Texas High School ELA Question of the Day

Test your knowledge with a hand-picked multiple-choice question.

Source 1: A coastal engineering study using multi-decadal storm-surge simulations compares the lifecycle costs of seawalls, elevated barriers, and hybrid "living shoreline" installations along an at-risk urban estuary. The authors find that gray infrastructure reduces expected annual losses in the near term but exhibits nonlinear failure risks under compound flooding. Their model assigns monetary value to reduced downtime of ports and utilities, and it shows that layered defenses—breakwaters coupled with restored marsh—delay overtopping thresholds while lowering maintenance volatility. However, the analysis treats households as interchangeable economic units and excludes cultural asset valuation, concluding with a decision rule based on net present value and probabilistic exceedance. Source 2: An ethnographic investigation of historically marginalized waterfront communities examines how retreat policies reshape social networks, livelihoods, and place-based memory. Through interviews and participatory mapping, the researcher documents the uneven burdens of relocation, including loss of informal care systems and cultural practices attached to working shores. The study notes that community-led in-situ adaptations—like elevated cooperative workspaces and shared rain gardens—build stewardship and hazard literacy. Yet, it cautions that insisting on remaining without robust evacuation and backup services can deepen vulnerability. The article prioritizes procedural justice and the co-production of risk knowledge rather than a single optimal technical fix.

Which synthesis statement best combines the two sources to create new understanding that advances beyond either source alone?

Select an answer and click Check.