All questions
Question 1
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Since the beginning of time, humans have moved from place to place for many reasons. Ancient people migrated for food, and later people traveled for trade and exploration. Today, transportation is faster than ever, and cities are busier than they used to be.
In Riverside, the city council is voting on whether to eliminate minimum parking requirements for new apartment buildings near the downtown bus corridor. A planning memo estimates that structured parking adds about $28,000 per unit to construction costs, contributing to higher rents. Opponents argue that street parking is already scarce and that removing requirements will "spill" cars into nearby neighborhoods. The writer's argument supports eliminating the minimums, claiming it will lower housing costs and encourage transit use, while proposing residential permit zones to address spillover.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
(Refer to the bolded introduction.)
- Some people think walking is healthier than driving, and cities should have more sidewalks.
- In Riverside, the decision to keep or remove parking minimums will shape whether new downtown apartments remain affordable or become even more expensive for renters. (correct answer)
- Parking has been around for as long as cars have existed, and cars are an important invention.
- This essay will explain why parking is a complicated issue with many different opinions on both sides.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice B strengthens the introduction by directly clarifying the stakes of Riverside's parking minimum decision, emphasizing its impact on apartment affordability and renter costs, which prepares readers for the argument's direction toward supporting elimination for housing and transit benefits. This addition provides specific context about the local policy debate, making the broad historical overview on transportation more relevant and engaging. By framing the issue in terms of real-world consequences, it orients the audience to the essay's purpose and builds urgency. A distractor like choice A fails rhetorically because it introduces an unrelated tangent about walking and sidewalks, diluting the focus instead of sharpening the stakes. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should clarify stakes to guide readers, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 2
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
School is important, and everyone has memories of being a student. Teachers work hard, and students have a lot on their plates, from homework to sports to friendships. Education has changed over the years, but it still matters because it shapes the future.
A state legislature is considering a bill that would require high schools to start no earlier than 8:45 a.m. Supporters cite a state health department report showing that teens who sleep at least 8 hours have lower rates of depression symptoms and fewer absences. One district that shifted start times reported a 14% drop in first-period tardies but also faced higher transportation costs and conflicts with after-school jobs and athletics. The student writer argues the bill should pass because sleep is a public health issue and because academic performance improves when schedules match adolescent biology.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- School has always been a place where young people learn facts and meet friends, and that experience is universal.
- Because teenagers' sleep needs conflict with early bells, the legislature's proposed 8:45 a.m. start-time mandate could affect students' health, attendance, and school logistics statewide. (correct answer)
- In this essay, I will argue that later start times are better and that schools should consider changing their schedules.
- Have you ever wondered why mornings feel so hard, especially when you have a big test first period?
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice B best revises the introduction by establishing precise context about teenagers' sleep conflicts and the proposed start-time mandate, highlighting its statewide effects on health, attendance, and logistics to prepare readers for the argument supporting the bill. This revision narrows the vague generalities about school importance into a focused setup that signals the essay's direction toward public health and biological alignment. By introducing the controversy's stakes early, it engages readers and provides a clear pathway to the thesis. A distractor like choice D fails rhetorically because its rhetorical question about mornings feels anecdotal and unfocused, lacking the specificity needed to contextualize the policy debate. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should provide targeted context to build purpose, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 3
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Sports are a big part of American culture, and many people love watching games. Athletes train hard, and fans feel connected to their teams. From little league to professional leagues, competition can bring out the best in people.
The state athletic association is considering a rule that would limit full-contact football practices to once per week during the season. A medical advisory panel cites research linking repeated sub-concussive impacts to long-term cognitive issues; one study of high school players found that teams with fewer contact reps reported 23% fewer diagnosed concussions. Coaches argue that reduced contact practice could increase injuries on game day due to poor tackling technique. The student writer argues in favor of the limit, proposing that technique be taught through non-contact drills and that the association fund certified athletic trainers for under-resourced schools.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
(Refer to the bolded introduction.)
- Football has been played for a long time, and it has changed a lot since it was invented.
- The association's decision could determine whether schools prioritize players' long‑term brain health over traditional practice routines, affecting thousands of teenagers each season. (correct answer)
- Some fans think football is too violent, while others think it builds character and discipline.
- This essay will discuss football practices and explain why they matter in today's society.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice B effectively strengthens the introduction by clarifying the stakes of the athletic association's decision on contact practices, framing it as a choice between brain health and traditions that affects thousands of teenagers, thus preparing readers for the argument favoring limits with alternative drills. This sentence adds specific context to the broad sports overview, highlighting real impacts like concussion risks and directing the essay toward health priorities. By emphasizing consequences, it engages readers and sets a clear purpose for the discussion. A distractor like choice A fails rhetorically because it offers irrelevant historical trivia about football's evolution, which broadens rather than narrows the focus to the stakes. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should articulate stakes to guide purpose, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 4
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Food is something everyone needs, and communities have always gathered around meals. There are many different kinds of restaurants, from fast food to fancy places. In recent years, my town has seen more conversations about where our food comes from.
In the full essay, the student argues that the town should convert two underused parking spaces on Main Street into a weekly "micro-market" for local farmers and small food vendors. The student cites a chamber-of-commerce report showing 35% storefront vacancy on Main Street and notes that the nearest full grocery store is 4 miles from the town's largest apartment complex.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It includes too many specific statistics, which may overwhelm readers before the argument begins.
- It relies on broad, generic statements that could introduce almost any essay and does not establish the local problem the argument addresses. (correct answer)
- It uses overly emotional language that makes the writer seem biased rather than reasonable.
- It provides a detailed counterargument too early, which distracts from the writer's claim.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction is to establish the context and purpose of the argument, orienting readers to the specific issue and the writer's stance. The bolded introduction's weakness, as identified in option B, lies in its reliance on broad, generic statements about food and communities that could apply to any essay, without addressing the local problem of storefront vacancies and food access. This vagueness fails to prepare readers for the argument's focus on converting parking spaces into a micro-market, missing an opportunity to highlight stakes like the 35% vacancy rate and distance to groceries. Instead, it leaves the context underdeveloped, making the essay's purpose unclear from the start. In contrast, option A incorrectly suggests the introduction has too many statistics, but it actually lacks any specifics, which is the real rhetorical failure. Ultimately, introductions should avoid generic platitudes and instead provide tailored details to guide readers toward the argument's core. This skill of crafting introductions appropriate to purpose and context is crucial for the essays on the AP English Language and Composition exam.
Question 5
Read the student essay draft below, then answer the question.
Work is a part of life, and people have jobs for many different reasons. Teenagers often want to earn money, learn responsibility, and save for the future. Rules at workplaces can help things run smoothly.
A state is considering a bill that would extend the latest allowable work time for 16- and 17-year-olds on school nights from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. Supporters argue it helps businesses fill shifts and gives teens flexibility; opponents argue it increases sleep deprivation and harms academic performance. A local university study found that students working past 10 p.m. reported significantly less sleep on weekdays, and the state's graduation task force has identified chronic absenteeism as a major concern. I argue the bill should not pass because it prioritizes short-term labor needs over students' health and learning.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Teenagers have been working for a long time, and many famous people had jobs when they were young.
- As legislators consider letting teens work until 11 p.m. on school nights, the state must decide whether "flexibility" is worth the predictable costs to sleep, attendance, and learning. (correct answer)
- What would you do if your boss asked you to stay later, even though you had school the next morning?
- This essay will argue that teens should not be allowed to work later on school nights.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal is to establish context that prepares readers for the specific argument about teen work hours. Option B succeeds by immediately framing the policy decision (extending work hours to 11 p.m.), identifying the decision-makers (legislators), and establishing the central tension between employer "flexibility" and predictable costs to student health and learning. This introduction efficiently presents the debate as a values conflict between short-term labor needs and long-term educational outcomes, giving readers a clear framework for understanding the argument's stakes. Options A and C offer only historical generalizations or rhetorical questions without establishing the specific policy context, while D merely states a position without explaining why it matters. Effective policy argument introductions must quickly establish both what's being decided and what values are in conflict. Note: AP essays require students to craft introductions that efficiently establish the specific context and competing interests in their argument.
Question 6
Read the student essay draft below, then answer the question.
Libraries have existed for a long time, and books are valuable sources of knowledge. In the modern world, people get information from many places, including phones and computers. Because everyone learns differently, communities should support reading.
A county commission is debating whether to cut library hours to save $180,000 annually. The proposal would close branches on Sundays and reduce evening hours, even though the county's workforce agency reports that many job seekers rely on library computers after 5 p.m. The library also hosts ESL classes and provides quiet study space for students who don't have reliable internet at home. I argue the county should keep hours intact and instead pursue targeted cost savings and partnerships.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Books are important, and so are libraries, which is why many people feel strongly about them in general.
- Libraries are quiet places, but sometimes they can be noisy depending on who is there and what is happening.
- This essay will show that library hours should not be reduced because libraries matter to communities.
- As the county considers cutting $180,000 by shortening library hours, it risks shutting out the very residents who need evening computer access for job applications and classes. (correct answer)
Explanation: The rhetorical goal is to establish context that prepares readers for the specific argument about library funding. Option D succeeds by immediately presenting the concrete policy proposal ($180,000 in cuts), the mechanism (shortened hours), and the human stakes (residents losing evening computer access for jobs and classes), creating a clear framework for understanding why this budget decision matters. This introduction efficiently moves from the specific proposal to its real-world impact, giving readers both context and motivation to engage with the argument. Options A, B, and C fail because they offer only abstract statements about libraries, books, and learning without establishing the specific funding debate or its consequences for community members. Effective policy argument introductions must quickly establish both what's being decided and who will be affected. Note: AP essays require students to craft introductions that efficiently establish the specific context and stakes of their argument.
Question 7
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Food brings people together, and every culture has its own traditions. Some meals are passed down through families, and cooking can be a form of art. Restaurants and home kitchens both play a role in how people eat.
A public university is debating whether to make all first-year meal plans "default vegetarian," with students able to opt in to meat add-ons. The dining office estimates the change would cut food-related greenhouse gas emissions by 12% and save $310,000 annually, but some students argue it restricts choice and may not meet athletes' nutritional needs. A campus survey found that 54% of first-years would be "fine" with a vegetarian default, while 31% would be "upset," and 15% were unsure. The student writer argues for the default vegetarian plan, contending that defaults shape behavior without banning options and that savings could fund better protein alternatives.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
(Refer to the bolded introduction.)
- Vegetables can be prepared in many ways, and some people like them more than others.
- The university's meal-plan vote will decide whether sustainability goals and student choice can coexist in daily campus life for thousands of first-years. (correct answer)
- This issue is complicated, and there are good arguments on both sides that deserve to be heard.
- In the past, people ate whatever food was available, which shows how much society has advanced.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice B strengthens the introduction by clarifying the stakes of the university's meal-plan vote, presenting it as a balance between sustainability and student choice affecting thousands of first-years, which prepares readers for the argument supporting the vegetarian default with options. This addition provides specific context to the broad food traditions, directing the essay toward behavior-shaping defaults and savings for alternatives. By framing daily impacts, it engages readers and establishes clear purpose. A distractor like choice D fails rhetorically because its historical note on past eating habits adds irrelevant generality, failing to address the current stakes. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should highlight stakes for orientation, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 8
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Driving is a normal part of life for many Americans, and roads are important for getting places. There are many kinds of traffic laws, and they help keep people safe. Our town has been growing, so traffic has become a bigger topic lately.
In the full essay, the student argues that the town should install a protected bike lane on Oak Avenue, a corridor where a new apartment complex opened and where the high school is located. The student cites a police report showing 14 bike-involved crashes in two years on Oak Avenue and notes that many students bike because parking permits are limited.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Traffic laws exist for a reason, and if everyone followed them, roads would be much safer for all users.
- Oak Avenue now carries more students and commuters than it was designed for, yet cyclists are forced into fast-moving traffic—helping explain the 14 bike-involved crashes reported there in two years. The town should build a protected bike lane on Oak to prevent predictable injuries as growth continues. (correct answer)
- Have you ever been stuck in traffic and wondered why town leaders don't fix it? Everyone has felt frustrated on the road.
- Roads were first built thousands of years ago, and transportation has evolved from horses to cars to electric vehicles.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction is to establish the context and purpose of the argument, orienting readers to the specific issue and the writer's stance. Option B revises the introduction by detailing Oak Avenue's increased traffic, cyclist dangers, and crash statistics, proposing a protected bike lane to address growth-related risks. This approach clarifies the stakes for student safety and commuter needs, using police reports to provide evidence-based context. It also outlines the essay's direction toward infrastructure changes amid limited parking and new developments. In contrast, option A offers a generic statement on traffic laws, failing to connect to the local bike safety issue. Ultimately, precise revisions help introductions frame the argument's relevance and implications. This skill of crafting introductions appropriate to purpose and context is crucial for the essays on the AP English Language and Composition exam.
Question 9
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
People have always had complicated relationships with technology. From the printing press to the smartphone, inventions change how we live, work, and communicate. In fact, my grandfather still talks about when his family got their first television, and how everyone gathered around it after dinner.
In my school district, the board is considering a policy that would require every student to use an AI "writing assistant" account for all major essays. The district's pilot data claims that in two middle schools, the percentage of students scoring "proficient" on a timed writing benchmark rose from 41% to 56% after a semester with the tool. However, teachers also reported that grading took longer because they had to verify sources and investigate "generic" paragraphs, and the district's own survey found that 62% of students said they were "less confident" writing without the tool.
The student's argument ultimately claims the district should not require the AI tool for all students because it undermines long-term writing development and increases inequity for students with limited home internet.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It provides broad background about technology but does not establish the specific controversy, audience, or stakes of the school board policy. (correct answer)
- It includes too much statistical evidence, which should be saved for the body paragraphs rather than the introduction.
- It states the writer's thesis too directly, leaving no room for nuance later in the argument.
- It uses overly technical vocabulary that would confuse a general audience.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice A correctly identifies the introduction's weakness by highlighting how it offers only vague historical background on technology, failing to connect to the school board's AI policy or signal the stakes like writing development and equity. This broad approach leaves readers unprepared for the argument's focus, as it does not specify the controversy or audience involved. In contrast, a stronger introduction would narrow quickly to the policy debate to build relevance and engagement from the start. A common distractor like choice B fails rhetorically because the introduction contains no statistics, so critiquing it for evidence placement misdirects from the real issue of contextual vagueness. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should hook readers with targeted context, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 10
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Community service is a good thing, and helping others can make society better. Many students volunteer because it looks good on college applications, but it can also teach responsibility. Different schools have different requirements for service hours.
A school board is considering making 40 hours of community service a graduation requirement. Supporters argue it will build civic engagement and cite a nearby district where students reported higher "sense of belonging" after a similar requirement. Opponents note that many students already work part-time or care for siblings; a student survey in the district found that 48% of juniors work at least 10 hours per week, and 22% provide regular caregiving at home. The student writer argues against a mandatory requirement, proposing instead that the district offer paid service internships and allow work/caregiving to count toward recognition programs.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It spends time on general praise of service and college applications rather than introducing the board's proposed mandate and its potential impact on students' time and equity. (correct answer)
- It is too short to function as an introduction and should be at least two pages long.
- It uses statistics too early and therefore overwhelms the reader with numbers.
- It includes too many specific names of stakeholders, which makes the essay sound biased.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal of an effective introduction in an argumentative essay is to establish context and purpose, orienting readers to the specific issue and its significance without overwhelming them with details. Choice A accurately captures the introduction's weakness by noting its general praise of service and applications, which overlooks introducing the board's mandate and its impacts on students' time and equity, failing to prepare readers for the argument against mandates with alternatives like internships. This approach keeps the context too broad, not signaling the stakes like civic engagement versus overburdening students. A more effective intro would specify the proposal early to build relevance and direction. A distractor like choice C fails rhetorically because the introduction has no statistics, so early numbers aren't the issue; the problem is the absence of specific context. Ultimately, this teaches the transferable principle that introductions should address impacts to set purpose, a skill vital for AP English Language essays where clear purpose drives persuasive writing.
Question 11
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Nature is full of amazing animals, and people have always been interested in wildlife. Some animals live in the ocean while others live on land. Our city is debating whether to ban the sale of single-use plastic water bottles at municipal buildings and events, and opponents argue the policy is inconvenient.
In the rest of the essay, the student supports the ban, arguing that city waste audits show bottles are a top item in event trash, refill stations are already installed, and the policy could normalize reuse.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It uses irrelevant, overly broad background about nature and animals that does not connect to municipal plastic policy or its consequences. (correct answer)
- It includes a quote that is not properly cited, weakening credibility.
- It focuses too narrowly on one piece of evidence, making the argument repetitive.
- It uses humor that distracts from the seriousness of the topic.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by orienting readers to the specific debate about plastic bottle bans. Option A correctly identifies that the introduction uses irrelevant, overly broad background about nature and animals that fails to connect to the municipal plastic policy or its environmental and practical consequences. These generic observations about wildlife and animal habitats waste crucial opening space without establishing why plastic bottles specifically matter or what's at stake for the city's waste management and environmental goals. Option B incorrectly identifies a citation problem that doesn't exist, while options C and D describe issues (narrow evidence focus and humor) not present in this introduction. Effective introductions create clear connections between opening context and the specific policy debate, helping readers understand why this particular issue deserves attention.
Question 12
Read the student draft below, then answer the question.
Student draft (intro + excerpt): Since the beginning of time, people have always had to make choices about what they value. Schools are a big part of society, and society is always changing. At my high school, the district is considering replacing most printed novels in 11th-grade English with a "digital-first" curriculum: short online excerpts, adaptive quizzes, and a class set of e-readers. The school board cites a $68,000 annual savings in book purchases and claims students will read "more efficiently." Teachers in the department note that last year, 42% of juniors reported they finished fewer than two assigned books, and they worry that excerpt-based reading will further reduce stamina.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Since the beginning of time, people have always debated what counts as "real learning," and that debate is still happening today in many places.
- In the past, students had to carry heavy backpacks full of books, which could be inconvenient and sometimes even bad for posture.
- As our school board weighs a digital-first English curriculum that would replace most full-length novels with online excerpts, the decision will shape whether juniors build the sustained reading habits colleges still expect—or learn to skim for points. (correct answer)
- Schools are changing quickly, and therefore the district should not replace printed novels with digital excerpts.
Explanation: This question asks students to identify which introduction best establishes context for an argument about replacing printed novels with digital excerpts. Option C succeeds rhetorically by immediately framing the specific policy debate ("digital-first English curriculum"), identifying the key stakeholders ("our school board"), and articulating the concrete stakes ("whether juniors build the sustained reading habits colleges still expect—or learn to skim for points"). This introduction prepares readers by providing both the immediate context (a curriculum decision) and the broader implications (college readiness and reading habits). Option A fails because its generic "since the beginning of time" opening could introduce any educational debate without establishing this specific context. The principle here is that effective introductions should quickly orient readers to the particular debate and its real-world consequences. Note that on the AP exam, students must craft similar context-setting introductions in their synthesis and argument essays.
Question 13
Read the student draft below, then answer the question.
Student draft (intro + excerpt): Art has been around for thousands of years, and it shows what people think and feel. Museums and galleries can be inspiring places. The city is considering cutting the public arts grant program from $500,000 to $150,000 to help close a budget deficit. The grants currently fund murals, student workshops, and small theater productions. Supporters of the cut argue that "art is optional," while opponents point out that last year the program supported 62 paid internships for high school and community college students, and downtown businesses reported increased foot traffic during mural events.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
- Many famous artists were not appreciated in their own time, which shows that art can be misunderstood.
- The city has many different kinds of art, from sculptures in parks to posters in coffee shops.
- Because the proposed cut would determine whether dozens of students can access paid creative opportunities and whether neighborhoods keep community-funded public art, the budget debate is also a debate about whose voices get seen. (correct answer)
- Public arts grants are good, and the city should keep funding them at the same level as before.
Explanation: This question tests students' ability to identify sentences that clarify an argument's stakes. Option C succeeds rhetorically by explicitly connecting the budget cut to its human impact ("whether dozens of students can access paid creative opportunities") and its community implications ("whether neighborhoods keep community-funded public art"), then reframing the debate as fundamentally about representation ("whose voices get seen"). This sentence elevates the discussion from budget numbers to questions of equity and cultural participation. Options A and B provide tangential observations about art without clarifying stakes, while option D states a position without establishing context. The principle here is that effective introductions should reveal how seemingly technical decisions (budget cuts) connect to deeper values (community voice and opportunity). This skill of connecting specific policies to broader principles is essential for successful AP argument essays.
Question 14
Read the student essay draft below, then answer the question.
Public transportation is something many places have, and it helps people get around. Buses and trains have changed over time as cities have grown. It is important for communities to plan for the future.
A mid-sized city is considering raising bus fares from $1.50 to $2.25 to close a budget gap. The transit agency claims the increase is necessary, but ridership data shows 48% of riders earn under $30,000 per year, and a local hospital reports that missed appointments rise when transportation costs increase. The mayor has also promised to reduce downtown traffic congestion, which depends on keeping buses affordable. I argue the city should avoid a flat fare hike and instead adopt income-based discounts and employer partnerships.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It includes too many concrete details about the fare proposal, leaving nothing for the rest of the essay.
- It focuses on broad, generic claims that don't lead into the specific debate about fare increases and who would be affected. (correct answer)
- It uses technical vocabulary that a general audience would not understand.
- It directly attacks the transit agency, which makes the tone too hostile.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal is to identify what weakens this introduction's effectiveness in establishing context for the transit fare argument. Option B correctly identifies the core problem: the introduction offers only broad, generic claims about public transportation that could introduce any transit-related essay, completely failing to establish the specific debate about fare increases or signal who would be affected by this policy change. These empty generalizations about transportation "helping people get around" and the importance of "planning for the future" don't prepare readers for an argument about balancing budget needs with low-income riders' access to essential services. Option A incorrectly suggests too much detail is the problem (there are no specific details), while C wrongly claims technical vocabulary is an issue. Effective introductions must move from general context to specific stakes, not remain at the level of truisms. Note: AP students must recognize when introductions fail to establish appropriate context for their specific argumentative purpose.
Question 15
Read the student essay draft below, then answer the question.
Technology is everywhere, and it affects how people live their daily lives. Social media has changed communication, especially for teenagers. Because the internet moves fast, it can be hard to keep up.
A state legislature is considering a bill that would require social media platforms to verify users' ages and automatically set accounts for users under 16 to the strictest privacy settings. Supporters argue it reduces targeted advertising and predatory contact; opponents argue it creates data-collection risks and blocks anonymous speech for vulnerable teens. A state health survey reports rising anxiety among teens, but civil liberties groups note that age-verification systems often require uploading IDs. I argue the state should focus on platform design standards (like limiting autoplay and default notifications) rather than ID-based age verification.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It is too specific and gives away the entire argument before the body paragraphs.
- It relies on vague, universal statements that could introduce any technology topic and doesn't preview the policy conflict. (correct answer)
- It uses overly emotional language that makes the writer seem biased.
- It includes a counterargument too early, which confuses readers.
Explanation: The rhetorical goal is to identify what weakens this introduction's effectiveness in preparing readers for the specific argument. Option B correctly diagnoses the problem: the introduction consists entirely of vague, universal statements about technology and social media that could introduce any tech-related essay, failing to establish the specific policy conflict about age verification or preview why this debate matters. These generic observations about technology being "everywhere" and the internet moving "fast" don't help readers understand the specific tension between privacy protection and civil liberties that drives this argument. Option A incorrectly claims the introduction is too specific (it's actually too vague), while C wrongly identifies emotional language as the issue. Effective introductions must move beyond platitudes to establish the specific context and stakes of the argument at hand. Note: AP students must recognize when introductions fail to establish appropriate context for their specific argumentative purpose.
Question 16
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Sports have been played since ancient times, and competition can bring out the best in people. Many students enjoy school athletics, and games can build school spirit. Our district is considering charging a $150 "pay-to-play" fee for each sport to cover rising transportation and equipment costs, and administrators say no one will be turned away.
In the rest of the essay, the student argues the fee will still reduce participation because waivers are hard to access, students may avoid applying due to stigma, and fewer athletes could harm team viability.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
- Some of the most famous athletes in history trained under difficult conditions and still succeeded.
- If the fee is adopted, students from low-income families may quietly drop out of sports, shrinking teams and limiting the opportunities that athletics provide beyond the scoreboard. (correct answer)
- There are many sports, including soccer, basketball, volleyball, and track, each with different rules.
- School spirit is important because it makes people feel connected to each other.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by clarifying what's at stake in the pay-to-play fee debate. Option B effectively strengthens the introduction by articulating the concrete consequence that matters most: students from low-income families may quietly drop out of sports, which would shrink teams and limit opportunities beyond just athletic competition. This sentence transforms an abstract fee discussion into a clear question about equity and access, preparing readers to understand why waiver stigma and team viability matter. Options A and C fail by offering historical examples or listing sports without connecting to the fee's impact, while option D makes vague claims about school spirit without addressing the policy's stakes. Effective introductions make policy debates concrete by showing readers the human consequences of seemingly neutral financial decisions.
Question 17
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Since the beginning of time, humans have used transportation to get from place to place. Cars are very common in America, and they can be helpful for families. Recently, our city council proposed adding protected bike lanes on Main Street, and some residents are upset about losing street parking.
In the rest of the essay, the student argues the bike lanes should be approved because the corridor has frequent near-miss crashes, a nearby city saw increased retail foot traffic after similar changes, and the plan still preserves parking on side streets.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Transportation is a fascinating topic, and everyone has their own preferences for how to travel.
- Bicycles have two wheels, and bike lanes are typically painted lines that separate riders from cars.
- As the council considers converting one lane of Main Street into protected bike lanes, the decision will determine whether commuters and students can travel the corridor safely without forcing local businesses to sacrifice all nearby access. (correct answer)
- The city council should add protected bike lanes on Main Street because it is the right thing to do.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by preparing readers for the specific debate about bike lanes on Main Street. Option C effectively establishes this context by immediately naming the specific proposal ("converting one lane of Main Street into protected bike lanes") and articulating the competing stakes—safety for commuters and students versus business access concerns. This revision efficiently orients readers to the precise conflict and its implications, setting up the body paragraphs' evidence about crashes, foot traffic, and parking alternatives. Options A and B fail rhetorically by remaining too general (A discusses transportation preferences broadly) or too definitional (B explains what bicycles and bike lanes are), while option D jumps to the claim without establishing context. Strong introductions balance specificity with accessibility, giving readers enough context to understand the stakes without overwhelming them with details.
Question 18
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Money matters to everyone, and budgets can be complicated. In the United States, people pay taxes for many reasons. This year, our town is voting on a property-tax increase to fund repairs to the aging water system, but some residents say the current rates are already too high.
In the rest of the essay, the student argues in favor of the increase, citing frequent water-main breaks, boil-water advisories, and the long-term cost of emergency fixes compared to planned upgrades.
Which revision to the bolded introduction would best establish context for the argument?
- Taxes are controversial, and people have debated them for hundreds of years in many different countries.
- The water system is old, and old things usually need to be fixed eventually.
- As voters decide whether to raise property taxes for water-system repairs, they are choosing between a predictable investment now and the escalating public-health and financial risks of continuing to patch failing pipes. (correct answer)
- The town should vote yes on the tax increase because water is important and people need it.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by preparing readers for the specific debate about water-system funding. Option C effectively establishes this context by framing the vote as a clear choice between "a predictable investment now" and "escalating public-health and financial risks of continuing to patch failing pipes." This revision efficiently articulates the competing considerations—immediate tax burden versus long-term infrastructure failure—while making the stakes concrete through references to public health and financial consequences. Options A and B fail rhetorically by remaining too abstract (A discusses tax debates generally) or too vague (B notes that old things need fixing without specifying consequences), while option D jumps to the claim without establishing context. Strong introductions present policy choices as concrete decisions with clear trade-offs.
Question 19
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
Libraries have existed for centuries, and books are important. People read for many reasons, including entertainment and learning. Our county is debating whether to cut library funding by 15% to balance the budget, and officials say digital resources can replace some services.
In the rest of the essay, the student argues against the cut, claiming the library functions as the county's only free tutoring hub, job-application center, and reliable internet access point for many residents.
Which sentence would most effectively strengthen the introduction by clarifying the argument's stakes?
- Some of the most famous libraries in history were located in ancient cities and contained rare manuscripts.
- If the cut passes, the county will shorten hours and eliminate staff positions, limiting access to homework help and internet service for residents who cannot afford private alternatives. (correct answer)
- Reading is a timeless habit, and many people say they prefer paper books to e-books.
- The library budget debate shows that communities sometimes disagree about money.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by clarifying what's at stake in the library funding debate. Option B effectively strengthens the introduction by specifying the concrete consequences of the proposed 15% cut: shortened hours, eliminated staff positions, and reduced access to homework help and internet service for residents without private alternatives. This sentence transforms an abstract budget discussion into a clear question about equity and community resources, preparing readers to understand why the library's role as a tutoring hub and internet access point matters. Options A and C fail by offering historical trivia or general observations about reading that don't connect to the funding debate, while option D acknowledges disagreement without clarifying what's actually at risk. Effective introductions make abstract policy debates concrete by showing readers what hangs in the balance.
Question 20
Read the student essay excerpt below, then answer the question.
People have always had opinions about schools, and education has been around for a long time. From chalkboards to laptops, classrooms look different than they used to. In my town, the school board has been discussing whether to ban student cell phones during the school day, and the topic has become a big conversation.
In the rest of the essay, the student argues that the district should adopt a "bell-to-bell" phone-free policy because teachers report constant off-task behavior, a pilot at the middle school reduced discipline referrals, and students need protected time to practice sustained attention.
Which weakness most limits the effectiveness of the bolded introduction?
- It includes too much specific evidence and leaves nothing for the body paragraphs to develop.
- It opens with overly broad statements that could introduce almost any topic and delays establishing the essay's stakes and direction. (correct answer)
- It uses technical jargon about education policy that will confuse a general audience.
- It relies on a personal anecdote that is too emotional to be credible.
Explanation: The introduction's rhetorical goal is to establish context and purpose by orienting readers to the specific debate about cell phone policies in schools. Option B correctly identifies that the introduction opens with overly broad statements ("People have always had opinions about schools") that could introduce virtually any education topic, failing to efficiently establish the essay's specific stakes about phone-free policies and their impact on student attention. These generic observations about education's history and classroom evolution waste valuable space without preparing readers for the focused argument about off-task behavior and discipline data. Option A incorrectly suggests the introduction includes too much evidence when it actually lacks specificity, while options C and D identify problems (jargon and emotional anecdotes) that don't exist in this introduction. Effective introductions move quickly from general context to specific stakes, helping readers understand why this particular issue matters now.