There are four total aromatic protons, consistent with two sets of identical pairs. This would result in two distinct aromatic signals, each having a doublet and each integrating two protons.

The methyl protons next to the ketone would be deshielded by the electron withdrawing ketone group, resulting in a downfield shift. The signal would be a singlet, since there are no neighboring protons to the methyl group.

Finally, the ethyl group would have two signals, one for the two protons next to the aromatic ring (shifted downfield because of the aromatic ring), and one highly shielded peak corresponding to the terminal protons. The protons next to the aromatic ring will result in a quartet from the three neighboring hydrogens, while the terminal peak will be a triplet from the two neighboring hydrogens.

The final result is one quartet (ethyl), one triplet (ethyl-terminal), two doublets (aromatic), and one singlet (methyl).

Looking at the structure above, we can see that the molecule only contains three carbons bonded to protons. These carbons are labeled 1, 2 and 3.

An important concept in NMR questions is determining if two carbons on the same compound will have protons split identically, and thus indistinguishable in an NMR (i.e. will those two carbons represent two individual peaks or one large peak?). In this case, C1 and C3 are clearly distinguishable from C2, since C1 and C3 are bonded to 3 hydrogens, while C2 is only bonded to two. Because C2 is adjacent to a three proton carbon, we know that the splitting pattern will display at least one quartet. This will narrow our answer choices down to two options.

Because C1 and C3 contain the same number of protons, we need to determine if they will represent one large peak, or two separate peaks. Looking at the compound, we can see that C3 is adjacent to a two-proton carbon in C2, while C1 is not adjacent to any proton-bonded carbons; therefore, we can expect that C1 will not be split by any protons, and will display a singlet, and C3 will be split by 2 protons, and will display a triplet.

As a final result, we would expect to see one singlet, one triplet and one quartet.

2,4-hexadiyne has only one ¹H-NMR signal, as the two terminal methyl groups are identical and will have the same chemical shift.

1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene has two singlets: one for the four methyl groups and one for the two aromatic protons. Likewise, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene will have two singlets: one for the three methyl groups (nine hydrogens total) and one for the three aromatic protons, which are all identical.

Methyl tert-butyl ether also has two singlets, one corresponding to the tert-butyl methyl protons, and one corresponding to the methoxy protons.

Finally, 1,4-dimethylbenzene has two singlets, one for the methyl groups, and one for the four aromatic protons, which are all identical.

The answer is: 

Within  NMR spectroscopy there are a couple important factors to understand, including the ppm shift (delta) and the splitting pattern. Here we are focusing on the splitting pattern for individual hydrogens. This is important for it lays the groundwork for understanding the patterns of peaks seen on large compound NMR’s. 

When determining the splitting of any hydrogen you must use the n+1 rule. Before going into that rule we must understand two things, 1. Only nonequivalent hydrogens (protons) couple and 2. Usually they only couple to other hydrogens (protons) attached to adjacent carbons. Nonequivalent means the protons occupy their own unique spatial environment with different atoms surrounding them. Typically two hydrogens attached to the same carbon are equivalent (though this isn’t always the case and you must think about where the hydrogens are located in space and see whether they are adjacent to different or similar chemical groups). 

The n+1 rule is performed as follows. n stands for the number of equivalent protons that are not equivalent to the proton of interest (the one we are trying to determine the splitting for). We multiply together each group of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest. For example, lets say there are two groups of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest, in group A there are 2 protons, and in group B there are 3 protons. We would use the n+1 rule for group A and get (2+1) = 3 and for group B get (3+1) = 4. We would then multiply these two numbers together to get the splitting for the proton of interest, thus there are 12 lines that the proton of interest would be split into. Proper use of this rule should allow you to get all NMR splitting questions correct (and elevate your understanding of why a certain NMR printout looks the way it does). 

The answer is: 

Within  NMR spectroscopy there are a couple important factors to understand, including the ppm shift (delta) and the splitting pattern. Here we are focusing on the splitting pattern for individual hydrogens. This is important for it lays the groundwork for understanding the patterns of peaks seen on large compound NMR’s. 

When determining the splitting of any hydrogen you must use the n+1 rule. Before going into that rule we must understand two things, 1. only nonequivalent hydrogens (protons) couple and 2. usually they only couple to other hydrogens (protons) attached to adjacent carbons. Nonequivalent means the protons occupy their own unique spatial environment with different atoms surrounding them. Typically two hydrogens attached to the same carbon are equivalent (though this isn’t always the case and you must think about where the hydrogens are located in space and see whether they are adjacent to different or similar chemical groups). 

The n+1 rule is performed as follows. N stands for the number of equivalent protons that are not equivalent to the proton of interest (the one we are trying to determine the splitting for). We multiply together each group of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest. For example, lets say there are two groups of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest, in group A there are 2 protons, and in group B there are 3 protons. We would use the n+1 rule for group A and get (2+1) = 3 and for group B get (3+1) = 4. We would then multiply these two numbers together to get the splitting for the proton of interest, thus 3 x 4 = 12 lines that the proton of interest would be split into. Proper use of this rule should allow you to get all NMR splitting questions correct (and elevate your understanding of why a certain NMR printout looks the way it does). 

The answer is:

Within  NMR spectroscopy there are a couple important factors to understand, including the ppm shift (Delta) and the splitting pattern. Here we are focusing on the splitting pattern for individual hydrogens. This is important for it lays the groundwork for understanding the patterns of peaks seen on large compound NMR’s. 

When determining the splitting of any hydrogen you must use the n+1 rule. Before going into that rule we must understand two things, 1. only nonequivalent hydrogens (protons) couple and 2. usually they only couple to other hydrogens (protons) attached to adjacent carbons. Nonequivalent means the protons occupy their own unique spatial environment with different atoms surrounding them. Typically two hydrogens attached to the same carbon are equivalent (though this isn’t always the case and you must think about where the hydrogens are located in space and see whether they are adjacent to different or similar chemical groups). 

The n+1 rule is performed as follows. N stands for the number of equivalent protons that are not equivalent to the proton of interest (the one we are trying to determine the splitting for). We multiply together each group of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest. For example, lets say there are two groups of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest, in group A there are 2 protons, and in group B there are 3 protons. We would use the n+1 rule for group A and get (2+1) = 3 and for group B get (3+1) = 4. We would then multiply these two numbers together to get the splitting for the proton of interest, thus 3 x 4 = 12 lines that the proton of interest would be split into. Proper use of this rule should allow you to get all NMR splitting questions correct (and elevate your understanding of why a certain NMR printout looks the way it does). 

The answer is:

Within 1H NMR spectroscopy there are a couple important factors to understand, including the ppm shift (delta) and the splitting pattern. Here we are focusing on the splitting pattern for individual hydrogens. This is important for it lays the groundwork for understanding the patterns of peaks seen on large compound NMR’s. 

When determining the splitting of any hydrogen you must use the n+1 rule. Before going into that rule we must understand two things, 1. only nonequivalent hydrogens (protons) couple and 2. usually they only couple to other hydrogens (protons) attached to adjacent carbons. Nonequivalent means the protons occupy their own unique spatial environment with different atoms surrounding them. Typically two hydrogens attached to the same carbon are equivalent (though this isn’t always the case and you must think about where the hydrogens are located in space and see whether they are adjacent to different or similar chemical groups). 

The n+1 rule is performed as follows. N stands for the number of equivalent protons that are not equivalent to the proton of interest (the one we are trying to determine the splitting for). We multiply together each group of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest. For example, lets say there are two groups of protons that are nonequivalent to the proton of interest, in group A there are 2 protons, and in group B there are 3 protons. We would use the n+1 rule for group A and get (2+1) = 3 and for group B get (3+1) = 4. We would then multiply these two numbers together to get the splitting for the proton of interest, thus 3 x 4 = 12 lines that the proton of interest would be split into. Proper use of this rule should allow you to get all NMR splitting questions correct (and elevate your understanding of why a certain NMR printout looks the way it does).