Calculus II — Integrals - Math
Card 0 of 372

The above graph depicts a function
. Does
exist, and why or why not?

The above graph depicts a function . Does
exist, and why or why not?
exists if and only if
;
the actual value of
is irrelevant, as is whether
is continuous there.
As can be seen,
and
;
therefore,
,
and
exists.
exists if and only if
;
the actual value of is irrelevant, as is whether
is continuous there.
As can be seen,
and
;
therefore, ,
and exists.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

The graph depicts a function
. Does
exist?

The graph depicts a function . Does
exist?
exists if and only if
; the actual value of
is irrelevant.
As can be seen,
and
; therefore,
, and
exists.
exists if and only if
; the actual value of
is irrelevant.
As can be seen, and
; therefore,
, and
exists.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

The above graph depicts a function
. Does
exist, and why or why not?

The above graph depicts a function . Does
exist, and why or why not?
exists if and only if
. As can be seen from the diagram,
, but
. Since
,
does not exist.
exists if and only if
. As can be seen from the diagram,
, but
. Since
,
does not exist.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
A function is defined by the following piecewise equation:

At
, the function is:
A function is defined by the following piecewise equation:
At , the function is:
The first step to determine continuity at a point is to determine if the function is defined at that point. When we substitute in 3 for
, we get 18 as our
-value.
is thus defined for this function.
The next step is determine if the limit of the function is defined at that point. This means that the left-hand limit must be equal to the right-hand limit at
. Substitution reveals the following:


Both sides of the function, therefore, approach a
-value of 18.
Finally, we must ensure that the curve is smooth by checking the limit of the derivative of both sides.


Since the function passes all three tests, it is continuous.
The first step to determine continuity at a point is to determine if the function is defined at that point. When we substitute in 3 for , we get 18 as our
-value.
is thus defined for this function.
The next step is determine if the limit of the function is defined at that point. This means that the left-hand limit must be equal to the right-hand limit at . Substitution reveals the following:
Both sides of the function, therefore, approach a -value of 18.
Finally, we must ensure that the curve is smooth by checking the limit of the derivative of both sides.
Since the function passes all three tests, it is continuous.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Give the
term of the Maclaurin series of the function 
Give the term of the Maclaurin series of the function
The
term of the Maclaurin series of a function
has coefficient 
The second derivative of
can be found as follows:




The coeficient of
in the Maclaurin series is therefore

The term of the Maclaurin series of a function
has coefficient
The second derivative of can be found as follows:
The coeficient of in the Maclaurin series is therefore
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Give the
term of the Taylor series expansion of the function
about
.
Give the term of the Taylor series expansion of the function
about
.
The
term of a Taylor series expansion about
is
.
We can find
by differentiating twice in succession:








so the
term is 
The term of a Taylor series expansion about
is
.
We can find by differentiating twice in succession:
so the term is
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Give the
term of the Taylor series expansion of the function
about
.
Give the term of the Taylor series expansion of the function
about
.
The
term of a Taylor series expansion about
is
.
We can find
by differentiating twice in succession:








so the
term is 
The term of a Taylor series expansion about
is
.
We can find by differentiating twice in succession:
so the term is
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Give the
term of the Maclaurin series of the function 
Give the term of the Maclaurin series of the function
The
term of the Maclaurin series of a function
has coefficient 
The second derivative of
can be found as follows:




The coeficient of
in the Maclaurin series is therefore

The term of the Maclaurin series of a function
has coefficient
The second derivative of can be found as follows:
The coeficient of in the Maclaurin series is therefore
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Find the second derivative of f(x).

Find the second derivative of f(x).
First we should find the first derivative of
. Remember the derivative of
is
and the derivative of
is
:

The second derivative is just the derivative of the first derivative:

First we should find the first derivative of . Remember the derivative of
is
and the derivative of
is
:
The second derivative is just the derivative of the first derivative:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Find the derivative of the function
.
Find the derivative of the function
.
We can use the Chain Rule:
Let
, so that
.

We can use the Chain Rule:
Let , so that
.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Evaluate:

Evaluate:
Set
.
Then
and
.
Also, since
, the limits of integration change to
and
.
Substitute:







Set .
Then and
.
Also, since , the limits of integration change to
and
.
Substitute:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Evaluate:

Evaluate:
Set
. Then

and

Also, since
, the limits of integration change to
and
.
Substitute:






Set . Then
and
Also, since , the limits of integration change to
and
.
Substitute:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Determine the indefinite integral:

Determine the indefinite integral:
Set
. Then
.
and

The integral becomes:






Substitute back:

Set . Then
.
and
The integral becomes:
Substitute back:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Determine the indefinite integral:

Determine the indefinite integral:
, so this can be rewritten as



Set
. Then

and

Substitute:





The outer factor can be absorbed into the constant, and we can substitute back:



, so this can be rewritten as
Set . Then
and
Substitute:
The outer factor can be absorbed into the constant, and we can substitute back:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
This integral will require a u-substitution.
Let
.
Then, differentiating both sides,
.
We need to solve for dx in order to replace all x terms with u terms.
.

This is a little tricky because we stilll have x and u terms mixed together. We need to go back to our original substitution.


Now we have an integral that looks more manageable. First, however, we can't forget about the bounds of the definite integral. We were asked to evaluate the integral from
to
. Because
, the bounds will change to
and
.
Essentially, we have made the following transformation:
.
The latter integral is easier to evaluate.



At this point, we can separate the integral into two smaller integrals.
.
The integral
evaluates to -2, so now we just need to worry about the other integral. This will require the use of partial fraction decomposition. We need to rewrite
as the sum of two fractions.

We need to solve for the values of A and B.





This means that
and
. This is a relatively simple system of equations to solve, so I won't go into detail. The end result is that
.

Let's now go back to the integral
.

Distribute the 2 to both integrals and separate it into two integrals.

![=-\ln|1-u| ]_{2}^{3} + \ln|1+u|]_{2}^{3}](https://vt-vtwa-assets.varsitytutors.com/vt-vtwa/uploads/formula_image/image/173704/gif.latex)


.
Remember we need to add this value back to the value of
, which we already determined to be -2.
The final answer is
.
This integral will require a u-substitution.
Let .
Then, differentiating both sides, .
We need to solve for dx in order to replace all x terms with u terms.
.
This is a little tricky because we stilll have x and u terms mixed together. We need to go back to our original substitution.
Now we have an integral that looks more manageable. First, however, we can't forget about the bounds of the definite integral. We were asked to evaluate the integral from to
. Because
, the bounds will change to
and
.
Essentially, we have made the following transformation:
.
The latter integral is easier to evaluate.
At this point, we can separate the integral into two smaller integrals.
.
The integral evaluates to -2, so now we just need to worry about the other integral. This will require the use of partial fraction decomposition. We need to rewrite
as the sum of two fractions.
We need to solve for the values of A and B.
This means that and
. This is a relatively simple system of equations to solve, so I won't go into detail. The end result is that
.
Let's now go back to the integral .
Distribute the 2 to both integrals and separate it into two integrals.
.
Remember we need to add this value back to the value of , which we already determined to be -2.
The final answer is .
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The integral of
is
. The constant 3 is simply multiplied by the integral.
The integral of is
. The constant 3 is simply multiplied by the integral.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Evaluate the integral below:

Evaluate the integral below:
In this case we have a rational function as
, where

and

can be written as a product of linear factors:

It is assumed that A and B are certain constants to be evaluated. Denominators can be cleared by multiplying both sides by (x - 4)(x + 4). So we get:

First we substitute x = -4 into the produced equation:

Then we substitute x = 4 into the equation:

Thus:

Hence:




In this case we have a rational function as , where
and
can be written as a product of linear factors:
It is assumed that A and B are certain constants to be evaluated. Denominators can be cleared by multiplying both sides by (x - 4)(x + 4). So we get:
First we substitute x = -4 into the produced equation:
Then we substitute x = 4 into the equation:
Thus:
Hence:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
To integrate
, we need to get the two equations in terms of each other. We are going to use "u-substitution" to create a new variable,
, which will equal
.
Now, if
, then

Multiply both sides by
to get the more familiar:

Note that our
, and our original equation was asking for a positive
.
That means if we want
in terms of
, it looks like this:

Bring the negative sign to the outside:
.
We can use the power rule to find the integral of
:

Since we said that
, we can plug that back into the equation to get our answer:

To integrate , we need to get the two equations in terms of each other. We are going to use "u-substitution" to create a new variable,
, which will equal
.
Now, if , then
Multiply both sides by to get the more familiar:
Note that our , and our original equation was asking for a positive
.
That means if we want in terms of
, it looks like this:
Bring the negative sign to the outside:
.
We can use the power rule to find the integral of :
Since we said that , we can plug that back into the equation to get our answer:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
What is the anti-derivative of
?
What is the anti-derivative of ?
To find the indefinite integral of our expression, we can use the reverse power rule.
To use the reverse power rule, we raise the exponent of the
by one and then divide by that new exponent.
First we need to realize that
. From there we can solve:

When taking an integral, be sure to include a
at the end of everything.
stands for "constant". Since taking the derivative of a constant whole number will always equal
, we include the
to anticipate the possiblity of the equation actually being
or
instead of just
.


To find the indefinite integral of our expression, we can use the reverse power rule.
To use the reverse power rule, we raise the exponent of the by one and then divide by that new exponent.
First we need to realize that . From there we can solve:
When taking an integral, be sure to include a at the end of everything.
stands for "constant". Since taking the derivative of a constant whole number will always equal
, we include the
to anticipate the possiblity of the equation actually being
or
instead of just
.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
What is the indefinite integral of
?
What is the indefinite integral of ?
To find the indefinite integral of our equation, we can use the reverse power rule.
To use the reverse power rule, we raise the exponent of the
by one and then divide by that new exponent.
Remember that, when taking the integral, we treat constants as that number times
since anything to the zero power is
. For example, treat
as
.

When taking an integral, be sure to include a
at the end of everything.
stands for "constant". Since taking the derivative of a constant whole number will always equal
, we include the
to anticipate the possiblity of the equation actually being
or
instead of just
.


To find the indefinite integral of our equation, we can use the reverse power rule.
To use the reverse power rule, we raise the exponent of the by one and then divide by that new exponent.
Remember that, when taking the integral, we treat constants as that number times since anything to the zero power is
. For example, treat
as
.
When taking an integral, be sure to include a at the end of everything.
stands for "constant". Since taking the derivative of a constant whole number will always equal
, we include the
to anticipate the possiblity of the equation actually being
or
instead of just
.
Compare your answer with the correct one above