The Amazon Rainforest is a very diverse plant habitat because it has all of the things a plant could need to grow and survive. The rainforest is a wet, humid, and warm place that offers plenty of water and sunlight. Many animal species rely on these plants to make homes and for food. Plants have adapted to this environment and thrive in the conditions.

Grasslands are home to many plants and animals, but they are not as plant diverse as one may think. All of the answer choices list reasons why the grasslands don't have an abundance of varying plant species. The soil is thin and dry, and not all plants are adapted to this type of earth. There are frequently wildfires, and many plant species cannot recover after these incidents. Finally, there is little rainfall, so many trees and plants cannot function in this habitat. The plants that live in grasslands and do well have evolved and adapted over many years to live in this type of habitat.

Jacob was collecting information about the animals in each habitat that he visited. When making a comparison or seeing how two things are similar, it can be seen that the only animal present in the parking lot is humans. In the grassy field, there are many animals and no signs of humans or buildings.

When reviewing the data table, scientists and readers can draw a conclusion or make a statement about what the information has revealed. Human-made or human-filled places like the parking lot have fewer animals present than the other locations. When looking at the list of animals from the more natural sites, there are far more species present. This allows us to conclude that there is greater animal diversity in those areas.

A habitat is a place where an animal or plant lives naturally. It is its home or environment. Different habitats support different animals and plants that must adapt to survive. Habitats can be found all over the world and vary in weather, temperature, location, and species diversity.

The photo of the ocean habitat shows the most diversity. The other images show one animal species where the ocean shows many different types of fish and coral. There are more animals in the desert, Antarctica, and grasslands than what is shown, but from what we can see, the oceans are most diverse.

The statement is untrue. Each habitat is very different and has animals that are suited to living in that specific environment. The species vary significantly from place to place, as do the number of animals. There are 228,450 known animal species in the ocean, nearly 6,000 animal species in Australia, and almost 1,000 different species in the Florida Everglades alone. Just these three places show such a variance in animal diversity.

In each habitat, there are diverse groups of animals based on living conditions. For example, in a cold-weather habitat, the animals have to be adapted to live in that weather. There are similarities between some of the animals living in each habitat, but across the different habitats, there is great diversity. Humans can study these habitats and take note of the different species to decide how diverse an area is.

A tundra would have the lowest diversity among animal species because of the harsh conditions for survival. Antarctica is one example of a tundra habitat. Antarctica is the coldest place on our planet. Temperatures can reach -120^oF, and winds can be powerful. There are no plants or animals that can make their homes permanently in central Antarctica. This area has no resources for animals, so they cannot survive.

When reviewing the data table, scientists and readers can draw a conclusion or make a statement about what the information has revealed. Human-made or human-filled places like the parking lot have fewer animals present than the other locations. When looking at the list of animals from the more natural sites, there are far more species present. This allows us to conclude that there is greater animal diversity in those areas. This means that "The habitats that are human-made or human-filled have the same animal diversity as natural places." is not supported by the evidence in the data table.