I am a graduate of Harvard University. I received my Bachelor of Arts in Social Studies with a focus in food policy and law. During my undergraduate studies I spent my time in political organizations and in research, teaching fellowships on political philosophy at Harvard Effective Altruism and serving as a Visiting Researcher in food policy at the University of Cambridge. After graduating, I spent time as a researcher in political science and history and mentored students working towards attending top schools in the US and UK, providing one-on-one help with applications and developing seminars on topics like Sociology and English. Most recently, I have started a non-profit organization in Ecuador focused on educating families about healthy cooking and providing nutritional assistance. At the same time, I am excited to continue pursuing my passion for teaching and helping students navigate subjects like History, English Literature, ESL, Spanish, and Standardized Tests like the ACT, AP, and IB tests. I believe that the knowledge young people receive in primary and secondary education is the ultimate individual enrichment; an essential part of understanding who they are and a key to seeing who they may become. In my spare time, I walk, read history books like Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals, and listen to music like Led Zeppelin and Lana del Rey.

I am available to tutor in a broad range of subjects, though I am most passionate about Economics, History, and Civics. Please feel free to contact me and I would be happy to arrange a session.

The ACT Science section is less about knowing biology or chemistry and more about reading graphs, interpreting experimental setups, and comparing competing hypotheses under time pressure. Sydney treats it as a data-literacy exercise, teaching students to extract trends from figures before they even look at the answer choices. Her 35 ACT composite speaks to how well that approach works in practice.

The ACT Science section is really a data-interpretation exam disguised as science, and Talia treats it that way. She breaks down how to read conflicting-scientist passages, extract trends from dense graphs, and eliminate answer choices without needing any outside scientific knowledge — the same approach that earned her a perfect 36 composite.

Most students overthink ACT Science because they assume they need to understand the experiments — in reality, the section is almost entirely about reading graphs, tables, and conflicting viewpoints quickly and accurately. Cindy scored a 36 composite and treats this section as a data interpretation exercise, teaching students to locate variables, identify trends, and compare competing hypotheses without getting lost in scientific jargon. Her background tutoring both physics and biology means she can clarify the actual science when a question does require content knowledge.

The ACT Science section isn't really a science test — it's a data interpretation sprint. Zoe teaches students to read graphs, compare experimental setups, and identify trends without getting bogged down in unfamiliar terminology. Her medical school training in parsing dense research data translates directly to the speed and accuracy this section demands.

The ACT Science section is really a test of how quickly you can read graphs, tables, and conflicting viewpoints — not how much biology or chemistry you remember. Clare teaches students to ignore the intimidating terminology and zero in on data trends and experimental design, a strategy that helped her earn a 35 composite. Her biology background also means she can clarify the actual science when a passage does require content knowledge.

Most students panic when they see the ACT Science section's dense graphs and conflicting experimental setups, but the secret is that it's really a data interpretation test. Alyssa scored a 35 composite and teaches students to read figures methodically — isolating variables, identifying trends, and comparing rival hypotheses — without needing deep knowledge of every scientific topic that appears.

The ACT Science section is really a data-interpretation exam disguised as biology and chemistry. Eunice, who scored a 35 composite and studies biology at Northeastern, teaches students to ignore background knowledge and instead read graphs, tables, and conflicting viewpoints like a scientist scanning results. That shift in approach alone often unlocks several extra points.

Most students panic when they see the ACT Science section, but it's really about reading graphs, interpreting data tables, and spotting trends — not recalling biology or chemistry facts. Parita teaches students to treat each passage like a puzzle, extracting the key variables and relationships in under a minute per question. Her 35 ACT composite and computer science training at Harvard make her especially sharp on the data analysis skills the section actually tests.

Most students panic when they see the ACT Science section's dense graphs and conflicting-viewpoint passages, but the trick is realizing it barely tests science knowledge at all. Kristen's chemical-biological engineering background means she reads data tables and experimental setups fluently, and she teaches students to do the same — extracting trends, comparing variables, and ignoring the jargon that's designed to intimidate. Her 36 ACT composite speaks to how well that approach works.

The ACT Science section isn't really a science test — it's a data interpretation sprint, and Connie treats it that way. With a 34 composite and a biology degree from Northwestern, she teaches students to read graphs, compare experimental setups, and evaluate conflicting viewpoints without getting distracted by unfamiliar scientific jargon. The key skill is extracting the right data point in under a minute, and that's a trainable habit.