All questions
Question 1
Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?
Biostatisticians warn that correlations in health data can be misleading when important variables are omitted. For example, a study might find that people who carry lighters have higher lung-cancer rates, even though the real driver is smoking. The point is not that data analysis is futile, but that causal claims require careful design and interpretation. Randomized trials can help, though they are not always ethical or feasible. Researchers therefore combine multiple approaches to approximate causal inference responsibly.
- It provides an example of confounding (correct answer)
- It introduces the passage’s main recommendation
- It acknowledges a limitation of randomized trials
- It concludes by summarizing the argument
Explanation: The underlined sentence provides an example of confounding by illustrating how lighter-carrying correlates with cancer due to the omitted smoking variable. It follows the warning about misleading correlations and gives a concrete case, which then emphasizes careful design, trials' role, and combined approaches. This logical flow demonstrates the issue before discussing solutions. Choice C might tempt as it limits trials, but it incorrectly assigns that role when the sentence exemplifies; choice B mislabels it as the main recommendation. In function questions, identify confounding examples by noting omitted variables that explain spurious links.
Question 2
Notes on renewable energy in Iceland:\n\n• About 85 percent of Iceland’s total energy supply comes from domestically produced renewables.\n• Geothermal sources provide heating for roughly 90 percent of homes.\n• Hydroelectric power dominates electricity generation.
Which choice best unifies the information into one sentence?
- Iceland is famous for geothermal hot water and hydropower electricity, giving it a high percentage of renewable energy overall.
- Iceland meets about 85 percent of its energy needs with home-grown renewables, using geothermal heat to warm nine out of ten houses and relying chiefly on hydropower for electricity. (correct answer)
- With geothermal heat and hydroelectricity, Iceland produces renewable energy that serves most of the country in various ways.
- Because geothermal and hydroelectric sources are abundant, Iceland has achieved a large share of renewable energy in its system.
Explanation: When you encounter a question asking you to "unify" information, you need to find the choice that combines all the given details accurately and completely without adding extra information or leaving out key facts.
Choice B is correct because it incorporates every piece of data from the passage: the 85% renewable energy figure, the 90% geothermal heating for homes (restated as "nine out of ten houses"), and hydropower's dominance in electricity generation. It presents these facts in a logical flow while maintaining the specific percentages and relationships mentioned in the original notes.
Choice A fails because it's too vague—it mentions Iceland is "famous" for these energy sources and has a "high percentage" of renewables, but it omits the crucial 85% and 90% statistics that make the information precise and meaningful.
Choice C is similarly imprecise, using weak language like "most of the country" and "various ways" instead of the specific data provided. It doesn't capture the quantitative nature of the original information.
Choice D focuses on explaining why Iceland has renewable energy (because sources are "abundant") rather than describing what the passage actually tells us about Iceland's current energy usage. It also lacks the specific percentages and uses vague terms like "large share."
Strategy tip: For synthesis questions, check that your chosen answer includes all the specific data points from the passage. Avoid choices that substitute vague language ("most," "many," "large") for precise statistics, and watch out for answers that explain causes rather than summarizing the given facts.
Question 3
Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?
Marine biologists observed that certain coral species can survive brief spikes in water temperature by expelling symbiotic algae and later reacquiring them, a process that sometimes prevents immediate death. repeated heat events within a single season can leave the corals with too little time to recover, increasing the likelihood of disease and long-term reef decline.
- Similarly
- As a result
- Nevertheless (correct answer)
- Conversely
Explanation: The logical relationship between the two sentences is one of concession, where the second sentence acknowledges a limitation despite the adaptive mechanism described in the first. The first sentence explains how corals can survive brief temperature spikes by expelling and reacquiring algae, but the second concedes that 'repeated heat events within a single season can leave the corals with too little time to recover,' leading to negative outcomes like disease. Choice C, 'Nevertheless,' appropriately conveys this concessive contrast by admitting a drawback to the survival process. Distractors such as A 'Similarly' and D 'Conversely' incorrectly suggest similarity or direct opposition, but the ideas involve a 'despite' dynamic; B 'As a result' implies straightforward causation, whereas the second sentence highlights an exception under repeated stress. Always analyze whether the second sentence concedes a point against an initial advantage, which often requires transitions like 'nevertheless' or 'even so.'
Question 4
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
The novelist invited Marisol and me to review the early chapters before she sent the manuscript to her editor. She asked that focus on whether the narrator’s voice stayed consistent from scene to scene.
- we (correct answer)
- us
- our
- ours
Explanation: This question tests pronoun case in subject position. After "asked that," we have a noun clause where the pronoun serves as the subject of the verb "focus," so we need the subjective case "we" (Choice A). Choice B "us" is objective case and can't be the subject of a verb. Choice C "our" is possessive and doesn't fit grammatically. Choice D "ours" is also possessive and creates an incomplete sentence. When a pronoun is the subject of a verb (even in a subordinate clause), always use the subjective case (I, we, he, she, they) regardless of what comes before the clause.
Question 5
A museum tracked visitor time spent in two exhibits. Exhibit X had interactive screens plus printed labels; Exhibit Y had only printed labels. Over a month, visitors spent a median of 14 minutes in X and 9 minutes in Y. Yet exit surveys show visitors rated their understanding of the topic similarly for both exhibits, and docents reported that visitors asked more questions in Y. The museum did not change the topics or the number of artifacts displayed. From this, it can most reasonably be inferred that the interactive screens .
Which choice most logically completes the text?
- encouraged visitors to stay longer without clearly increasing self-reported understanding (correct answer)
- reduced visitor curiosity, which is why fewer questions were asked in X
- caused visitors to misunderstand the topic, lowering their exit survey ratings
- were unnecessary because printed labels alone always maximize visitor engagement
Explanation: The passage sets up a comparison pattern where the presence of interactive screens in Exhibit X affects visitor behavior but not necessarily comprehension. Evidence shows visitors spent a median of 14 minutes in X versus 9 in Y, yet understanding ratings were similar, with more questions asked in Y and no changes in topics or artifacts. This builds to indicate screens increased engagement time without enhancing self-reported learning. The correct answer follows as it infers screens encouraged longer stays without clearly improving understanding, directly supported by the time and survey data. Choice B reverses the evidence by claiming reduced curiosity in X, but more questions in Y suggest otherwise; choice C assumes misunderstanding from lower ratings, but ratings were similar; and choice D overgeneralizes that labels alone maximize engagement, ignoring the time difference. When evaluating inferences, compare all metrics provided to avoid focusing on one aspect like time while ignoring outcomes like understanding.
Question 6
In a 2022 article on urban ecology, researcher Lina Chen argues that in large North American cities, planting diverse native flowering species along road medians reduces summer surface temperatures primarily by increasing evapotranspiration (not by shading), with the strongest effects during midday heat. Which finding, if true, would most directly support Chen’s hypothesis?
- Neighborhoods with more street trees report lower electricity bills, though tree canopy varies widely block to block.
- Median plantings of native flowers show higher midday leaf transpiration rates and larger temperature drops than equally shaded gravel medians. (correct answer)
- A survey finds drivers prefer flowering medians to concrete barriers, citing aesthetics and perceived calmness.
- In small rural towns, roadside wildflower strips increase insect abundance but show no measurable change in pavement temperature.
Explanation: The researcher claims that diverse native flowering species in road medians reduce summer temperatures specifically through evapotranspiration (water release from plants), not shading, with strongest effects at midday. To support this, we'd need evidence showing that flowering medians produce measurable evapotranspiration and temperature reduction during peak heat hours. Choice B directly supports this by showing native flower medians have higher transpiration rates and larger temperature drops than equally shaded gravel medians—this isolates the evapotranspiration effect from shading since both have equal shade. Choice A addresses street trees (not median flowers) and doesn't isolate evapotranspiration from shading effects. Choice C only addresses driver preferences, not temperature mechanisms. Choice D shows no temperature change in rural towns, which actually contradicts the hypothesis. When evaluating support for a specific mechanism claim, look for evidence that isolates that mechanism from other possible causes.
Question 7
Researchers tested four fertilizers on tomato plants and recorded average yield per plant (Figure 1). In a summary, they claim Fertilizer C produced the highest average yield, exceeding Fertilizer A by . Which choice most effectively uses data from the bar graph to complete the text?
- 0.7 kg per plant, from 3.1 kg (A) to 3.8 kg (C) (correct answer)
- 0.4 kg per plant, from 3.4 kg (B) to 3.8 kg (C)
- 0.7 kg per plant, from 3.8 kg (C) to 3.1 kg (A)
- 0.4 kg per plant, from 3.1 kg (A) to 3.5 kg (D)
Explanation: The researchers' claim requires data showing Fertilizer C's yield exceeds Fertilizer A's by a specific amount, emphasizing C as highest. From the bar graph, choice A cites 0.7 kg per plant from 3.1 kg (A) to 3.8 kg (C), correctly calculating the difference as 3.8 minus 3.1. Choice C uses the same 0.7 kg but reverses the order from 3.8 kg (C) to 3.1 kg (A), implying A exceeds C, which contradicts the claim. Choice B accurately notes a 0.4 kg difference but compares B to C instead of A to C, missing the required pairing. In bar graphs, always confirm labels and directions to avoid reversing comparisons or selecting incorrect bars.
Question 8
A study analyzed the composition of municipal solid waste in two cities, Northtown and Southville, in 2022. In Northtown, paper products constituted 28% of the waste, food waste 22%, plastics 15%, and other materials 35%. In Southville, the waste consisted of 31% food waste, 24% paper products, 14% plastics, and 31% other materials. The study's authors suggest that cities with higher proportions of food waste may benefit more from municipal composting programs.
Which statement accurately uses data from the text to support the authors' suggestion?
- Northtown's waste included 28% paper products, a higher percentage than its 22% food waste, indicating a lesser need for composting.
- Southville's waste contained a greater percentage of food waste (31%) than Northtown's did (22%), suggesting a composting program would address a larger portion of Southville's waste. (correct answer)
- The percentage of plastics was similar in both Northtown (15%) and Southville (14%), implying that recycling programs for plastics are equally important in both cities.
- In both cities combined, food waste and paper products made up more than half of the total waste, indicating a broad need for multiple types of waste-reduction programs.
Explanation: When you encounter data interpretation questions on the PSAT, you need to carefully match the evidence in the passage to the claim being made. Here, the authors suggest that cities with higher proportions of food waste benefit more from composting programs, so you're looking for evidence that directly supports this relationship.
Choice B correctly identifies that Southville has a higher percentage of food waste (31%) compared to Northtown (22%) and logically connects this to the authors' suggestion. Since composting programs specifically target food waste, a city with 31% food waste would indeed see a composting program address a larger portion of its total waste stream than a city with only 22% food waste. This directly supports the authors' claim.
Choice A misses the point by focusing on paper products versus food waste within Northtown, but doesn't compare food waste percentages between cities as the authors' suggestion requires. Choice C discusses plastic recycling, which is irrelevant to the authors' point about composting programs for food waste. Choice D talks about combined waste categories across both cities, but this doesn't address the authors' specific claim about cities with higher food waste proportions benefiting more from composting.
Remember that data-driven questions require you to find the specific evidence that matches the claim. Don't get distracted by accurate but irrelevant statistics—focus on finding the data point that directly supports the argument being made. Always check that your chosen answer uses the right comparison and addresses the right topic.
Question 9
A labor economist compared median hourly wages in 2015 and 2025 for four occupations. The economist claims that the occupation with the greatest absolute wage increase over the period was . Which choice most effectively uses data from the table to complete the text?
- Technician, rising from 18.50in2015to24.00 in 2025
- Retail associate, rising from 12.00in2015to15.50 in 2025
- Nurse, rising from 28.00in2015to34.50 in 2025 (correct answer)
- Teacher, rising from 22.00in2015to27.00 in 2025
Explanation: The economist claims the greatest absolute wage increase over the period was for a specific occupation, needing the largest dollar rise from 2015 to 2025. The table shows Nurse wages from 28to34.50, a 6.50increase,surpassing5.50, 3.50,and5.00 in others. Choice A has a $5.50 rise for Technician, close but not the greatest if overlooking Nurse. In tables with changes, calculate all differences to confirm the maximum, not just spot high final values.
Question 10
Which choice completes the sentence with the correct punctuation?
The theater troupe traveled to three cities last summer: Chicago, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin; and Minneapolis, Minnesota.
- Des Moines, Iowa; (correct answer)
- Des Moines, Iowa
- Des Moines; Iowa
- Des Moines Iowa;
Explanation: When you encounter a series with complex items that already contain commas, you need to use semicolons as the primary separator to avoid confusion. This is called a "complex series" or "series with internal punctuation."
In this sentence, you're dealing with a list of cities and their states. Since each item in the series contains a comma (Chicago, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin), you must use semicolons to separate the main items. The pattern is: "City, State; City, State; City, State."
Choice A is correct because "Des Moines, Iowa;" follows the established pattern perfectly. It includes the comma between city and state, followed by a semicolon to separate it from the next item in the series. Even though "Des Moines, Iowa" is the last location before "and Minneapolis, Minnesota," it still needs the semicolon to maintain parallel structure throughout the series.
Choice B fails because it uses only a comma, breaking the semicolon pattern established in the rest of the series. Choice C incorrectly places the semicolon between the city and state rather than between the city-state pairs. Choice D omits the essential comma between "Des Moines" and "Iowa" while keeping the semicolon in the wrong position.
Study tip: When you see a series where individual items contain commas, automatically switch to semicolons as your main separators. Keep the internal punctuation (commas within items) and use semicolons between items consistently throughout the entire series, even before the final "and."
Question 11
While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:
- In 1903, the Wright brothers achieved powered, controlled flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina.
- Their aircraft used wing-warping to control roll and a movable rudder for coordinated turns.
- The 1905 Wright Flyer III could make sustained, practical flights with improved control.
- The brothers refined their designs through repeated glider tests and wind-tunnel experiments.
- Kitty Hawk was chosen for its steady winds and soft sand for landings.
- Patent disputes later shaped early aviation business competition in the United States.
The student wants to describe how the Wright brothers developed improved flight control through testing and design changes. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?
- The Wright brothers chose Kitty Hawk for steady winds and soft sand, and their 1903 success there sparked later patent disputes that influenced early aviation business competition across the United States.
- After achieving powered flight in 1903 at Kitty Hawk, the Wright brothers improved control by using wing-warping and a movable rudder, refining these ideas through repeated glider tests and wind-tunnel experiments. (correct answer)
- The 1905 Wright Flyer III enabled sustained, practical flights, and Kitty Hawk’s steady winds and soft sand made it a suitable location for early trials and safer landings during development.
- The Wright brothers refined designs through wind-tunnel experiments, and the 1905 Wright Flyer III could make sustained flights, which led to patent disputes that shaped aviation business competition afterward.
Explanation: To describe how the Wright brothers developed improved flight control through testing and design changes, the answer must connect their testing methods to specific control improvements. The correct answer combines information from bullets 2 and 4, explaining how they achieved powered flight in 1903 using wing-warping and a movable rudder, then refined these control systems through repeated glider tests and wind-tunnel experiments. Choice D mentions the testing methods and the improved 1905 Flyer III but fails to explain the specific control mechanisms they developed, making it incomplete for the stated goal. When a goal asks for development or progression, ensure the answer shows both the process and the specific outcomes.
Question 12
Neuroscientist Dana Iversen argues that in adults, short bouts of moderate aerobic exercise improve performance on working-memory tasks mainly by increasing cerebral blood flow during the hour after exercise, rather than by long-term changes in brain structure. Which finding, if true, would most directly support Iversen’s argument?
- After eight months of training, exercisers show increased hippocampal volume compared with nonexercisers, regardless of test timing.
- Working-memory scores improve only when measured within an hour of exercise and correlate with post-exercise blood-flow increases. (correct answer)
- Participants who enjoy exercise report better mood after workouts, and mood ratings correlate with self-reported concentration.
- Elite endurance athletes outperform sedentary adults on working-memory tasks even when tested on rest days.
Explanation: Neuroscientist Dana Iversen argues that short aerobic exercise bouts improve adult working-memory performance mainly via increased cerebral blood flow in the immediate post-exercise hour, not through long-term brain structure changes. To support this, we'd need evidence tying memory gains to short-term blood flow without structural alterations. Choice B directly reinforces this by showing improvements only within an hour of exercise, correlating with blood-flow increases, emphasizing the temporary mechanism over enduring changes. Choice A describes hippocampal volume growth after months of training, which points to long-term structural effects rather than acute benefits. Choice C links mood to concentration anecdotally, not to memory or blood flow, while Choice D compares athletes to sedentary adults without isolating short-term exercise effects. For claims about temporal mechanisms, prioritize findings that align benefits with the proposed timeframe, like immediate post-exercise here, while excluding longer-term alternatives.
Question 13
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
The committee on campus safety, after months of meetings and feedback from students, proposed several changes to nighttime lighting. The committee planning to present the final recommendations to the administration next week.
- are
- is (correct answer)
- were
- be
Explanation: This question tests subject-verb agreement with collective nouns and the use of present progressive tense. 'Committee' is a singular collective noun, so 'is' correctly agrees with it, and 'is planning' uses present progressive to indicate a future intention from a present perspective. Choice A 'are' treats the committee as plural, which is inconsistent here; C 'were' shifts to past; and D 'be' is subjunctive or infinitive, not fitting the indicative mood. Collective nouns like 'committee' or 'team' typically take singular verbs in American English unless emphasizing internal division.
Question 14
In a 2023 article on urban ecology, biologist Laila Chen argues that in dense city neighborhoods, planting native flowering species in small roadside strips increases local pollinator diversity primarily by extending the season of available nectar, not by increasing total green area. Which finding, if true, would most directly support Chen’s hypothesis?
- Neighborhoods with larger parks show higher pollinator diversity than neighborhoods with only roadside plantings, regardless of plant species.
- Roadside strips planted with natives bloom across more months and host more pollinator species than equal-area turfgrass strips. (correct answer)
- In rural meadows, native flowering plants support greater pollinator abundance than nonnative flowering plants during midsummer.
- Residents report noticing more butterflies after roadside planting projects, though no insect surveys were conducted to verify changes.
Explanation: Biologist Laila Chen claims that in dense urban neighborhoods, planting native flowering species in small roadside strips boosts local pollinator diversity mainly by prolonging the season of available nectar, rather than by expanding the total green area. To support this hypothesis, we'd need evidence demonstrating that native plantings extend blooming periods and attract more pollinator species compared to alternatives with the same area but shorter blooming seasons. Choice B directly supports this by showing that roadside strips with natives bloom over more months and host more pollinator species than equal-area turfgrass strips, which likely provide limited seasonal nectar, thus isolating the extended season as the key factor while controlling for green area. In contrast, Choice A focuses on park size differences, which addresses green area rather than plant type or seasonality, making it irrelevant to Chen's specific mechanism. Choice C examines rural settings and a single season, failing to match the urban context or test seasonal extension, while Choice D offers anecdotal observations without verified data on pollinator changes. In evidence-based questions like this, prioritize findings that isolate the proposed causal mechanism, such as extended nectar availability, while ruling out alternatives like area increases.
Question 15
The robotics club’s presentation focused on one key challenge: keeping the robot stable on uneven ground. The team tested several solutions larger wheels, a lower center of gravity, and software that adjusts balance in real time. By the final trial run, the robot could climb a ramp without tipping.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
- solutions, larger
- solutions; larger
- solutions: larger (correct answer)
- solutions. larger
Explanation: This question tests the use of a colon to introduce a list of examples. The sentence structure clearly sets up an expectation: 'The team tested several solutions' promises that specific solutions will be named, and the text after the blank delivers exactly that—a list of three specific solutions. A colon is the standard punctuation mark for introducing such an explanatory list. Choice A (comma) is too weak for this purpose, choice B (semicolon) is used between independent clauses not for lists, and choice D (period) would create a fragment since 'larger wheels...' cannot stand alone as a sentence.
Question 16
According to entomologist Dr. Yue Chen, the decline of firefly populations is often blamed on pesticide use, yet light pollution poses a greater threat to the insects’ survival. Fireflies rely on bioluminescent signals to find mates; excessive artificial lighting obscures these signals, leading to failed reproduction. Chen argues that mitigating night-time illumination in rural areas would bolster firefly numbers far more effectively than stricter pesticide regulations alone.
What main point does Dr. Chen make?
- Reducing light pollution is the most critical step toward reversing firefly declines. (correct answer)
- Current pesticide regulations do little to protect nocturnal insects such as fireflies.
- Bioluminescent communication in insects is often misunderstood by non-specialists.
- Rural communities resist dimming lights because they fear increased crime rates.
Explanation: When you encounter a reading comprehension question asking about an author's "main point," focus on identifying the central argument or claim being made, not just supporting details or background information.
Dr. Chen's main argument follows a clear structure: she acknowledges that pesticides are commonly blamed for firefly decline, but then pivots to argue that light pollution is actually the greater threat. The passage emphasizes her solution—that "mitigating night-time illumination in rural areas would bolster firefly numbers far more effectively than stricter pesticide regulations alone." This directly supports answer choice A, which correctly identifies reducing light pollution as the most critical step Chen advocates for reversing firefly declines.
Looking at the wrong answers: B misrepresents Chen's position—she doesn't argue that current pesticide regulations are ineffective, just that light pollution is a bigger problem. C focuses on a minor detail about bioluminescent communication rather than Chen's main argument about solutions. D introduces information about rural communities' resistance that simply isn't mentioned anywhere in the passage.
Notice how B and D represent common traps: B takes a supporting point and inflates it to seem like the main argument, while D introduces plausible-sounding information that relates to the topic but wasn't actually stated.
For main idea questions, always ask yourself: "What is the author's primary claim or recommendation?" Distinguish between the central argument and the evidence or context used to support it. The main point is typically the solution, conclusion, or position the author wants you to remember.
Question 17
Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?
Archaeologists once treated broken pottery as mere debris, useful mainly for dating layers of soil. More recently, researchers have argued that patterns of repair—such as drilled holes for mending—reveal how households valued and prolonged the use of everyday objects. In one coastal settlement, a high proportion of repaired cooking vessels suggests that clay was scarce or that trade disruptions made replacement difficult. Even so, repair marks can be ambiguous, since some holes may have been used to hang pots rather than to fix cracks. Careful comparison with wear patterns and residue analysis helps distinguish these possibilities.
- It introduces a revised interpretive approach (correct answer)
- It supplies chemical evidence for a claim
- It dismisses an alternative explanation
- It offers a concluding generalization
Explanation: The underlined sentence introduces a revised interpretive approach by shifting from the traditional view of pottery as debris to a modern perspective that sees repair patterns as insights into household values and practices. It contrasts with the opening sentence's description of past practices and leads into specific evidence from a settlement, followed by qualifications about ambiguity. This revision structures the text's progression toward a more nuanced methodology. Choice C might attract those who see it as dismissing an alternative, but it presents a new approach rather than outright rejecting the old one. Choice B misreads it as supplying chemical evidence, which isn't present here. In these questions, look for shifts in perspective signaled by phrases like 'more recently' to identify introductions of revised ideas.
Question 18
Nutritionist Caleb Jordan argues that labeling foods as simply "good" or "bad" promotes unhealthy relationships with eating. He advocates for a more nuanced approach that focuses on overall dietary patterns and moderation, claiming that rigid categorizations often lead to guilt-driven binge cycles rather than lasting nutritional improvements.
Jordan’s primary assertion is that
- binary food labels can harm eating habits, so guidance should emphasize balanced patterns instead. (correct answer)
- nutrition education programs should allocate more class time to discussing micronutrients.
- marketing campaigns frequently exploit consumers’ guilt to sell fad diets.
- reducing sugar intake is the most important step individuals can take toward better health.
Explanation: When you encounter a question asking about someone's "primary assertion" or main argument, focus on identifying the central claim that everything else in the passage supports. Look for the author's core thesis, not supporting details or tangential points.
Jordan's argument has two key components: he criticizes binary "good"/"bad" food labels because they harm eating habits, and he proposes an alternative approach emphasizing overall dietary patterns and moderation. The passage explains that rigid categorizations lead to "guilt-driven binge cycles" rather than lasting improvements. This makes choice A correct—it captures both Jordan's criticism of binary labels and his solution of focusing on balanced patterns instead.
Choice B is wrong because Jordan never mentions nutrition education programs or micronutrients. Choice C incorrectly focuses on marketing campaigns exploiting guilt, but Jordan's argument is about how labeling systems themselves (not marketing tactics) create problems. Choice D is completely off-target since Jordan never identifies sugar reduction as a priority—his focus is on the labeling approach, not specific dietary recommendations.
The key trap here is confusing supporting evidence with the main argument. While Jordan mentions guilt and binge cycles, these are consequences he uses to support his primary assertion about labeling problems, not the assertion itself.
For reading comprehension questions about main ideas or primary assertions, always ask yourself: "What is the author's biggest point?" Then check that your answer captures both the problem identified and the solution proposed, rather than just focusing on one piece of the argument.
Question 19
The museum’s new exhibit explains how early photographers worked with fragile glass plates, and it includes a short video demonstration. Visitors often linger in the final room because the curator offers a clear takeaway the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands.
- takeaway, the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands.
- takeaway: the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands. (correct answer)
- takeaway; the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands.
- takeaway. the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands.
Explanation: This question tests the use of a colon to introduce an explanation or appositive that defines or clarifies the preceding term in an independent clause. The phrase before the blank is an independent clause ('the curator offers a clear takeaway'), and the following clause 'the earliest images required patience, careful chemistry, and steady hands' directly explains what the takeaway is, making a colon the appropriate punctuation for this elaboration. Choice A uses a comma, resulting in a comma splice since both parts are independent clauses that could stand alone. Choice C employs a semicolon, which joins related independent clauses but doesn't emphasize the explanatory role as effectively as a colon here, and Choice D uses a period but fails to capitalize the following word, creating a fragment-like error. To distinguish between semicolon and colon, consider whether the second part explains or exemplifies the first; if it does, a colon is often the better choice.
Question 20
Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?
Marine ecologists have long suspected that kelp forests serve as nurseries for many fish species. Surveys show that juvenile rockfish are far more abundant within dense kelp stands than in nearby barren seafloor areas. This distribution supports the idea that kelp provides both food and shelter from predators. However, abundance alone does not prove higher survival, since juveniles might simply be easier to detect in kelp. To address this, researchers pair surveys with tagging studies that track survival over time.
- It provides supporting evidence (correct answer)
- It introduces a counterargument
- It draws a final conclusion
- It shifts to a new topic
Explanation: The underlined sentence provides supporting evidence for kelp forests as fish nurseries by referencing survey data on juvenile rockfish abundance. It follows the suspicion of kelp's role and precedes qualifications about survival, offering empirical support to the nursery idea. This evidence bolsters the claim while setting up methodological refinements like tagging. Choice B might tempt if seen as opposition, but it affirms the initial suspicion; choice D incorrectly shifts it to a new topic when it continues the discussion. In function questions, always read surrounding text to confirm if evidence precedes or follows qualifications.
Question 21
Read the following text, then answer the question:
In the 1840s, the photographer Anna Atkins used a process called cyanotype to make images of seaweed specimens. She placed the plants directly on light-sensitive paper and exposed them to sunlight, producing white silhouettes on a deep blue background. Although later photographers favored cameras and lenses, Atkins’s method suited her scientific purpose because it recorded fine edges without requiring drawing skill. Her book of these prints is sometimes described as an early photo-illustrated work, but its intent was meticulous documentation.
According to the text, how did Atkins create her cyanotype images?
- She traced seaweed by hand onto blue-tinted paper.
- She placed specimens on treated paper and exposed it to sunlight. (correct answer)
- She photographed specimens with a camera and developed the film.
- She painted silhouettes using dye extracted from seaweed.
Explanation: The passage clearly describes Atkins's cyanotype process in the second sentence: 'She placed the plants directly on light-sensitive paper and exposed them to sunlight, producing white silhouettes on a deep blue background.' This direct placement method is explicitly contrasted with later photographers who 'favored cameras and lenses,' ruling out choice C. The text makes no mention of hand-tracing, painting, or using seaweed-extracted dyes, eliminating the other options. When answering detail questions, stick closely to what the passage explicitly states rather than making assumptions about historical photographic techniques.
Question 22
A financial report shows annual revenue (in millions of dollars) for a startup from 2021 to 2024. The report states that revenue increased each year, and that the total increase from 2021 to 2024 was million dollars. Which choice most effectively uses data from the line graph to complete the text?
- 9 million, from 12 million in 2021 to 21 million in 2024 (correct answer)
- 8 million, from 13 million in 2021 to 21 million in 2024
- 9 million, from 12 million in 2021 to 20 million in 2024
- 7 million, from 14 million in 2021 to 21 million in 2024
Explanation: The report states that revenue increased each year with a total increase from 2021 to 2024 of a specific amount, so we need the line graph's values for those years where the difference matches the stated increase without calculation errors. Choice A effectively completes the text with 9 million, citing from 12 million in 2021 to 21 million in 2024, as 21 - 12 = 9 accurately reflects the data and the total change. Choice C states 9 million but uses from 12 to 20, which is actually only 8 million, likely a misreading of the 2024 point or an arithmetic error. Choice B and D provide consistent math for their cited values (8 million for 13 to 21, 7 million for 14 to 21), but they don't match the graph's actual revenues if it shows 12 to 21. In line graph questions about total change over time, subtract the end value from the start and ensure the choice's numbers and result align precisely with the visualized trend.
Question 23
Historian Petra Novak contends that the fall of the Han dynasty should be attributed more to fiscal mismanagement than to barbarian invasions. She points to records of escalating court expenditures and heavy taxation that provoked widespread peasant revolts, arguing these internal crises fatally weakened the state before external forces delivered the final blow.
Novak’s main claim is that
- internal economic failures, not external invasions, played the decisive role in the Han dynasty’s collapse. (correct answer)
- peasant revolts during the Han era were larger in scale than previously documented.
- court officials deliberately overstated the barbarian threat to mask their fiscal errors.
- taxation patterns in the Han dynasty resembled those of contemporary Mediterranean empires.
Explanation: When you encounter reading comprehension questions asking for a "main claim," focus on identifying the author's primary argument rather than supporting details or tangential points mentioned in the passage.
Novak's central thesis is clearly stated: "the fall of the Han dynasty should be attributed more to fiscal mismanagement than to barbarian invasions." She's making a comparative argument about causation, emphasizing that internal economic problems were the primary factor in the dynasty's collapse, while external invasions were secondary. Her evidence—escalating court spending, heavy taxation, and resulting peasant revolts—all supports this core claim that internal economic failures were decisive. This matches choice A perfectly.
Looking at the wrong answers: Choice B focuses on the scale of peasant revolts being "larger than previously documented," but Novak doesn't make any claims about documentation or historical records of revolt size. Choice C suggests court officials deliberately misrepresented the barbarian threat, but the passage never mentions officials' motivations or any intentional deception. Choice D brings up Mediterranean empires, which aren't mentioned anywhere in the passage and aren't relevant to Novak's argument about causation.
For main claim questions on the PSAT, always distinguish between the author's primary argument and the supporting evidence they use. The correct answer will capture the overarching thesis, not just specific examples or details. Look for language that signals the author's main position—here, words like "should be attributed more to" clearly indicate Novak's central comparative claim about what primarily caused the Han dynasty's fall.
Question 24
Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the overall structure of the text?
Some art historians argue that Impressionism was revolutionary mainly because of its visible brushwork. Yet the movement’s innovations also depended on new commercial galleries that allowed artists to bypass official salons. This institutional shift changed how paintings reached audiences and how reputations were built. At the same time, critics in traditional academies continued to shape public taste by controlling prizes and commissions. Understanding Impressionism thus requires attention to both technique and the art market that sustained it.
- It provides supporting evidence
- It qualifies a narrow explanation (correct answer)
- It introduces a new topic
- It draws a final conclusion
Explanation: The underlined sentence qualifies a narrow explanation of Impressionism's revolution by adding the role of commercial galleries. It follows the argument about brushwork and precedes discussions of institutional shifts, broadening the view to include market innovations. This qualification enriches the understanding of the movement's context beyond technique alone. Choice A might confuse it with evidence, but it nuances the initial focus; choice C incorrectly sees it as a new topic when it expands the existing one. In function questions, look for transitional words like 'yet' that indicate qualification of a preceding idea.
Question 25
Mina drafted an email to her classmates about the group project, and she wanted the message to sound firm but polite. She had already assigned tasks to two people, and she still needed someone to design the slides she asked Jordan to take that role.
- slides, she asked Jordan to take that role.
- slides; she asked Jordan to take that role. (correct answer)
- slides. she asked Jordan to take that role.
- slides and she asked Jordan to take that role.
Explanation: This question tests the use of a semicolon to join two closely related independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction. Both parts around the blank are independent clauses—'she still needed someone to design the slides' can stand alone, as can 'she asked Jordan to take that role'—and they share a logical connection in the sequence of actions, so a semicolon properly links them. Choice A creates a comma splice by using only a comma between the two independent clauses, which is grammatically incorrect. Choice C uses a period but does not capitalize the following word, resulting in a run-on feel, while Choice D omits necessary punctuation and attempts an awkward coordination with 'and' that disrupts the sentence structure. When evaluating options for joining sentences, test if each side can stand alone as a complete thought; if yes, a semicolon or period (with proper capitalization) is needed instead of just a comma.