All SSAT Middle Level Reading Resources
Example Questions
Example Question #122 : Nonfiction Passages
Adapted from The Boy Heroes of Crecy and Poitiers by Treadwell Walden (1879)
There was only one road to success or fame in those days, and that was the profession of fighting. The ambition of every high-born young fellow was to become a knight. Knighthood was something that both king and nobles regarded as higher in some respects than even the royalty or nobility to which they were born. No one could be admitted into an order of the great brotherhood of knights, which extended all over Europe and formed an independent society, unless he had gone through severe discipline, and had performed some distinguished deed of valor. Then he could wear the golden spurs; for knighthood had its earliest origin in the distinction of fighting on horseback, while ordinary soldiers fought on foot. Although knighthood changed afterward, the word "chivalry" always expressed it, from the French word cheval, a horse. And in addition to valor, which was the result of physical strength and courage, the knight was expected to be generous, courteous, faithful, devout, truthful, high-souled, high-principled. Hence the epithet, "chivalrous," which, even today, is so often heard applied to men of especially fine spirit. "Honor" was the great word which included all these qualities then, as it does in some measure now.
The underlined word “profession” most nearly means __________.
amateur
career
house
war
teacher
career
The word “profession” means job or career. If your mother is a doctor, then her profession is medicine. If your father is a famer, than his profession is agricultural work. In the context of the passage, the author describes the “profession of fighting.” None of the other choices make sense when plugged in for "profession." To help you, an "amateur" is someone not paid for their work or someone who is not an expert; an amateur is the opposite of a professional.
Example Question #61 : Humanities Passages
Adapted from The Boy Heroes of Crecy and Poitiers by Treadwell Walden (1879)
There was only one road to success or fame in those days, and that was the profession of fighting. The ambition of every high-born young fellow was to become a knight. Knighthood was something that both king and nobles regarded as higher in some respects than even the royalty or nobility to which they were born. No one could be admitted into an order of the great brotherhood of knights, which extended all over Europe and formed an independent society, unless he had gone through severe discipline, and had performed some distinguished deed of valor. Then he could wear the golden spurs; for knighthood had its earliest origin in the distinction of fighting on horseback, while ordinary soldiers fought on foot. Although knighthood changed afterward, the word "chivalry" always expressed it, from the French word “cheval,” a horse. And in addition to valor, which was the result of physical strength and courage, the knight was expected to be generous, courteous, faithful, devout, truthful, high-souled, high-principled. Hence the epithet, "chivalrous," which, even to-day, is so often heard applied to men of especially fine spirit. "Honor" was the great word which included all these qualities then, as it does in some measure now.
The underlined word “distinguished” most nearly means __________.
energizing
tiresome
well-known
enigmatic
mysterious
well-known
The word “distinguish” means separate someone from others. Something that is distinguished is known for being different and recognized as an accomplishment. The author says, “No one could be admitted into an order of the great brotherhood of knights, which extended all over Europe and formed an independent society, unless he had gone through severe discipline, and had performed some distinguished deed of valor.” In order to become a knight, one had to perform some kind of heroic act. "Mysterious" and "unknown" both mean not known or hard to predict, which makes little sense because someone can't become recognized for doing something unknown. The correct answer is “well-known,” because that most accurately fits into the sentence. As for the other answer choices, something that is "tiresome" is exhausting and boring, and something that is "energizing" gives you energy.
Example Question #136 : Nonfiction Passages
Adapted from The Boy Heroes of Crecy and Poitiers by Treadwell Walden (1879)
There was only one road to success or fame in those days, and that was the profession of fighting. The ambition of every high-born young fellow was to become a knight. Knighthood was something that both king and nobles regarded as higher in some respects than even the royalty or nobility to which they were born. No one could be admitted into an order of the great brotherhood of knights, which extended all over Europe and formed an independent society, unless he had gone through severe discipline, and had performed some distinguished deed of valor. Then he could wear the golden spurs; for knighthood had its earliest origin in the distinction of fighting on horseback, while ordinary soldiers fought on foot. Although knighthood changed afterward, the word "chivalry" always expressed it, from the French word “cheval,” a horse. And in addition to valor, which was the result of physical strength and courage, the knight was expected to be generous, courteous, faithful, devout, truthful, high-souled, high-principled. Hence the epithet, "chivalrous," which, even to-day, is so often heard applied to men of especially fine spirit. "Honor" was the great word which included all these qualities then, as it does in some measure now.
The underlined word “distinction” most nearly means __________.
similarity
difference
lofty
boastful
arrogant
difference
The word “distinction” is taken from this sentence in the passage: “Then he could wear the golden spurs; for knighthood had its earliest origin in the distinction of fighting on horseback, while ordinary soldiers fought on foot.” This sentence compares two things, fighting on horseback and fighting on foot, and discusses how the knight is different from the soldier because he fights on the back of a horse. The word “distinction” is used to describe a difference between two things where one is usually of a higher quality or deserving of greater respect, so "difference" is the correct answer because it is closest in meaning to "distinction." As for the other answer choices, "lofty" means high up or proud; "arrogant" and "boastful" are loose synonyms of one another that both mean proud and constantly talking about yourself in a way that other people find annoying.
Example Question #21 : Finding Context Dependent Meanings Of Words In Narrative Humanities Passages
Adapted from "A Very Narrow Shave" by John Lang in Adventures in Many Lands (1912)
It was a cold, clear, frosty morning when we started, the stars throbbing and winking as they seem to do only during frost, and we toiled, not particularly gaily, up the bed of a creek, stumbling in the darkness and barking our shins over more boulders and big stones than one would have believed existed in all creation. Just before dawn, when the grey light was beginning to show us more clearly where we were going, we saw in the sand of the creek fresh tracks of a large bear, the water only then beginning to ooze into the prints left by his great feet, and I can hardly say that I gazed on them with the amount of enthusiasm that Halley professed to feel.
The underlined word “toiled” most likely means __________.
struggled
enamored
embraced
leapt
deplored
struggled
In context, the author says, “we toiled, not particularly gaily, up the bed of a creek, stumbling in the darkness and barking our shins over more boulders and big stones than one would have believed existed in all creation.” From this description you can reasonably see that the author and his party were “struggling” to carry out their expedition. It was dark, they were falling over, and there were more obstacles than “one would have believed existed in all creation.” Even if you don’t know that “toil” means work and “toiled” means worked hard or struggled, you can infer this meaning from the manner in which the author talks about the expedition. To provide further help, “leapt” means jumped high; “embraced” means enthusiastically adopted or hugged; “enamored” means in love with; and “deplored” means hated.
Example Question #21 : Context Dependent Meanings Of Words And Phrases In Narrative Humanities Passages
Adapted from "Wild Animals in Captivity" by W. A. Atkinson in Chatterbox Periodical (1906, ed. J. Erskine Clark)
Notwithstanding all the care which is now bestowed upon wild animals in our zoological gardens and menageries, nearly all of them suffer a little in some way or other by confinement. When we think of the great difference which exists between the surroundings natural to a free wild animal, and those of even the best zoological gardens, we cannot but be surprised that so many animals from all parts of the world can be kept alive and in good condition in a climate so changeable as ours. Every effort is made by the keepers to copy as far as possible the natural conditions to which each animal is accustomed.
It was usual, for instance, to deprive all the flesh-eating animals of one of the greatest traveling menageries of food during one day in each week. It was found by experience that the animals were healthier when they suffered periods of fasting like this, than they were when they were fed regularly every day without a break. The explanation of this was very simple. These animals, when they were living wild in the jungles, forests, deserts, or ice-fields, obtained all their food by hunting. When game was scarce or difficult to catch, they were compelled to go hungry; and this occurred so often as to be a natural condition to which they were well accustomed. When, therefore, they were placed in cages, and were fed as regularly, though not as frequently as human beings, their health was more or less impaired.
Animals in confinement often undergo slight changes even when no alteration in their appearance or falling-off in health is noticeable. Many of them, for instance, rarely have young ones, and even when they have, the young are seldom as healthy and robust as if born in a wild state. The keepers have frequently the utmost difficulty in rearing animals which are born in menageries and zoological gardens. Yet if these animals were born in their own countries and under natural conditions, they would grow up healthy and strong, without receiving any more care than a kitten receives from its mother.
An incident which occurred in the Zoo not long ago affords a striking illustration of these facts. A wolf had an ordinary family of eight young ones. The keepers, probably thinking that these were too many for the captive wolf to bring up alone, divided the family. Four of them were left with their mother, and four of them were placed in charge of a collie. The dog took kindly to her foster-children, and reared them successfully with her own. This was only what the keepers expected. But when they placed the young ones together again, and compared the collie's family with the wolf's family, they were surprised to find that the four which had been nurtured by the collie were stronger and better animals than their four brothers and sisters. The best explanation of this result is that the collie was living a healthy natural life, while the wolf, though to all appearance quite well, was not enjoying the full vigor which results from a free and active life.
The underlined word “scarce” most nearly means __________.
deadly
infinite
unlimited
sequestered
limited
limited
In context, the author says, “When game was scarce or difficult to catch, [wild animals] were compelled to go hungry.” “Game” is food that can be hunted and eaten and “compelled” means forced. So, when food was “scarce,” the wild animals went hungry. This suggests that “scarce” means rare or “limited." To provide further help, “infinite” means unlimited.
Example Question #1 : Finding Context Dependent Meanings Of Phrases In Narrative Humanities Passages
Passage adapted from "Of One Defect in Our Government" in Essays of Michael, Seigneur de Montaigne in The Complete Works of Michael de Montaigne (1580, trans. C. Cotton, ed. W. Hazlitt 1842)
My late father, a man that had no other advantages than experience and his own natural parts, was nevertheless of a very clear judgment, formerly told me that he once had thoughts of endeavoring to introduce this practice; that there might be in every city a certain place assigned to which such as stood in need of anything might repair, and have their business entered by an officer appointed for that purpose. As for example: I want a chapman to buy my pearls; I want one that has pearls to sell; such a one wants company to go to Paris; such a one seeks a servant of such a quality; such a one a master; such a one such an artificer; some inquiring for one thing, some for another, every one according to what he wants. And doubtless, these mutual advertisements would be of no contemptible advantage to the public correspondence and intelligence: for there are evermore conditions that hunt after one another, and for want of knowing one another's occasions leave men in very great necessity.
I have heard, to the great shame of the age we live in, that in our very sight two most excellent men for learning died so poor that they had scarce bread to put in their mouths: Lilius Gregorius Giraldus in Italy and Sebastianus Castalio in Germany: and I believe there are a thousand men would have invited them into their families, with very advantageous conditions, or have relieved them where they were, had they known their wants. The world is not so generally corrupted, but that I know a man that would heartily wish the estate his ancestors have left him might be employed, so long as it shall please fortune to give him leave to enjoy it, to secure rare and remarkable persons of any kind, whom misfortune sometimes persecutes to the last degree, from the dangers of necessity; and at least place them in such a condition that they must be very hard to please, if they are not contented.
My father in his domestic economy had this rule (which I know how to commend, but by no means to imitate), namely, that besides the day-book or memorial of household affairs, where the small accounts, payments, and disbursements, which do not require a secretary's hand, were entered, and which a steward always had in custody, he ordered him whom he employed to write for him, to keep a journal, and in it to set down all the remarkable occurrences, and daily memorials of the history of his house: very pleasant to look over, when time begins to wear things out of memory, and very useful sometimes to put us out of doubt when such a thing was begun, when ended; what visitors came, and when they went; our travels, absences, marriages, and deaths; the reception of good or ill news; the change of principal servants, and the like. An ancient custom, which I think it would not be amiss for every one to revive in his own house; and I find I did very foolishly in neglecting it.
Based on context, what is the meaning of the underlined clause “he ordered him whom he employed to write for him”?
the narrator's father's servant ordered the narrator's father to write for the narrator's father's servant
the narrator ordered one of the narrator's father's servants to write for the narrator's father
the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for himself
the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for the narrator's father
the narrator's father's servant ordered the narrator's father to write for the narrator
the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for the narrator's father
Answering this question correctly requires you to read in context very carefully in order to determine the antecedents of each of the pronouns involved in the specified clause. Let's figure out each one in turn. The first "he" refers to "My father," as it is part of the sentence that begins with "My father," so he is still the subject of the sentence. Don't be confused by phrase "and which a steward always had in custody" that immediately precedes the selection!
So, so far we have "[the narrator's father] ordered him whom he employed to write for him." The "him whom he employed" is signifying employees of the narrator's father, and since we know that the narrator's father employs servants, we can replace "him whom he employed" with "one of the narrator's father's servants" and be accurate. So, we now have "[the narrator's father] ordered [one of his servants] to write for him."
This reduces the potentially correct answer choices to "the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for the narrator's father" and "the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for himself." Well, if it were the latter answer, the sentence would need to say "himself," in order to refer reflexively to the servant. That means that "the narrator's father ordered one of his servants to write for the narrator's father" is the correct answer.
Example Question #2 : Finding Context Dependent Meanings Of Phrases In Narrative Humanities Passages
Passage adapted from the Preface to The Woman in White (1859) by Wilkie Collins
One word more, before I conclude, in acknowledgment of the heavy debt of gratitude which I owe to the reading public. It is no affectation on my part to say that the success of this book has been especially welcome to me, because it implied the recognition of a literary principle which has guided me since I first addressed my readers in the character of a novelist.
I have always held the old-fashioned opinion that the primary object of a work of fiction should be to tell a story; and I have never believed that the novelist who properly performed this first condition of his art, was in danger, on that account, of neglecting the delineation of character — for this plain reason, that the effect produced by any narrative of events is essentially dependent, not on the events themselves, but on the human interest which is directly connected with them. It may be possible, in novel-writing, to present characters successfully without telling a story; but it is not possible to tell a story successfully without presenting characters; their existence, as recognisable realities, being the sole condition on which the story can be effectively told. The only narrative which can hope to lay a strong hold on the attention of readers, is a narrative which interests them about men and women — for the perfectly obvious reason that they are men and women themselves.
The phrase "primary object" is closest in meaning to __________.
essential purpose
first printing
main character
central theme
essential purpose
"Primary" is an adjective that means of chief importance. "Object" is a noun with many possible meanings, one of which is a goal or purpose. This is useful information, but we don't necessarily have to know that in order to find the best answer.
We're looking for a phrase that explains the relationship between fiction and telling stories. Try inserting each phrase into the blank of the following sentence: the [blank] of fiction is to tell a story. Which answer makes the most sense? We can eliminate "central theme" and "main character" because these are components of stories themselves, not explanations of the relationship between fiction and telling stories. We can also eliminate "first printing"; this could refer to an event, the first time the book was printed, or it could refer to a physical book produced during that event, but again it doesn't explain the relationship between fiction and telling stories. "Essential purpose" has the closest meaning.
Example Question #72 : Ssat Middle Level Reading Comprehension
Passage adapted from the Preface to The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1902) by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Some few words on the chronology of these stories may not be out of place. The first of them, "A Study in Scarlet," published in '87, was the very first separate booklet of mine that ever appeared. "The Sign of Four" followed two years later. Then, in ‘91, the “Adventures of Sherlock Holmes” began to appear in the “Strand Magazine.” The public having shown them some favour I was persuaded to continue them into another series, “The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes,” which came to an end in 1893. That it was an end, and that I had no intention of abusing the patience of the public, was shown by the last story in which, wisely or unwisely, I brought my hero as well as my stories to an end. The subject had begun to weary me, and it seemed to me that, while there was no reason to be ashamed of doing detective stories, it was unjustifiable that I should allow myself to be tempted into doing nothing else. “The Hounds of Baskerville” represents the inevitable relapse after repentance.
In the context of this passage, the phrase "my hero" most likely refers to _____________.
the main character in the author's stories
a person who once helped the author
a person the author admires
the main character from the author's favorite book
the main character in the author's stories
When people say "my hero," they often refer to a person they admire. However, since we're reading a passage about writing stories, we should be aware of the possibility that the author is talking about a character in a story. This possibility is likely, since the author uses the phrase in the sentence, "I bought my hero as well as my stories to an end." Of the answer choices, only one of them is within the author's control to "end": "The main character in the author's stories" is the best answer.
Example Question #61 : Humanities Passages
Passage adapted from the Preface to The Woman in White (1859) by Wilkie Collins
One word more, before I conclude, in acknowledgment of the heavy debt of gratitude which I owe to the reading public. It is no affectation on my part to say that the success of this book has been especially welcome to me, because it implied the recognition of a literary principle which has guided me since I first addressed my readers in the character of a novelist.
I have always held the old-fashioned opinion that the primary object of a work of fiction should be to tell a story; and I have never believed that the novelist who properly performed this first condition of his art, was in danger, on that account, of neglecting the delineation of character — for this plain reason, that the effect produced by any narrative of events is essentially dependent, not on the events themselves, but on the human interest which is directly connected with them. It may be possible, in novel-writing, to present characters successfully without telling a story; but it is not possible to tell a story successfully without presenting characters; their existence, as recognisable realities, being the sole condition on which the story can be effectively told. The only narrative which can hope to lay a strong hold on the attention of readers, is a narrative which interests them about men and women — for the perfectly obvious reason that they are men and women themselves.
In this passage, the phrase "men and women" refers to _____________.
First readers, then characters.
First readers, then writers.
First authors, then readers.
First characters, then readers.
First characters, then readers.
If we follow the subject of the sentence: "The only narrative which can hope to lay a strong hold on the attention of readers, is a narrative which interests them about men and women — for the perfectly obvious reason that they are men and women themselves."
We can see that "them" refers to readers, and therefore "they are men and women" also refers to the readers. So we know that the second instance of the phrase "men and women" refers to readers. Now all we have to do is figure out whether the first instance of the phrase "men and women" refers to authors or characters. Since the previous sentences in the passage discuss the role of characters in telling stories and interest in readers, "Characters, then readers" is the correct answer.
Certified Tutor
Certified Tutor