Home

Tutoring

Subjects

Live Classes

Study Coach

Essay Review

On-Demand Courses

Colleges

Games

Opening subject page...

Loading your content

ACT English

ACT English Help: Topic Development

Review real example questions for Topic Development in ACT English.

Question 1

PASSAGE V: The River of Grass

¹ In the early twentieth century, the general consensus regarding the Florida Everglades was that it was a useless, disease-ridden swamp. Developers and politicians viewed the millions of acres of wetlands as a problem to be solved. They embarked on massive drainage projects, digging canals and building levees to convert the marsh into dry, arable land for farming and real estate. For decades, the destruction of the Everglades was celebrated as a triumph of human engineering over nature. (41)

² One woman, (42) however, saw the Everglades differently. Marjory Stoneman Douglas, a freelance writer and journalist, moved to Miami in 1915. She spent years exploring the vast wetlands, observing the intricate balance of the ecosystem. In 1947, she published a groundbreaking book titled The Everglades: River of Grass.

³ The title itself was revolutionary. By calling it a "river," Douglas completely reframed how the public understood the region. She explained that the Everglades was not a stagnant swamp, but a wide, shallow sheet of water flowing imperceptibly slowly from Lake Okeechobee southward to the Florida Bay. (43) This sheet of water, rarely more than knee-deep, supported a staggering diversity of wildlife. Douglas vividly described the sawgrass marshes, the cypress domes, and the delicate wading birds that relied on the seasonal floods.

⁴ Douglas’s book was a bestseller, (44) and it catalyzed the early environmental movement. She fiercely argued that draining the wetlands was ecological suicide. Without the slow flow of freshwater, the underground aquifers that supplied South Florida’s drinking water would dry up or become contaminated by saltwater intrusion from the ocean. (45) In addition, the dry peat soil of the drained marshes became highly flammable, leading to massive, uncontrollable muck fires.

⁵ Despite the success of her book, the drainage projects continued. (46) Infuriated by the government's inaction, Douglas founded the Friends of the Everglades in 1969, when she was 79 years old. For the next thirty years, she was a relentless advocate for the wetlands. She attended public hearings, organized protests, and famously stated, "The Everglades is a test. If we pass it, we may get to keep the planet."

⁶ Today, the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan is the largest environmental restoration project in history. Engineers are currently working to undo the damage of the past century by filling in canals and allowing the water to flow naturally once again. (47) While the ecosystem is still threatened by pollution and climate change. (48) It is widely acknowledged that the Everglades would likely have been paved over completely if not for Marjory Stoneman Douglas. (49) Her legacy is a reminder that a single voice, armed with a profound understanding of nature, can change the course of history. (50)

Which choice most effectively concludes the essay?

  1. NO CHANGE — Her legacy is a reminder that a single voice, armed with a profound understanding of nature, can change the course of history.
  2. She lived to be 108 years old, passing away in 1998.
  3. The Florida panther is still highly endangered today.
  4. Many schools and parks in Florida are now named after her.
Explanation: The correct answer is A (NO CHANGE). The essay traces Marjory Stoneman Douglas's journey from observer to author to activist, building to a central argument: that one person with knowledge, passion, and persistence can have a transformative impact on the natural world. The concluding sentence 'Her legacy is a reminder that a single voice, armed with a profound understanding of nature, can change the course of history' directly captures this argument in universal, resonant terms. It elevates Douglas's story from a biographical account to a broader lesson — which is the hallmark of a strong essay conclusion. B (she lived to be 108 years old) is a biographical trivia fact with no thematic resonance — it tells us something interesting but adds nothing to the essay's argument. C (the Florida panther is still endangered) introduces a new environmental concern unconnected to Douglas's work or legacy. D (schools and parks are named after her) is a minor honor that understates her actual impact — the essay has argued she saved an entire ecosystem, and naming a park after her is a weak ending to that story. On conclusion questions, the right answer always connects back to the essay's central argument and provides thematic closure rather than adding new, unrelated facts.

Question 2

A student is drafting an essay about how city parks can support wildlife. The draft reads:

[1] In many cities, parks are designed mainly for people: open lawns, paved paths, and bright nighttime lighting. [2] But small design changes can make these spaces friendlier to birds and insects without reducing their usefulness for visitors. [3] For example, replacing some lawn with native plants provides food and shelter for pollinators. [4] Leaving a few fallen logs in an out-of-the-way corner can create habitat for beetles and fungi. [5] There are many different kinds of parks in the world.

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence that reinforces the paragraph’s main idea (specific design changes that help wildlife). Which choice best replaces the underlined sentence?

  1. Because cities contain so many people, parks often need to be large enough to host concerts and sports tournaments.
  2. NO CHANGE
  3. Thoughtful features like native plantings and small “wild” areas can turn an ordinary park into a healthier ecosystem for urban species.
  4. Some park visitors prefer wide sidewalks because they make it easier to walk in groups.
Explanation: This question asks you to identify a concluding sentence that reinforces the paragraph's main idea about specific design changes that help wildlife. The paragraph establishes that small changes can make parks wildlife-friendly without reducing human usefulness, then provides concrete examples like native plants and fallen logs. Choice C effectively concludes by summarizing how thoughtful features can transform parks into healthier ecosystems, directly reinforcing the main idea. The original sentence (B) is far too broad and unfocused, merely stating an obvious fact about park variety. Choices A and D focus on human needs rather than wildlife benefits, missing the paragraph's central purpose. A strong concluding sentence should echo the paragraph's specific focus while providing closure, not introduce new or tangential ideas.

Question 3

"Turn Right at the Big Pine\n\nMy father believed that road maps were for people who lacked a sense of adventure. He preferred to navigate by instinct, landmark, and the occasional contradictory tip from a gas station attendant. Consequently, [19] our annual family trips to the Cedar Creek campground were rarely straight lines; they were sprawling, improvisational loops through the backroads of Oregon.\n\nI was ten years old, sitting in the backseat of our station wagon, squeezed between a cooler full of soda and my sleeping brother. The air outside was thick with the scent of pine and dust. We had been driving for six hours, [20] but according to Dad, we were "just around the river bend." He pointed to a massive, gnarled tree standing sentinel at a fork in the road. "That's the Big Pine," he declared with the confidence of a ship captain spotting land. "We turn right here."\n\nWe turned right. The pavement immediately gave way to gravel, and the road narrowed until the blackberry bushes were scraping the sides of the car. My mother, who had been quietly reading a novel, looked up. "Honey," she said, her voice dropping an octave, "I don't think this is the way to the campsite." Dad waved a hand dismissively. He insisted that this was a shortcut he had discovered years ago. [21]\n\nTen minutes later, the road ended abruptly at a rusted gate marked "Private Property." A cow stared at us blankly from the other side. Silence filled the car. The cow chewed its cud, looking entirely unimpressed by our arrival. [22] Without a word, Dad shifted the car into reverse. As we backed down the dusty trail, he caught my eye in the rearview mirror and winked. "Well," he said, "now we know what's down that road." For him, the wrong turn wasn't a mistake; it was just another part of the story. [23]\n\n[1] We eventually found the campsite, arriving just as the sun was setting behind the mountains. [2] I realized then that the destination mattered less to him than the wandering it took to get there. [3] Years later, when I drive [25] my own kids on vacation, I keep a GPS on the dashboard. [4] But sometimes, when I see a strange road winding off into the trees I feel [24] a familiar tug to turn the wheel."

Which choice best concludes the paragraph by connecting the specific event to the father's general philosophy?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. We were all very hungry and ready to eat dinner.
  3. My mother shook her head and went back to reading her book.
  4. It was getting late, and we still had to set up the tent.
Explanation: This is a topic development question testing concluding sentences and thematic connection. You can tell because the question asks which choice "best concludes the paragraph by connecting the specific event to the father's general philosophy." This requires you to link a concrete narrative moment to an abstract theme. For questions about concluding sentences, identify the paragraph's main point or the essay's central theme, then choose the sentence that most effectively ties specific details back to that larger idea. Strong conclusions create coherence by showing readers why the specific example matters in the bigger picture. Avoid mundane details that don't provide thematic insight. Choice A (NO CHANGE) is correct because "For him, the wrong turn wasn't a mistake; it was just another part of the story" directly connects the specific wrong-turn event to the father's general philosophy of treating life as an adventure. This echoes the essay's opening: "road maps were for people who lacked a sense of adventure." The sentence reveals his worldview—mistakes are adventures, detours are part of the experience. This creates thematic unity. Choice B ("We were all very hungry and ready to eat dinner") is a mundane practical detail that doesn't connect to any larger philosophy or theme. It's just a fact with no thematic resonance. Choice C ("My mother shook her head and went back to reading her book") provides a character reaction but doesn't articulate or connect to the father's philosophy about adventure and wandering. Choice D ("It was getting late, and we still had to set up the tent") is another practical detail about logistics that fails to provide any thematic insight or philosophical connection. Remember: Strong concluding sentences do more than state facts—they reveal meaning and connect specific events to larger themes. Pro tip: When the ACT asks for a sentence that "connects specific to general" or "concludes by showing the significance," look for the option that contains abstract or philosophical language ("philosophy," "belief," "meaning," "significance") rather than concrete actions or mundane details. The correct answer often uses metacognitive language that steps back from the action to reflect on its meaning.

Question 4

"The Vertical Forests of Milan\n\nIn 2014, the skyline of Milan, Italy, began to change in a way that surprised many observers. Two residential towers, known as Bosco Verticale (Vertical Forest), rose above the Porta Nuova district. At first, [1] Italian architect Stefano Boeri envisioned these structures, critics were skeptical. They claimed that planting trees on balconies was a gimmick that would cause structural issues. Boeri, however, believed the naysayers were totally wrong. [2]\n\nBoeri's design called for the towers to host 900 trees, 5,000 shrubs, and 11,000 floral plants. This "living facade" not only improves air quality but also regulates temperature. The vegetation, which includes oak, beech, and larch trees act [3] as a natural shield against the intense Mediterranean sun. To ensure the safety of the structure, botanists tested the wind resistance of the trees in a wind tunnel. Similarly, [4] the engineering team reinforced the concrete balconies with steel to support the immense weight of the soil.\n\nThe result is a self-sufficient ecosystem that changes colors with the seasons. In autumn, the leaves turn golden and red; in winter, they fall to let in sunlight. [5] Residents live nestled among the branches, enjoying a connection to nature rarely found in urban environments. Boeri's work has inspired similar projects in China and the Netherlands, proving that architecture and ecology can collaborate [6] to create sustainable cities. As cities grow denser, the Vertical Forest offers a blueprint for a greener future, demonstrating that nature need not be pushed, to the margins, [7] of urban life.\n\nThe project's success suggests a new path forward for urban planning. [8] By integrating living systems into high-rise buildings, architects can help reduce the carbon footprint of cities. [9]"

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

  1. Kept, because it provides descriptive details that illustrate the "changes colors" mentioned in the preceding sentence.
  2. Kept, because it explains why residents prefer to live in the towers during the winter.
  3. Deleted, because it repeats information about the trees that was provided in the second paragraph.
  4. Deleted, because it detracts from the paragraph’s focus on the structural engineering of the towers.
Explanation: This is a topic development question asking whether to keep or delete a sentence. You can tell because the question stem says "The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?" You must evaluate whether the sentence serves a rhetorical purpose in the paragraph. To answer deletion questions, determine the purpose of the surrounding paragraph, then ask: Does this sentence support that purpose? Does it provide necessary detail, evidence, or development? If yes, keep it. If the sentence is redundant, off-topic, or distracting, delete it. Always read the reasoning in the answer choices carefully—both "kept" and "deleted" options will have good and bad reasons. Choice A (Kept, because it provides descriptive details...) is correct because the preceding sentence states "changes colors with the seasons," and the underlined sentence directly illustrates this claim by providing specific examples: autumn (golden and red) and winter (leaves fall). This is effective development through concrete detail. Choice B (Kept, because it explains why residents prefer winter) is incorrect reasoning—the sentence doesn't discuss residents' preferences at all; it simply describes the seasonal changes objectively. Choice C (Deleted, because it repeats information from paragraph 2) is incorrect because paragraph 2 mentions trees but doesn't describe seasonal color changes. Choice D (Deleted, because it detracts from structural engineering focus) misidentifies the paragraph's purpose—paragraph 3 focuses on the ecosystem and experience, not engineering. Remember: The ACT often includes deletion questions where you must keep valuable supporting details. When a sentence provides specific examples that illustrate a general claim made in the previous sentence, it should almost always be kept. Look for signal relationships like "For instance," or direct illustration. Pro tip: If the sentence answers the question "Like what?" or "Such as?" after reading the previous sentence, it's probably worth keeping.

Question 5

In a discussion about the benefits of meditation, which choice adds the most relevant information about mental health?

  1. Meditation has been shown to reduce stress and anxiety by promoting relaxation.
  2. Many people meditate early in the morning to start their day positively.
  3. Meditation can be practiced in various settings, including at home and in nature.
  4. Some cultures have practiced meditation for thousands of years.
Explanation: This question seeks the most relevant information about meditation's mental health benefits in a discussion about meditation's advantages. The context focuses on mental health impacts, so the most relevant choice should directly address psychological benefits. Choice A explicitly connects meditation to mental health by stating it 'has been shown to reduce stress and anxiety by promoting relaxation,' providing specific mental health benefits with evidence. Choice B mentions timing preferences but doesn't address mental health impacts. Choice C discusses practice settings, which is logistical rather than benefit-focused. Choice D provides historical context but doesn't explain mental health benefits. When a question specifies a particular aspect of a topic, choose information that directly develops that specific aspect.

Question 6

The writer wants to add an example that illustrates the rapid growth of renewable energy industries. Which choice best achieves this?

  1. Wind turbine technology has advanced rapidly in recent years.
  2. Many people are becoming more conscious of their carbon footprint.
  3. The cost of installing solar panels has decreased significantly.
  4. Solar energy companies have seen a 25% increase in job creation over the past decade.
Explanation: This question asks for an example that illustrates the rapid growth of renewable energy industries. The writer wants to demonstrate growth in this sector through a specific example. Choice D provides concrete evidence of rapid growth by stating that 'solar energy companies have seen a 25% increase in job creation over the past decade,' offering quantifiable proof of industry expansion. Choice B discusses general environmental consciousness but doesn't demonstrate industry growth. Choice C mentions cost decreases, which could indicate growth but isn't as direct. Choice A focuses on wind turbine technology rather than renewable energy industry growth broadly. Specific examples with concrete data are generally better than general statements for effectively illustrating claims about trends or developments.

Question 7

A student is writing a report about how scientists study glaciers:

To track how glaciers change over time, researchers compare satellite images taken years apart. They also place GPS stakes on the ice to measure how quickly it flows downhill. In addition, scientists drill narrow cores to examine trapped air bubbles, which can reveal past atmospheric conditions. These methods together help explain how glaciers respond to shifts in temperature and snowfall.

The student wants to add a sentence at the end of the paragraph that provides a specific example of how the data are used. Which choice best accomplishes this?

  1. Some glaciers are so remote that researchers must travel by helicopter to reach them safely.
  2. A glacier’s surface can appear blue because dense ice absorbs some wavelengths of light more than others.
  3. By combining GPS measurements with satellite maps, a team can calculate annual ice loss and estimate how much meltwater will enter nearby rivers.
  4. Ice cores are stored in freezers so they do not melt before being analyzed in a lab.
Explanation: This question asks for a specific example of how glacier research data are used. The paragraph describes various data collection methods: satellite images, GPS stakes, and ice cores. Choice C provides the most relevant example by explaining how GPS measurements combined with satellite maps can calculate annual ice loss and estimate meltwater entering rivers - showing a concrete application of the collected data. Choices A and B discuss research logistics and ice appearance but don't show data usage. Choice D mentions ice core storage but not data application. When asked for specific examples of data use, focus on how the information leads to concrete calculations, predictions, or understanding rather than just collection methods.

Question 8

A student writes the following paragraph for a school magazine about community repair events:

At a repair café, volunteers help neighbors fix broken items instead of throwing them away. People bring everything from lamps with loose wires to jackets with torn seams, and the volunteers explain each step so visitors can learn basic skills. The events reduce waste while also making repair feel less intimidating. Many cafés keep a box of spare parts—buttons, screws, and cords—so small fixes can happen on the spot.

The student wants to add a sentence after the third sentence that elaborates on how the events make repair feel less intimidating. Which choice best accomplishes this?

  1. Some volunteers specialize in electronics, while others are more comfortable with sewing machines and fabric.
  2. Visitors often sit beside the volunteer working on their item, asking questions and practicing with the tools under supervision.
  3. Many towns also host seasonal festivals that include music, food trucks, and art booths.
  4. A few repair cafés operate in libraries, which may already have meeting rooms and tables available.
Explanation: This question asks you to elaborate on how repair cafés make repair feel less intimidating. The preceding sentence states that volunteers explain each step so visitors can learn basic skills, and the events make repair feel less intimidating. Choice B perfectly elaborates on this by describing how visitors sit beside volunteers, ask questions, and practice with tools under supervision - showing exactly how the intimidation factor is reduced through hands-on guidance. Choices A and D discuss volunteer specializations and café locations but don't address intimidation. Choice C about seasonal festivals is completely off-topic. When elaborating on a specific claim, choose details that directly explain the mechanism or process being described.

Question 9

A student is revising a paragraph about why libraries lend more than books. The draft reads:

[1] Many libraries now lend items such as sewing machines, Wi-Fi hotspots, and board games. [2] These collections can make expensive or specialized resources available to people who might otherwise go without them. [3] Libraries have long been places where people can find information. [4] For instance, a hotspot loan can help a student complete online homework when home internet is unreliable. [5] A sewing machine loan can help someone mend clothing instead of replacing it.

The writer wants to keep Sentence 3 but make it more clearly connected to the paragraph’s main idea (lending non-book items to expand access). Which choice best revises the underlined sentence?

  1. Libraries have long been places where people can find information, and lending practical items is another way they help communities access what they need.
  2. Libraries have long been places where people can find information, especially in encyclopedias and newspapers.
  3. Libraries have long been places where people can find information, and many are built with quiet reading rooms.
  4. Libraries have long been places where people can find information, which is why some people prefer to buy their own books.
Explanation: This question asks you to revise a sentence to better connect it to the paragraph's main idea about libraries lending non-book items to expand access. The paragraph discusses how libraries now lend practical items like sewing machines and Wi-Fi hotspots to help people who couldn't otherwise afford them. Choice A effectively revises the sentence by maintaining the traditional information role while explicitly connecting it to lending practical items as another way libraries help communities access what they need. Choices B and C keep the information focus but fail to connect to the lending theme, while Choice D actually works against the paragraph's message about shared access. When revising for connection, ensure the sentence bridges between familiar concepts and the new idea being developed.

Question 10

A student is drafting a short essay about the value of translating poetry. The draft reads:

[1] Translating a poem is not the same as swapping each word for its dictionary equivalent. [2] A translator has to decide which features to preserve—sound, rhythm, imagery, or literal meaning—when not all of them can survive the move into another language. [3] Some translators add brief notes to explain cultural references that would otherwise be confusing. [4] Poetry has existed for a long time in many cultures. [5] Even when a translation cannot match every nuance, it can still carry a poem’s central emotion to new readers.

The writer wants Sentence 4 to elaborate on the challenge described in Sentences 1–3 without drifting into a broad, unfocused statement. Which choice best replaces the underlined sentence?

  1. NO CHANGE
  2. Because metaphors and wordplay often rely on local history and everyday speech, translators must sometimes invent new phrasing that creates a similar effect for their audience.
  3. Some poems are short, while others are long enough to fill an entire book.
  4. Many readers enjoy poetry because it can be read silently or performed aloud at public events.
Explanation: This question asks you to elaborate on the translation challenge without drifting into unfocused statements. The paragraph discusses how translators must choose which poetic features to preserve since not all can survive translation, and how they sometimes add cultural notes. Choice B effectively elaborates by explaining how metaphors and wordplay depend on local context, requiring translators to create new phrasing for similar effects—directly developing the challenge theme. The original sentence (D) is far too broad and unfocused, merely stating poetry's historical existence. Choices C and D drift into general observations about poetry rather than translation challenges. When elaborating on a specific challenge, provide details that deepen understanding of that particular difficulty rather than making broad generalizations.