All questions
Question 1
Read the following passage embedded in the prompt, then answer the question.
The city keeps calling the new downtown lanes "bike infrastructure," but what we have is paint that disappears exactly where drivers speed up. Two weeks ago, a cyclist was hit at the intersection by the river—an intersection the transportation department already flagged as "high conflict" in its own memo. In response, officials posted a social media reminder telling riders to "be visible," as if reflective gear can substitute for protected design. When a plan treats injury as an individual failure rather than a predictable outcome of traffic patterns, it guarantees more memorial rides and fewer commuters willing to pedal. If the city wants people out of cars, it has to build lanes that don't evaporate at the most dangerous points and then blame the public for not trusting them.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- the author's purpose of encouraging more people to ride bicycles for exercise
- the general topic of traffic congestion in growing cities
- a recent crash and the city's inadequate, paint-only bike lanes that fail at dangerous intersections (correct answer)
- the consequence that downtown businesses will lose customers if people stop biking
Explanation: This question requires identifying and describing the exigence that motivates the author's response. The passage reveals that a recent cyclist crash occurred at an intersection already identified as dangerous, where the city's paint-only bike lanes disappear precisely where protection is most needed. This specific incident and the inadequate infrastructure (choice C) constitute the urgent problem demanding response, not the author's general purposes (choice A) or broad topics about traffic (choice B). Choice D mistakes a potential consequence for the actual exigence. To identify exigence accurately, focus on the specific event or condition that creates urgency for response, particularly when it involves public safety and preventable harm.
Question 2
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The university's decision to replace most in-person advising with an AI chatbot was announced as a "student-centered upgrade," but students learned about it only after the advising office doors were literally locked for renovation. The chatbot can list degree requirements, yet it cannot interpret a transcript with transfer credits, explain how to appeal a failed prerequisite, or notice when a first-generation student is quietly panicking about losing financial aid. Since the change, wait times for the few remaining human appointments have stretched to three weeks—an eternity during add/drop. Administrators point to cost savings, but those savings are being purchased with missed deadlines and preventable withdrawals. Technology can assist advising, but it cannot replace it; the university should restore walk-in hours and use AI only as a supplement, not a gatekeeper.
The passage is motivated primarily by concern about…
- The general trend of universities adopting new technologies to modernize student services
- The author's intent to argue that human relationships matter more than machines
- The university's recent shift to an AI advising system that reduces access to timely, individualized human support (correct answer)
- The risk that students will withdraw or miss deadlines later in the semester because of advising delays
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The passage is motivated by the university's recent shift to an AI advising system, which locked advising office doors and reduced human support, leading to long wait times and inadequate help for complex student needs. This change, announced as an upgrade but implemented without notice, prioritizes cost savings over personalized guidance, risking missed deadlines and student withdrawals. The author argues for restoring human advising and using AI only as a supplement to ensure equitable access. Choice A, a common distractor, confuses the exigence with a general trend in technology adoption, but it ignores the specific, disruptive implementation at this university as the prompting concern. For analyzing exigence, focus on the text's details about a particular, recent change or problem rather than overarching trends or hypothetical risks.
Question 3
Read the following passage and answer the question.
Our state's new "anti-distraction" law was supposed to keep drivers off their phones, but the enforcement pattern tells another story. In the first month, 71% of citations were written in three predominantly Black neighborhoods, even though crash data show no corresponding concentration of phone-related accidents there. Officers can stop a driver for "suspected device use," a standard so vague that it invites pretext. Meanwhile, the law does little to address the most common causes of serious collisions on our highways: speeding and impaired driving. Safety policy should be measured by lives saved, not by tickets issued. If lawmakers want a law that protects everyone, they should narrow the stop criteria, require data transparency by precinct, and pair any phone restrictions with proven interventions like speed-calming design and sobriety checkpoints.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- The author's purpose of arguing that all laws should be fair and evidence-based
- The enactment and early enforcement of a new anti-distraction law that appears to enable disproportionate, potentially pretextual policing without clear safety benefits (correct answer)
- The background condition that distracted driving is a problem nationwide
- The consequence that communities may lose trust in police if ticketing continues at current rates
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The passage is prompted by the enactment and early enforcement of a new anti-distraction law, which enables vague, disproportionate policing in certain neighborhoods without addressing key safety issues like speeding. Enforcement data shows citations concentrated in Black areas despite no matching crash patterns, suggesting pretextual stops and ineffective policy. The author advocates for narrower criteria, transparency, and evidence-based interventions to ensure fair protection. Choice C, a common distractor, conflates the exigence with the nationwide problem of distracted driving, but it overlooks the specific law's implementation and biases as the core motivation. An effective strategy for exigence is to focus on the text's evidence of a new, localized situation or policy flaw, separating it from broader conditions or secondary consequences.
Question 4
Read the following passage, then answer the question.
The state's new water bill offers rebates for replacing lawns with drought-tolerant landscaping, a sensible idea—until you notice who is excluded. Renters cannot apply without a landlord's signature, and homeowners must pay the full cost upfront before reimbursement arrives "within 12 to 16 weeks." In neighborhoods like mine, where many residents rent and few have spare cash, the program functions less like conservation policy and more like a reward for people already able to invest. Meanwhile, the state continues to approve new developments with decorative fountains and watered medians, as if individual households are the only place waste occurs. If officials want meaningful savings, they must design programs that low-income residents can actually use and apply the same scrutiny to large-scale consumption.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- Ongoing drought conditions and the general need for water conservation in the state
- The author's purpose of encouraging readers to replace lawns and adopt drought-tolerant plants
- A rebate program structured in ways that effectively exclude renters and cash-strapped households while focusing blame on individuals (correct answer)
- The potential consequence that conservation efforts will appear unfair and therefore fail to gain public support
Explanation: The skill being tested here is identifying and describing exigence, which refers to the urgent situation or problem that motivates an author to write and shapes the rhetorical response. In this passage, the author is responding to a rebate program for drought-tolerant landscaping that is structured to exclude renters and cash-strapped households by requiring landlord approval and upfront payments. This setup rewards those who can afford initial costs while ignoring large-scale water waste from new developments, functioning more as a perk for the affluent than effective conservation. The program is critiqued for unfairly blaming individuals and failing to scrutinize bigger consumers. A common distractor, such as choice A, mistakes the exigence for ongoing drought conditions, but it overlooks the specific program's flaws as the catalyst for the argument. To identify exigence in other texts, look for the specific event or policy that the author directly critiques, distinguishing it from broader trends or potential outcomes.
Question 5
Read the following passage embedded in the prompt, then answer the question.
When our state announced a "teacher quality initiative," the slogan sounded harmless enough—until the details arrived. Under the new plan, teacher evaluations will hinge on a single standardized test score model that even the department admits has a wide margin of error. A teacher who takes on more English learners or students with interrupted schooling could be labeled "ineffective" simply because the algorithm expects a different trajectory. Supporters say the policy will "reward excellence," but it offers no additional mentoring, smaller class sizes, or time for planning—only consequences. If lawmakers truly want better instruction, they should invest in the conditions that make it possible, not outsource judgment to a formula and call it accountability.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- the author's intention to explain how standardized tests are created
- the broader, long-term challenge of improving public education in the state
- a newly announced policy tying teacher evaluations to a single test-based algorithm with high stakes (correct answer)
- the consequence that some teachers may leave the profession because they feel discouraged
Explanation: This question asks you to identify and describe the exigence motivating the passage. The author responds to a newly announced state policy that ties teacher evaluations to a single standardized test score model with acknowledged errors, potentially penalizing teachers who work with challenging student populations. This specific policy announcement (choice C) is the urgent situation demanding response, not the author's intent to explain testing (choice A) or broader educational challenges (choice B). Choice D mistakes a potential consequence for the motivating exigence itself. To identify exigence accurately, focus on the immediate policy or event that creates urgency for response, particularly when it involves high stakes and questionable methodology.
Question 6
Read the passage and answer the question.
The city's "Vision Zero" campaign claims to prioritize pedestrian safety, yet the latest budget allocates more money to new parking meters than to crosswalk improvements near schools. On Maple Avenue, where two students were hit this year, the only change has been a banner reminding drivers to "share the road." Banners do not slow cars; street design does. If the mayor wants fewer injuries, the city must install raised crosswalks, daylight intersections by removing curbside parking near corners, and enforce speed limits with redesign rather than sporadic ticketing. Public safety cannot depend on perfect driver behavior, because people are not perfect. The real test of a safety campaign is whether it changes asphalt, not whether it changes slogans.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- The city's mismatch between pedestrian-safety rhetoric and spending priorities despite recent collisions near schools (correct answer)
- The author's desire to explain what Vision Zero means to readers
- The background condition that cities often need to balance many budget categories
- The consequence that drivers may feel blamed and become defensive about road safety
Explanation: This question requires identifying and describing the exigence motivating the passage. The author is responding to the city's mismatch between its "Vision Zero" safety rhetoric and its actual spending priorities, particularly after recent student collisions (choice A). The specific problem combines inadequate safety measures on Maple Avenue where students were hit with a budget that prioritizes parking meters over crosswalk improvements. Choice B misidentifies the author's explanatory purpose as the exigence, choice C describes general background rather than the urgent situation, and choice D focuses on a potential consequence rather than the triggering problem. The exigence is the concrete disconnect between safety claims and actual policies following real injuries. To identify exigence accurately, look for the specific situation combining immediate harm with inadequate response.
Question 7
Read the following passage and answer the question.
Our town's water utility mailed a cheerful flyer announcing a "small adjustment" to monthly bills, but it omitted the detail that rates will rise 17% starting next cycle. The increase might be defensible if it funded pipe replacement in the neighborhoods that flood with rusty water every spring. Instead, the utility's own capital plan shows major upgrades postponed again while funds are redirected to a waterfront "beautification" project meant to attract tourists. Meanwhile, residents are told to conserve, even as the utility reports millions of gallons lost to leaks it has not prioritized fixing. Public trust erodes when essential infrastructure is treated like a branding opportunity. Before any rate hike takes effect, the utility should hold an open forum, publish a plain-language breakdown of spending, and commit to leak reduction and pipe replacement as the first call on new revenue.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- The author's purpose of encouraging civic participation in local government decisions
- A proposed water-rate increase communicated opaquely and paired with spending priorities that appear to neglect urgent infrastructure repairs (correct answer)
- The general fact that water systems require maintenance and that conservation is important
- The consequence that residents will lose trust in the utility if the town continues promoting tourism projects
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The passage responds to a proposed water-rate increase that was communicated opaquely in a flyer, paired with spending that neglects urgent pipe repairs in favor of tourism projects. This situation highlights a lack of transparency, misplaced priorities, and ongoing leaks that waste water while residents are asked to conserve. The author demands an open forum and commitment to infrastructure before any hike, emphasizing eroded public trust. Choice C, a frequent distractor, confuses the exigence with general facts about water maintenance, but it misses the specific proposal and its flawed communication as the urgent trigger. A useful strategy is to isolate the exigence by identifying the text's central, timely conflict or decision, distinguishing it from universal truths or potential outcomes.
Question 8
Read the following passage embedded in the prompt, then answer the question.
Our city's new "quiet streets" ordinance was supposed to target late-night drag racing. Instead, it has become a blanket permission slip for tickets that treat ordinary life as noise. Last week my neighbor was fined because her toddler's birthday party "exceeded permissible sound" at 6:40 p.m.—a time when most people are still cooking dinner. Meanwhile, the blocks where engines scream at midnight remain untouched because enforcement is complaint-driven, and the people most affected are the ones least likely to call. The council keeps repeating that the rule is "content-neutral," but neutrality is not the same as fairness when the burden falls predictably on families and renters. If the city wants peace, it should focus on the specific behavior that prompted the ordinance—dangerous street racing—and stop using a broad decibel threshold as a shortcut for real policing.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- a city ordinance intended to curb drag racing that is being enforced broadly and unfairly against everyday residents (correct answer)
- the author's belief that street racing is dangerous and should be punished more harshly
- the general fact that cities have always struggled to balance freedom and order
- the likelihood that neighbors will stop hosting parties because they fear fines
Explanation: This question requires identifying and describing the exigence that motivates the author's response. The passage reveals that a city ordinance originally intended to stop dangerous drag racing is now being enforced broadly against ordinary residents, with the author's neighbor receiving a fine for a toddler's birthday party at 6:40 PM. This misapplication of the law (choice A) is the specific problem demanding immediate attention, not the author's personal beliefs about street racing (choice B) or abstract concepts about city governance (choice C). Choice D mistakes a potential consequence for the actual exigence. To identify exigence effectively, focus on the concrete situation or policy change that creates an urgent need for response, particularly when there's a gap between stated intent and actual implementation.
Question 9
Read the following passage embedded in the prompt, then answer the question.
The hospital's new "streamlined check-in" is really a kiosk that asks patients to scroll through pages of legal language while a line forms behind them. Last week, my grandfather—who can barely see the screen—was told to "just sign" a consent form that included permission to share data with "partners" for "service improvement." When he asked what that meant, the volunteer pointed to the next patient. The hospital argues that digital forms reduce errors, but speed is not the same as understanding, especially when the information being collected can follow a person for years. If this system is here to stay, the hospital should provide staff trained to explain the forms, offer large-print options by default, and stop bundling essential treatment consent with optional data-sharing agreements.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- the author's desire to describe how hospitals have changed over time
- a newly implemented kiosk-based check-in process that pressures patients into signing unclear data-sharing consent (correct answer)
- the background condition that many older adults struggle with technology
- the result that patients will distrust hospitals and avoid seeking care
Explanation: This question asks you to identify and describe the exigence prompting the author's argument. The passage describes a newly implemented hospital check-in system using kiosks that pressure patients, especially elderly ones, to quickly sign complex consent forms including unclear data-sharing agreements without adequate explanation. This specific new process (choice B) is the urgent situation demanding response, not the author's desire to describe changes (choice A) or general background conditions (choice C). Choice D confuses a potential outcome with the motivating exigence. When analyzing exigence, look for the specific new policy or system that creates immediate problems, especially when it involves consent and vulnerable populations.
Question 10
Read the following passage and answer the question.
Last week, our state's Department of Motor Vehicles began requiring online-only appointments for license renewals, claiming it would "reduce lines." But the lines did not disappear; they moved to the digital world, where the next available slot is often 40 days away. For residents without reliable internet—especially seniors and rural families—"online-only" is not convenience but exclusion. The department suggests using the public library, yet many branches are open limited hours and do not allow patrons to refresh appointment pages for an hour straight. A basic public service should not depend on bandwidth and luck. The DMV can keep online scheduling while restoring a daily block of in-person, first-come appointments and a phone option that a human being actually answers.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- A desire to explain how appointment systems work and why some people prefer them
- The long‑term challenge of modernizing government services in a digital age
- Recent DMV policy changes to online-only appointments that have created access barriers and long delays for renewals (correct answer)
- The likelihood that people will drive with expired licenses and face penalties if they cannot get appointments
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The author addresses recent DMV policy changes requiring online-only appointments for license renewals, resulting in long delays, digital access barriers, and exclusion for those without reliable internet. This shift, intended to reduce lines, instead creates new obstacles, particularly for seniors and rural residents, turning a basic service into a test of bandwidth and availability. The passage calls for restoring in-person options and human phone support to make the system inclusive. A distractor such as choice B misidentifies the exigence as a long-term modernization challenge, but it fails to capture the specific, immediate policy implementation causing current hardships. To describe exigence accurately, trace the author's response to the most proximate and detailed problem in the passage, avoiding broad generalizations or future consequences.
Question 11
Read the following passage and answer the question.
Our city's new ordinance banning "unpermitted food distribution" in public parks is being sold as a cleanliness measure, but the timing tells a different story. The ban arrived two weeks after volunteers began serving hot meals near the library, where the line of people—many newly displaced by rent hikes—became impossible to ignore. Now, volunteers face $500 fines for handing out sandwiches unless they secure a permit that requires an indoor kitchen and liability insurance most grassroots groups cannot afford. If officials truly cared about sanitation, they would provide trash pickup and portable sinks rather than criminalize kindness. The ordinance does not reduce hunger; it relocates it to alleys and underpasses where fewer eyes can see and fewer services can reach. We should repeal the ban and replace it with a simple registration system that supports safe distribution without pricing volunteers out of helping.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- A recent ordinance that penalizes volunteer meal distribution in parks through burdensome permitting requirements (correct answer)
- The author's goal of encouraging citizens to be kinder to people experiencing homelessness
- The broader reality that homelessness and hunger exist in many cities
- The possibility that hunger will become less visible to the public if people stop gathering in parks
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The author is responding to a recent city ordinance that bans unpermitted food distribution in public parks, imposing fines and permit requirements that burden volunteer efforts to feed the homeless. This policy, timed suspiciously after visible meal services began, is framed as a cleanliness measure but effectively hides hunger by relocating it away from public view. The passage critiques how the ordinance criminalizes kindness instead of supporting safe distribution, calling for its repeal and replacement with accessible systems. A distractor like choice C mistakes the exigence for the broader, ongoing issue of homelessness, but it overlooks the specific, new ordinance as the immediate prompt for the author's argument. A transferable strategy is to distinguish exigence by pinpointing the timely, specific event or policy change that demands the rhetorical response, separating it from background context.
Question 12
Read the following passage and answer the question.
After last month's district board meeting, our superintendent celebrated a "balanced budget" and urged families to be proud of our "efficient schools." Yet the same budget document shows that the district eliminated 18 librarian positions, reduced bus routes so that some students now walk over a mile along roads without sidewalks, and capped heating repairs even as several classrooms hovered near 58°F during the cold snap. Teachers have been told to "innovate" with fewer supplies, while the district's public-relations contract increased by 22%. A community cannot claim it values literacy and safety while quietly stripping the staff and infrastructure that make both possible. If the district must cut, it should cut transparently and proportionally—starting with nonessential consulting and branding—rather than pushing costs onto children and calling it efficiency. Families deserve a budget hearing that explains tradeoffs in plain language and invites amendments before votes are final.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- A general desire to persuade the community that literacy and safety are important values
- Recent district budget decisions that cut student-facing services while increasing spending on public relations, prompting concern about priorities and transparency (correct answer)
- Longstanding financial constraints that require schools everywhere to operate efficiently
- The likelihood that students will suffer lower test scores and morale in the future if cuts continue
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The passage responds to recent district budget decisions that eliminated librarian positions, reduced bus routes, and limited heating repairs while increasing spending on public relations, creating a mismatch between claimed efficiency and actual impacts on students. This situation raises concerns about misplaced priorities, lack of transparency, and the quiet erosion of essential services under the guise of balancing the budget. The author highlights how these cuts affect literacy and safety, urging for transparent hearings and proportional reductions starting with nonessential areas. A common distractor like choice A confuses the exigence with a broad, vague desire to promote values, but it lacks the specific, timely trigger of the recent budget actions detailed in the passage. To identify exigence effectively, look for the immediate catalyst in the text, such as a recent event or decision, rather than general themes or future predictions.
Question 13
Read the following passage embedded in the prompt, then answer the question.
After the storm, our county promised a "resilient rebuild," and for a moment it sounded like we had learned something. But the new rebuilding guidelines still allow developers to replace wetlands with parking lots as long as they add a decorative retention pond. Residents are told flooding is "unpredictable," even as the same neighborhoods fill with water every year. The county celebrates ribbon cuttings while ignoring the unglamorous work of restoring natural drainage and limiting construction in the most vulnerable zones. Resilience is not a slogan you print on a banner; it is a set of choices that either respect water's path or pretend it can be negotiated with concrete. If officials want fewer disaster declarations, they must stop approving projects that trade short-term tax revenue for long-term damage.
The passage is motivated primarily by concern about…
- the general existence of storms and natural disasters in coastal regions
- the author's goal of encouraging residents to volunteer for storm cleanup
- county rebuilding policies that continue to permit development patterns worsening repeated flooding (correct answer)
- the consequence that the county will need to declare more emergencies in the future
Explanation: This question tests your ability to identify and describe the exigence motivating the passage. The author responds to county rebuilding policies that, despite promises of resilience, continue to permit development patterns that worsen flooding by allowing wetlands to be replaced with parking lots. These specific policies (choice C) represent the urgent problem requiring response, not the general existence of storms (choice A) or the author's goals (choice B). Choice D mistakes a future consequence for the current exigence. To identify exigence effectively, focus on the specific policies or decisions that create immediate concern, particularly when there's a disconnect between stated goals and actual practices.
Question 14
Read the passage and answer the question.
At last night's school board meeting, the superintendent celebrated a "return to normal" after the pandemic and announced a plan to reduce library staffing to fund new test-prep software. Yet in the same presentation, she noted that student requests for counseling appointments have doubled since 2021 and that discipline referrals are up, especially for ninth graders. In this context, it is not merely shortsighted but irresponsible to treat reading spaces as luxuries. A library is one of the few places in a school where a student can be alone without being isolated—where silence is not punishment but relief. When we cut librarians, we don't just lose book recommendations; we lose adults trained to guide students toward credible sources in a year when misinformation spreads faster than homework. If the district wants higher scores, it should start by rebuilding the conditions that make learning possible: calm, community, and the habit of sustained attention.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- A general belief that libraries are valuable community spaces in any era
- The superintendent's proposal to cut library staffing in order to purchase test-prep software (correct answer)
- The author's desire to persuade the district to raise test scores
- An increase in misinformation on the internet over the last several years
Explanation: This question asks you to identify and describe the exigence—the specific situation or problem that prompted the author to write. The passage responds to the superintendent's announcement to cut library staffing in order to fund test-prep software, which the author views as misguided given the increased student mental health needs and discipline issues. The author argues that libraries provide essential spaces for students to find calm and access to trained adults who can guide them toward credible sources. Choice A represents a general belief rather than a specific triggering event, while C misidentifies the author's purpose as supporting test scores when they actually criticize the test-prep focus. Choice D mentions a real concern but isn't the immediate catalyst for this response. To identify exigence, look for the specific, timely event or decision that the author directly addresses—here, it's the superintendent's proposal announced at the school board meeting.
Question 15
Read the passage and answer the question.
Our university is piloting an "AI integrity" policy that requires students to record their screens during any take-home exam and to submit browser histories with their answers. Administrators say the measure protects academic honesty, but it also normalizes surveillance as the price of education. Students who share devices with siblings, use campus computers, or manage medical appointments online would be forced to expose private information unrelated to coursework. Worse, the policy treats every student as a suspect before any misconduct occurs, eroding the trust that makes learning more than compliance. If we are serious about integrity, we should redesign assessments—oral defenses, drafts, reflections—rather than expanding a system that collects data it cannot ethically secure.
The passage is motivated primarily by concern about…
- The general rise of artificial intelligence tools in higher education
- The author's goal of encouraging professors to assign more creative projects
- A new university policy that mandates screen recording and browser-history submission for take-home exams (correct answer)
- The potential that students will feel more trusted if assessments are redesigned
Explanation: This question asks you to identify and describe the exigence motivating the passage. The author responds to a specific new university policy requiring screen recording and browser-history submission during take-home exams—a concrete measure that the author argues normalizes surveillance and violates student privacy. The passage critiques this policy as treating all students as suspects and forcing them to expose private information unrelated to coursework. Choice A describes a general trend rather than the specific triggering event, while B confuses the author's proposed solution with the exigence. Choice D speculates about a potential positive outcome rather than identifying the problem. To identify exigence correctly, look for the specific policy, event, or decision that prompted the author to write—here, it's the university's new "AI integrity" policy with its invasive requirements.
Question 16
Read the following passage and answer the question.
In the name of "academic integrity," our school recently began running all student writing through an AI-detection program and automatically assigning a zero when the software flags a paper above a certain percentage. The policy would be troubling even if the tool were accurate, but the vendor's own documentation admits false positives are common for multilingual writers and for students who use grammar checkers. In the first week, two classmates who wrote their essays in Google Docs—with revision histories—still had to prove their innocence to reverse zeros that tanked their averages. Punishment cannot be automated simply because suspicion can be. If administrators want honesty, they should use drafts, conferences, and transparent evidence standards, not a black-box score that treats students as guilty until they can afford the time and stress to appeal.
The passage is motivated primarily by concern about…
- The broad rise of artificial intelligence and how it affects education
- The author's goal of persuading students not to cheat and to value integrity
- A newly implemented school policy that uses AI-detection scores to impose automatic zeros despite acknowledged inaccuracies and burdensome appeals (correct answer)
- The consequence that students may feel stressed and distrustful of teachers if the policy continues
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The passage is motivated by a newly implemented school policy that uses AI-detection software to assign automatic zeros for suspected cheating, despite the tool's inaccuracies for certain writers and burdensome appeals. This approach, enacted in the name of integrity, treats students as guilty by default and causes unfair punishments, as seen in cases requiring proof of innocence. The author suggests alternatives like drafts and conferences for fairer enforcement. Choice A, a typical distractor, misidentifies the exigence as the broad rise of AI in education, but it fails to address the specific policy's flaws and immediate impacts as the driving concern. A transferable strategy is to identify exigence by focusing on the precise, recent policy or event the author critiques, avoiding conflation with wider trends or emotional outcomes.
Question 17
Read the following passage and answer the question.
When our hospital announced it would close the maternity ward, executives framed it as "streamlining services" and suggested that families could simply drive to the regional medical center 38 miles away. That distance might look minor on a map, but it becomes dangerous at 2 a.m. on icy roads, especially for patients without cars or paid leave. The closure also means fewer prenatal appointments in town, because the obstetrics group will relocate with the ward. In public comments, officials cite staffing shortages, yet nurses report that positions went unfilled after wages lagged behind neighboring hospitals for years. A community cannot recruit teachers, factory workers, or small-business owners while telling them that childbirth requires a road trip. The board should pause the closure, raise wages to retain staff, and partner with the county for targeted support rather than abandoning rural families.
The passage is motivated primarily by concern about…
- The general topic of rural health care and the difficulties of staffing hospitals
- The author's aim to convince readers that hospitals should value families and community identity
- The hospital's imminent closure of its maternity ward, forcing patients to travel far for care and revealing neglected staffing policies (correct answer)
- The future possibility of worse outcomes during emergencies if patients must travel long distances
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The author is concerned about the hospital's imminent closure of its maternity ward, which forces patients to travel long distances for care and exposes neglected staffing policies like lagging wages. This decision, framed as streamlining, endangers rural families during emergencies and reduces local prenatal services, making it harder to attract residents. The passage urges pausing the closure, raising wages, and partnering for support to prioritize community needs. A distractor like choice A mistakes the exigence for the general topic of rural health care staffing, but it lacks the specificity of the ward closure as the immediate, prompting event. To identify exigence reliably, examine the passage for the most pressing, recent development that the author directly counters, rather than abstract issues or predicted effects.
Question 18
Read the following passage and answer the question.
Our neighborhood association's proposal to ban street parking overnight is being marketed as a way to "keep roads clear," but the real effect would be to push working families out. Many households on our block have two adults commuting to jobs with different schedules, and most homes were built without driveways. Under the proposal, cars left on the street after 2 a.m. would be ticketed and towed, a penalty that falls hardest on residents who cannot afford sudden fees or garage rentals. Supporters point to a few nights of congestion during last summer's festival, yet the ban would apply year-round. If the goal is access for emergency vehicles, we can mark no-parking zones near corners and enforce existing rules during events instead of criminalizing ordinary life. A neighborhood should solve problems without redesigning itself for only those with extra space and money.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- The author's purpose of arguing that neighborhoods should be inclusive and considerate
- The general condition that cities often struggle with parking and traffic congestion
- A specific proposal by the neighborhood association to ban overnight street parking, which would lead to ticketing and towing that disproportionately burdens residents without driveways (correct answer)
- The consequence that working families might eventually move away if they receive too many parking penalties
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The author addresses a specific proposal by the neighborhood association to ban overnight street parking, which would result in ticketing and towing that disproportionately affects residents without driveways, particularly working families. This year-round ban, justified by occasional congestion, ignores practical needs and risks pushing people out through financial penalties. The passage proposes targeted solutions like no-parking zones instead of broad restrictions to foster inclusivity. A distractor like choice B mistakes the exigence for the general urban issue of parking congestion, but it misses the particular proposal and its burdens as the immediate catalyst. For effective exigence analysis, seek the text's most detailed, current problem or proposal that demands the rhetorical intervention, rather than pervasive conditions or long-term effects.
Question 19
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The museum's leadership insists that raising admission to $28 is necessary to "protect the visitor experience," but the new price arrived alongside the quiet cancellation of free community days and the elimination of the student discount. For a family of four, the museum now costs more than a week of groceries for some neighbors, and the message is unmistakable: culture is for those who can afford it. The museum argues that private donors will cover scholarships, yet those programs require applications, documentation, and waiting periods that turn spontaneous learning into a bureaucratic obstacle course. If the museum wants to be a civic institution rather than a luxury venue, it should reinstate free days, keep a low-cost student rate, and publish a clear accounting of how ticket revenue is spent.
The author is responding to which situation or problem?
- The general topic of how museums balance revenue and public access
- The author's purpose of encouraging families to visit museums more often
- Recent museum policy changes increasing admission and removing affordability programs, limiting access for local residents (correct answer)
- The consequence that fewer children will develop a love of art if tickets remain expensive
Explanation: This question tests the skill of identifying and describing exigence in a rhetorical situation, which is the urgent issue or problem that prompts the author to write. The author responds to recent museum policy changes that increased admission fees and eliminated free community days and student discounts, limiting access for local families and turning culture into a luxury. These shifts, justified as protecting the experience, impose bureaucratic hurdles for scholarships and send an exclusionary message. The passage calls for reinstating affordability programs and transparent revenue accounting to maintain civic accessibility. A distractor such as choice A confuses the exigence with the general challenge of balancing revenue and access, but it ignores the specific, recent fee hikes and cancellations as the urgent prompt. To describe exigence well, pinpoint the immediate changes or decisions in the text that provoke the response, distinguishing them from ongoing topics or future implications.
Question 20
Read the passage and answer the question.
This semester my high school began using a "restorative justice" program, but it has been implemented as a script rather than a practice. After a hallway fight, the students involved were placed in a circle and told to read prewritten statements about "community harm," while the counselor—responsible for 480 students—rushed to the next meeting. Teachers now complain the program is "soft," and students complain it is "fake," which is what happens when a school adopts a philosophy without funding the labor it requires. Restorative work can reduce suspensions, but only when staff are trained, time is protected, and follow-up is real. Otherwise the program becomes another checkbox that satisfies a district report while leaving conflict to simmer. If we want a safer school, we must invest in people, not just terminology.
The exigence prompting the passage is…
- A general interest in explaining what restorative justice is
- The author's goal of persuading readers that schools should be safer and kinder
- The school's rushed, under-resourced implementation of restorative justice that is producing backlash and ineffectiveness (correct answer)
- The long-term consequence that students may distrust adults in school if conflicts continue
Explanation: This question requires identifying and describing the exigence prompting the passage. The author is responding to the school's rushed, under-resourced implementation of restorative justice that is failing both students and teachers (choice C). The specific problem is that the program has been adopted as a superficial "script" without proper training, time, or follow-up, leading to complaints from all parties and potential backlash. Choice A misidentifies general interest as exigence, choice B confuses the author's goal with the triggering situation, and choice D focuses on a potential future consequence rather than the current problem. The exigence is the concrete implementation failure that undermines the program's goals. To identify exigence, look for the specific situation or policy execution creating immediate problems, not abstract interests or long-term possibilities.