Home

Tutoring

Subjects

Live Classes

Study Coach

Essay Review

On-Demand Courses

Colleges

Games

Opening subject page...

Loading your content

ACT English

ACT English Help: Word Choice

Review real example questions for Word Choice in ACT English.

Question 1

The artist's use of color was intended to complement the natural beauty of the landscape.

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. compliment
  3. complimentary
  4. completion
Explanation: This question tests the distinction between 'complement' and 'compliment,' two commonly confused words. The sentence describes how color enhances or completes the landscape's beauty. 'Complement' means 'to complete or make perfect,' which fits the artistic context. 'Compliment' means 'to praise,' 'complimentary' means 'free' or 'praising,' and 'completion' means 'finishing.' Remember: complement completes; compliment praises.

Question 2

PASSAGE IV: The Violin Doctor

¹ In a small, dust-mote-filled workshop in Chicago, Elena creates voices. She is a luthier, a craftsperson (36) who specializes in the repair and restoration of stringed instruments. While the world is full of mass-produced violins, Elena works on the "sick" ones—antique instruments that have suffered centuries of wear, weather, and neglect. Her patients are often older than the country she lives in.

² To the untrained eye, a crack in a violin's body looks like a simple fracture in wood. To Elena, it is a wound in the instrument's soul. Fixing it requires more than just (37) glue, it demands an understanding of physics, chemistry, and history. She begins by removing the top plate, a delicate operation performed with a thin, heated knife. Once the instrument is open, she can see the internal architecture: the bass bar, the soundpost, and the lining strips.

³ (38) Elena's most recent project was a cello from 1790. It had been crushed in a shipping accident, its ribs splintered and its varnish scarred. Most luthiers would have declared it a total loss. Elena, (39) however, saw potential. She spent three months humidifying the wood to restore its shape. Then, using tiny "cleats"—small squares of spruce—she reinforced the cracks from the inside. (40) Each cleat had to be carved by hand to match the grain of the original wood.

⁴ The final step is the varnish. Modern synthetic varnishes are durable, but they stifle the sound. Elena mixes her own recipes using natural resins like amber, mastic, and sandarac. She applies the varnish in microscopic layers, (41) polishing each one with a cloth dipped in olive oil and rottenstone. This process can take weeks, but it is essential. The varnish must protect the wood while allowing it to vibrate freely, a paradox that has challenged makers for centuries.

⁵ When the cello was finally strung and tuned, Elena played a single low note. The sound was rich and dark, filling the small room with a resonance that felt physical. It was no longer a broken collection of wood; it was a living thing again. (42) Elena smiled, wiping the rosin dust from her hands. She isn't just fixing instruments; she is preserving history, one note at a time. (43)

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would be LEAST acceptable?

  1. beaming
  2. grinning
  3. laughing maniacally
  4. smiling with satisfaction
Explanation: This is a LEAST acceptable vocabulary question. Choice C (laughing maniacally) is LEAST acceptable because "maniacally" suggests madness, wildness, or insanity, which contradicts the gentle, reverent, satisfied tone of the moment. The passage portrays Elena's work as careful, respectful, and meaningful—"laughing maniacally" would create jarring tonal dissonance. Choices A (beaming), B (grinning), and D (smiling with satisfaction) all appropriately convey positive emotion and quiet pride. Pro tip: Check whether word connotations match the emotional tone of the context.

Question 3

PASSAGE I: The Golden Seam

¹ In Western cultures, a shattered ceramic bowl is usually destined for the trash. If an attempt is made to repair it, the goal is often to hide the cracks, rendering the object as close to its original, pristine state (1) as possible as it can be. However, a centuries-old Japanese art form takes the exact opposite approach. Known as kintsugi, which translates to "golden joinery," this technique does not disguise the damage. Instead, it highlights the fractures (2) with a super-expensive lacquer mixed up with gold, silver, or platinum.

² The origins of kintsugi are traced back to the late fifteenth century. According to legend, Japanese shogun Ashikaga Yoshimasa broke his favorite tea bowl and sent it to China for repairs. When the bowl was returned, it had been stitched back together with ugly metal staples. (3) Displeased with the aesthetic, the shogun challenged his local craftsmen to find a more beautiful solution. The result was kintsugi.

³ The process of kintsugi is meticulous and time-consuming. First, the artisan must gather all the broken pieces and clean them thoroughly. Next, a natural adhesive called urushi—a sap extracted from the Chinese lacquer tree(4) are carefully applied to the edges. Because urushi is highly toxic in its raw state, artisans must wear protective gear(5) during this phase of the process. The pieces are pressed back together, and the bowl is placed in a warm, humid environment to cure. This curing process can take several weeks.(6)

⁴ Once the lacquer has fully hardened, the true artistry begins. The artisan sands the seams flush with the surface of the ceramic. Then, a final layer of urushi is applied to the cracks. Before this layer dries, the artisan gently brushes the powdered gold over the sticky sap.(7) The gold adheres to the lines, transforming the chaotic web of fractures into a luminous, deliberate design.

⁵(8) Consequently, kintsugi is more than just a repair method; it is a profound philosophical statement. It reflects the Japanese concept of wabi-sabi, which is the embrace of the flawed, the impermanent, and the incomplete.(9) Rather than throwing away a broken item, kintsugi teaches that the break is simply a chapter in the object's history. By illuminating the scars with gold, the artisan celebrates the object's survival. (10) The bowl becomes more beautiful not in spite of its brokenness, but because of it.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would be LEAST acceptable?

  1. Instead of discarding a shattered vessel,
  2. Rather than throwing out a damaged piece,
  3. Opposed to the trashing of a broken thing,
  4. In contrast to disposing of a ruined object,
Explanation: The correct answer is C. This is a LEAST acceptable question, meaning three choices work and one fails. A ('Instead of discarding a shattered vessel') is a precise, formal restatement that fits the essay's register perfectly. B ('Rather than throwing out a damaged piece') is slightly less formal but fully acceptable — 'throwing out' is standard written English. D ('In contrast to disposing of a ruined object') is also formal and grammatically sound. C ('Opposed to the trashing of a broken thing') fails on multiple levels: 'trashing' is informal slang, 'a broken thing' is vague and childlike compared to the passage's careful language, and the phrasing is structurally awkward. The passage uses vocabulary like 'meticulous,' 'luminous,' and 'philosophical' — 'trashing' and 'thing' are wildly inconsistent with this register. On LEAST acceptable questions, eliminate the three that work and identify the one that fails — usually through informal diction, grammatical error, or a meaning shift.

Question 4

PASSAGE II: The Ghost in the Machine

¹ In 1920, a Russian physicist named Leon Theremin was conducting experiments with high-frequency oscillators when he noticed something strange. As he moved his hand near the (11) equipments circuits, the pitch of the audio signal changed. Theremin realized he had stumbled upon a completely new way to produce sound. He quickly adapted his laboratory apparatus into a musical instrument. It was officially named the aetherphone, but it soon became known simply as the theremin.

² (12) Unlike a piano, a guitar, or a flute, the theremin is played without physical contact. The instrument consists of a wooden box featuring two metal antennas: a vertical one on the right and a horizontal loop on the left. (13) The vertical antenna controls pitch, while the horizontal loop controls volume. As the player’s hands move closer to or further from the antennas, they alter the electromagnetic fields surrounding them. This interference is translated into electrical signals, which are then amplified through a speaker.

³ Playing the theremin requires intense concentration and absolute physical control. Because there are no keys, frets, or strings to guide the musician, relying entirely on "muscle memory" and a flawless ear for relative pitch (14) is required. A tremor in the performer’s hand, a shift in posture, or even a deep breath can unintentionally alter the pitch. (15) Many people try to play the theremin and give up after a few days.

⁴ When Leon Theremin demonstrated his invention to the public in the 1920s, audiences were mesmerized. The musician stood behind the box, waving their hands in the air like an orchestra conductor, (16) coaxing out ethereal, trembling melodies. (17) The sound was often compared, by critics, to a human voice singing a wordless, mournful tune. Classical composers began writing concertos specifically for the instrument.

⁵ Despite its initial popularity, the theremin was ultimately too difficult for the average person to master, so it never became a household instrument. (18) However, it found a second life in Hollywood. In the 1950s, film composers realized that the theremin’s eerie, otherworldly wail was the perfect soundtrack for science fiction and psychological thriller movies. Whenever a flying saucer landed on screen or a character experienced a cinematic mental breakdown, the theremin was there to provide the sonic backdrop.

⁶ Today, the theremin is enjoying a modern resurgence. Contemporary artists use it to add a vintage, atmospheric layer to rock and electronic music. Though synthesizer technology has made it incredibly easy to produce identical sounds digitally, the physical magic of the theremin, (19) the act of pulling music out of thin air—remains utterly unique.

The writer wants to replace the underlined word 'coaxing' with a more straightforward word. Which of the following replacements would LEAST preserve the intended meaning of the sentence?

  1. drawing
  2. pulling
  3. producing
  4. demanding
Explanation: The correct answer is D (demanding). 'Coaxing' means to gently and skillfully persuade or draw out something — it implies patience, finesse, and a kind of delicate negotiation. F ('drawing') and G ('pulling') both preserve the sense of extracting or bringing forth the music with effort and direction — close enough in meaning to be acceptable substitutes. H ('producing') is more neutral but conveys the basic meaning of generating music from the instrument. J ('demanding') inverts the connotation entirely: 'demanding' implies forceful, aggressive insistence rather than the gentle, skilled persuasion of 'coaxing.' A musician 'demanding' melodies from the theremin suggests confrontation rather than the ethereal, trembling quality the passage describes. The surrounding context — 'waving their hands like an orchestra conductor' and 'ethereal, trembling melodies' — makes clear the gesture is graceful, not forceful. On word-choice questions, consider not just dictionary definitions but connotations and how the word fits the surrounding tone.

Question 5

PASSAGE III: The Science of Art Restoration

¹ For centuries, the restoration of classic paintings relied on a delicate, and often dangerous, physical touch. Restorers used to rely on harsh (21) chemicals, these solvents could easily strip away original layers of paint along with the dirt. Today, however, the intersection of art and technology has introduced a new era of preservation. The use of modern lasers and X-ray fluorescence (22) are revolutionizing the way museums care for their most prized artifacts.

² One of the most significant breakthroughs in restoration is the use of laser ablation. When a painting has accumulated centuries of soot or discolored varnish, conservators can fire a highly focused laser at the canvas. The laser (23) safely vaporizes the layer of grime. Because the dirt absorbs light at a different frequency than the original pigments, the laser removes the filth without heating or damaging the artwork beneath it. (24) On the other hand, the painting can reveal (25) it's true, original colors for the first time in centuries.

³ (26) Peeling away the darkened varnish, the brilliant blue skies of Renaissance landscapes are suddenly revealed to the restorers. This process allows experts to see the brushstrokes exactly as the artist intended.

⁴ In addition to lasers, restorers now use X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanners to map the chemical composition of a painting. By analyzing the metallic elements present in the pigments, such as the lead in white paint or the copper in green paint, XRF scanners can look through the top layer of art. (27) This technology has allowed historians to discover hidden sketches and abandoned compositions painted over by the artists themselves.

⁵ It takes years of specialized training to master these technologies. A modern conservator must be a hybrid: part art historian, part chemist, and part technician. They are ultimately (28) responsible of preserving human history. By combining a deep respect for antiquity with the power of modern physics, they ensure that (29) old, antique masterpieces will survive for future generations to study and enjoy. (30)

Which of the choices below makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. responsible to preserve
  3. responsibly preserving
  4. responsible for preserving
Explanation: The correct answer is D. The correct idiomatic English construction is "responsible for [gerund]" — in this case, "responsible for preserving." "Responsible of" is not a standard English idiom and is always incorrect. "Responsible to preserve" uses an infinitive after "responsible," which does not follow standard idiomatic usage. "Responsibly preserving" converts "responsible" from an adjective (describing the conservators) to an adverb (modifying "preserving"), which changes the sentence's meaning and structure. The sentence says the conservators are a certain kind of people (responsible) — an adjective, not an adverb, is needed. Pro tip: Idiom questions test fixed preposition-adjective combinations. "Responsible for," "capable of," "interested in," and "different from" are all fixed English idioms. Memorizing common ones helps significantly on the ACT.

Question 6

The effect of the new law was immediately noticeable in the community. Which word best fits the meaning of the sentence?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. affect
  3. impact
  4. change
Explanation: This question tests the affect/effect distinction in a context requiring a noun. The sentence structure 'The   of the new law' requires a noun after the article 'the.' 'Effect' is typically a noun meaning a result or consequence, which fits perfectly here. 'Affect' is typically a verb meaning to influence, making it grammatically incorrect in this noun position. 'Impact' and 'change' could work grammatically but 'effect' is the most standard and precise choice for describing results. Remember: affect is usually a verb (to influence); effect is usually a noun (a result).

Question 7

During the student council meeting, Maya proposed extending library hours, noting that many students work after school and can only study in the evening. She emphasized that the change would affect students who rely on the library’s computers for homework and college applications.

Which choice most precisely expresses the intended meaning?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. effect
  3. reflect
  4. infect
Explanation: This question tests knowledge of the commonly confused words 'affect' vs. 'effect.' The sentence describes how extending library hours would influence students who rely on the library's resources. In this context, the sentence requires a verb meaning 'to influence' or 'to have an impact on.' 'Affect' is typically a verb meaning to influence something, which precisely fits the intended meaning here. The distractors 'effect' (usually a noun meaning result), 'reflect' (to mirror or think about), and 'infect' (to contaminate) don't convey the idea of influence. Remember: affect is usually a verb (to influence); effect is usually a noun (a result).

Question 8

The survey results will affect the company's future strategy. Which choice is the most appropriate for the context?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. effect
  3. alter
  4. influence
Explanation: This question tests the affect/effect distinction in a context requiring a verb. The sentence structure 'results will   the company's strategy' requires a verb that means to influence or impact. 'Affect' is typically a verb meaning to influence or change, which fits perfectly. 'Effect' is typically a noun meaning a result, making it grammatically incorrect as the main verb. 'Alter' and 'influence' could work but 'affect' is the most standard and precise choice for describing how results will impact strategy. Remember: affect is usually a verb (to influence); effect is usually a noun (a result).

Question 9

The lab manual explained that the class would first record the mass of each sample and than calculate density by dividing mass by volume. The steps needed to be followed in order to avoid mistakes.

Which choice most precisely expresses the intended meaning?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. nevertheless
  3. whereas
  4. then
Explanation: This question tests the distinction between 'than' and 'then.' The sentence describes a sequence of lab steps: first record mass, and next calculate density. The context requires a word indicating the next step in a sequence. 'Then' indicates temporal sequence or 'next,' which precisely fits the procedural context. 'Than' is used for comparisons, 'whereas' shows contrast, and 'nevertheless' shows concession. Remember: than is for comparisons; then indicates time sequence or next steps.

Question 10

The chef was known for his ability to improvise dishes based on the ingredients available.

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. implement
  3. improve
  4. impose
Explanation: This question tests the distinction between similar-sounding verbs related to creating or doing. The sentence describes a chef's ability to create dishes spontaneously without preparation. 'Improvise' means 'to create spontaneously without preparation,' which fits the culinary context perfectly. 'Implement' means 'to put into action,' 'improve' means 'to make better,' and 'impose' means 'to force upon.' Improvise specifically implies creativity and spontaneity.