on. The option "that high school, his first" does not fix it completely as it is a comma splice. The option "that high school, but his first" does join the two independent clauses, but it is incorrect as it indicates the two clauses contradict each other. The correct answer, "that high school; his first" correctly joins the two related independent clauses with a semicolon.
Example Question #12 : Punctuation Errors
Adapted from The Apology by Plato (trans. Jowett)
This inquisition has led to my having many enemies of the worst and most dangerous kind and has given occasion also to many false statements against me. And I am called wise, for my hearers always imagine that I myself possess the wisdom which I find lacking in others. However, O men of Athens, the truth is that god only is wise. By his answer he intends to show that the wisdom of men is worth little or nothing. He is not speaking of Socrates, he is only using my name by way of illustration. It is as though he said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who, like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing.” And so, I go about the world, obedient to the god, searching and making enquiry into the wisdom of any one, whether citizen or stranger, who appears to be wise. If he is not wise, then I show him that he is not wise. My occupation quite absorbs me, and I have no time to give either to any public matter of interest or to any concern of my own. Indeed I am in utter poverty by reason of my devotion to the god.
There is another thing. Young men of the richer classes, who have not much to do, come about me of their own accord. They like to hear my examinations of others and often imitate me, and then proceed to examine others. They quickly discover that there is plenty of people, who think that they know something but really know little or nothing. Then, those who are examined by them instead of being angry with themselves become angry with me.
“This confounded Socrates,” they say, “this villainous misleader of youth!” And then, if somebody asks them, “What evil does he practice or teach?” they do not know and cannot tell. However, in order that they may not appear to be at a loss, they repeat the ready-made charges which are used against all philosophers: the teaching things up in the clouds and under the earth, having no gods, and making wrong things appear to be right.
They do not like to confess that their pretence of knowledge has been detected (which is the truth). And as they are numerous and ambitious and energetic, they have filled your ears with they’re loud and inveterate calumnies.
And this, O men of Athens, is the truth and the whole truth. I have concealed nothing; I have dissembled nothing. And yet, I know that my plainness of speech makes them hate me. Still, what is their hatred but a proof that I am speaking the truth? From this have arisen the crowds’ prejudice against me. This is the reason of it, as you will find out either in this or in any future enquiry.
Choose the answer that best corrects the underlined portion of the passage. If the underlined portion is correct as written, choose "NO CHANGE."
He is not speaking of Socrates: he is only using my name by way of illustration.
He is not speaking of Socrates; he is only using my name by way of illustration.
He is not speaking of Socrates—he is only using my name by way of illustration.
He is not speaking of Socrates, but he is only using my name by way of illustration.
NO CHANGE
He is not speaking of Socrates; he is only using my name by way of illustration.
As written, the sentence contains a comma splice, as it separates two independent clauses with a comma, which is grammatically incorrect. Among the options provided, the best option is the one that uses a semicolon to separate the two clauses. The colon is completely improper. The hyphen could be justified as a rhetorical device, but the more certain answer of the two is the one that uses the semicolon.
Example Question #15 : Punctuation Errors
Adapted from Looking Backward from 2000 to 1887 by Edward Bellamy (1889)
"Here we are at the store of our ward," said Edith, as we turned in at the great portal of one of the magnificent public buildings I had observed in my morning walk. There was nothing in the exterior aspect (1) of the edifice to suggest a store to a representative of the nineteenth century. There was no display of goods in the great windows, or any device to advertise wares, or attract custom (2). Nor was there any sort of sign or legend on the front of the building to indicate the character of the business carried on there; but instead, above the portal, standing out from the front of the building, a majestic life-size group of statuary (3), the central figure of which was a female ideal of Plenty, with her cornucopia. Judging from the composition of the throng (4) passing in and out, about the same proportion of the sexes among shoppers obtained (5) as in the nineteenth century. As we entered, Edith said that there was one of these great distributing establishments in each ward of the city, so that no residence was more than five or ten minutes (6) walk from one of them. It was the first interior of a twentieth-century public building that I had ever beheld, and the spectacle naturally impressed me deeply. I was in a vast hall full of light, received not alone from the windows on all sides, but from the dome, the point of which was a hundred feet above. Beneath it, in the centre of the hall, a magnificent fountain played, cooling the atmosphere to a delicious freshness with its spray. The walls and ceiling were frescoed in mellow tints, calculated to soften without absorbing the light which flooded the interior. Around the fountain was a space occupied with chairs and sofas, on which many persons were seated conversing. Legends (7) on the walls all about the hall indicated to what classes of commodities the counters below were devoted. Edith directed her steps towards one of these, where samples of muslin of a bewildering variety were displayed, and proceeded to inspect them.
"Where is the clerk?" I asked, for there was no one behind the counter, and no one seemed coming to attend (8) to the customer.
"I have no need of the clerk yet," said Edith (9) "I have not made my selection."
"It was the principal business of clerks to help people to make their selections in my day," I replied.
"What! To tell people what they wanted?"
"Yes (10) and oftener to induce them to buy what they didn't want."
"But did not (11) ladies find that very impertinent?" Edith asked, wonderingly (12). "What concern could it possibly be to the clerks whether people bought or not?"
Choose from the following four options the answer that best corrects the underlined mistake preceding the number (9). If there is no mistake or the original text is the best option, choose "NO CHANGE."
Edith;
Edith:
NO CHANGE
Edith,
Edith;
Edith is making two separate statements rather than uttering a single sentence, so the semicolon would be the most appropriate choice here.
Example Question #13 : Punctuation Errors
From an adaptation of a Letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, On the Occasion of the Death of the Latter's Wife Abigail (1818)
The public papers my dear friend, have announced the fatal event of which your letter of October the 20th had given me ominous foreboding. Tried myself in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection which can rive the human heart, I know well and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to endure. The same trials have taught me that for ills so immeasurable, time and silence are the only medicine. I will not, therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours, will I say a word more where words are vain, but that it is of some comfort to us both, that the term is not very distant at which we are to deposit our sorrows and suffering bodies in the same soil and to ascend in essence to an ecstatic meeting with the friends we have loved and lost, and whom we shall still love and never lose again. God bless you and support you under your heavy affliction.
Which of the following is the best form of, "Open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours"?
open afresh the sluices of your grief nor although mingling sincerely my tears with yours
open afresh the sluices of your grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours
open afresh the sluices of your grief: nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours
open afresh the sluices of your grief; nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours
open afresh the sluices of your grief; nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours
Simplifying the long prose will help you to see the two independent clauses involved here: (1) "I will not . . . open . . . the sluices of your grief"; (2) "nor . . . will I say a word more where words are vain."
Therefore, it will be best to separate these two clauses either with a semicolon or with a period. Note that this is a somewhat odd use of "nor," for we use it today as a correlative conjunction with "neither." Here, the sense of "nor" is something like saying, "Likewise . . . I will not . . ." Another way that the sentence could be completely rewritten would be something like: "I will neither . . . open afresh . . . nor will I . . ." However, this is not the question presented here.
Example Question #11 : Punctuation Errors
Adapted from The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin (ed. 1896)
Look at a plant in the midst of it’s range. Why does it not double or quadruple its numbers? We know that it can perfectly well withstand a little more heat or cold, dampness or dryness, for elsewhere it ranges into slightly hotter or colder, damper or drier districts. In this case, we can clearly see that if we wish in imagination to give the plant the power of increasing in number, we should have to give it some advantage over its competitors, or over the animals of the wild that prey on it. On the confines of its geographical range, a change of constitution with respect to climate would clearly be an advantage to our plant; but we have reason to believe that only a few plants or animals range so far, that they are destroyed exclusively by the rigor of the climate. Not until we reach the extreme confines of life, in the Arctic regions or on the borders of an utter desert, will competition cease. The land may be extremely cold or dry, yet their will be competition between some few species, or between the individuals of the same species, for the warmest or dampest spots.
Hence we can see that when a plant or animal is placed in a new country amongst new competitors, the conditions of its life will generally be changed in an essential manner, although the climate may be exactly the same as in its former home. If it’s average numbers are to increase in its new home, we should have to modify it in a different way to what we should have had to do in its native country; for we should have to give it some advantage over a different set of competitors or enemies.
It is good thus to try in imagination to give to any one species an advantage over another. Probably in no single instance should we know what to do. This ought to convince us of our ignorance on the mutual relations of all organic beings; a conviction as necessary, as it is difficult to acquire. All that we can do is to keep steadily in mind that each organic being is striving to increase in a geometrical ratio; that each at some period of its life, during some season of the year, during each generation or at intervals, has to struggle for life and to suffer great destruction. When we reflect on this struggle, we may console ourselves with the full belief that the war of nature is not incessant, that no fear is felt, that death is generally prompt, and that the vigorous, the healthy, and the happy survive and multiply.
What is the best form of the boldfaced and underlined section?
country; because,
country; for,
country because
country: because,
country because
Admittedly, this sentence is a bit wordy, so it is difficult to come up with a "textbook" form for the answer. Look for the least bad answer among those offered. The independent clause following the "for" indicates the reason for the modifications proposed earlier in the sentence. The sense of the "for" is because or since. The best option among those provided is the one that makes this explicit but does so without using a semicolon. This use of a semicolon creates a fragment for the second complete clause (i.e. the whole portion including the "because" or "for" after the semicolon).