Gather Information and Assess Credibility
Help Questions
8th Grade Writing › Gather Information and Assess Credibility
Research question: “What are the main causes of the Dust Bowl in the 1930s?”
Which piece of information is MOST relevant to include as evidence?
Data from a history book explaining how severe drought and poor farming practices left soil dry and vulnerable to wind erosion.
An opinion post arguing the 1930s were “the best decade,” without mentioning farming or weather.
A description of popular radio shows families listened to during the 1930s.
A list of famous baseball players from the Great Depression era.
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). When researching the causes of the Dust Bowl, students must identify information that directly addresses the "causes" aspect of their research question - the Dust Bowl was an environmental disaster caused by a combination of severe drought and poor farming practices that left soil vulnerable to wind erosion. The data about drought and farming practices (option B) directly explains what caused the Dust Bowl by identifying both the natural factor (drought) and human factor (poor farming methods) that created the conditions for massive dust storms. The correct answer demonstrates relevant information gathering by providing specific, factual evidence from a credible source (history book) that directly answers the "what caused" aspect of the research question. The incorrect options show common relevance mistakes: option A describes entertainment during the time period but doesn't address causes, option C lists sports figures which is completely unrelated to environmental causes, and option D presents an opinion without factual evidence about farming or weather conditions. To gather relevant information effectively, students should constantly refer back to their research question, look for evidence that directly answers the specific aspect being researched (in this case, "causes"), and distinguish between interesting contextual information and essential evidence. This focused approach ensures that research papers stay on topic and build strong, evidence-based arguments.
You are researching: “What are the health effects of vaping on teenagers?” You find four sources.
Which source should you treat as LEAST credible for medical claims?
A) Peer-reviewed study in a medical journal (2023) written by public health researchers
B) CDC webpage about e-cigarettes updated 2024 (.gov)
C) News article (2024) from an established newspaper that interviews doctors and links to studies
D) Vaping company blog post (2025) claiming vaping is “harmless,” with no scientific references
News article (2024) from an established newspaper that interviews doctors and links to studies
Peer-reviewed study in a medical journal (2023) written by public health researchers
CDC webpage about e-cigarettes updated 2024 (.gov)
Vaping company blog post (2025) claiming vaping is “harmless,” with no scientific references
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). When assessing credibility for health information, sources with clear commercial bias and no scientific support are least reliable - a vaping company has financial incentive to minimize health risks and provides no scientific references to support its "harmless" claim. For example, while the medical journal, CDC, and newspaper all cite research and expert opinions, the vaping company blog makes unsupported claims that benefit their business without providing evidence. Option D is correct because commercial sources about their own products have inherent bias, and this source specifically lacks any scientific references while making a strong health claim that contradicts medical consensus. The credible options all have merit: A is peer-reviewed research by health experts, B is an official government health agency, and C is journalism that cites medical professionals and studies. When evaluating sources about health topics, be especially wary of commercial sources making claims about their own products, and always look for scientific evidence and expert credentials rather than unsupported assertions.
You are researching: “What are the health effects of vaping on teens?” You try different searches.
Which search is MOST likely to give you credible, research-focused results (like studies or government/medical sources)?
vape tricks
vaping health effects teens site:.gov OR site:.edu
vaping is awesome
vaping
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Effective searching for credible sources requires using specific terms related to the research question and limiting results to authoritative domains - the search "vaping health effects teens site:.gov OR site:.edu" combines relevant keywords with domain restrictions to find government and educational sources. This search strategy uses "vaping" (the topic), "health effects" (the specific aspect being researched), "teens" (the population of interest), and the site: operator to limit results to .gov (government agencies like CDC or NIH) and .edu (universities and research institutions) domains, which typically provide research-based, unbiased information. The correct answer (B) demonstrates advanced search techniques that filter out commercial sites, blogs, and opinion pieces in favor of scientific studies, government health reports, and academic research. The incorrect options show ineffective search strategies: option A uses biased language that would return opinion pieces, option C searches for entertainment content rather than health information, and option D is too broad and would return millions of results including advertisements and unreliable sources. To find credible sources efficiently, students should use specific keywords from their research question, employ search operators like site: to limit to reliable domains, include relevant demographic or geographic terms, and avoid emotional or biased language in searches. This targeted approach leads directly to the authoritative sources needed for strong academic research.
You are researching: How has social media affected teen mental health? A classmate suggests using only one source: a single TikTok video where someone shares their personal experience. Which evaluation of this research plan is BEST?
It is not very effective because it relies on only one type of source; the student should gather information from multiple credible sources (for example, a psychology book or database article, a peer-reviewed study, and a reputable health organization website) and compare evidence.
It is effective as long as the TikTok video has a lot of likes and comments.
It is effective because personal stories are always more accurate than research studies.
It is effective because using one source saves time and avoids conflicting information.
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Effective research requires gathering information from multiple credible sources to get a comprehensive, balanced understanding of a topic - relying on a single source, especially an anecdotal social media post, cannot provide the breadth and reliability needed for academic research about complex topics like social media's effects on teen mental health. A single TikTok video represents only one person's experience and lacks the systematic research, peer review, and broader perspective that comes from consulting varied sources like psychology databases, peer-reviewed studies, and health organization reports. The correct answer C identifies the critical flaw in using only one anecdotal source and suggests a better approach using multiple types of credible sources that would provide research-based evidence, expert analysis, and varied perspectives. The incorrect options reflect poor research practices: A wrongly elevates personal stories above research, B misunderstands that multiple sources provide necessary verification and complexity rather than confusion, and D incorrectly uses social media engagement as a measure of credibility. Students should gather information from at least 3-5 varied, credible sources including academic databases, books, reputable organizations, and possibly news sources to build a well-rounded understanding supported by evidence rather than relying on single, anecdotal sources.
You are researching: “How does climate change affect the frequency and intensity of heat waves in the United States?” You find four possible sources.
Which source is MOST credible to use as a main source for scientific evidence?
A) NASA Climate website article, updated 2024, credited to NASA scientists (.gov)
B) Personal blog post (no author credentials) claiming “heat waves are a hoax,” posted 2017
C) Social media thread summarizing a TV segment, no links to data, posted 2025
D) Advertisement from an air conditioner company explaining why summers feel hotter, no citations
B) Personal blog post (no author credentials) claiming “heat waves are a hoax,” posted 2017
C) Social media thread summarizing a TV segment, no links to data, posted 2025
A) NASA Climate website article, updated 2024, credited to NASA scientists (.gov)
D) Advertisement from an air conditioner company explaining why summers feel hotter, no citations
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). When researching climate change and heat waves, you need scientific evidence from credible sources with expertise, recent data, and no commercial bias - the NASA Climate website (.gov domain) is written by climate scientists, updated in 2024, and provides government-verified scientific data. For example, a NASA article would include peer-reviewed research, temperature data, and citations to scientific studies, making it ideal for academic research on climate topics. Option A is correct because NASA is a government scientific agency with climate experts, the .gov domain indicates official government information, and the 2024 update ensures current data. The incorrect options fail credibility tests: B is a personal blog with no credentials and outdated information plus bias ("hoax"), C is social media without original data or citations, and D is a commercial source with potential bias to sell products and no scientific citations. When gathering information, always check the source's authority (who wrote it), currency (when published/updated), accuracy (verifiable data), and purpose (why it was created) to determine credibility.
You are researching: How does sleep affect middle school students’ learning? You read this sentence in a book (print source) by Dr. Lila Chen:
Original sentence (page 42): “Students who regularly get 8–10 hours of sleep show better attention and memory during lessons.”
In your notes, you wrote: “Students who regularly get 8–10 hours of sleep show better attention and memory during lessons.”
You did NOT use quotation marks or cite the book. Does this count as plagiarism?
No, because it is a fact and facts never need citations.
No, because you only copied one sentence.
Yes, but only if the book is more than 10 years old.
Yes, because you copied the author’s exact words without quotation marks and without a citation.
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Plagiarism occurs when someone uses another person's words, ideas, or work without proper attribution - in this case, the student copied Dr. Chen's exact sentence word-for-word without quotation marks or citation, which is a clear example of plagiarism regardless of the content being factual. Even when information seems like common knowledge or fact, if you copy the specific wording from a source, you must either use quotation marks with a citation or paraphrase the information in your own words with a citation. The correct answer C accurately identifies this as plagiarism because copying exact words without quotation marks and citation is intellectual theft, whether the content is one sentence or many. The incorrect options reflect common misconceptions: A wrongly assumes facts don't need citations when copied verbatim, B incorrectly suggests the amount copied matters for plagiarism, and D introduces an irrelevant factor about the source's age. To avoid plagiarism, students must always use quotation marks when copying exact words and include proper citations, or better yet, paraphrase the information in their own words while still providing attribution to the original source.
You are researching: “How does social media use affect teen mental health?” You read this sentence in a psychology magazine (print, page 18):
Original sentence: “Teens who spend more than three hours per day on social media report higher rates of anxiety symptoms.”
A student writes in their report: Teens who spend more than three hours per day on social media report higher rates of anxiety symptoms.
The student does not use quotation marks and does not cite the magazine.
Does this count as plagiarism?
Yes, because it copies the exact wording without quotation marks or a citation
No, because it is a fact and facts never need citations
Yes, but only if the magazine is older than five years
No, because the student changed nothing, so it is clearly from the magazine
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Plagiarism occurs when you use someone else's exact words or ideas without giving proper credit through quotation marks (for exact words) and citations (for both quotes and paraphrases). The student copied the magazine's exact sentence word-for-word without using quotation marks or providing any citation, which is textbook plagiarism regardless of whether the information is factual. Option C is correct because copying exact wording without quotation marks and citation is plagiarism - you must either quote with proper punctuation and citation or paraphrase in your own words with citation. The incorrect options misunderstand plagiarism: facts still need citations when taken from sources (A), copying without attribution is plagiarism even if obvious (B), and the age of the source doesn't affect plagiarism rules (D). To avoid plagiarism, always use quotation marks around exact words from sources and include a citation, or rewrite the information completely in your own words and still include a citation. Even factual information needs attribution to show where you found it and to allow readers to verify your sources.
You are researching: What are the health effects of vaping on teenagers? You gathered sources from print and digital places:
-
Print book (library): “Teen Health Today” (2021), written by a pediatrician, published by an educational publisher
-
Digital: CDC webpage on e-cigarettes (cdc.gov), updated 2024
-
Digital: Peer-reviewed journal article (2020) about nicotine addiction in adolescents
-
Digital: Influencer video (no sources listed) claiming vaping is “just water vapor”
Which research plan shows the best credibility assessment and use of sources?
A) Use the influencer video as the main source because it is the most recent and easiest to understand; ignore the journal article because it is too technical
B) Use the CDC webpage and the peer-reviewed journal article as primary evidence, use the print book for background definitions, and mention the influencer video only as an example of misinformation
C) Use only the print book because online sources can be edited; do not use any digital sources
D) Use all four sources equally because using more sources automatically makes the report accurate
Use only the print book because online sources can be edited; do not use any digital sources
Use all four sources equally because using more sources automatically makes the report accurate
Use the CDC webpage and the peer-reviewed journal article as primary evidence, use the print book for background definitions, and mention the influencer video only as an example of misinformation
Use the influencer video as the main source because it is the most recent and easiest to understand; ignore the journal article because it is too technical
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Choice B demonstrates the best research plan by prioritizing the most credible sources (CDC webpage and peer-reviewed journal) for primary evidence due to their authority and scientific rigor, using the print book appropriately for background information, and acknowledging the influencer video only as an example of misinformation rather than ignoring it completely. This approach shows sophisticated source evaluation that considers authority (government health agency, peer review, medical author), currency (2024 CDC update), accuracy (peer review process), and bias (identifying the influencer's lack of sources). The correct answer reflects proper credibility assessment across multiple source types and appropriate use based on each source's strengths. The incorrect options show poor source evaluation: choice A prioritizes the least credible source, choice C dismisses all digital sources based on a misconception, and choice D fails to differentiate between source quality. When gathering information from multiple sources, students should assess each source's credibility individually, use the most authoritative sources for main evidence, acknowledge less credible sources appropriately, and recognize that more sources don't automatically mean better research if the sources lack credibility.
You are researching: How effective are residential solar panels at reducing a household’s electricity costs? Your first search, “energy,” gives millions of unrelated results. Which set of search terms is MOST likely to find relevant, focused sources?
"solar panel" AND residential AND (cost savings OR electricity bill) AND efficiency
power
solar panel residential effectiveness 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 comparison calculator government database
energy
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). Effective search terms are crucial for finding relevant, credible sources efficiently - the example shows how a broad term like "energy" yields millions of unrelated results, while specific, targeted search terms narrow the results to exactly what's needed for the research question about residential solar panels and electricity costs. The search string in option B uses Boolean operators (AND), quotation marks for exact phrases ("solar panel"), parentheses for grouped alternatives (cost savings OR electricity bill), and specific keywords (residential, efficiency) that directly relate to the research question. The correct answer B demonstrates mastery of search techniques by combining multiple relevant terms with search operators to find focused, relevant sources about solar panels' effectiveness in reducing household electricity costs. The incorrect options fail in different ways: A and C are single, overly broad terms that would return too many irrelevant results, while D strings together too many terms without proper operators, creating an ineffective search that might return no results or confusing ones. When gathering information, students should start with specific keywords from their research question, use Boolean operators to combine concepts, and refine searches based on initial results to find the most relevant and credible sources.
You are writing about water conservation and want to cite a PRINT book in simplified MLA.
Book details: Author: Maria Lopez. Title: Saving Water at Home. Publisher: Green Leaf Press. Year: 2021. You used information from page 57.
Which in-text citation is BEST (simplified MLA) after a paraphrase from page 57?
(Saving Water at Home page 57)
(Maria, 2021, p.57)
(Green Leaf Press)
(Lopez 57)
Explanation
This question tests gathering relevant information from multiple print and digital sources using effective search terms, assessing source credibility and accuracy (authority, publication type, currency, bias), quoting or paraphrasing data and conclusions properly (with citation), avoiding plagiarism (attributing all source material), and following standard citation format (MLA or APA simplified for 8th grade). In simplified MLA format for print books, the in-text citation includes the author's last name and page number in parentheses, with no punctuation between them and no abbreviation for "page." When citing a book by Maria Lopez using information from page 57, the correct format is (Lopez 57), which gives readers the minimum information needed to find the source in your Works Cited. Option A is correct because it follows proper MLA format with just the author's last name and page number, no comma or "p." needed. The incorrect options use wrong formats: option B mixes MLA with APA style by including the year and "p." (B), option C incorrectly uses the book title instead of author (C), and option D uses the publisher name which never appears in in-text citations (D). When citing print sources in MLA, remember the pattern is simply (Author's Last Name Page#) with a space but no comma between elements. This clean, simple format points readers to your Works Cited page where they'll find complete publication information.