Award-Winning Organic Chemistry Tutors
serving Bridgeport, CT

I am a PhD student in Inorganic Chemistry at Yale University. I've been spreading my love of chemistry for the past several years as a TA for general chemistry, and I'm excited to share my passion with you! Prior to Yale, I got my B.S. in chemistry from Caltech, where I also served as a TA for both general chemistry lab and advanced inorganic chemistry. Outside of teaching and research, I enjoy fencing, reading, and playing piano.

Two years as a TA in organic chemistry at UConn — where Noah is pursuing a PhD in medicinal chemistry with research rooted in organic synthesis — means he's seen exactly where students lose the thread on arrow-pushing, stereochemistry, and multi-step reaction sequences. He teaches from the bench as much as the blackboard, connecting textbook mechanisms to the real synthetic challenges he tackles in his own research. Rated 5.0 by students.

Most students dread organic chemistry, but Lily genuinely loves it — and that enthusiasm comes through when she's walking someone through a tricky elimination mechanism or explaining why a carbonyl is so electrophilic. Her neuroscience degree meant she encountered these reactions both in the classroom and in the lab, where seeing functional group transformations play out in real experiments made the arrow-pushing logic click in a way pure lecture never could. Rated 4.9 by students.

Most organic chemistry struggles come down to not recognizing patterns — why a nucleophile attacks here and not there, or how electron-pushing arrows predict a product. Eric's graduate training in chemistry means he teaches reaction mechanisms as a connected framework of electronic and steric principles rather than a list of isolated reactions. Students rated him 5.0.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Casey reads them fluently after years of bioengineering coursework that demanded constant fluency in electron-pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group transformations. She teaches students to recognize patterns across reaction types — why nucleophilic additions behave the way they do, how leaving groups dictate substitution vs. elimination — so each new chapter feels like a variation on something familiar rather than a fresh nightmare.

Decades of running an organic chemistry research lab and teaching it at the college level mean Wyatt has explained arrow-pushing mechanisms, retrosynthetic analysis, and spectroscopy interpretation thousands of times — and learned exactly where students get stuck on each one. His PhD in the subject gives him the depth to trace a tricky multi-step synthesis back to the underlying electronic principles, then rebuild it at whatever pace clicks. Rated 4.9 by students.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry — if you can't follow electron movement through a nucleophilic substitution or an elimination, every new reaction feels like something to memorize from scratch. Cassandra teaches students to recognize the patterns that repeat across seemingly different reactions: leaving group quality, steric effects, acid-base behavior. That pattern-recognition approach, sharpened by her biology and biochemistry background, turns a notoriously overwhelming course into something students can actually reason through.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and David treats them that way — once a student can read electron flow through curved arrows, predicting products for substitution, elimination, and addition reactions becomes systematic rather than overwhelming. His Yale neuroscience training required two semesters of organic chemistry, and he still uses those fundamentals daily in his bioethics graduate work.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Troy spent two semesters teaching that language as an organic chemistry TA. He walks students through arrow-pushing, stereochemical outcomes, and retrosynthetic analysis by emphasizing the handful of recurring electronic patterns that make hundreds of reactions predictable rather than random.

Max spent much of high school independently pursuing organic chemistry through coursework and projects well beyond what was required — the kind of deep, self-driven study that builds real fluency with reaction types and synthesis logic. His chemistry degree from MIT and mathematical instincts mean he approaches problems like retrosynthetic analysis and multi-step mechanism design as structured puzzles, breaking each one into clear decision points. Rated 5.0 by students.

Daniel's PhD work in genetics and neuroscience at Rockefeller means he uses organic chemistry daily — understanding how small molecules interact with proteins, how drug candidates are designed, and why stereochemistry matters at the molecular level. That real-world context turns topics like carbonyl reactivity and functional group transformations into something students can anchor to actual science, not just exam prep.

Reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry are less about memorizing hundreds of arrows and more about recognizing a handful of recurring patterns — nucleophilic attacks, leaving group stability, and electron density shifts. Aidan studied organic chemistry as part of Notre Dame's premed track and teaches students to predict products by understanding why electrons move, not just where.

Reaction mechanisms are the language of organic chemistry, and Josef teaches students to read them — arrow pushing, stereochemistry, and functional group reactivity — rather than memorize hundreds of individual reactions. His biochemistry focus at Cornell means he can connect orgo concepts like nucleophilic substitution and carbonyl chemistry directly to biological molecules students will encounter later.

Currently majoring in chemistry at MIT, Nicholas is immersed in the reaction logic and electron-pushing that organic chemistry demands — and he's learning it at a program known for its rigorous mechanistic approach. He breaks down topics like nucleophilic additions and stereochemical outcomes by connecting them to the underlying thermodynamic and kinetic reasoning, making unfamiliar transformations feel predictable rather than random. Rated 5.0 by students.

Having taught General Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, and GOB courses for health professions repeatedly at the college level, Jeremy approaches reaction mechanisms as skills to be practiced — not facts to be memorized. His PhD in Chemistry from Yale means he can trace arrow-pushing, stereochemical analysis, and multi-step synthesis all the way down to first principles, then rebuild them at whatever level a student needs. He holds a 4.6 rating.