This question tests Section 179 annual limit application. The key facts are equipment costing $1,300,000 with no other Section 179 purchases, annual limit of $1,250,000, and phase-out threshold of $3,130,000. Since total purchases ($1,300,000) don't exceed the phase-out threshold, the full annual limit is available. The maximum Section 179 deduction is limited to $1,250,000, even though the equipment cost exceeds this amount. Answer A incorrectly allows deduction above the annual limit. Answer C incorrectly prohibits December placements. Answer D incorrectly reduces the limit based on bonus depreciation. The annual limit caps Section 179 deductions regardless of individual asset costs.

This question tests the interaction when Section 179 fully expenses an asset. The key facts are equipment costing $500,000 with a Section 179 election of $500,000 and 60% bonus depreciation available. When Section 179 equals the full asset cost, the remaining basis is $0, so bonus depreciation is also $0 (60% × $0 = $0). Answer A incorrectly calculates bonus on the original cost. Answer C incorrectly applies 100% bonus depreciation. Answer D incorrectly prohibits using both methods on the same asset. Section 179 reduces basis before bonus depreciation applies, so full Section 179 expensing leaves no basis for bonus depreciation.

This question tests straightforward bonus depreciation calculation. The key facts are qualifying equipment costing $700,000 with 60% bonus depreciation for 2025. Bonus depreciation equals $700,000 × 60% = $420,000, with the remaining $280,000 basis depreciated under regular MACRS. Answer B incorrectly applies 100% bonus depreciation. Answer C incorrectly limits bonus to real property. Answer D incorrectly uses a 50% rate. The 60% bonus depreciation rate for 2025 applies uniformly to all qualifying property regardless of asset type or placement date.

This question tests basic bonus depreciation calculation for C corporations. The key facts are qualifying equipment costing $800,000 with 60% bonus depreciation for 2025. Bonus depreciation equals $800,000 × 60% = $480,000, with the remaining $320,000 basis depreciated under regular MACRS. Answer A incorrectly states C corporations can't claim bonus depreciation. Answer B incorrectly applies 100% bonus depreciation. Answer D incorrectly uses a 50% rate. All business entities, including C corporations, are eligible for bonus depreciation on qualifying property.

This question tests the interaction between Section 179 and bonus depreciation. The key facts are equipment cost of $600,000, a Section 179 election of $100,000, and 60% bonus depreciation for 2025. Section 179 is applied first, reducing the asset's basis from $600,000 to $500,000. Bonus depreciation is then calculated on the remaining basis: $500,000 × 60% = $300,000. Answer A incorrectly applies bonus depreciation to the full cost. Answer C incorrectly applies bonus depreciation before Section 179. Answer D incorrectly states that claiming Section 179 disqualifies bonus depreciation. The proper order is Section 179 first, then bonus depreciation on the remaining basis, then regular MACRS on any remainder.

This question tests bonus depreciation eligibility for used property in 2025. The key facts are a used machine purchased for $400,000 with 60% bonus depreciation available for 2025. Used property acquired after September 27, 2017, is eligible for bonus depreciation if it meets certain requirements (first use by the taxpayer, etc.). Bonus depreciation is calculated as $400,000 × 60% = $240,000, with the remaining $160,000 basis depreciated under regular MACRS. Answer A incorrectly states used property is never eligible. Answer C incorrectly applies 100% bonus depreciation. Answer D incorrectly uses a 50% rate. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expanded bonus depreciation to include qualifying used property.

This question tests Section 179 phase-out calculation with multiple assets. The key facts are specific equipment of $1,600,000, total Section 179 purchases of $3,500,000, annual limit of $1,250,000, and phase-out threshold of $3,130,000. The phase-out reduction equals $3,500,000 - $3,130,000 = $370,000. The maximum Section 179 deduction is $1,250,000 - $370,000 = $880,000. Answer A incorrectly ignores the phase-out. Answer C incorrectly eliminates the deduction entirely. Answer D uses incorrect calculation methodology. The phase-out is based on total Section 179 property purchases, not individual asset amounts.

This question tests Section 179 calculation for mixed-use property. The key facts are a van costing $60,000 with 80% business use and 20% personal use. Section 179 is limited to the business-use portion of an asset's cost basis, calculated as $60,000 × 80% = $48,000. Answer A incorrectly allows Section 179 on the full cost regardless of business use. Answer C incorrectly applies the 60% bonus rate to limit Section 179. Answer D incorrectly states mixed-use vehicles are ineligible for Section 179. The business-use percentage limitation ensures Section 179 benefits only apply to the portion of the asset used in the trade or business.

This question tests bonus depreciation calculation under Section 168(k) for 2025. The key facts are that new machinery (7-year MACRS property) was purchased for $900,000 and bonus depreciation is 60% for 2025. Bonus depreciation is calculated as 60% of the asset's basis before any other depreciation, which equals $900,000 × 60% = $540,000. The remaining $360,000 basis is then depreciated under regular MACRS rules. Answer A is incorrect because 7-year property is eligible for bonus depreciation. Answer B incorrectly applies 100% bonus depreciation when the 2025 rate is 60%. Answer D incorrectly uses a 50% rate instead of the 60% rate for 2025.

This question tests Section 179 phase-out with slight excess over threshold. The key facts are equipment costing $2,900,000, total purchases of $3,140,000, annual limit of $1,250,000, and phase-out threshold of $3,130,000. The phase-out reduction equals $3,140,000 - $3,130,000 = $10,000. The maximum Section 179 deduction is $1,250,000 - $10,000 = $1,240,000. Answer A incorrectly ignores the phase-out. Answer C incorrectly eliminates the entire deduction. Answer D incorrectly involves bonus depreciation in the Section 179 calculation. Even small amounts over the phase-out threshold trigger dollar-for-dollar reductions.