AP English Language and Composition Quiz: Use Comparisons Appropriately
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Use Comparisons AppropriatelyQuestion 1 of 20

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a city council meeting about expanding bus service, a resident argues that reliable public transit is not a "perk" but basic infrastructure: "A bus route is like a circulatory system—when it runs on time and reaches every neighborhood, the city's economy gets oxygen. But when service is infrequent, whole blocks go numb: workers arrive late, appointments are missed, and local shops lose foot traffic. Last year, our transit agency reported that routes with 15-minute frequency saw a 22% ridership increase, while routes running every 45 minutes lost 11%. If we want more people to use buses, we have to stop treating schedules like suggestions. We wouldn't accept a hospital that delivered oxygen only three times an hour."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

It works by claiming that buses literally carry oxygen to residents, making transit delays medically dangerous.
It works primarily by equating transit frequency with a life-sustaining system, helping readers grasp how inconsistent service can weaken many parts of the city at once.
It is effective because it lists ridership statistics that prove buses are more important than hospitals.
It works by suggesting that all city problems—crime, rent, and pollution—would disappear if buses ran every 15 minutes.
← Back to quizzes

AP English Language and Composition Quiz

AP English Language and Composition Quiz: Use Comparisons Appropriately

Practice Use Comparisons Appropriately in AP English Language and Composition with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Use Comparisons Appropriately, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP English Language and Composition.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a city council meeting about expanding bus service, a resident argues that reliable public transit is not a "perk" but basic infrastructure: "A bus route is like a circulatory system—when it runs on time and reaches every neighborhood, the city's economy gets oxygen. But when service is infrequent, whole blocks go numb: workers arrive late, appointments are missed, and local shops lose foot traffic. Last year, our transit agency reported that routes with 15-minute frequency saw a 22% ridership increase, while routes running every 45 minutes lost 11%. If we want more people to use buses, we have to stop treating schedules like suggestions. We wouldn't accept a hospital that delivered oxygen only three times an hour."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It works by claiming that buses literally carry oxygen to residents, making transit delays medically dangerous.
  2. It works primarily by equating transit frequency with a life-sustaining system, helping readers grasp how inconsistent service can weaken many parts of the city at once. (correct answer)
  3. It is effective because it lists ridership statistics that prove buses are more important than hospitals.
  4. It works by suggesting that all city problems—crime, rent, and pollution—would disappear if buses ran every 15 minutes.
Explanation: This question asks us to analyze how a comparison helps clarify the author's argument about public transit infrastructure. The author compares bus routes to a circulatory system, explaining how reliable transit acts like oxygen flow—when it works consistently, the city's economy thrives, but when service is infrequent, whole areas suffer economically. The comparison helps readers understand transit not as a luxury but as essential infrastructure that affects multiple interconnected systems. Choice A misreads the comparison as claiming buses literally carry oxygen, while Choice D oversimplifies by suggesting all problems would disappear with better frequency. The most effective strategy is recognizing how comparisons reframe abstract concepts through concrete, familiar systems.

Question 2

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a proposal to update school computers, a technology director writes: "Outdated computers are like dull scissors in an art room. Students can still cut, technically, but they spend more time fighting the tool than making the project. Our devices take an average of four minutes to boot, and teachers report losing at least 15 minutes of class time per period to logins and crashes. Upgrading isn't about having the newest gadget. It's about removing friction so learning can happen."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It claims that computers and scissors are interchangeable tools used for the same tasks.
  2. It illustrates how inefficient tools waste time and attention, supporting the argument that upgrades improve learning by reducing unnecessary struggle. (correct answer)
  3. It mainly provides statistics about boot times without connecting them to classroom impact.
  4. It suggests that upgrading computers will automatically raise grades even if instruction stays the same.
Explanation: This question examines how comparison illustrates how inadequate tools waste time and attention. The author compares outdated computers to dull scissors—both technically function but require excessive effort and time that could be better spent on the actual task. This helps readers understand that technology upgrades improve learning by removing obstacles rather than just providing newer equipment. Choice A incorrectly claims computers and scissors are interchangeable, while Choice D overstates the automatic impact on grades. Effective comparisons show how tool quality affects the efficiency of the work process.

Question 3

Read the following excerpt from a college newspaper column and answer the question.

"During finals week, the library extends hours to 2 a.m., and students celebrate as if more time automatically means better studying. But time is not the same as attention. Keeping the building open all night is like leaving every light on in a house to 'help' someone sleep: the gesture feels generous, yet it ignores what the person actually needs. Many students would benefit more from quiet morning study blocks, more tutoring appointments, and clear limits that protect sleep. A campus that equates access with support mistakes quantity for care."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It works because it claims that bright lights directly cause insomnia in all students who study late.
  2. It is effective because it uses an everyday scenario to show how a well-intended policy can be counterproductive, strengthening the argument that support should match students' actual needs. (correct answer)
  3. It is effective because it suggests the library should close earlier to punish students for procrastinating.
  4. It works primarily by summarizing the library's extended hours without evaluating whether they help.
Explanation: This question tests the skill of using comparisons appropriately in opinion pieces by analyzing how an analogy critiques a policy's unintended effects. The comparison of extended library hours to leaving lights on for sleep reframes generous access as counterproductive interference, clarifying that more time doesn't equate to better focus when it disrupts rest. This everyday scenario illustrates how a well-intended gesture ignores actual needs like attention and recovery, supporting the argument for tailored support such as morning blocks and tutoring. By highlighting the mismatch between quantity and care, the analogy makes the abstract flaw in equating access with support more evident and persuasive. A distractor misreads it as advocating earlier closures to punish procrastination, which distorts the focus on holistic needs. For effective comparisons, use familiar contrasts to expose policy gaps and guide readers toward balanced solutions.

Question 4

Read the following excerpt from a workplace memo and answer the question.

"Our customer-support team now uses five separate apps to track the same ticket: one for intake, one for chat logs, one for escalations, one for metrics, and one for internal notes. The result is predictable—updates get lost and customers repeat themselves. This system is like cooking in a kitchen where every ingredient is stored in a different building: you can still make dinner, but you waste your energy walking instead of seasoning. Consolidating into one platform won't magically solve every problem, but it will let us spend time on actual service rather than navigation. If we want faster response times, we should reduce tool sprawl first."

The comparison is effective because…

  1. it implies that customer-support work is as easy as cooking and therefore does not require specialized tools.
  2. it highlights inefficiency by translating digital fragmentation into a concrete physical inconvenience, reinforcing the claim that consolidation would free time for service. (correct answer)
  3. it proves that all companies with multiple apps inevitably lose customers, regardless of staff training.
  4. it restates that the team uses five apps, adding a decorative image but no argumentative force.
Explanation: This question tests the skill of using comparisons appropriately in professional communication by examining how an analogy illustrates inefficiency in tool usage. The comparison of fragmented apps to ingredients stored in different buildings reframes digital disorganization as a physical hassle, clarifying how time wasted on navigation detracts from productive work like cooking. This vivid image helps readers grasp the concrete frustration of switching tools, reinforcing that consolidation would redirect energy toward customer service rather than logistics. By translating abstract 'tool sprawl' into a relatable kitchen scenario, the analogy strengthens the call for a single platform without claiming it solves everything. One distractor wrongly sees it as merely restating the app count without argumentative value, overlooking the inefficiency critique. When employing comparisons, ensure they convert intangible problems into sensory experiences to persuade without exaggeration.

Question 5

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

At last month's school board meeting, the superintendent argued that the district should adopt a "phone-free instructional day." She noted that in a pilot at two middle schools, teachers logged 31% fewer classroom interruptions and the number of students failing two or more classes dropped from 18% to 12% over one semester. Still, she acknowledged that phones can be useful for contacting family after school and for occasional research.

To explain her proposal, she compared smartphones in class to "a smoke alarm that chirps every few minutes—not because there's a fire, but because the battery is low. You can keep teaching through the chirps, but eventually the lesson becomes a series of pauses."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It proves that phones are physically dangerous in the same way that fires are dangerous, so banning them is a safety measure.
  2. It works primarily by showing that even small, frequent disruptions can erode sustained attention, supporting the argument that learning suffers from repeated interruptions. (correct answer)
  3. It restates that phones make noise in class, which is why teachers dislike them.
  4. It suggests that the district should replace students' phones with smoke alarms so students learn responsibility for batteries.
Explanation: The skill of using comparisons appropriately involves selecting analogies that clarify complex ideas by drawing parallels to familiar concepts, making arguments more relatable and persuasive. In this excerpt, the superintendent compares smartphones in class to a chirping smoke alarm with a low battery, which reframes classroom interruptions as persistent, low-level distractions that accumulate over time rather than isolated events. This analogy clarifies how even non-emergency disruptions, like phone notifications, fragment attention and hinder sustained learning, much like ignored chirps disrupt a lesson's flow. By evoking a common household annoyance, the comparison makes the abstract impact on education more tangible, supporting the proposal for phone-free days without dismissing phones' benefits. A common distractor might misread this as equating phones to literal dangers like fires, overlooking the focus on erosion of focus rather than physical harm. Ultimately, a transferable strategy is to choose comparisons that highlight the core mechanism of a problem, ensuring they illuminate rather than exaggerate the issue.

Question 6

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a commentary on group projects, a student writes: "A group project without individual accountability is like a relay race where only the last runner's time counts. The team might finish, but the strongest runner ends up carrying the reputation of everyone else. In my history class, peer evaluations were optional; unsurprisingly, two students did most of the research while others 'helped' by changing fonts. When our teacher added checkpoints and individual reflections, the work became more evenly distributed. Collaboration should be shared effort, not shared cover."

The author's comparison works primarily by

  1. claiming that classrooms should replace projects with athletic competitions.
  2. illustrating how a system can reward outcomes without tracking contributions, supporting the argument for structures that make effort visible. (correct answer)
  3. describing a relay race in order to entertain readers who dislike school.
  4. arguing that the only fair grading method is to give every student the exact same score in every class.
Explanation: This question analyzes how the author uses comparison to critique group project fairness. The comparison likens projects without individual accountability to relay races where only the final runner's time counts—both systems can reward outcomes without tracking individual contributions. This helps readers understand how shared grades can mask unequal effort and create unfair situations. Choice A misreads this as advocating for athletic competitions in class, while Choice D oversimplifies to suggest identical grades for everyone. Comparisons effectively reveal how well-intentioned systems can produce unintended inequities.

Question 7

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In an editorial about phone bans during class, a teacher writes: "A smartphone in a student's pocket is like a slot machine on silent mode: even when it's not in use, it promises a reward the next time you pull the lever. We tell students to 'just focus,' but we're asking them to ignore an object designed to interrupt them. When my school piloted locked pouches, referrals for off-task behavior dropped by 30% in one quarter. The policy didn't make students less curious; it made the classroom less rigged against attention. If we want learning, we should stop leaving the casino on every desk."

The author's comparison works primarily by

  1. arguing that students are literally gambling money in class whenever they receive notifications.
  2. describing the pouch program in detail so readers can replicate the exact steps at home.
  3. highlighting how the design of phones encourages compulsive checking, reinforcing the claim that willpower alone is an unfair expectation in classrooms. (correct answer)
  4. implying that all technology is harmful and should be removed from schools permanently, including laptops used for assignments.
Explanation: This question focuses on how the author uses comparison to explain the challenge of maintaining focus in classrooms with smartphones present. The comparison likens smartphones to slot machines on silent mode—both are designed to interrupt attention through intermittent rewards, even when not actively used. This helps readers understand that asking students to ignore phones isn't just about willpower but about fighting engineered distraction. Choice A incorrectly literalizes the gambling aspect, while Choice D misrepresents the argument as opposing all technology. The transferable insight is that effective comparisons reveal underlying mechanisms rather than surface similarities.

Question 8

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In an article about nutrition labels, a writer argues: "Trying to eat healthy without clear labels is like shopping in a store where every price tag is hidden under the counter. You can still buy groceries, but you'll either guess wrong or spend your whole day interrogating the cashier. A study from our state university found that when restaurants posted calorie counts, customers chose meals with an average of 60 fewer calories. Transparency doesn't force anyone to order a salad; it simply lets people decide with their eyes open."

The comparison is effective because it

  1. suggests that restaurants are literally stores and that cashiers should announce calories out loud to each customer.
  2. frames information as a prerequisite for meaningful choice, supporting the claim that labels empower rather than coerce consumers. (correct answer)
  3. summarizes the university study without connecting it to the point about transparency.
  4. argues that people who eat high-calorie foods are trying to deceive others.
Explanation: This question focuses on how comparison reframes nutrition labels as tools for informed choice. The author compares eating without clear labels to shopping where prices are hidden—both situations force consumers to make decisions without essential information needed for meaningful choice. This helps readers understand that transparency empowers rather than restricts consumer freedom. Choice A incorrectly suggests cashiers should announce calories, while Choice D creates moral judgment about food choices. Effective comparisons frame information access as a prerequisite for genuine autonomy.

Question 9

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In an editorial about customer service, a business owner writes: "A return policy is a brand's handshake. It's not the product itself, but it tells customers what kind of relationship you're offering. When we extended returns from 14 to 30 days, repeat purchases rose by 12% because shoppers felt safer trying something new. Some owners fear abuse, but most customers aren't looking for a loophole—they're looking for trust. A stiff handshake makes people pull away."

The author's comparison works primarily by

  1. claiming that customers will only shop at stores where employees literally shake their hands.
  2. framing the policy as a signal of trust and relationship, supporting the argument that flexible returns can increase loyalty. (correct answer)
  3. summarizing sales changes without connecting them to consumer psychology.
  4. arguing that all return policies should be unlimited, regardless of cost or feasibility.
Explanation: This question analyzes how the author uses comparison to frame return policies as relationship signals. The comparison likens return policies to handshakes—both communicate the nature of the relationship being offered rather than just defining specific terms. This helps readers understand that flexible policies build customer trust and loyalty by signaling confidence and partnership. Choice A misreads this as requiring literal handshakes, while Choice D advocates unlimited returns regardless of cost. Effective comparisons frame business policies as communications about relationships rather than just rules.

Question 10

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a newsletter about saving for emergencies, a financial counselor explains: "An emergency fund is a household's fire extinguisher. You don't buy one because you expect a blaze tomorrow; you buy it because small fires happen, and panic makes them spread. When your car needs an unexpected $600 repair, the extinguisher keeps you from ‘putting it out’ with a high-interest credit card. In our clinic, clients with even $1,000 set aside were half as likely to miss rent after a surprise bill. The goal isn't to hoard cash forever; it's to keep one spark from taking the whole kitchen."

The comparison is effective because it

  1. suggests that saving money will literally prevent house fires from occurring.
  2. clarifies the preventive purpose of an emergency fund and shows how it limits damage from predictable but uncertain events. (correct answer)
  3. summarizes the steps of opening a savings account without explaining why anyone should do so.
  4. argues that people who use credit cards are irresponsible and deserve the consequences of debt.
Explanation: This question examines how comparison clarifies the preventive function of emergency funds. The author compares an emergency fund to a fire extinguisher—both are purchased not because disaster is expected immediately, but because they prevent small problems from becoming catastrophic ones. The comparison helps readers understand that the fund's value lies in avoiding high-interest debt when unexpected expenses arise. Choice A misinterprets the comparison as claiming saving prevents fires, while Choice D shifts to moral judgment about credit card users. Strong comparisons illuminate function and purpose, making abstract financial concepts concrete.

Question 11

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In a letter to a local paper about library funding, an advocate argues: "A public library is a city's toolbox, not its decoration. You don't ask a toolbox to 'turn a profit'; you ask whether it helps people fix what breaks. Last year our branch logged 18,400 computer sessions, many from job seekers who don't have reliable internet at home. Cutting hours because the library doesn't generate revenue is like selling the toolbox because it doesn't build houses by itself. The point is access: tools in reach change what people can do."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It works by proving that libraries literally contain hammers and saws that residents can borrow for construction projects.
  2. It reframes the library's value in terms of usefulness rather than profit, supporting the claim that funding should be justified by public benefit. (correct answer)
  3. It distracts from the argument by shifting attention away from budgets and onto home repairs.
  4. It suggests that once libraries are funded, unemployment will end because everyone will get a job immediately.
Explanation: This question focuses on how comparison reframes the library's value in terms of public utility rather than profit generation. The author compares the library to a city's toolbox—both are valued for their usefulness in helping people accomplish tasks, not for generating revenue. This helps readers understand that funding should be justified by public benefit rather than profit margins. Choice A misreads the comparison as claiming libraries literally contain construction tools, while Choice D overstates the impact on unemployment. The transferable strategy is using familiar utility objects to reframe discussions about public goods.

Question 12

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In an article about reading news critically, a professor writes: "Misinformation spreads like glitter. Once it's on your hands, it ends up on the couch, the carpet, and everyone you hug, even if you never meant to make a mess. A false claim shared in a group chat can be screenshot, reposted, and repeated long after the original is deleted. During a campus survey, 46% of students reported believing at least one headline that later turned out to be fabricated. The solution isn't shame; it's slower sharing and better habits. Glitter demands containment."

The author's comparison works primarily by

  1. arguing that social media companies should ban arts-and-crafts supplies to reduce misinformation.
  2. illustrating how misinformation is hard to contain once released, supporting the argument for cautious sharing and verification. (correct answer)
  3. summarizing the survey result without connecting it to any behavior change.
  4. claiming that anyone who shares a false story is doing so intentionally to harm others.
Explanation: This question analyzes how the author uses comparison to illustrate misinformation's persistence and spread. The comparison likens misinformation to glitter—both are difficult to contain once released and tend to transfer to everything and everyone they contact, often unintentionally. This helps readers understand that false information spreads through normal social interactions and requires careful handling rather than just good intentions. Choice A misreads this as suggesting banning craft supplies, while Choice D assumes intentional harm. Effective comparisons show how problems persist and multiply through ordinary mechanisms.

Question 13

Unlike the mayor,  .

  1. the budget was rejected
  2. the rejection was unanimous
  3. rejection came from council
  4. the council rejected the plan (correct answer)
Explanation: The comparison must be between two things that can logically be contrasted: the mayor and the council. Since the mayor is a person, the clause after the comma should have a person as its subject, so the council rejected the plan completes the sentence. The tempting wrong choice rejection came from council still compares the mayor to the rejection, not to the council, so it fails parallel structure.

Question 14

She is taller than   in her class.

  1. any student
  2. all students
  3. any other student (correct answer)
  4. every student
Explanation: She is a student in her class, so the comparison must exclude her. "Any other student" does that; "any student" would include her and make the sentence illogical, since she cannot be taller than herself. "All students" and "every student" have the same flaw.

Question 15

She likes dogs more than her brother. Which revision removes the ambiguity?

  1. than her brother
  2. than her brother does (correct answer)
  3. than her brother's
  4. than her brother likes
Explanation: The original compares either two things she likes (dogs vs. her brother) or two people's liking (her vs. her brother). Adding 'does' makes the comparison explicit: she likes dogs more than her brother likes dogs. The tempting wrong choice is leaving it as 'than her brother,' which simply keeps the original ambiguity.

Question 16

The food here is  . Which ending creates an illogical comparison?

  1. better than the cafe (correct answer)
  2. better than the cafe's
  3. better than that cafe's
  4. better than cafe food
Explanation: The sentence compares the food here to the cafe itself, which is a place, not a food. That is an illogical comparison. "Better than the cafe's" correctly means the cafe's food, and "better than cafe food" compares food to food. Watch out for the possessive "cafe's": it sounds incomplete but is a standard way to avoid repeating "food."

Question 17

Which comparison is not parallel?

  1. Skiing is as hard as to skate. (correct answer)
  2. Skiing is as hard as skating.
  3. To ski is as hard as to skate.
  4. Skiing is harder than skating.
Explanation: The two items being compared must take the same grammatical form. Skiing is a gerund, while to skate is an infinitive, so the forms don't match. The tempting wrong choice is 'Skiing is harder than skating' because it uses 'than' instead of 'as...as', but it still pairs two gerunds, so it is parallel.

Question 18

In a school-board meeting about smartphone policies, an op-ed argues that banning phones entirely is less effective than teaching students to manage them. The writer notes that a district that required phones to stay in backpacks saw hallway conflicts drop for a month, but teachers still reported frequent "under-the-desk" use during independent work. The writer then compares phones to "a river that will keep finding channels unless we build thoughtful banks," and claims the better policy is structured phone breaks plus explicit instruction in attention and self-regulation. Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

A. The author's comparison works primarily by showing that phones, like rivers, are natural forces that cannot be stopped, so schools should stop trying to regulate them. B. The comparison is effective because it reframes the issue from total elimination to guided control, supporting the argument that boundaries and instruction can shape inevitable student behavior. C. The comparison is effective because it proves that phone bans always fail after exactly one month, just as rivers always overflow after a short time. D. The comparison works primarily by describing what rivers look like in order to make the op-ed more vivid, without contributing to the policy claim.

  1. The author's comparison works primarily by showing that phones, like rivers, are natural forces that cannot be stopped, so schools should stop trying to regulate them.
  2. The comparison is effective because it reframes the issue from total elimination to guided control, supporting the argument that boundaries and instruction can shape inevitable student behavior. (correct answer)
  3. The comparison is effective because it proves that phone bans always fail after exactly one month, just as rivers always overflow after a short time.
  4. The comparison works primarily by describing what rivers look like in order to make the op-ed more vivid, without contributing to the policy claim.
Explanation: This question tests understanding of how comparisons function to support arguments about smartphone policies in schools. The river comparison reframes the debate from whether phones can be eliminated (they can't) to how their inevitable presence can be channeled productively through boundaries and instruction. This shifts the policy discussion from futile prohibition to practical management, supporting the writer's claim that structured breaks and self-regulation training are more effective than outright bans. Choice A misreads by suggesting no regulation at all, while C incorrectly treats the one-month timeframe as a literal parallel rather than recognizing the comparison's conceptual function. When analyzing comparisons, focus on how the familiar concept (rivers needing banks) illuminates the unfamiliar policy challenge (managing student phone use), not on superficial similarities.

Question 19

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

A local columnist argues that the town should repair sidewalks before building a decorative archway at the entrance to Main Street. "An archway is icing," she writes, "but cracked sidewalks are the cake." She mentions that the town's own accessibility audit found multiple curb ramps missing and that several seniors have reported avoiding downtown because of uneven pavement. "If we want people to come," she argues, "we should start with what they must walk on."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It effectively ranks priorities by contrasting cosmetic additions with essential infrastructure, making the case that safety and access should come before aesthetics. (correct answer)
  2. It proves that the town can fund both projects because cakes can be made cheaply with icing.
  3. It is effective mainly because it provides a recipe that demonstrates how to fix sidewalks step by step.
  4. It works by implying that residents who want an archway are childish, since they care about desserts.
Explanation: This question asks you to explain how a comparison supports an argument about municipal spending priorities. The columnist compares a decorative archway to icing and sidewalks to cake, which effectively establishes a hierarchy between essential infrastructure and cosmetic additions. The comparison works because it uses a familiar distinction everyone understands (you need cake before you can add icing) to clarify that basic accessibility and safety must come before aesthetic enhancements. This analogy makes the priority clear: just as icing without cake is pointless, beautification projects are meaningless if people can't safely navigate the basic infrastructure. The supporting evidence about accessibility audits and seniors avoiding downtown due to uneven pavement reinforces that this isn't just about preferences but about fundamental usability. Choice A correctly identifies how the comparison ranks priorities by contrasting cosmetic additions with essential infrastructure, while choice B incorrectly suggests it proves both can be funded, choice C misreads it as providing a literal recipe, and choice D wrongly interprets it as insulting archway supporters. When analyzing comparisons about priorities, look for how they use familiar hierarchies to clarify what must come first.

Question 20

Read the following excerpt and answer the question.

In an op-ed about data privacy, a writer argues: "Clicking 'I agree' on a 30-page terms-of-service document is like signing a lease in a language you don't speak because the landlord promises it's 'standard.' The problem isn't that people are careless; it's that the system depends on unreadable complexity. Last month, a watchdog group found that five popular apps shared location data with at least 70 third parties. If consent is real, it must be understandable. Otherwise, we're not choosing—we're surrendering."

Which explanation best accounts for the effectiveness of the comparison?

  1. It emphasizes how 'agreement' can be hollow when information is inaccessible, reinforcing the argument that current consent practices are structurally unfair. (correct answer)
  2. It proves that all landlords and all apps are equally unethical in every situation.
  3. It claims that signing leases should be illegal because people might not read them.
  4. It merely restates that terms-of-service documents are long without explaining how that supports the author's claim.
Explanation: This question examines how the author uses comparison to critique current consent practices for data privacy. The comparison likens clicking 'I agree' on unreadable terms to signing a lease in an unknown language—both create the appearance of informed consent while making genuine understanding impossible. This helps readers see that the problem isn't user carelessness but systemic design that depends on incomprehensible complexity. Choice B overgeneralizes about all landlords and apps, while Choice C misrepresents the argument as opposing all contracts. Effective comparisons expose structural unfairness in seemingly voluntary arrangements.